Convince my dad to vote no

He says himself that he's socially conservative and economically liberal; as a Catholic, he is against gay marriage. But he's a bit of a fence-sitter. His opinion is that gays can do whatever the fuck they want and that he doesn't care. Help me talk him out of this. Help me make him vote no to marriage equality.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=EZX55HUPFSU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

your dad is a boomer and doesn't give a shit about the country.
He will let it fall apart as that is what he has always done.
Fuck boomers and fuck these lefties who want to destroy the country

We here at Sup Forums are people who live in opposition to the way things are currently being run in our society.

Rather it be homosexual behavior being viewed as normal - by even doctors, abortion being normalized, white people being mistreated simply for being white or scientists trying to tell us there's unlimited genders.
Not only in our daily lives do we have these lifestyles being impressed upon us by the degenerate sheep masses, but they also slip it into our education and our entertainment.

I would like to ask anyone reading this who pushes degenerate lifestyles to please stop.
Please stop promoting your way of life to our society.

That is all.
Thank you and go with Christ, He is with us until the end.

>Matthew 28:16-20
Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go.
When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you.
And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

Tell him if he doesn't you'll smash his face. Watch him post it to confirm.

tell him if he votes yes your going to turn into a faggot

This image should help inform his decision.

>Tell him if he doesn't you'll smash his face
That man raised you fed you and clothed you, you disgusting wretched turd.

Your daddy is right so you go to biggest echo chamber to justify your cognitive dissonance?

Fuck him, I hope a poofter marries him.

A cucks a cuck. My old man would never support poofters anyway. Keep your mericunt values to yourself.

...

How is it cognitive dissonance?

>actually voting in this shit

Who gives a fuck.

Better plan op
>act like a raging faggot next time you visit
>bring dildos and shit
>talk with lisp
>call anyone a bigot for calling you out
>go back to normal after the vote

Your dad is a dumb boomer just like mine. You can't change a dumb aussie boomers mind about anything.

Ask your dad if he would have predicted that this would happen when they decriminalised sodomy and ask him if he can possibly predict what's going to happen next.

What are the chances of this actually passing with a postal ballot? I thought the reason the greens etc were so against any plebicite was that they figured people wouldn't want gay marriage

I'm not even that against gay marriage but I feel like it would rustle enough jimmies that I would vote no just for keks

>cognitive dissonance
I know English isn't your first language Ahmed, but try to find out what words mean before you use them.

Freddy Mercury was a satanist.

"BEELZEBUB HAS A DEVIL PUT ASIDE FOR ME!
FOR MEEEEE!
FOOOORRR MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

Its not compulsory he doesnt seemed that bothered just convince him not to vote which will probably be easier.

Under a compulsory election people like your dad "hmmm why not allow fag marriage" would win it for yes but under this survey they wont bother voting

Stop being a sinner before God sends you to hell.

Wat

If his dad is going to vote yes but doesn't seemed that bothered its vastly easier just to tell him not to vote than to change his mind. Its difficult to change someone's mind but to play on aussie apathy is easy

>Relatively Neutral Australian man trying to be respectful and kind to harmless minorities wanting to live their own lives is a dumb boomer

Lmao fuck off underage.

...

Me.

There's nothing wrong with gay people, they're not any more good or bad than straights. There's been gay marriage in many countries for almost a decade and nothing's changed for the worse.

>mfw I usually make decisions for mum on who/what to vote for
>what her to vote no
>she knows and everyone else knows I'm gay
>they all think I'm voting yes but I'm voting no
I could have prevented this if I weren't a homo. I couldaa had 4 no votes. But I will have 4 yes'

tell your dad his grandkids will be gay because he helped make gay marriage socially acceptable by voting 'yes'

Go stick a didgeridoo up your ass, you pseudo-intellectual cunt.

His kid already is a faggot. He may as well vote yes

interesting, could you please elaborate on exactly why you are voting against?

>do whatever the fuck they want and that he doesn't care

This is the most retarded opinion ever yet many people repeat that meme argument. It's the typical (((classical liberal))) argument that assumes everyone is an island and not part of a society where every member has an interest to prevent social and moral degradation and decay

my english is poor but let's try...

first arguement appeals to homosexuality is bad because it can't produce children. Well that's stupid Taking into account overpopulation, do we really need more massive births?.

Also, being homosexual is not being sterlie. in a world of homosexuals they can reproduce for survival and then back to being homosexuals, we can be sure not all they childrens are gonna be homosexual, since homosexuals are a biological minority.

The spread of AIDS can be regulated by SEXUAL EDUCATION. sexually transmitted diseases are not necesary a consequence of homosexuality, but they are of ignorance.

There is nothing inherently wrong with being homosexual, there is not any logical arguement agaisnt homosexuality because is just a sexual taste that can be practiced by conscient adults.

