Gentle Redpills

Easy redpills for our new guests, normies, shills and commies alike.

Other urls found in this thread:

jettandjahn.com/2010/10/frankfurt-school-of-social-research/
mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg
hankeringforhistory.com/the-brothels-of-auschwitz/
express.co.uk/news/history/597877/Untouched-Auschwitz-greenhouses-where-Jewish-prisoners-grew-flowers-for-the-Nazis
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2443817/Former-prisoner-war-96-remembers-playing-Auschwitz-football-league-return-Nazi-death-camp.html
holocaustmusic.ort.org/places/camps/death-camps/auschwitz/camp-orchestras/
youtube.com/watch?v=DhI8YPmTAw8
youtube.com/watch?v=G8pPbrbJJQs
youtube.com/watch?v=ghx3d1GiAc0
youtube.com/watch?v=fkcy7256tBM
youtube.com/watch?v=fG6TcYfpQOg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

...

...

Look into FBI stats for how much violent crime blacks commit, how many blacks are murdered by other blacks per year, and then tell me how on earth it makes sense to assert that cops are "unfairly" targeting blacks.

...

...

The biggest redpill of all is learning about the program of White genocide

...

...

...

...

earth is ran by a death cult

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

The fuck is that?

From 2014 in the Netherlands.

...

I hate the smug looks on the teachers' faces.

This one got me

>prayforparis 3 times

Yeah, very happy with themselves.

...

That's a good one.

...

I should organize my folder between beginner level and full-blown Sup Forumslack.

...

These are great. Keep them coming. You are starting to make me a believer.

...

...

...

Do this. I have a collection of paranoia I'm not sure how much is right, and the easier to swallow red pills.

...

Give them but no /x/ shit please.

...

...

...

(((Who))) controls your mind?

Maybe not on this thread, nazi, but religion has united people of different races.

jettandjahn.com/2010/10/frankfurt-school-of-social-research/
>The Frankfurt School & Cultural Marxism
[YouTube] The Frankfurt School & Cultural Marxism - 1 of 3 (embed)
[YouTube] The Frankfurt School & Cultural Marxism - 2 of 3 (embed)
[YouTube] The Frankfurt School & Cultural Marxism - 3 of 3 (embed)
>The History of Political Correctness
[YouTube] The History of Political Correctness (Complete) (embed)

...

Any idea on the veracity of this image?

Yeah you've definetly not taken the redpill if you say sich liberal humanist shit and refer to me as a "nazi". I posted the updated version btw,

...

Read Culture of Critique if you want the best redpill on the JQ because at a certain point you can't argue with infographs only.
For 1,500 years Jewish society had been designed to produce
intellectuals… Jewish society was geared to support them…
Rich merchants married sages’ daughters; …Quite suddenly,
around the year 1800, this ancient and highly efficient social
machine for the production of intellectuals began to shift its
output. Instead of pouring all its products into the closed circuit
of rabbinical studies, …it unleashed a significant and evergrowing
proportion of them into secular life. This was an event
of shattering importance in world history. (A History of the Jews,
Paul Johnson 1988, 340-341)

mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg

I once took a Holocaust class by a cradle catholic who married a jew and converted. I came to Sup Forums and felt the "stab in the back" the Germans claimed.

Also, the Jews betrayed Hispania to the Moors and were hated by Christians for centuries for supposedly impoverishing them.

Also, the problem with "tribalism" is that when it's done by everyone, everyone loses. The oldest extant tribe is the Jews. When there is only one tribe and many people, the one tribe will grow and the people will weaken.

Honestly, the Nat Geo covers shouldn't be there. I read the articles, and they were more of an objective analysis than propaganda.

Time is still shit though.

...

I appreciate the updated version. Bartolomé de las Casas argued for equal treatment for people of all races. I'm a Christian, bruh.

While Nazis have a bad rap, why wouldn't the Jews (if Judeo Christianity is our heritage) feel offended at attacks on their character? Why are they only offended when their are called out on their tribe?

I'd blame the welfare state and a barbaric subculture...however, one can't deny the stats.

WHEN ANYONE IS ACCUSED OF SOMETHING, ALWAYS CHECK THAT IT DOESN'T APPLY TO THE ACCUSER. "Tu Quoque" is a POWERFUL propaganda tool.

>if Judeo Christianity is our heritage
Suspiciously started being used after the 1950's and grew exponentially after the 60's.

...

that is false

A few examples:
hankeringforhistory.com/the-brothels-of-auschwitz/
express.co.uk/news/history/597877/Untouched-Auschwitz-greenhouses-where-Jewish-prisoners-grew-flowers-for-the-Nazis
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2443817/Former-prisoner-war-96-remembers-playing-Auschwitz-football-league-return-Nazi-death-camp.html
holocaustmusic.ort.org/places/camps/death-camps/auschwitz/camp-orchestras/

Ah, I haven't read them myself so I can't comment. They do paint an unfortunate picture when together however.

