GAY IS OKAY

What's wrong with being gay? Why does it upset you so much? Is it because you can't stand seeing other happy while you're a basement dweller that never knew what affection is? Or is it that you're jealous and wanted a cute male for yourself?

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk
nytimes.com/2012/08/10/us/gay-couples-face-pressure-to-have-children.html
unvis.it/www.nytimes.com/2012/08/10/us/gay-couples-face-pressure-to-have-children.html
youtube.com/watch?v=aHk9JoXoBMY
yourbrainonporn.com/are-sexual-tastes-immutable
yourbrainonporn.com/are-fetishes-innate
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

...

If it's ok, why the left have to enforce it now?
Why it wasn't universally accepted for centuries?
Why should I give a fuck about homos wanting to fuck each other?

being gay is a fucking disease. diseases need to be wiped out
faggot poop pushers

Study a little, christianity is responsible for making gays ''not okay''. Ancient greeks, romans and even samurais used to fuck guys all the time. It was always accepted before.

Not much desu. It's the degenerate gay culture thats the issue.

Prove me someone being gay is a disease

Christianity is responsible for making homos not acceptable in mid-east and china too? Tell me more.
Or maybe your stories of ancient greeks are just fabricated 19 century bullshit.

i fap to gay furry porn
t. korwin voter

If gays were anti Muslim that'd be okay, after all, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

>he doesn't know there are texts and paintings about males fucking each other in ancient greece

Is this the average Sup Forums IQ?

subjective

and not according to the book of Leviticus

Christ would that you leave your sin behind and repent.

ALLAH IS GAY

Like, the west had that massive "progressive" push to make homosexuality acceptable. What benefits did it give to western societies, besides making mockedy of it to world outside? Why me, a straight guy, should give a shit about homos and their problems? I'm not for persecuting them as long as they are not making fuss about it in public, but that's it. No "marriages', no "prides". Prove me that this is not the most reasonable, balanced approach to the problem.

I don't care about homosexuals
Just don't flaunt that shit in public
Keep it to the bedroom

Why it's wrong is dependent upon whether it's a choice or genetic. If it's genetic, then it's a genetic disorder that makes parts of the male population more reluctant to reproduce, making gays a liability as they will not contribute to the future of the society. If it's a choice, then we should give them treatment to reform gays into normal men, and if they refuse the treatment they become a liability to the society and should be purged.

Imagine two males together, forget all the progressive bullshit and politics. Do you it's still wrong just because they are males?

I just want to live with my boyfriend and not be harrassed, I couldn't care less about all those pride parades or gays being able to marry I just want peace!

Must suck to be so self hating to come on Sup Forums every 15 minutes and beg for others to justify your existence.

There are millions and millions of gays that contributed more to society more than your neckbeard ass ever will. Should you be purged too?

It doesn't, I fuck my cute bf everyday and have a successful job, if anything I love my life

Fuck off reprobate(Romans 1:26-32 KJV)

Ignore sodomite orders
m.youtube.com/watch?v=DiqtFAKQHlk

I'm not going to image that. See, legalizing homosexuality will open the pandora box of endless stream of sexual deviants, fetishists and perverts wanting to get their "thing" mainstream too. Image a guy who only gets aroused by imagining a girl with penis getting swallowed by snake while being stepped on by giant dog. "Don't ask don't tell" is literally the best solution to the problem.

>I just want to live with my boyfriend and not be harrassed
Don't shout about it on every corner and it's gonna be ok I think. The modern west is atomized, internet-absorbed society and no one will give a shit about you two.

Christ never existed. There is 0 archaeological evidence that he was real. There are no AUTHENTIC records by non-Christian scholars of a person named Jesus from Nazareth, which was not a town at the supposed time of his birth. Jesus supposedly predicted the fall of the Second Temple. Either you believe he is magical and predicted the fall of the Second Temple in 70 CE or he was an invention of the Romans during the times of the Flavian dynasty based on a syncretism of Mithraism, Caesarian emperor worship, Judaism, and Stoicism. It is a pacifistic variant of Judaism that welcomes slaves (who were not allowed to be Jewish) and discourages open revolt. Nothing in the New Testament is critical of the Romans. You can look at the history, or you can be a true believer and discard reality for biblical inerrancy.

