ITT: Seemingly easy concepts Sup Forums can't get their heads around

ITT: Seemingly easy concepts Sup Forums can't get their heads around.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E
youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

1/10 you tried

>Sir Karl Raimund Poppe(28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) was an Austrian Jewish-British philosopher
every
fucking
time

>says a flag that is LITERALLY "if you aren't with us you are against us"

You can have responsible intolerance and exploitive intolerance

there is a difference between tolerance and acceptance

and if you believe in the retarded concept in the picture you cant really speak out against hate itself, youre just as hateful as anyone you accuse of hate

based (((sir karl popper))) telling us we need to start crushing antifa and BLM skulls

so you're saying we should ban islam

o.o the jew part is missing in the german article
makes you wonder

>this

You fucking moron

It's not easy when you add the liberal "paradox of the paradox of tolerance" when tolerating intolerance doesn't apply to muslims or blacks or anything non-white. How does that even work?

>will eventually be seized and destroyed by the intolerant

i think we're in this stage. the intolerant still have a long way to go i believe. they have become mainstream, and soon will become dominant soon. scary times ahead.

Paradox? It's more like a fallacy.
>in order not to fall victim to intolerance we have to be intolerant
?????

The paradox of tolerance only exists in the first place because tolerance is so retarded that it doesn't make any logical sense. The paradox isn't a problem that needs to be solved. Rather, the paradox proves that the concept of tolerance is logically flawed. Trying to hold on to this silly, idealistic concept through workarounds amounts to nothing more than stubborn refusal to admit you're wrong.

>1 post by the COCKSUCKING FAGGOT

S A G E

wtf did i just read
saved

>pedo flag
I am intolerant of pedos

oh yes pls make this a meme
this will be the self destruction of this movement

>o.o
Neck yourself, redditfag.

Muslims and the west in a nutshell

Tolerance is such a shit non-virtue that it has to be broken to be enforced, proving that it is worthless. Anybody who advocates this is simply a hypocrite and self-deluded who wants to get away with being intolerant whilst claiming in true Orwellian fashion that their acts of intolerance are actually acts of tolerance.

My coincidence detector is broken. Is the site with the list down?

I know right? I always wonder why the Jews always have to succeed in everything? This subhuman filth has made way too many positive contributions to the world. Where the white people at

This makes no sense. Being intolerant of intolerance is effectively being the most intolerant possible, since every single group of people is intolerant to some degree; therefore, Karl Popper's society would have to reject every political group in existence, including itself.

I agree, Muslims and communists should be hanged right next to the nazis
I'm sure they would willingly sacrifice themselves for the white future that would result

...

1) Karl Popper is a kike
2) Who gets to decide what "intolerance" is? I see a lot of "intolerant" views and hatred toward white people, but that's apparently okay

The way I see it, shitskins and jews are intolerant of whites. And therefore, the only way to fix this - the final solution, if you will - is to get rid of all shitskins and jews who, so that we may have tolerance

Churches are full of cucks who bring in illegals and refugees.

It doesn't suggest anything other than that 'tolerance' is perhaps a too general term. The philosophy behind it is perfectly reasonable.

Tolerance is literally just cowardice. That's all it is. There's no reason you should tolerate bad things happening to you and the things you care about unless you're a weak and spineless coward.

>muh paradox

There is no fucking paradox. There's no imperative to be courteous to the discourteous. Why should there be?

Nazism, by it's core believes, is hostile to vast categories of people and does not respect the basic tenets of democratic society, nor does it acknowledge any set of human rights. There is literally zero virtue in being tolerant of that kind of ideology.

I already fucking knew before clicking on the thread that this would be the case. Really makes us think...

SO WE ARE ALL DEPRESSED HERE???

>these wiki screenshots are a good idea

>muh virtue

...

Jesus is my homeboy, and Jesus DID NOT tolerate lying, stealing Kikes

Op is retarded. Nobody here thinks tolerance is the supreme value; it you shitlibs who think that. Thus you are the ones subject to Popper's criticism. Popper is pointing out that your own commitment to tolerance requires you to be intolerant. In your breathtaking stupidity, you miss his point completely and fail to recognize the incoherence of your own value system. Typical low iq shitlib.

hmmmm really activated my almond

That's exactly why we should ban islam as a whole, as well as judaic tribalism and degenerative ideologies like gay rights and transgenders.