This is an important book to read, recommend it and Lippmann's Public Opinion to everyone

>basic redpills
Here's one that blows the fuck out of the "poverty causes criminality" meme

Teach me Nazi-sempai. Sadly, history is not my strong suit since I had shitty textbooks in elementary school and said Holocaust teacher taught me US History.

Not the softest redpill

BLAH BLAH BLAH PICTURES THAT NO ONE WILL OPEN
Here's a question for newfriends... can a media company (emphasis on company) with advertisers to keep happy, a CEO running the joint, a profit margin to ever expand even if means clickbait and inciting hatred and sowing division, and sponsors w/contributions... be expected to report the news fairly?

A school field trip.

Alright, ironic posting is off for this post.

I'll say this once unironically do to what happened a few days ago: White genocide is the most stupid and fairytale-ish garbage I've ever read about on this site. We're considered the majority and live in first world countries. Nobody "new" is going to believe that crap no matter what. Go on, post about it, its just going to look stupid to everyone, and hurt our cause more.

Let him talk substantively, or ignore.

Nice.

...

Have you seen london?

Shill shill

don't be afraid liberals, i was one of you, came here to troll, then i saw the light

...

...

...

youtube.com/watch?v=DhI8YPmTAw8

Speaking of Iran

...

Redpill

And for the regressive eurocentrist left above is the worst picture, they will not even see the last pair, well 2 seconds before they get beheaded they will understand.

>"The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day."

>alright kids, for this part of the trip we pray to the false god moloch!

Kek
The Alt-Left on April 1 a year ago

He did everything right, he loved his people and their common origin, his heart was just too big.

Ahhh the red suppository thread, plenty of lube and slip it in gently

...

...

Smart lad that one.

Incoming cultural marxist redpill.

Just what is “Political Correctness?” Political Correctness is in fact cultural Marxism (Cultural Communism) – Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. The effort to translate Marxism from economics into culture did not begin with the student rebellion of the 1960s. It goes back at least to the 1920s and the writings of the Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci. In 1923, in Germany, a group of Marxists founded an institute devoted to making the transition, the Institute of Social Research (later known as the Frankfurt School). One of its founders, George Lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, “Who shall save us from Western Civilisation?” The Frankfurt School gained profound influence in European and American universities after many of its leading lights fled and spread all over Europe and even to the United States in the 1930s to escape National Socialism in Germany. In Western Europe it gained influence in universities from 1945.

The Frankfurt School blended Marx with Freud, and later influences (some Fascist as well as Marxist) added linguistics to create “Critical Theory” and “deconstruction.” These in turn greatly influenced education theory, and through institutions of higher education gave birth to what we now call “Political Correctness.” The lineage is clear, and it is traceable right back to Karl Marx.

The parallels between the old, economic Marxism and cultural Marxism are evident. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, shares with classical Marxism the vision of a “classless society,” i.e., a society not merely of equal opportunity, but equal condition. Since that vision contradicts human nature – because people are different, they end up unequal, regardless of the starting point – society will not accord with it unless forced. So, under both variants of Marxism, it is forced. This is the first major parallel between classical and cultural Marxism: both are totalitarian ideologies.

The third parallel is that both varieties of Marxism declare certain groups virtuous and others evil a priori, that is, without regard for the actual behaviour of individuals. Classical Marxism defines workers and peasants as virtuous and the bourgeoisie (the middle class) and other owners of capital as evil. Cultural Marxism defines all minorities, what they see as the victims; Muslims, Feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and they view ethnic Christian European men as evil. (Cultural Marxism does not recognise the existence of non-Feminist women, and defines Muslims, Asians and Africans who reject Political Correctness as evil, just like native Christian or even atheist Europeans.).

The fourth parallel is in means: expropriation. Economic Marxists, where they obtained power, expropriated the property of the bourgeoisie and handed it to the state, as the “representative” of the workers and the peasants. Cultural Marxists, when they gain power (including through our own government), lay penalties on native European men and others who disagree with them and give privileges to the ”victim” groups they favour. Affirmative action is an example.

Finally, both varieties of Marxists employ a method of analysis designed to show the correctness of their ideology in every situation. For classical Marxists, the analysis is
economic. For cultural Marxists, the analysis is linguistic: deconstruction. Deconstruction “proves” that any “text,” past or present, illustrates the oppression of Muslims, women, homosexuals, etc. by reading that meaning into words of the text (regardless of their actual meaning). Both methods are, of course, phony analyses that twist the evidence to fit preordained conclusions, but they lend a ‘scientific” air to the ideology.

...

One group of Marxist intellectuals resolved their quandary by an analysis that focused on society’s cultural “superstructure” rather than on the economic substructures as Marx did. The Italian Marxist Antonio Gramsci and Hungarian Marxist Georg Lukacs contributed the most to this new cultural Marxism.