Gays don't have children, they don't contribute to the future of the society. Unless those "millions" of gays are revolutionary inventors, that statement is simply false. If a Henry Bessmer or Michael Foucault turned out to be gay, I would say that they contributed as much as the average father, but as such this is not the case. In the grand scheme of the future of a society, children > anything but the most revolutionary technologies. Gays don't have children, they are thus largely of lesser value than a normal man.

Straight user.....You're not interesting either.

20% of gays do have kids though.

Many gay people adopt, either stranger's kids or ones from their own extended family who others could not take care of. This is a useful societal function.

Also, surrogacy is now an option in many places for gays of a certain means.

Do you know how many people have been and still are being killed for being gay?

It's not about enforcing it; it's about giving them the same rights as straight people. It's not difficult.

pol =/= burger

>gays are a political group

I'm gonna be honest here as someone that supports the LGBTQ community ... I'm jelly as fuck.

You are a faggot because the "written records" of Christ are found in multiple different Greek and Aramaic documents that were multiple sources eventually COMPILED as the Bible and as the apocryphal texts.

Also that logic doesn't hold up to the Jewish practices of the day. The Oral Talmud was in full swing at this time but never committed to paper until after the death of Christ and after the Roman crackdown in the Holy Land. Jews didn't write things down until it was absolutely necessary, documentation was expensive and even with Romans usually the priority with documentation was military in nature.

I'd love to try it with a qt blond twink sometime.

>iq above 90
>having children in the current year (2017)
why would you do this?

A gay fedora, aren't they all...

>20% of gays have children

Sauce? Why would they have children if they're gay? If they aren't attracted to women why are they banging them?

>Many gays adopt
That's not "having" children, That's raising someone else's children. Gays raising children is tantamount to child abuse and scars them worse then if they were raised by a single parent.

Do you believe in evolution or creationism?

Gays boost the populational crysis. Also, they're a bunch of useful idiots at the dialectic left's strategy.

Doesn't upset me in the least. Have a Gay ole time being homosexual (consenting adults only)

Lol bullshit. I am not arguing about the Talmud. There are no references besides Christians that are authentic and pertain, literally, not allegorically to a Jesus of Nazareth. There are contradictions between those gospels as to where he was born, raised, lived, and how.

Josephus's work was altered because by 300 CE Christian scholars often were the ones who had access to translating Greek and Roman works.

If you really think people back then were not capable of adding later surreptitious references to a myth they wanted to promote, you deserve to buy into Roman ideology of 75 CE or so.

>Paintings
>Ancient Greece
You can't be this fucking stupid.

Two men together is fine, two women together is a recipe for domestic abuse.

Upset? Good. Not upset? You're gay or a girl.

Enjoy your AIDS faggot.

To breed a new race of ubermensch that will colonize Mars and guide us to enlightenment.

burn degenerate

I'm not a fedora, I simply don't believe Jesus was a real person.

Plenty of gays (especially women) marry someone of the opposite sex then leave and take the kids with them. Others may adopt or hire surrogates.

The shift is also reflected in census data. Between 2000 and 2010, among same-sex couples raising children, the percentage of couples with adopted children increased to 20 percent from 9 percent, according to an analysis by Gary Gates, a demographer at the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles. (Most same-sex couples with adopted children are lesbians, but gay men make up a growing share, accounting for nearly a third of such couples in 2010, up from a fifth in 2000.)

nytimes.com/2012/08/10/us/gay-couples-face-pressure-to-have-children.html

evolution. why?

