Don't tolerate Nazis

Don't tolerate Nazis.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/8t-IT0fM-n0
youtu.be/UL4bdHzVFso
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Don't tolerate Sharia.
Also sage

Nah fuck that old kike. The only speech that ever needs protection is hate speech. If you commies don't like free speech for ALL speech then move to china where you can have big daddy government tell people what they can and can't say. Also I saged your thread faggot.

Who is to define tolerance and intolerance?

The Charlottesville marchers weren't all Nazis, in fact the trolls were fairly obvious. The thing is when you abuse the word tolerant and change it to mean whatever the fuck works for you, "do not hire white men" becomes a not intolerant statement and "equal treatment and equal opportunities instead of patronising minorities with affirmative action for the sake of equal outcome" becomes an intolerant statement.

This is why they'll keep marching until the Marxists are outed as the exclusive source of intolerance in our society.

>Karl R. Popper

Oh hi, Soros.

when god is dead
everything is permitted

Where does intolerance start?
Saged.

>Karl Popper*
>*
Would have used ((())), but a star is fine too

(((open society)))

This

Why don't they apply the same logic to Islam?

it's funny how simple minded liberals. they see nazi germany as just a bunch of jerks, and not a reaction of self defense. Both the tolerant and intolerant are the exact same people, protecting their group interest. They both see the other as intolerant. we're already seeing leftist movements with similar aim of the nazis, like the paradox of antifa. The left sees the right as intolerant and acts like nazis to destory their intolerance, and the right does the same. Intolerance basically just means having separate interests. it's just basic tribalism and you are just warring

So they're saying national socialism is so powerful that if you let them speak, they'll convince everyone? Sounds about right.

What is the author proposing then, ban hate speech? Hate speech is so broad that it often is also defined as "having a negative opinion towards immigration." There's plenty of other ways where banning "hate speech" would not only ban statements founded on bigotry, but also ban statements founded on reason and logic.

That is not a tolerant society.


Also, yes, "defending tolerance requires to not tolerate the intolerant" is paradoxical, and completely throws the idea out the window. A paradox is, by definition, something that is "logically unacceptable." This entire comic is therefore, by definition, illogical and nobody should be drawing any sort of wisdom from it.

It's funny how Americans defend Nazis all the time. If you had actually experienced the war, rather than just waltz in at the last minute, you'd quickly realize that Nazis are shit.

SOMEONE PHOTOSHOP IN ISLAMISTS AND ISLAMIC SYMBOLS INSTEAD

Let's use this against them!

Juan Carlos gets it here.

This is where you realize that most people are defending their right to criticize immigration, which is quickly becoming an entirely "nazi" thing to do.

it was only the last minute because we joined in :D

why do you tolerate muslims and communists then?

...

Cartoon is bullshit. Nazis rose to power by fighting Red Communist mobs and promising a return of law and order. Conclusion: fastest way to put Nazis in power is punching them.

um no sweetie. I'm not defending nazis, i'm clearly saying the nazis and the nazis of the left are all the same stupid person. They are just people protecting their group's interests. And over time violence occurs, that's just inevitable with mental disorder.

The way is to have balance. North korea is not balanced. self defense is good. respect and compassion must be balanced and that starts at the individual level

but being intolerant of intolerance is intolerance and therefore shoud be banned

this is no paradox, it is pseudo-intellectual bullshit communist apologism that presumes there is one monolithic morality that is globally understood and accepted

...

kill everyone you disagree with

So by this logic we should have exterminated leftists a long time ago.

>Nazis
I can't wait for this stupid shit to die. By perpetually calling people Nazis they created the problem that didn't exist to begin with.

>people are defending their right to kill people with their car
ftfy

/thread

Antifa are more intolerant than nazis

best underated

>TOLERATE ME CUTTING OFF MY THREE YEAR OLDS DICK AND ADVOCATING OTHERS DOING THE SAME, THEY PLAY WITH DOLLS AFTER ALL
>OH NO WHITEY THINKS THEY SHOULD HAVE STATUES YOU KNOW YOU SHOULDN'T TOLERATE EVERYTHING LOOK AT THIS COMIC

Popper drew the line when people start calling for murder and persecution of others. He didn't draw it at the speaking of intolerant thoughts.
>I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.

LIKE ISLAM?

Feelz>Realz amirite? kekekekek

>basing your perception of an entire group of the action of a single person
What a brainlet

>Ben Garrison

Quads of truth

>People are defending their right to play the victims after blocking a street intersection during a state of emergency.
ftfy

The Left has decided to define anything they disagree with as "Nazi," which has the ironic side effect of legitimzing actual Nazis. Because the Left is functionally retarded.

>the tolerant ones end up being destroyed
As the old right found out the hard way

(((Coincidence?)))

Alt-right is the ideology of peace, that driver doesn't represent REAL alt-righters and if you think about it the alt-right is the real victim here

Islam is as intolerant as nazism, way more actually.
Go read about the affinities of nazism and pisslam.
No wonder you see some of these fuckers walking around with posters saying Hitler was right.
Fucking pleb

>One can, nay must, be tolerant by being intolerant. Contradicting said tolerance.
Doublethink is fun. The thing to due to keep morally consistent would be to abandon the charade altogether.

>Ben Garrison
Ah, my fucking sides. Every time.

Aren't you being intolerant by not tolerating?

Don't tolerate raids or one-line one-posts or Faceberg Flotsam.

>#notallnazis

That was not a true white nationalist he didnt properly follow the teachings of our leader Richard Spencer (implicit white identity upon him) white nationalism is an ideology of peace.

Based GK

its okay when muslims do it

I'm OP, I clearly said Nazis, and all the amerifats are going "who's to say they're so bad? hurrdurr! i never learned history!"

