Saw this on fagbook, and I enjoy the strawman argument, but are they right?
Discuss
Other urls found in this thread:
www(dot)drawninpowerpoint.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
washingtonpost.com
nytimes.com
washingtonpost.com
snopes.com
snopes.com
sfgate.com
twitter.com
No, you absolute retard.
Assuming they ARE right, why is it ok to fly gommunist flag?
sage
how stupid one can be?
sage
besides, did u know that "BAM" "By any means necessary" is a group in the Alt-Left?
sage
refute your claim, then.
I agree with you, but probably because the gibsmunist flag represents communism, and Marx didn't explicitly preach "kill the ____"
Plus, that would be a moot point, since we are not talking about that flag
Incitements to violence have to present an explicit threat, fuck's sake
If this mental gymnastics could be used to justify violence just speaking day to day would be even more of a fucking minefield than it already is
So what about the group this creator belongs to, the left, that has actually attempted to kill people during these protests (and been successful)
sage for autism
Replace the Nazi flag with the hammer and sickle, change text to match, and repost that shit.
>I agree with you, but probably because the gibsmunist flag represents communism, and Marx didn't explicitly preach "kill the ____"
But it's USSR flag they are flying, and USSR was better explicit about killing those of the wrong class or political inclinations.
The Marxists would argue that marxism does not fundementally call for any violence like the Nat Soc flag does.
The fact that Stalin killed millions of his own people and political opponents does not necessarily reflect the ideals of all of communism throughout the rest of the life of the USSR, and that the deaths were based on a "crazy dictator"