Wikileaks confirmed garbage, commie trash

wikileaks confirmed garbage, commie trash.

Other urls found in this thread:

businessinsider.com/assange-turned-down-documents-related-to-russian-government-corruption-2017-8
archive.is/NOVx9
archive.is/ORw5c
twitter.com/AnonBabble

assange=faggot that needs to get shot

3 SCOOPS!!!??????

It's not like they could change an election by focusing on Russia.

THIS IS IT. HE's DONE

IMPEACHMENT WHEN?????

>Russia
>Communist

what's the point ?it's way more interresting

also sauce

faggot fuck, this is popping up because assange is meeting with US govt officials re the fact that RUSSIA is NOTHING. was inside job. fuck off, shill

The media knows something is about to come out big and they need to try to smear Assange now.

The U.S. election was the biggest event at the time, why would they waste their time publishing stuff about Russia

fucking moron
>impeachment doesn't remove a prez from office
>clinton was impeached
read a book on american govt some time faggot

Because they're supposed to be unbiased?

At least that was the initial hope years ago. Assange has let it get into his head, and now he's politically motivated

>"w-wikileaks is literally Russia!"
>same day it's reported assange passes information to sitting congressman

Lol that article is trash, its from (((Foreignpolicy))) and rehosted on businessinsider. They don't even say what the leaks are.

op confirmed as having 12" dildo up arse

>TFW the left is using "commie" as a slur now, and hates indie whistle-blowing groups.

What a weird-ass timeline.

sounds like bullshit to me.

Assange has been red-pilling the FUCK out of the planet of Twitter. And you call him "commie trash"?

FUCKING KILL YOURSELF

Probably because assange couldnt create a kill switch. And it was probably bad info and fake documents from our friends at the IC. It's almost as if the US can approach him with false crap. Assange/wikileaks will deny. Oops now let's smear him to say he rejected our phony Russian Intel.

Assange had a beef with Hillary because of the whole drone thing.

He didn't want to get poloniumed..

Even if you did buy into this bullshit - it's almost as if he realizes that there is a high correlation rate between crossing the Russian government and shooting yourself 3 times in the back of the head

You and all your friends are going to jail and the whole ride there you are going to see little Russian Hackers crawling around you.

Lol kys

Assange has been on record saying he had shit on Trump and Hillary but he didn't feel like outing Trump because reasons.

Hillary joked about droning Assange before the election year.

That's what did it.

He probably had the Pepe Dossier, which would have been tactically leaked to him.

Where was that said? Lemme guess no source but your dreams.

several alarms here
1. written by a woman so instantly discarded
2. it says nothing about whether it was good info, just that wikileaks turned it down
3. you're a faggot

>2017
>just now realizing Shitileaks is garbage

This is true.

But Wikileaks was always meant to be an unbiased whistle blower, and if the 'leaks' from Russia where credible and of importance, it's their duty to take that in as well. It's disconcerting if it is true, and it would put an asterisk next to every bit of information they release during the campaign.

He's always been politically motivated, you just didn't stay on the right side of history.

Keep believing that sweetie

Oh look its another slide thread.

Even if he was biased, does that somehow absolve Democrats and Clinton of their horrid behavior?

And how do they know this?

You'd need to know the extent of what he "ignored".

He very well may have published it on the site, just that his media focus was elsewhere.

Lots of stuff is put up that doesn't make it to the MSM. They should probably do more research IMO.

Woah, what do you know.

>Case against Clinton re-opened by FBI
>Assange meets with Congressman regarding DNC leaks
>Assange is a Russian minx REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Fuck off.

Assange went from being a right-wing libertarian, to a socialist to whatever he is today.

The only constant in all his views: He wants America to burn and fall.

It's not a great start to assume someones political view, especially when they merely stated a technical fact. Wikileaks is supposed to be unbiased, Assange's influence on it's releases moves him closer to being like those he targets.

>defending
>an entity that publishes leaks
>turning leaks down
The only faggot in this is line of thought is you mongoloid

Source for that

Post link you faggot. Learn how to make a thread

Source or fuck off nigger

Who said leaks were credible faggot

>russian intel vs US intel during a fucking presidential election

Gee, I wonder which one will have more impact?
:thinking:

Proof that this just isn't another fabrication?

Learn how to googlefu nigger

>that flag
Everytime

Hahahha!
Faggot is mad because Julian didn't take the bait. It probably is was that same whore Don jr met with.

Leftist or spook?

No, it doesn't.

But it still leaves a black mark on Wikileaks, because they'll be another step closer to what they where initially out to oppose.

Do these dipshits think that Putin can be impeached? Do they think that leaks about the Russian Government would change anything at all?

>kafka trapping

Saged

>implying Shitileaks has ever been concerned with credibility of leaks
A FUCKING LEAF!

Here it is nordbro give me a hand
businessinsider.com/assange-turned-down-documents-related-to-russian-government-corruption-2017-8

Read it its trash

Is there proof of this or is Jenna McLaughlin just a stupid lying cunt?

Into archive
archive.is/NOVx9

Chur my bro

Banned from Reddit so I couldn't ask, but why do why depend on Wikileaks? Surely there are many other whistleblower sites or they could have just given it to journalists.

name one false leak they have ever published

Does fake news really deserve this many replies? You're better than this, anons.

I don't get why people don't understand this. Same with China. They kill people just for criticizing leaders.

No doubt complete bullshit like every other anti-Wikileaks article, but it's funny seeing the media get visible rattled at selective publishing when they do it on an hourly basis.

The absolute state of journalism!

