/lrg/ - LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL: FREE CANTWELL EDITION

This is a thread for the discussion of all ideologies that promote self-ownership, individual liberty and the natural order. These include (but are not limited to) anarcho-capitalism, paleolibertarianism, minarchy, objectivism and anti-leftism (i.e. physical removal, so to speak). All others are welcome to learn and debate us.
Reminder that this is a right-wing thread, so libertine degenerates ('live and let live' faggotry), open-border advocates and faux-libertarians (e.g. Gary Johnson) are not welcome here - people here recognise that property rights imply discrimination and a return to traditional, conservative values.
Although questions are welcome, many are repeated often, so it is recommended you research the basics first. Nobody here is obligated to debate with you, so try to avoid using fallacies in your arguments or creating unrealistic scenarios.

THREAD RESOURCES:
>Pastebin: pastebin.com/iT0Rw8PT
>Discord & Book Club: Kd2WD2X

REQUIRED READING:
>The Machinery Of Freedom: Illustrated Summary (David Friedman) - youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o (Watch this!)
>Anatomy of the State (Murray Rothbard) - mises.org/library/anatomy-state
>Democracy: The God that Failed (Hans Hermann-Hoppe) - riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

FURTHER READING:
>Reference - See i.imgur.com/wCIpgNA.jpg
>Torrent - magnet:?xt=urn:btih:8d8ec6ef882dee291f119eb69994797574e5d616&dn=Anarcho-Capitalism%20Books

THREAD THEME:
>hoppewave | Hans-Hermann Hoppe | the argument - youtube.com/watch?v=tdd2cF8UgfQ
>Against the State - (Hoppewave Hans Hermann Hoppe) - youtube.com/watch?v=HLaqr3QorCw
>I need a Pinochet! - youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
>Drop it like it's Hoppe - youtube.com/watch?v=HPKGgo4kGQM

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LP41IK91_qA
youtu.be/w0m0hTrtlWM
youtu.be/hCIc5ymZai4
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Also those (((YouTube))) people took down the original Hoppewave video that I made with much love and care, saying it incited hatred and went against terms of use. Fortunately, some Anons have already re-uploaded it. It's a shame, the original had 17,000 views.

youtube.com/watch?v=LP41IK91_qA

Thanks to the guy who re-uploaded it!

Wherever am I, I must run free.
Fuck Pinochet, authoritarian CIA Israel-lover puppet. And you OP, you're a statist cuck.

Lets sing.
youtu.be/w0m0hTrtlWM

FREE CANTWELL! HE DIDN'T DO NOTHING!

>Mexican Libertarians
I hope this doesn't have something to do with muh "free migration"

...

No, but yes less trade regulations at the border.

End all state subsidy and maybe.

You'd be a lot freer if you had a General too, you know? Also, I remember reading they painted an American flag over the Dukes's car. Fucking criminal.

Also here's some Nick Land OC

>privatise the welfare recipients as they are basically public property due to tax-funded programs and shit
THIS AND MUCH MORE AT SLOVAKBRO'S ONE AND ONLY DUMBLR BLOG
hans-hermann-hoppe.tumblr.com

Amazing, I should pay attention to your Tumblr wisdom more often.

Subsides to business?
They're almost non-existent in my country

lel

Oc

.>fuck google desu

Awesome

d-delete that, Paco pls

Who's gonna fix the potholes?

I think you meant to ask:
"Who's gonna pozz my hole?"
And the answer is whomever else we physically remove from our covenant based on protection of family and kin.

You after you kill your boyfriend with AIDS and I buy the rights to your physical body and make you fix the potholes.

Until you can properly answer this question with logic and reason, the libertarian movement will continue to be a joke.

Sorry babes.

Ignore sodomite propositions for argument.

The current pope is a major problem.

is this the real /lrg/?
the other one which is up doesn't seem to have the regular posters in it

Also I've just noticed my ID.
>31 GFs
Cantwell's polygyny proposal got nothing on me.

Props to whoms't'd've'll made this coat of arms, it's beautiful.

the OP in the other one seems to be quite incompetent, but oh well

My dude

How is it a problem?
Religion is voluntary and He literally doesn't force anyone to believe/do what He preaches.

Who would do the roads?

And he's not in our Discord, or so I think.

Brazilian wage slaves

Wait, there was another one? Fuck, I should've checked the catalogue before I made this one. My bad, they are both real.

>the asphalt jew
baka desu senpai

>our
>Discord
Oh, this is cancer.

>no roads
Explain it why

You gotta stay on your side of the wall, Paco.

No it is ok I like this one more, seems by the posts that the same people are in this one as always.

Pedro, your country is an example of why roads are evil.

We'll use helicopters and jetpacks instead. Uma delícia!