Into archive
unvis.it/www.nytimes.com/2012/08/10/us/gay-couples-face-pressure-to-have-children.html

Ok I'll write long answer. The key problem, this entire "straight" and "gay" people, it's fabricated narrative. There are people who are normal and people who are perverts. People who normal may get sexually attracted to whatever, but they simply don't make the point of their lives about it. Meanwhile for people who are perverted, their sexual urges completely define their lives for them, overcoming their societal duties. You mentioned ancients. A roman senator could be attracted to cute boys. Everyone would probably know about it, everyone would probably have a laugh about it occasionally, but that's it. It would be just a regular roman senator who happens to be attracted to boys, nothing more. It wouldn't be yay, we got our first "gay" senator thing. Meanwhile in modern western culture, being deviant is regarded as bonus points, putting that "gay" senator about the same senator who isn't. This is huge societal problem, which leads to people being advanced over more capable people simply for being weird over talented.

those fetishes already exist, my friend. as surprising as it may sound to you, a quick missionary fuck from doesnt do it for a lot of peeps. the amount of "straight" people that fool around with guys besides their marriages its pretty big. then you have the guys that fap to furry shit, then all kind of dom stuff, then casual but rigorous cheaters, etc etc. we all have a kink. Homosexuality is not a kink, its a sexual orientation. If people start using legalization gay marriage as an argument for their pedophilia, thats a faux-logic and thats why we talk shit out.

Stop pushing this bullshit on me and my kids and I'll stop giving a fuck.

Evolution:
Gays don't continue the evolution of man.
Religion: if we where created then we are going against our creators will.
Nothing:
You have no morals and everything is ok.
Doesn't matter what you believe:
Less children.
>They can still bang women.
But if they want to have children why are they gay?

claims, claims, claims, burden of proof
The question of Nazareth is fucking stupid. He probably was a Nazarite and an author was confused by this. Nazarites were virgin men who devoted themselves to God (or under the Jewish metaphor men who did not cut their hair)

>forgets apocryphal documents
>forgets references by Tacitus
>forgets reference to Christ in Talmud

retard alert! your shit of a spawn will probably contribute less then he produces for society. contribution to society = tax paid to keep society running for your shit spawning shit spawn. a straight family resides more on services provided by the state then a lone gay couple, therefore consumes more of the produce. to what means? to drive your stoner kid to practice and see him become a target salesman? how about contributing with an abortion or just kill yourself now, as your iq tells me pretty much your spawns will not be strong contributors to society

>oppic
ewwwwwwww
t. fag

Every faggot I have EVER known:

>"TEE HEE all I can think about is getting my LIL POO POO FUCKT by EVEY SINGLE MAN I MEET!!"

>"TEE HEE I can't just be cool and chill and NOT ALWAYS THINKING ABOUT WHERE MY NEXT POOPOOFUCK IS GONNA COME FROM!"

>"I gotta always TEST THE WATERS with every single new male I meet to SEE IF THEY'RE POSSIBLY GAY, WHICH COULD TRANSLATE IN TO MORE POOPOOFUCKIES FOR ME!"

>"Not gay? NO PROBLEM! I'll just keep pushing the issue and saying creepy things like "I'LL MAKE YOU GAY EVENTUALLY" or "GAWD IF YOU WERE GAY ID JUST RAPE YOU RIGHT NOW!"

>"I'll NEVER get off it, because it's literally ALL I AM: A fucking degenerate glutton for POODIE POO BUTTFUCKS WHO just can't fathom any scenario where EVERY GUY ON THE PLANET doesn't what to feed his peepee to my poopoos!"

>"When I finally get my face jacked the fuck in, (clearly BECAUSE IN GAY! Not because I'm an INSUFFERABLE CUNT!) I'll scream "HATE CRIME"

>"TEE HEE! NOOOBODY UNDERSTAAAAANDS MEEEE!!!!"

I have no problem with gays, but please don't push you're orientation on other people or be a retard and profess pride for it.

They have a sexual paraphilia.

sexual intercourse
1
: heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis

The definition of "sex" and "sexual intercourse" has been changed and pushed over the course of the last eight years under Obama's presidency. Sex is solely for reproduction. If a person is attracted to another person of the same sex, they cannot reproduce, therefore, the "playing out" of traditional man/woman sex acts with that person is wasted effort. If a person is attracted to someone of the same sex, this means that they see something in that person that is worthy of being reproduced, but they know that it cannot happen: it is therefore a sexual paraphilia.