"Intolerant of intolerance" in this context means exactly this. Get over it faggot, science says you and your shitskin pals must be excluded from society.

>alt-right millenials do ethics

Virtue as a concept existed for thousands of years before your latest shitposting meme. Get off my fucking lawn, you punk.

who gets to decide who is intolerant then? Do you think that people like christians who are okay on their own, are intolerant and want to remove your stuff? Why is it that if they are left alone the only thing that they do is respect freedom of speech, but dont want to bake cakes for fags and the jews have to be the ones who are intolerant and punish them with laws?

Maybe the ones who are intolerant are not the fascists and nazi's. Maybe its just you liberals who decided to censor and remove everyone when society was at peace.

We understand it. You don't.
The PARADOX of tolerance clearly states that maintaining tolerance is impossible. Therefore, the Left cannot claim to be tolerant when they are clearly not.

>muh virute

That's because they're communists, and are acting in a typical communist fashion. Remember that ultra-nationalists only really began sprouting up across Europe as a response to combat the communists.

>Maybe the ones who are intolerant are not the fascists and nazi's. Maybe its just you liberals

Topkek. Are there really people who unironically believe this, and not in an "I know you are but what am I" kind of way?

That's the most rerarded concept I ever heard. Not that he's wrong, but the fact you make knowledge tgat obvious into a philosophical term is just declaring bankrupcy on your philosophical career.

Try replacibg the word tolerance with evil and see what Harry Potter level he's working on.

I don't think he's an idiot, the fallibism was a good conception, but this is retarded.

>muh nihilism-signalling
>muh vice-signalling

Much better? Still a good little drone, but now an evil one.

George Soros' PhD was earned under Karl Popper.

sure i never even visited reddit but hey
sperglord

The christians that came to the US were okay with the laws and were bitching about things like freedom of speech, and its absolute use.

It is only you lefties and you jews who started to go on the path of censorship of others. And started to fight the first amendment in court. The fact of the matter is that intolerance has a very short halflife that worked well with absolute freedom of speech in the past.

It is only when you other foreigners came into the nation and wanted special treatment you didnt like the fact that the shit you spew to others, could be thrown back at you.

werent*

Which is exactly why you don't let shitskins in from the 3rd world

That's very convenient especially when you decide to define "intolerance" as "anything I don't want to tolerate". And in a society that can redefine binary concepts such as "gender" to mean "64 variations of made up bullshit plus an attack helicopter" redefining a word like "intolerance" is as easy as spray painting a misshapen swastika on your own fucking front door you shitsucking fuckfaced cockmongling autorectal stretching practitioning absolutely degenerate utterly pernicious yid

>It is only you lefties and you jews who started to go on the path of censorship of others.

Said on a board that post daily fantasies of throwing people with different opinions out of helicopters and lynching them on DotR. I hope you're meming because if you're not, Sup Forums did a job on you.

Liberals have literally only accepted limitations to freedom of speech in cases that is clearly bordering on incitement to commit crimes.

"Gas the kikes, racewar nao" is a fun meme, but if people ever started acting on it then it changes character to something else. Something which shouldnt actually be protected.

>That's very convenient especially when you decide to define "intolerance" as "anything I don't want to tolerate".

It's not that complicated really. I dont have to be polite to you if you've already been rude to me. Tolerance works exactly the same way. I know this is hard for intolerant people to accept, them always being the instigators, but that's how it works.

Call obvious and insurmountable flaw in your retarded ideology as a paradox - well that'll do it no everything is fine again

who do you think murdered a cool 100 million in the last century? It wasnt fascists, or natsoc guys. It was you commies all the way. WE are the ones who are pre maturely marching against your murderous intolerance. Maybe if you didnt persecute people like the christians for gay cakes, or show violence towards businesses and lots of other things on a daily basis, we wouldnt be like this. We just wanted to play video games you know. Most of us who descended down this path did so because you people always fucking attacked us everywhere for reasons that we now learned about.

You guys started this and we intend to finish it in blood. Lots of yours this time.

FUCK WHITE PEOPLE

I'm not a commie. I'm a progressive, believing in democracy and human rights. I want neither communism or white supremacy as both tend to get people killed and tend to destroy the nice and safe world you and me grew up in and which I would prefer my children grew up in too.