So your whole argument is as dumb as your dumbass nation.

You're a fsggot. You didnt experience it either, no 80+ visit chinese cartoon image boards.

remove dicks from mouth, then apologize to your wife's bull for being white, and a faggot

Kek. I take that as sarcasm. Har to tell on Sup Forums though.

get better bait next time

Who gets to define what "intolerance" is? I see a lot of intolerance toward straight white men, but no one says anything about that. And if you do speak up about it, YOU are the one who gets called intolerant.

This is just talmudic bullshit. And of course it's punctuated by an image and quote of (((Noam Chomsky)))

running someone over just to have this card to play, shame on you sending in that spy, someone was killed

The state, of course, in its infinite benevolence :^)

Antifa is watching this board. We're taking notes.

>Islam is as intolerant as nazism
absolutely agree

>way more actually.
nah. they just have less power than islam. given the same power, they'd be exactly the same.

i'm ignoring the rest because you're just being an edgyfag after that.

KEK AGREES

This advocates hypocrisy, and it doesn't SEEM paradoxical, it IS paradoxical on top of being completely illogical.
By (((Popper)))'s intolerance of Hitler's beliefs, Hitler can turn around and claim intolerance on Popper's part (which he would be guilty of), and they would reverse roles infinitely because this is simply a method of hypocritical finger pointing and nothing more.
Stop posting this shit.

I sang along

Am I intolerant if I don't tolerate murder, pedophilia, and terrorism as well?

...

Did you just go third grade playground tier insult. My argument is my own. The Left is clearly redefining anything they disagree with as being "Nazi" and it is pants on head retarded as a long term strategy because it alienates everyone who might be an ally and gives cover to actual fucking Nazis, you stupid poo poo head. (That last was to engage you at your apparent intellectual level. Dumbass.)

Never said that. Shitty strawman argument to make you feel like you're right. ISIS are as bad as Nazis, just stronger.

Every fucking time

>tolerates pedophilia because he's so tolerant

So basically, supporting the free speech of nazis puts my own free speech at risk?

Strange that people don't like being genocided. A real mystery.

Remember when these "intolerant" groups were allowed to suppress dissenting opinions and pass anti-assembly laws because they had no first amendment?

The argument for freedom of speech is specifically to prevent totalitarian government from taking hold. You fucking retards are zero-ing in on how free speech allowed an ideology to take root and ignoring how the ideology was only able to persist by stamping it out.

Fucking everybody thinks authoritarian government is good and just when it's on their side. AUTHORITY IS ONLY ON ITS OWN SIDE. You can argue all you want about whose feelings get hurt because people are allowed to express any opinion, but when push comes to shove it's the most vital freedom there is.

The comic is titles "the paradox of tolerence", the comic isn't saying that it's not a paradox, the comic is saying this is a necessary paradox. Becuse supporting fascists threatens yourself

Fuck liberals and fuck jihadists. Fuck feminists. Those people have to GO. God help us all.

>we must be intolerant of the intolerant

The comic is basically
>The Slippery Slope: Revoking the First Amendment Edition
It's a no from me.

Uncle Ben!!

High. Come back to Alabama. We'd love to have you.
youtu.be/8t-IT0fM-n0

youtu.be/UL4bdHzVFso

Open Society Foundation...brought to you by George Soros... Now go away faggot...

so basically the nazis are right. if they weren't, their ideology wouldn't be able to rise in any free society.

fpbp

George needs to grow up and stop posting nasty things about his former employers online.

What if Nazis were about demanding more tolerance instead of intolerating non-Nazis?

(((open society)))

where post-communist countries at?

The same way we won't tolerate intolerant Nazislamist.

That's not how Hitler came into power what the fucking hell

Free speech isn't given out to individuals based on their ideology

Free speech is where all statements are allowed to be made, regardless of the content. Does saying that you love Hitler make you a nazi? Depends on if you say it unironically or not, but the only way hate speech laws function is by a blanket ban on ever uttering "I love hitler"

A necessary paradox makes no more sense than an ordinary paradox. By definition, it is logically unsound.

And are you supporting fascists by refusing to ban certain things that they can say? Not at all, because by refusing to ban certain statements, you are in fact upholding your own free speech as much as you are nazis' free speech, or antifa's free speech. Laws on speech apply to everyone, they aren't applied on a person-to-person basis just because someone follows a certain ideology.

Youre hoping far too hard that the confederates, nazis, and kkk have actual reading comprehension.

They dont. Thats why everything is very simple, and blamable on the jews.

I agree, which is why the first amendment is pointless. If the First Amendment didn't exist, we would have never gotten to this point in the first place.

If the intolerants manage to grow big enough to destroy the tolerants, then that society wasn't tolerant to begin with. That society simply showed its true colors. The only way to defeat intolerance is with education. In a truly tolerant and educated society the intolerants would never grow to be a majority.

This is in fact, not an argument.

you:
>i'm being oppressed
mentally healthy people:
>why?
you:
>i'm not allowed to kill niggers
mentally healthy people:
>...
you:
>and people complain about my desire to kill niggers
mentally healthy people:
>......................

>Who is to define tolerance and intolerance?

"Niggers, Kikes, Shitskins and Faggots GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY! HEIL HITLER!" seems like a pretty good start.

Hmm. Not an argument. Pity.

Popper was a smart guy, but he's not always right, just like everyone else.

For the last 70 years, Nazis have been a largely ignored fringe movement. Did they go extinct? Nearly.

For the last year, the eyes of the country have been on the actions of what amounts to only a few thousand people in a nation of 330,000,000. What is the result?

More Nazis.

Pretty much.
Funny how people regard National Socialism as a failed ideology because of the fact that it was defeated by a concerted effort against it, yet they often believe in ideologies which fail all by themselves.

sad