How many more years are we going to see an upsurd plethora of "survivors". I swear to god it seems like there are more "survivors" now than vets. How much longer can they milk this with "survivors"? 10 years? 20 years?
A person born in 1945 would be 72.
Other urls found in this thread:
politicallyincorrectbase.com
theguardian.com
dailystormer.com
archive.is
articles.latimes.com
archive.is
youtube.com
hooktube.com
twitter.com
>inb4 there are more lolocaust "survivors" than there were supposedly jews left after muh genocide of 6 gorillion
who's gonna roll?
Don't forget the virtual holocoust stuff is coming too
Gimme dat fresh flesh
>7
Hooray!
YOU LUCKER DOG
inb4 their children start saying they inherited their parent/grandparent's memories of the Holocaust
inb4 "Oy vey! I relive my grandpappy's memories of the Holocaust every night! Here's a GoFundMe to help pay for my red Ferrar-uh...treatment! I need $1,000,000, goys!"
...
They'll follow the same trend as niggers and muhslavery later, in that "holocaust survivors" will be the descendants of the supposedly real ones.
Expect a bunch of screeching 20 years old liberals in the future screaming about how they're holomyth survivors.
Lol
PLEASE I NEED IT.
...
Fuck
give me the best dressed one
if you were born at the direct end of the declaration that the war ended (1945) 72 years old, to be living in internment you would have to be even older than that.
Age checks out, she looks like a corpse.
Give it 10 or more years, the natural american has a shorter lifespan due to post-modernist processed food.
Fake Holocaust survivors went as far as getting tattoos 70 years ago /s
a lot of them vividly recal memories from when they were 4 or 5 years old, when last i chaecked almost nobody can do that.
Many holocaust redpills here:
politicallyincorrectbase.com
Thanks. Asshole.
It's an win-win
This. But seriously, shouldn't they all be dead by now?
Please don't give me the granny kike
Seriously, when are these "holocaust survivors" going to finally die out?
my great grand parents fled Europe to escape the Holocaust and i still tell people that if the nazis won i wouldnt exist
that being said today in America Nazis dont actually exist
>The holocaust tattoos don't even go into the millions, let alone 6 million
Hmmm...
>inb4
You're too late
This guy gets it
It's simple goy if your old and Jewish than your a Holocaust survivor
OY VEY NEVER UNDERMINE THE 6 MILLIONS, GOY, AND ALWAYS BELIEVE THE 500 MILLIONS WHO WERE DEPORTED (NUMBER THAT GOES UP EVERY YEAR MIGHT I ADD HEHEHEH)
>old
New holocaust survivors are born every day from New York to Tel Aviv
>escaped
how brave
I could defeat her, no lie.
>implying the holocaust happened
How many Africans alive today were brought here by slave ships vs. How many African Americans bitch about their ancestors being slaves.
...
Pretty much all fake, I forgot whole but someone did a study, and it showed that the Jews even if they had nothing to do with the Holocaust claim they were in it.
That's what it is was, people were claiming relatives who allegedly died in the Holocaust and it went over 6mill almost reaching 7mill and I'm just thinking there weren't even that many Jews in all of Europe if we go by their numbers.
They also said thousands and thousands were making the claim.
Fix'd
They also said thousand upon thousand were claiming it, daily.
I'll also say, it will eventually reach new heights that probably every Jew in existence will make that claim.
Lol
My grandma is still alive and she lived through WW2. She's 91. I can't be the only one.
OY VEY! A EUROPEAN STILL ALIVE, TIME TO GET FIRING SQUADS!
Please please gimme the teen twat
Fuckin yes
>The holocaust tattoos don't even go into the millions
Each camp started counting at zero. There were hundreds of extermination camps.
lol
Why does it remind me of this??
That image is wrong. Both Dachau and Buchenwald were extermination camps.
articles.latimes.com
archive.is
By Christopher Hitchens (a socialist Jew)
>I was raised in two other traditions as well, however. The first was to believe, with the late Karl Popper, that a case has not been refuted until it has been stated at its strongest. The second was to take it for granted that historians have prejudices. To manifest the first point, then, let us summarize the best case that the revisionists can make. Would it surprise you to know that:
>1) there were no gas chambers or extermination camps on German soil, in other words, at Belsen or Dachau or Buchenwald;
>2) there were no Jews made into soap;
3>) the "confession" of Rudolf Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz, was extracted by force and contains his claim to have killed more Jews than was "humanly" possible?
>These are, however, the now-undisputed findings of all historians and experts on the subject. And if they are sound, then it means that much "eyewitness" testimony is wrong. It necessarily changes our attitude toward the everyday complicity of average Germans. It also means that much of the evidence presented and accepted at Nuremburg was spurious. Of course, we knew some of this already--the Nazis were charged by Soviet and Allied judges with the massacres at Katyn in Poland, which had obviously been ordered by Stalin and are now admitted to have been. And every now and then, a bogus Holocaust merchant makes an appearance. The most recent was the fantasist "Binjamin Wilkomirski," whose book, "Fragments," was a whole-cloth fabrication by someone who had spent the entire war in Switzerland. This did not prevent him from receiving several awards and the warm endorsement of Goldhagen. Earlier, a high Israeli court found the evidence of witnesses useless, ruling that John Demjanjuk had not been at Treblinka in the mythical shape of "Ivan the Terrible."
Whatever. It's historic fact that Dachau and Buchenwald were extermination camps. We have witness testimonies from survivors. Hitchens was born after the war, why should we value his opinion?
Forever m8
Didnt you hear about "inherited holocaust trauma"? Apparently the nazis cruelty was so extreme it embedded itself in jewish DNA
There were WWI survivors until recently
There are stilll hundreds of millions of people who were alive during WWII
They can milk it a little longer because many of them were just kids in 1945. Assume thy were 8, they'll be 80 now. A lot of people in America live to their mid/late 90s. So 20 years, tops.
>It's historic fact that Dachau and Buchenwald were extermination camps.
But it isn't. That's why I referenced a mainstream author, who was also a socialist Jew.
>We have witness testimonies from survivors.
A lot of those are bullshit, but others tell different stories. That's the bigger point about the Holocaust narrative. No one really cares about how many people died, or how they died. The real message is that you can never criticize Jews, Israel, or express "nationalism" otherwise it could happen again.
youtube.com
hooktube.com
>Hitchens was born after the war, why should we value his opinion?
Historians aren't just eyewitnesses, neither are detectives. Eyewitness testimony isn't the only form of evidence, primary documents, physical evidence, and basic reasoning all help us arrive at the truth. We should value Hitchen's opinion because he was willing to look into the issue earnestly, which allowed him to come to the conclusion that Churchill was overrated. If we limited ourselves to only trusting eyewitnesses our history would be pure shite.