If a man starts watching porn, and finds himself looking at the penis a little too much, that does not mean he is gay, but society would like to convince him of that. The sight of an erect penis is a sperm competition cue for many men, which goes back to early human days when nudity was more common. In other words, men who like looking at dicks are highly competitive, but get tricked by the society that pushes the gay agenda. Men are more likely to describe the penis using highly descriptive words such as, "veiny", "huge", "thick", etc. It's why even lots of "straight" men find pre-op transsexuals visually appealing.

>3% of population
>demands laws for just them
>media make it look like they are 20%+

fucking disgusting homoproaganda fueled by jews

I don't have an issue with that being gay I have an issue with interracial though. Mongrelizers will get the rope whether gay or straight

This is a lie. See Adonis Georgiades' book "Homosexuality In Ancient Greece The Myth is Collapsing."

youtube.com/watch?v=aHk9JoXoBMY

Homosexuality is a paraphilia that can be cured by abstinence from pornography and masturbation like any other, as thousands of men have testified. Hence why it was simply seen as a vice and not an "identity" in former ages.

yourbrainonporn.com/are-sexual-tastes-immutable

yourbrainonporn.com/are-fetishes-innate

Exactly there was no such place called Nazareth at 0 CE so the title Jesus of Nazareth is nonsense.

Sometime before 117 AD, the Roman historian apparently wrote:

"Nero looked around for a scapegoat, and inflicted the most fiendish tortures on a group of persons already hated for their crimes. This was the sect known as Christians. Their founder, one Christus, had been put to death by the procurator, Pontius Pilate in the reign of Tiberius. This checked the abominable superstition for a while, but it broke out again and spread, not merely through Judea, where it originated, but even to Rome itself, the great reservoir and collecting ground for every kind of depravity and filth. Those who confessed to being Christians were at once arrested, but on their testimony a great crowd of people were convicted, not so much on the charge of arson, but of hatred of the entire human race.

Their deaths were made farcical. Dressed in wild animals' skins , they were torn to pieces by dogs, or crucified, or made into torches to be ignited after dark as substitutes for daylight."

– Tacitus (Book 15, chapter 44):


As we have seen, the term 'Christian' was not in use during the reign of Nero and there would not have been 'a great crowd' unless we are speaking of Jews, not Christians. 'Jewish/Christians' – being perceived by Roman authorities (and the populace at large) simply as Jews meant that early Christ-followers also got caught up in general attacks upon the Jews.

"Their effects to dissemble their Jewish origins were detected by the decisive test of circumcision; nor were the Roman magistrates at leisure to enquire into the difference of their religious tenets."

– Edward Gibbon (Decline and Fall)

>ancient Greeks and Romans

And they fucked guys of their own race not a bunch of stinking niggers

We gave you the reasons yesterday so fuck off

>imagine two males together
If they're the same race and not doing shit like wearing suits made of dicks I have no problem with it

sounds like made up bullshit to me desu senpai

see
They're not killed for "being gay." They're killed for being unhinged and inconsiderate about their need for buttfuck

The homosexual agenda has always been closely connected with the advocacy of paeadophilia. Many of the early homosexual advocates, like Allen Ginsburg, openly advocated it until they plainly saw that that was a threshold over which the general public would never step.

if it was okay you wouldn't crying like a bitch seeking the approval of perfect strangers on a nazi board
you are ashamed of yourself and you are right to be

You argument like an autistic child screeches. God speed

the straight agenda has also been closely connected with the advocacy of fucking little keeds

>Nothing
>It doesn't
>No
>I am a cute male I don't need one ;)

I am bi but prefer women I have no problem with you except your degenerate hookup pozzing culture and exposing kids to sexual shit at pride parades.

ar you all gay in murica or what ?