>if the 'leaks' from Russia where credible and of importance
They've already responded to this: it was already-public information, therefore outside of their role.

The article whines that it was published elsewhere, and "languished in obscurity" because Wikileaks didn't take it.

Wikileaks doesn't exist to promote information they think is important. They exist to make information public, when those who possess it are too afraid to make it public themselves. Assange lives as a walking target because he takes the heat for leakers, and that's what he's there for.

It's a fundamental misrepresentation of Wikileaks to act like they've done anything inconsistent with their purpose by ignoring information that's already public.

right he has children.. whatever he feels about helping global citizens to understand the truth about their governments a man who'd abando.... well maybe he'll be able to get back to them someday.

This, a preemptive damage control, to soften the blow of whatever is coming.

I wish nothing but the absolute agonizing worst for you and yours.

/sage

This. Exactly this.

you sound like an assange fanboy. dont cry too hard when he gets his cement shoes, faggot

I just hate how Liberals take every article with an unknown source seriously when all the fake news that was disseminated during the election had anonymous sources.

No. Since you are demanding proof the onus is on you faggot. Prove every leak Shitileaks has ever published right now.

Well?

We are waiting.

> russia is based and would never lie

mc fucking kill yourself commie scum.

Honestly, if this info is as bad as they make it seem, why didn't they distribute it through other sources?

You guys don't find it fishy that wikileaks has suddenly taken this right wing slant? If you don't believe me go look at their twitter account, it may as well belong to paul joseph whatshisname or someone like him.

nice flag ya got there, cuck

Leftist here

Spent months defending wikileaks saying he and trump weren't put in puppets. I've been prove horribly wrong.

>wikileaks confirmed garbage, commie trash.

They were served disinfo and Assange didn't trust it?

this one is very much possible

also I decided to stop smoking weed everyday (it has been two months!)

(((they))) are trying to discredit him because DNC and hilldawg are going down within a week,

> thats fake
> no proof
> smear based julian!
> russia is so based

what a bunch of faggots. hahahaha

You sound like CNN. Throw out baseless accusation and just hope it sticks.

From the article they sourced it from
archive.is/ORw5c
>“As far as we recall these are already public,” WikiLeaks wrote at the time.
“WikiLeaks rejects all submissions that it cannot verify. WikiLeaks rejects submissions that have already been published elsewhere or which are likely to be considered insignificant. WikiLeaks has never rejected a submission due to its country of origin,” the organization wrote in a Twitter direct message when contacted by FP about the Russian cache.
Valid reasons i would say.

> baseless

oh, look another delusional commie fanboy. please, kill yourself

assange is too big of a fucking pussy, thats why. typical auscuck, > t-t-t-the usa is so bad! > russia would never lie to the people, we cant validate!

yawn. hes gunna get his. and its going to be epic

>WikiLeaks rejects submissions that have already been published elsewhere

I'm going to be an asshole and repeat myself since I'm not getting enough attention:
>The article whines that it was published elsewhere, and "languished in obscurity" because Wikileaks didn't take it.
>Wikileaks doesn't exist to promote information they think is important. They exist to make information public, when those who possess it are too afraid to make it public themselves.

When will you leftypol fags understand that your god damn retarded D&C tactics has the opposite effect here?

You're attempting to divide a board which has always been divided, up until the point when you retards started shilling during the 2016 campaign, essentially forcing every Sup Forumsack who used to hate eachother to fight you as a common enemy.

I'm not even mad about your shilling. Incompetence just fucking annoys me.

From another article.

>“As far as we recall these are already public,” WikiLeaks wrote at the time. “WikiLeaks rejects all submissions that it cannot verify. WikiLeaks rejects submissions that have already been published elsewhere or which are likely to be considered insignificant. WikiLeaks has never rejected a submission due to its country of origin,” the organization wrote in a Twitter direct message when contacted by FP about the Russian cache.

Isn't this confirmation of Trump having possible collusion with Russia?

He never said anything like that, just that it is already oublished so no reason to waste ressources on validating 64gigs of data which very well might be fake and able to slander wikileaks reputation. Releasing stuff comes with huge responsibillity, and to take that responsibillity takes a lot of ressources which can be used to validate the next big leak that isnt published anywhere yet

The "sounds like a valid reason" thing wasnt meant to sound ironic or sarcastic. I really thing its a good reason as you see in the top part of my reply

>wanting a source and not blindly believing something makes me cuck
Got me there mate

I was replying to amplify, not to object. We were saying essentially the same thing.

retarded piece of shit OP cant copypaste a link, so why should i google it?
Im tired of all the low effort threads without any content on this board. If you cant be bothered to post a source than i cant be bothered to even evaluate your oppinion and waste mental ressources on the intellectual equivalent of diarreah

Even better, you canmake some random claim and if its wrong a shill will be quick come up with a good source to debunk it saving you a lot of research. If it is right he will either make baseless claims or post some bullshit source to (((debunk))) it.
Truely our greatest ally

Then why the fuck is your lazy ass posting? Fuck off back to r/eddit nigger. Shitjheads like you are exactly who needs to GTFO this Mozambique Underwater Footsie board.

>Jenna McLaughlin
>Mother Jokes
FAKE NEWS
O I'M LAUGHLIN

>continues drinking tears

Don't be hard on assange guys. It's either this or get poisoned. He has no choice but to be Russia's lapdog

OP is too stupid to provide a source and im from r3ddit. Top kek
You really just work through your memo to call everyone that doesnt sgree with you a r3dditor. You need to step up your game m8. Its too easy to spot you guys. Get creative lmao

IMPEACH PUTIN