I will always be Mexican, you will always be cancer.
Simple.

She looks like a young transgender Hoppe with FAS. I hate her guts so much.

There is a correlation between the amount of roads and air pollution, which in turn creates more precipitation cores and brings irregular rain patterns, which have less space to soak into due to roads, so they create erosion.
Highways also give kids autism.

Roads are tools,tools can't be evil.

>We'll use helicopters and jetpacks instead
You know that you sounds stupid,right?

Mexican is cancer, so I wouldn't act like a winner in this situation if I were you.
At least if cancer kills you, the dope pushers won't flay your face and literally skullfuck you alive. They might do that post-mortem, though.

Of course I'm memeing. I think we've been asked this question so many times (mostly by trolls) that we also answer in a troll-ish attitude. Anyway, read The Privatization of Roads and Highways by Walter Block

Not enough of these anymore, it's nothing but slide threads for the past two weeks.

I like her, for me she is really cute.
but yesterday someone posted an older pic of her, where she looked exactly like hoppe just with long hair.

I dislike her because of her smug attitude with Cantwell and Spencer. And always trying to shoehorn some "witty" or clever rebuttal when they're talking. She's rude and deserves a bullet in her head.

You don't know what autism is, right?

She's so dumb, her interview with Spencer was embarrassing

>1 post by this ID
>literally only came here because he knew he could put his expertise on autism to good use
Wow, seems like the Natty Socks won again. We ARE more autistic than them.

Amazing

Uma Cecília!

I only saw what you can call smug in her facial expression in the last interview with chris where she talked with closed eyes as she asked him questions, but all the other times she looked innocent to me and I like those kind of girls.
We all can have different tastes, because value is subjective and we are not some kind of egalitarian socialists.

Mmm ya baby the government loves to fuck me and then throw me tocsode I hate but love it at the same time. Those pussies in the government can protect me that's all I want I don't want taxes down my throats it's just too big of taxes baby.

Friendly reminder that anarcho-capitalism needs to be put on the ideological backburner until we have actually achieved some semblance of a libertarian society.

Have you guys ever revealed your ancap power level in public or to someone else IRL? How'd it go?

Does she have a dick, looks barizilian to me.
Just ignore the eternal german patriot.

guys, is there any point in being occupied with this ideology when there's actually no possibility in we seeing an ancap society in the future ?

To some people I have, but they're already radicalized peeps they didn't react much. As far as normal fags go I just say "voluntary government" and they don't hassle me with roads questions, and I can still be open and honest about my shit.

The owners of the roads, whether they be the state or private companies.

>Have you guys ever revealed your ancap power level in public or to someone else IRL? How'd it go?
Started talking about property rights and the free market, people hated me more than when I was literally quoting parts of the NSDAP party program back when I was an edgy teen.

Why? Read SIEGE and What Must Be Done, faggot.
It's not like the kikes are going to let you create a minarchist society.

Sure you can see an AnCap society, just buy some land dude. It won't be Nation or worldwide, but it's pretty easy to setup a covenant in America at least.

what the fuck is with the lefts obsession with statues now. Why do they have to tear down irreplaceable monuments, and promote bullshit revisionist history, I'm fucking sick of it.

The typical libertysplaining about how taxation is pretty much the exact same thing as theft, how governments work in a way very akin to mafias and terrorist groups only that they have more resources to bullshit the people into supporting them...

Always that I've done this I could get my point accross and most people would agree with me as long as I didn't label those ideas with anything, but with time I realized that proselytizing is pretty much an useless waste of time.

The good thing about libertarianism is that it calls for individual action which can benefit you personally. No need to get through the cumbersome processes of politics.

They hate the West, whites and the culture and civilization we invented. We must do what must be done.

Ancap may come eventually but the people are not ready for it yet. Let's just focus on, at the very least, becoming something like a Ron Paul republic (with strict immigration policy).

Private cities might bring an opportunity, there are already some examples in the works, it's hard when dealing with governments, specially 3rd world countries, but someone will get it right eventually.

Yes, she is Brazilian. Don't know if she has a dick or not, but looking at her face she isn't that really attractive.

We're getting there, dude.

>cryptocurrencies
>startup societies attracting investors and becoming technologically feasible
>percentage of Americans who believe democracy is necessary is at all-time low
>the entire phenomenon of reactionary movements against democracy, migrants and political correctness
>3D printing to bypass gun bans
>socialist projects fail time after time and pretty much everyone except commies and socialists see it
>both the right and the left hate each other; leftists are the ones who want secession this time (Calexit)

If current trends maintain (which they will), hopefully Jewmerica will collapse and we'll get more, smaller, states. I'll glady move to New Hampshire or Texas when they achieve independence.

what do you think about immigration policy in an ancap society btw ? who should decide who can/can't come ?

