How can american liberals live knowing they have contradicting points of view

How can american liberals live knowing they have contradicting points of view

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oyzSrtr6oJE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

ideology isn't, nor should it be, a protected class

mystery solved

>protected class
aren't we all equal?

The right of association/disassociation isnt a right in new america.

Button choices for you guys:
>not all conservatives are the same; there is room for intelligent political discussion and contradictory viewpoints within its spectrum
>the same liberal believes both these things

>How can humans live knowing they have contradicting points of view

FTFY

Same way you do

via cognitive dissonance
literally THE definition

Kek.

so thats why mudlimes, antifags, blm, and la raza are ideologies protected by the state while white nationalism is persecuted and false flagged by the state
really made me think

lets take down native and nigger statues while were at it. Losers and slaves dont deserve monuments

Except they're not participation trophies you dolt, they're monuments meant to memorialize the heroes of the South. Until you take a hammer to our Vietnam War Memorial, you can't talk about our statues.

Also, you're not even am american, so I'm 90% sure you don't even know what we're talking about.

I'm not electing people to suit my fucked up mentality, I know people are different and have different points of view, if I had to vote I would elect someone who tried to give me and everyone more freedom

>monuments are participation trophies
heh

Welp, lets tear down all the Indian monuments and erase them from history.

Yeah, I don't think people are really that mad about the statues. What they're really mad about is a bunch of degenerate scumbag niggers & libs getting to do whatever the hell they want, all the time, without repercussion. They try to come at it with the "history argument", because they're afraid of losing everything they ever worked for if they dare tell the truth on social media. That's just my opinion though.

Yeah, except the left does support participation trophies, so no cognitive dissonance here. Unless you're refining your thought and now want to do that.
They don't commemorate shit, they were mostly made in response to the civil rights movement to preserve some "I may be a hick but at least I'm not black" pride

this
to admit fault at this point would be crazy

Compare the outcray of liberals over the bakery vs godaddy and it is obvious the vast majority of liberals support godaddy.

if all niggers, libshits, womyn, and other garbage get their statues removed and aren't protected class anymore then by all means remove confederate statues.

since losers are protected by liberals then the statues should stay

Are you seriously asking me to explain my point of view?

And it's to remember the dead. The regular grunt who stood in the Line, fighting for what he believed in.

>except the left does support participation trophies
you're mentally ill and should be euthanized. the entire left platform is allowing garbage and subhumans like you get spots you don't deserve at the expense of your superiors, progress, and society

No, we know what your point of view is, and conveying how stupid you are for having it.

weakest raid yet

Literally what I said, retard. I was showing how you aren't proving a point to the left, because what you said doesn't contradict their values.

I'm a lefty and I don't agree with forcing bakeries to bake cakes for anyone. But if people wanna shame them on social media or boycott them, have at it.

I'm an American living in Korea, nice try though

>aren't we all equal?
Yes. Private entities are not allowed to discriminate on the basis of race, sex, orientation, etc. Racism is not covered.

they are mentally ill, just like all liberals

They are amoral (not immoral), look into postmodernism
youtube.com/watch?v=oyzSrtr6oJE

ELBOW FROM THE SKY!

Sexual orientation is not a protecredclass you dolt

This, we're not all SJW cucks the same way not all of you fuck your sisters.

Didn't you follow the 2016 democratic primaries?

There are 2 types of liberals: ultra high IQ, urban Hillary voters and low-IQ, rural and suburban Bernie supporters.

Oregon was a Bernie state.

Let's see if I can break this down

People are born black
People are born gay
People are NOT born racist
and that's why Ideology is not a protected class

But luckily for Sup Forums people ARE born totally fucking retarded, so you're all safe

Religion is basically ideology + stupid fairy tales.

Hear hear, my brother. Though I'm sympathetic to most lefty causes, some of the SJW shit I see posted on FB from my virtue-signaling friends sometimes awakens the Pepe in me. If only a little bit.

You shouldnt be a protected class cause u stick your meat in a guys ass

It would fall under the "sex" category. Not to mention its generally accepted that being a homosexual isn't as much of a choice as being racist.

It's easy. Republicans are stupid and/or evil. Majority of the civilized world is sliding away from their antiquated view points. Hopefully Mexicans, robots, and self driving cars replace every one of you.

how is "punch a nazi" not hate speach?

Fair point
Excellent point. Checked.

Privilege is the black box that solves this problem for them, OP.

If (((they))) say you have more privilege (the criteria is always evolving and intentionally arbitrary, so everything is always uncertain, and the weak are eager to please and avoid breaking the rules), get ready to get bent.

Unfortunately, this user is correct

"Under Federal law, employers generally cannot discriminate against employees on the basis of:

Race[1]
Sex[1][2]
Pregnancy[3]
Religion[1]
National origin[1]
Disability (physical or mental, including SOUP[disambiguation needed][citation needed] status)[4][5]
Age (for workers over 40)[6]
Military service or affiliation[7]
Bankruptcy or bad debts[8]
Genetic information[9]
Citizenship status (for citizens, permanent residents, temporary residents, refugees, and asylees)"


Only certain states protect people based on orientation.

Basically in any state that voted for Trump, it's legal to fire a man for kissing another man

>People are NOT born racist

Wrong. Search "infant in-group preference"

so, some people are more equal than others is that what you're saying?
>private entities are not allowed to discriminate
but it's that ok? should they be forced to do what the government says? do people don't have rights and believes, are they slaves to the political system?
what about the other way around, by using your principles, if a black person owns a business and a literal kkk member enters the building and it's about to make a purchase but then he sees who's in charge and leaves after saying he doesn't support niggers, should the black person file a complaint about the customer not buying their product and then be forced by the government to do it?