Antonio Gramsci worked for the Communist International during 1923-24 in Moscow and Vienna. He was later imprisoned in one of Mussolini’s jails where he wrote his famous “Prison Notebooks.” Among Marxists, Gramsci is noted for his theory of cultural hegemony as the means to class dominance. In his view, a new “Communist man” had to be created before any political revolution was possible. This led to a focus on the efforts of intellectuals in the fields of education and culture. Gramsci envisioned a long march through the society’s institutions, including the government, the judiciary, the military, the schools and the media. He also concluded that so long as the workers had a Christian soul, they would not respond to revolutionary appeals.

(((Georg Lukacs))) was the son a wealthy (((Hungarian banker))). Lukacs began his political life as an agent of the Communist International. His book History and Class Consciousness gained him recognition as the leading Marxist theorist since Karl Marx. Lukacs believed that for a new Marxist culture to emerge, the existing culture must be destroyed. He said, “I saw the revolutionary destruction of society as the one and only solution to the cultural contradictions of the epoch,” and, “Such a worldwide overturning of values cannot take place without the annihilation of the old values and the creation of new ones by the revolutionaries.”

When he became Deputy Commissar for Culture in the Bolshevik Bela Kun regime in Hungary in 1919, Lukacs launched what became known as “Cultural Terrorism.” As part of this terrorism he instituted a radical sex education program in Hungarian schools. Hungarian children were instructed in free love, sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle-class family codes, the out-datedness of monogamy, and the irrelevance of religion, which deprives man of all pleasures. Women, too, were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time. Lukacs’s campaign of “Cultural Terrorism” was a precursor to what Political Correctness would later bring to Western European schools.

In 1923, Lukacs and other Marxist intellectuals associated with the Communist Party of Germany founded the Institute of Social Research at Frankfurt University in Frankfurt, Germany. The Institute, which became known as the Frankfurt School, was modelled after the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow. In 1933, when Nazis came to power in Germany, the members of the Frankfurt School fled. Most came to the United States.

The members of the Frankfurt School conducted numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they believed lay behind the rise of National Socialism in Germany. The Frankfurt School’s studies combined Marxist analysis with Freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of Western culture, including Christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism. These criticisms, known collectively as Critical Theory, were reflected in such works of the Frankfurt School as Erich Fromm’s Escape from Freedom and The Dogma of Christ, Wilhelm’s Reich’s The Mass Psychology of Fascism and Theodor Adorno’s The Authoritarian Personality.

True, but I fear the moderates won today. Trump saved and doomed the American Right at the same time and do to the cultural influence also the European, unless a wonder happens
>Just what is “Political Correctness?” [...]
Is that St. Anders? reminds me about him

The Authoritarian Personality, published in 1950, substantially influenced Western European psychologists and social scientists. The book was premised on one basic idea, that the presence in a society of Christianity, capitalism, and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial and religious prejudice and German fascism. The Authoritarian Personality became a handbook for a national campaign against any kind of prejudice or discrimination on the theory that if these evils were not eradicated, another Holocaust might occur on the European continent. This campaign, in turn, provided a basis for Political Correctness.

Critical Theory incorporated sub-theories which were intended to chip away at specific elements of the existing culture, including “matriarchal theory,” “androgyny theory,” “personality theory,” “authority theory,” “family theory,” “sexuality theory,” “racial theory,” “legal theory,” and “literary theory.” Put into practice, these theories were to be used to overthrow the prevailing social order and usher in social revolution.

To achieve this, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School recognised that traditional beliefs and the existing social structure would have to be destroyed and then replaced. The patriarchal social structure would be replaced with matriarchy; the belief that men and women are different and properly have different roles would be replaced with androgyny; and the belief that heterosexuality is normal would be replaced with the belief that homosexuality is equally “normal.”
As a grand scheme intended to deny the intrinsic worth of native Christian European, heterosexual males, the Critical Theorists of the Frankfurt School opened the door to the racial and sexual antagonisms of the Trotskyites. Many believed that oppressed Muslims, non European minorities and others like Feminists and Homosexuals could be the vanguard of a communist revolution in Europe.

Atheists are lower than animals

"I turned against the left wing because they don't like genetics, because genetics implies that sometimes in life we fail because we have bad genes. They want all failure in life to be due to the evil system."
James Watson

TLDR
youtube.com/watch?v=G8pPbrbJJQs

>The Frankfurt School & Cultural Marxism
youtube.com/watch?v=ghx3d1GiAc0
youtube.com/watch?v=fkcy7256tBM
youtube.com/watch?v=fG6TcYfpQOg
If the videos are blocked in your country replace the "youtube" in the link with "hooktube".

Capitalism always beats Communism.
Communisim requires all members to agree and work together. If one person falls out of line the system collapses. That's why communist states quickly shift to an Authoritarian state so as to repress the actions of dissidents.

Capitalism takes the views of dissidents and sells them products they like.

And maybe that is because communism goes against human nature? It tries to impose equality while hierarchies are biological and a basic human instinct.

Thanks for the dump, gonna read through.

Have a bump.