The goal is to convince hearts and minds. Ancap is too extreme at this moment in history. Later it can be reintroduced when people see that a libertarian society works and is actually superior.

That'S what they always did they just grow stronger in the west, we barely have any memorials of ww1/ww2 anymore only on small graveyards on the countryside.
And you can see how they push to also archieve this with memorials from imperial times.

The property owners, as always.

Well in that case, it's up to the property owners or city-states.

Constantly, well maybe not full ancap but Im pretty sure all my friends know I don't have appreciation for the government.

Anyway, I told some ancaps before, let's not be like vegans, let's not make being ancap our only talking point, our only interest, be more than just an ideologue or people will get tired of your shit.

Malta poster, best poster

The property owner. I'd like to live in a city where pretty much all neighborhoods are segregated and only the "public square" (which would be privately funded, of course, by the money I pay to the corporation/defense agency) would be somewhat integrated, for ethnic restaurants and other small crap like that.

hello my brothers :D

it should be fairly obvious, some of the cynics here often state it, you may just ignore it.

this is cultural/historical/identity destruction, pull down all the statues of the "great" men and leaders of the past (read: Europeans) and proclaim their actions racist and unacceptable. essentially this is the scrubbing clean of the past.

Whites don't get a history they define, you enslaved millions of people, invaded tons of countries and abused their native populations, you stripped the resources from the land and stole it for yourself, much like you stole entire nations. Because all of this, you're racist, a bigot and a devil, if you choose to fight against the identity you've been handed, you're free to go stand with the nazis, nationalists and supremacists. Given enough time, Whites wont even know what they're fighting for or defending, they'll merely believe of themselves to be the villain of history. Nonsense? Look around, there are millions of Whites advocating for the mixing, reduction of or potentially even genocide (from some types) of the entirety of Whites for a litany of reasons. The brainwashing is working.

oh you mean the owners of the property that the immigrants want to live in ? okay, so no "government banning x kind of people from entering" ?

On that topic of revealing your power level: people know I don't like the government, since I complain about taxes, migration policy and the Left, but only my close friends know I'm full AnCap. I stopped arguing with leftists because I noticed that most people just revert back to what their original position was if they don't dedicate time and resources to read books and be informed.

Who decides who's gonna own the state?

Checkmate

More like property owners banning x kind of people from entering.

Correct. Property owners, driven by self-interest, will only admit those immigrants who they perceive to add value to their property. So bye bye niggers, terrorists and other subhuman trash who drive down property values.

>she isn't that really attractive.
But posing with a gadsden flag raises their sex appeal too bad that most females on your side are degenerate left- libertarians.

We got Julie Borowski

All the girls I spoke to in the Hoppe conference were right libertarians.

All 8 of them :^)

Getting this tattoo on my right sholder next month. Looking forward to some leftist tears on that chain.

but what if it's an empty land and they can build their own house there ?

You don't have to convert everyone, those ideas are the ideas of a minority and they will always be the static masses will never understand the full principle of those actions they will just follow who ever speaks in their favour or grants them security.
It should not be the goal to reach out to the masses, but rather to form an elite to archieve a new society.

Pitch libertarianism for me, /lrg/.
Give it your best shot. Why is libertarianism better than national socialism or fascism?

If no one owns it I don't care, just don't expect any inclusion on my part.

No such thing as empty land unless we discover new planets/continents.

At this moment, land belongs to those who have poured resources into them, the tax payers, they have the better claim in case we went ancap to what we know as public lands today, simply because they paid taxes for the protection against settlement.

Then they do it. It's called homesteading/original appropriation.

Exactly. We'll go a longer way by converting more tech moguls and businessmen then trying to convert the average pleb.

SAVE HISTORY! JEFFERSON LEGACY BEING TRASHED BY TAX FUNDED ACADEMIA!!! youtu.be/hCIc5ymZai4

SAVE COUNTRY, WEST, and MAGA
!!!

Want to be a king? Dictate all the rules of your community? Set up a national socialist empire, anything goes as long as you don't tread on me Desu.

If you institute this I will come into your house and use your toothbrush.

How does Hoppean anarchism differ from feudalism, typically we call a political system in which the owner of a territory is also its ruler, monarchism.

>We got Julie Borowski
>don't know who she is
>types her in in youtube
>expecting an old hag from vhs tapes from the 90s
>she is actually good looking
wow
>All 8 of them :^)
Never even spoken to so many girls at once

Contractual obligations subjected to third party arbitration.

And planes.

Not that different, maybe the difference would be that hoppean AnCap would be based on real contracts rather than muh implicit agreement to be ruled.