It probably is. But nazis want to infringe on people's rights based on ethnicity, so fuck them.

It's ok to kill killers. It's ok to bully bullies. You're the bad guy to normal people. Not everyone has extremist opinions

so now you're the bully. is it ok to kill you now?

>but it's that ok?
It literally doesn't matter, because every single private entity ensures they can fire for any unspecified reason.

>people are not born racist
fuck off, we're all racist, it's in our nature, but we are more tolerant
who decides who's a protected class, why are white people not a protected class then

if we're all equal there should not be protected classes, everyone decides what's good for them, if someone is racist or do something wrong, the people around them would dissaprove their actions, same with corporations

so, christians and tech companies, white supremacist, faggots, mexicans, fucking chinks and their disguised rat food have the right to decide who uses their services, the people around them will decide if what they did is good or wrong

I'm an American child care worker working for an International school in Korea, I know all about that, and I also know it's due to exposure. An newborn doesn't even know what it's own skin color is. If a newborn is raised in a household and only exposed to 1 skin color, a change in color MIGHT be frightening to them until they grow used to it. But they still aren't BORN with that fear.

Anything new is frightening. I have one little girl who is terrified of a video of Hickory Dickory Dock, but I wouldn't say she's racist against clocks. She's afraid of the change in tone and cadance from her other songs. Children fear change.

Korea is a very homogeneous society, so many babies never see a white person before they meet me. 3 and 4 year olds can find it disorienting at first but rarely are they scared by me looking different.
But the 2 year olds don't even notice and call me "Appa" (which means Father) because they are so limited in exposure to other humans, that they think "Father" must be the name of any large male.

TLDR: No, Children are not BORN racist, even in one of the most racist countries in the world.

The whole eye for an eye thing stops taking eyes when justice is served. We don't kill executions. Or shoot people who stopped a home invasion. That's incredibly dumb argument you're making.

and it's their right to do so if you agreed to their terms of the contract

turnabout is fair play boyyyeeeee

t.Flavor Flav

Wasn't trying to deny that, if that's what you're thinking.

I'm not about to statues it's a part of America the first step the dictators and totalitarians always take is to erase history so they can replace it with their own State ideology

No contradiction there. Ideology is a choice, being gay isn't.

But the left keeps calling people Nazis who are not literal national socialists who want to execute blacks and other scourge and expel jews.

pretty sure christians don't have a monopoly on bakeries, faggots can get their cakes from someone else, same with the white supremacists, racists or whatever they can move around to another service

I see. forgive me I had no idea your cause was so righteous and your intent so pure. truly we are blessed to have level headed and totally not insane people such as yourself guiding this country. where would we be without the selfless and forward thinking of the tolerant left? I shudder to imagine.

I'd say "we still have history books"....but then I remembered that we're talking about the South and it all makes sense...

...are the statues literally the only historical records left down there? Are there any books that aren't bibles that haven't been burned? If so this argument makes a lot more sense all of a sudden

Nope.

left can't meme.

Since when is a government forcing people to do X a "liberal" position?

It's authoritarian in nature.

Where's your proof for the Bible?

Not on a mission to anything but answer someone's question. Next time post it on Yahoo answers. This board's for smart people and nazis, neither is which resort to sarcasm

And racists can get their social media somewhere else. So what's the problem then?

>losers shouldn't get participation trophies
>blacks deserve affirmative action hiring

That was actually pretty funny to be a poor sport

> lefty memes
god theyre horrid lol

american liberals are authoritarians, they want to force you to pay for someone else expenses, they want to force you to do as they say, they want to to impose rules to you so everyone is "safe"
american liberals just want to be liberal with your wallet

You can't figure this out on your own?

Yes, people and businesses must do what the government tells them to do, but people have representation, so they can control what the government tells them to do. That's not slavery.

As for the other part, no. How is that supposed to be hard to answer?

you're mixing your ideologies
the first is something stated by the right
the second is something stated by the left
there's no cognitive dissonance when it's literally 2 different groups' stances

that would be like

>hates gun ownership
>supports second ammendment

you're talking about 2 different people at that point

thanks for the invite but imma pass, think ill stay here and stare at my monitor in awe of the hubris of leftists.

if thats alright with you of course....

When america becomes brazil, then they will learn. They are too prosperous and sheltered not to develop a simplistic point of view.

>they want to to impose rules to you so everyone is "safe"

oh you mean like how the TSA screenings, the travel laws, the Patriot Act, the domestic surveillance, the Stop-and-Frisk, the War on Drugs, the screenings of refugees and on and on and on are all rules and laws and restrictions imposed on Americans to keep them safe from terrorists and criminals?

Oh wait....those are what the Conservatives want too...

This isn't contradictory. Typical sub 60 IQ liberal mistake.

I thought you were saying there's no contradiction, what if the white nationalist is a faggot, is he protected now? who's more equal, the faggot, the white nationalist, or the faggot white nationalist
how's that representation working out? how's that "new" system where government tells you what to do working out? america was built on the principle of freedom, now we see people like you defending this system where 51% of people decide what the other 49% must do
my question was, is that ok for the government to do? you say yes, so you're not in charge of your own person, you belong to the government, you are doing what they say or what the other 51% of people say, you want to put a lemonade stand in front of your house, well too bad you can't you need a fill some paperwork, then you should follow some regulations and after half a week maybe you can, you want to plant a tree in your property? well too bad you can't cause that kind of tree you want is illegal, you and your neighbors decided long ago to put a monument honoring your ancestors, well too bad you have to take it down now cause the neighbors don't like it and they're the 51% now

>thinking i'm a cuckservative
fuck them too