I'm not into gay shit. I'm just telling you where their paraphilia comes from. They're basically men who aren't afraid to admit they see something attractive in another male, but confuse this thinking they want to suck his cock and buttfuck like weird motherfuckers instead of double teaming a chick.

we get it, you figured it out, bravo. now go back to bed, sweet summer child

The comparatively fewer number of "heterosexual" deviants are simply another shade of pervert, and you are all of you mentally disordered. But toleration and advocacy of paedophilia is endemic among homophiles as a class. There is nothing like it, proportionally speaking, among heterosexuals. That is the point. Your remark is as fallacious as it would be if you said, "Non-transgenders commit suicide as well as transgenders, therefore, the fact that almost half of transgenders attempt to kill themselves is of no consequence, and signifies nothing."

Yeah I am not gay either.

>sweet summer child
Not a summerfag either.

>being this mad

Faggots just got btfo

DEATH TO LGBT!!!!

Nothing.

I just wish you faggots would stop overwhelmingly support commie garbage.

Well can you at least understand how a concerted push by some to remove the rights of others drive some gays to communism?

I'm in college for nuclear engineering with a 135-140 iq.

When I talk about "gays", I'm not talking about women. Women are much more sexually fluid than men and all have a capacity to be bisexual. That's the reason there's a "lesbian phase" for women but no "gay phase" for men. It makes sense for a straight women who divorces her husband and holds custody to turn to women instead and remarry with her biological child, I can certainly see that happening. But that's a separate issue and doesn't affect a gay man's utility to society in any way.

Yes, and I'm not cool with those assholes, either.

Let freedom ring.

I dont care if you are gay and won't discriminate against you for it. What annoys me is all the social activism and flaming faggotry present. Just act normal. I have gay acquatance that i hang out with sometimes and he is a bro who likes to crush beers and eat ribs and comes off more as a Chad than a flaming homo.

Gay men also adopt and hire surrogates and sometimes even get custody of kids had in opposite sex couplings. Is this so hard to believe?

The activism is in response to evangelical Christian anti-gay activism. If one well dried up, both would. Some gay people are more feminine than others, why would you hold that against them?

Also there's aways 100x comments in these threads "I don't care but x". I get that it is sort of like litotes, but obviously you do care if you have to explain to others specifics of how you feel gays live their lives/should live their lives after hypocritically saying you do not care.

ok, that was retarded. in your case both suicidals, have an issue. the result of the issue is the suicide, but the issue that brought them there is different. as to my case as well, a straight guy fucking kids and a gay guy fucking kids is the result of a psychological problem, but the problems might be of different backgrounds. i have never met a gay guy who fucked a kid or hit on a kid or talked about fucking a kid.
HOWEVER, your case is not without loss. Young teenagers that start to consider themselves gay are easy prey for pervs, but we are not talking about below 14 guys, but 15, 16,17.

>niggers

I don't hate gays but if the gay racemixes and raises nigger children they're going to get the rope for being a fucking niggerlover

100% disgusting. No matter how many sexual fetishes I've gotten into in the past, two people of the same sex getting married still disgusts me to the very core.

>I don't care

Because I genuinely don't care about gays and I hate straight racemixers too

I just want a bf whom I can confess my love to, cuddle and be around, that's all

Its ok if you're gay, but promoting it as normal is degeneracy you communist shill.

>freedom and not liberty
In you go

Like I said before, getting custody of kids from normal families doesn't mean that the gays are having kids. The human family needs a man and a woman to raise the kid. The woman nurtures the baby until adolescence, and then the man takes over and teaches the child to be self-sufficient. That's how it's been since the first mammal came into being. Why do you think you can go against nature and somehow turn out fine? Two men can't raise a child any better than two buffalo.

No you don't. You're a goofy lonely faggot. Go outside and get a girlfriend

Surrogacy definitely means having kids and a lot of kids are still from failed opposite sex pairings. Your statements are not based in any facts.

The only problem with gays is that they bring with them a lot of really stupid opinions and movements.

being gay is okay, but don't be a fag.

no, its just that youre not decent enough to discuss with. thanks dr phil, im gonna gang bang a hooker and feel so straight for looking at the others guys dicks to be able to cum. yay im cured

but I don't want a girlfriend
there's about 100 guys for every girl I find cute

...

suck my dick while i whip the hell out of your ass