So, it doesn't matter if is a fucking choice or not. Better worry about everybody has sexual education instead of forbid some sexual taste.

You're so angry.

Go clean your room.

>Why do you care what sodomites do in the privacy of their own homes xD xD

This shit is from Art Bell's Coast to Coast, it was a meme back in 98.

T. Buttblasted faggots

youtube.com/watch?v=EZX55HUPFSU
show him what happened in other places where they legalised gay marriage

Got some emu-feces in your food or what?

Oi cunts someone give me a quick reply of how this shit is going to work? Is voting mandatory? Is there a certain number of votes required for it to be accepted? I can't be fucked to watch the news. Sorry im a bit of a dumb cunt lads

If Sup Forums can shit up other boards, we just do the same back. You're destroying the rest of this site.

Your dad's going to die of cancer.

This vote isn't mandatory according to some Sheila I spoke to yesterday

Slippery slope and wanna see the triggered libs

Its not mandatory and 3 people could vote and it'd still go through

You should beat the fuck out of him

what the fuck is he thinking?

Sodomites are just normal people like you and me. They just love men of the same sex!!!

#loveislove

Boomers do what ever the news tells them to do.

My dad is 66 and me and my brother are trying to redpill him. Its really had because we have to basically start at modern leftist 101 with him. He thinks they just want to legalize weed and make $15 and hour.

boomers just think everything will turn out ok, because that is how it has always been for them.

The alt-right is a worthless movement who makes the fight against feminists and muslims much harder.

WHAT ARE STATE UNIONS
>WHAT ARE STATE UNIONS
WHAT ARE STATE UNIONS

Polygomy.

Oh look it's some sodomite abomination larping that he hates pisslam

>alt-right
>alt
I hate this meme.

He's not "socially conservative" if he won't vote against samesex marriage. That is the definition of socially liberal.

Tell him of the slippery slope and how it's not a fallacy.

''uhhh sodomites aren't normal, they are evil, degenearte'' for me you sound like a stupid princess, you sound more fag than any homosexual. my main problem with all this nazi/fascist/homophobicidiots/christians/ is if something disturb them, then that's ''antinatural''.

nature is not for complacency of all humans, everything we are and do is natural because we are nature, learn that if you want to live in this world, or live in a permanent cry because ''nature'' is not of your taste. Nature is ugly and cruel. Go cry to your god if you don't like it.

Is menopause a disability?

these people just need to be hid from public at the end of the day

can user elaborate on this?
heard people say its a fallacy all the time but don't agree.

>need decent pensions
>please leave me alone, but pay me money

Cheers lads. Bunch of cunts whinging at me saying this shouldn't even be up for a vote. Going to vote no to spite those commie fucks

It is unnatural in the sense that it goes beyond normal social convention and traditionally established morals.

Why does a "HEALTHIER HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE" lead to FIFTY TIMES THE DISEASE RATE?

YOU'RE A REPROBATE!
GO READ YOUR BIBLE!

Squirting your semen up shit is not the purpose for which your genitals and your sexuality exist. Therefore, it is unnatural.

I don't have a problem with homosexual people as long as they're not faggots about it.
For example, I masturbate with my hand. I do it in the privacy of my own bedroom, I don't hurt anyone. No one cares. But I don't go around demanding people recognise it as equal to a relationship with a real person.
Other people use their pets as proxy relationships. We've all heard about the spinster who owns 17 cats, or the people who never had kids, but calls their dog their "fur child". Hey, that's fine, but don't ask me to treat their pet as if it's a real spouse or human child.
If you want to be gay, go be gay. But don't act as though it's anything other than being gay.

It's not a fallacy; it's a form of argument. When someone calls an argument a fallacy, they're saying they don't have a way of challenging it.

Look at Canada. They made it illegal to even criticise trans people and legalised beastiality

You both know there is literally no arguments against sex marriage and you believe otherwise. That's school example of cognitive dissonance.

call him a faggot

>I don't have a problem with homosexual people as long as they're not faggots about it.

You are responsible for this. With your "live and let live" attitude you are enabling those freaks on every level. At the end of the day if you are not actively against sodomites and their agenda you are enabling and endorsing pure evil

Why do they need it to be called marriage?

Tell him that gays can hold hands and ream each other all they want. But to have the state recognize that relationship serves no purpose at all - because the only reason a state would ever recognize marriage is to serve its own interests, i.e. to get people to settle down and procreate. Marriage as a legal concept is above all a family subsidy. Otherwise, it's just words spoken in front of people or no one, doesn't matter. Anyone can do that.
>"We hereby declare ourselves married, and God surely agrees."
Gays can do that. What they can't do is get children, unless they are sure to adopt (in which case they'll likely cause damage due to messed up gender roles and models).

By the way, this also applies to childless marriage. Self-serving scum that gets tax benefits and legal rights without actually having a family.

Reminder that vote for no is a vote for sharia law

Lmao so you define ''nature'' based on fucking morals and traditions? man, what a joke. Remember this. ''NATURE IS BEYOND GOOD OR EVIL''

even the desire of a psychopath is a Natural impulse of his mind.

the purpose of my genitals are whatever i want to fucking do with them because i have a natural brain that gives me the great oportunity of control my actions and do whatever with my body. Can u understeand that?, if i do something that i don't like then i'm goung against my natural impulses.

we are not animals based on istinct, do you think the biological purpose of your entire existence is sitting your ugly ass infront of a stupid computer?.

the nature of human, our nature is the possibility of do whatever we want with our possibilities.

>oy vey 90% of gay men have 6 gorillion partners EVERY YEAR

I'm sorry but I just can't take some of these statistics seriously. Especially since there's no methods stated as to how data was taken and the most recent source is from fucking 2001.

Why is marriage state's business in the first place?
I think marriages should belong to churches, who are able to discriminate however they want.

>we are not animals based on instinct
>hunger and lust serve no purpose

>You both know there is literally no arguments against sex marriage
>I think marriages should belong to churches, who are able to discriminate however they want.
Literal copy pasted quotes

Its true. Theres a gay man at work who claims to have fucked over 15000 blokes

The truth can be hard to swallow sometimes.

Me and my family are voting NO
So there is 20 NO votes

i've literally made no arguments for anything you fucking spaz, what i've clearly stated is that you have no idea what cognitive dissonance means. Whenever i see some cunt use the term cognitive dissonance in this context I already know they're full of shit. You can fuck off now

30% of sodomites have had over 1000 "sexual partners" so it's possible

I thought this was about preserving marriage so it's only between man+woman?
Why's there all this shrill pissing and moaning about "DEM FAGS!"

>"vital statistics data... from 1987 to 1992"

tell him that voting doesn't work if he casts his vote for other people

>The nature of being a fag would have fundamentally changed in the last few decades

>Well that's stupid Taking into account overpopulation
Which overpopulation?

>Also, being homosexual is not being sterlie.
Being homosexual instantly puts you in disavantage at reproducing. You are right they can force it, but they shouldn't have to do so if they were mentally health.

>The spread of AIDS can be regulated by SEXUAL EDUCATION
Not really because homosexuals because of their condition are mental ill. They are naturally condicioned to it.

>There is nothing inherently wrong with being homosexual,
Except everything in that post.

You really should go practice your english instead of trying to debate online.

It's probably much worse now since sodomites are enabled and are more depraved than ever.
Although the mortality must be lower since taxpayers spend billions subsidizing the AIDS medication of those filthy vile freaks

Sure, gays aren't that bad. Left wing government socialist parties are bad though, and fuck them

the ambition, the entrepreneurship, the art, the feelings, emotions, fantasies, did you forget it? dumb nazi tribal animal?. my point was, if we limit to just animal instinct we are wasitng all that our human nature can bring us, and yes, that's the sexual pleasure and diversity of fantasies.

its still soooo daaaammm funny when some dumb christian/nazi calls something ''unatural/antinatural'' because it goes against his stupid moral/bible.

tell me then, why the viruses exists, what is their positive purpose in the cicle of life, they are not even liing beings and they exist in nature just to kill, kill animals, vegetables, bacteria, etc. Nature is senseless as life. you can enjoy it or die like a dumb stupid christian thinking on hell.

The bible is not a valid argument
This is a secular country and nobody has any obligation to adhere to the rules of your religion

Gays regulating the breeding and overpopulation. Less people = more resources. The alt-right is trying to overpopulate the West.

>large Canadian urban area

Well there's your fucking problem. It's cities that are degenerate, not gays.

>Not really because homosexuals because of their condition are mental ill. They are naturally condicioned to it.

the fuck are you talking about?
sex education is impossible for gays because they're "condicioned" to being mentally ill?
what

Overpopulation is not an issue in first world countries - decreasing birth rate is

...

More than 710,000 individuals (14%)[164] are immigrants and their descendants; there are 117,000 children of immigrants, born in Norway.

Of these 710,000 immigrants and their descendants:

323,000 (39%)[164] have a Western background (Australia, North America, elsewhere in Europe)
505,000 (61%)[164] have a non-Western background (primarily Morocco, Iraq, Somalia, Pakistan, Iran).
In 2013, the Norwegian government said that 14% of the Norwegian population were immigrants or children of two immigrant parents. About 6% of the immigrant population come from EU, North America and Australia, and about 8.1% come from Asia, Africa and Latin America.[165]

Then why do you care about marriage, a religious institution?