Brainwashing yourself into thinking that everyone who disagrees with you is a communist is your way of rationalizing that it is ok for you to be a supporter of monstrous ideas.

pretty simple actually

It's all because of the holocaust.
There's a famous saying about racism and the holocaust:

First they came for the peepee, but I said nothing.
Then they can for the poopoo, but again I said nothing
Then they came for the cummies, and still I said nothing
Then they came for my own sweet yummy doodoo buttfarts and reggae CDs, and nobody was left to say anything on my behalf

Got it?!

Tolerance means you put up with something not that you like it, approve of it, or condone it. You tolerate it just like you tolerate the pain of a flu shot or tolerate some fat person standing in the grocery line complaining about how her coupon for hot pockets should apply to the package of toaster strudel she is trying to use it on.

Yet you side with them, even a centrist does for most of his stuff. You are uneducated, ignorant on history and generally a threat to your own people in your state. You know nothing of the past struggles, nothing of the interplay between different groups. Nothing of the religious zealotry of others. You are nothing, just a fart in the wind who thinks that because some jew lore given to you by the media, enables you to have a voice.

youtube.com/watch?v=ca8CpIFb0_E

is a small example of the vast historical evidence that history has to offer. And who the driving forces are. Do you even know anything of bell curves, races and other cool things? Do you know why civilizations fall and rise? Do you know the bio evolutionary principles behind it?

youtube.com/watch?v=W8N3FF_3KvU

Again, its good that newfags like you come here to get educated, but you are an ant. The accumulated knowledge that we have here dwarfs you by several years in education.

He's right, tolerance is a vice, not a virtue

>I'm not a commie. I'm a progressive
Just another word for commie mate, what you don't understand is that you don't understand what you believe

>implying that anyone cares about tolerance
I want a white society not a tolerant one. Honestly I don't know why anyone every got the idea that tolerance is important at all.

You're a communist.

Extremist lefties doxing attacking and generally being fucks.
You're right the right has been too tolerant for too long with these intolerant cunts and should gas them all.
Have a nice day.

>Fox
>left of Trump
No

>implying "antifas" fascists are not as hateful as "profas" fascists

(((decision theory))) hmm bait nigger, why didnt thee post some nigger shit about (((critical race theory))).

"Austrian Jewish-British"
Nigger W E W LaD

>Presupposes that tolerance is a societal virtue.
>Oh look, a paradox!

No shit. Paradoxes tend to arise when you start from false premises.

But the left is intolerant of the right and the right is intolerant of the left doesn't this mean that they are both right and wrong at the same time?

>be intolerant towards intolerant
>get killed by the tolerant

No, I'm not fucking siding with Communists. Commies want the dictatorship of the Proletariat. I dont want the dictatorship of the Proletariat. Commies dont believe in democracy. I do believe in democracy, and individual rights, including property rights.

I'm only siding with commies in your head so you can go on being a retarded nazi.

Can you meme so hard you actually start believing it? Been wondering since 2004...

Paradoxes arent possible within the conditional parameters of neurolinguistic multitudinal social mechanisms.

t. Man who is smarter than Karl.

Tldr
>You have to fight your enemy

10/10 concept, totally smells of peace and tolerance

>If you tolerate intolerance, then the group spreading that intolerance will grow powerful and remove any tolerance

Is he assuming that people are pre-disposed to support intolerant groups? Doesn't that mean tolerance is unwanted by the people, and forcing tolerance down people who don't want is intolerant?

Did he paradox himself with that paradox?

>I do believe in democracy

too bad that your nation is not that, its a republic. Democracy was a construct made by the jew. Again, you are just some uneducated low IQ fag. srsly, how do you even dare to post here. Last reply. Go kill yourself or whatever.

>Extremist lefties doxing attacking and generally being fucks.
>doxxing is bad
>online harassment is bad
>t. alt right user

Sweetie...

Representative form of government then, you autistic cuck. Have fun playing with your ball at home. Don't pretend you're just meming, I know you're not.

I'm seeing this term pushed by my lefty friends on fb, I wonder where it's coming from...

As far as "who decides", the answer is whatever virtue signalising is in vogue at the time. Right now, it's not tolerating nazis or confederates. You'd be skewered for suggesting we not tolerate Islam.

Ha, I'm going to post that next time I see the original.

Fucking (((anglo)))

>You'd be skewered for suggesting we not tolerate Islam.
But everyone would agree with you if you suggested we not tolerate IS. Both of which makes perfect sense.

Ironically Karl Popper was a radical libertarian and would have never approved of antifa existing much less 99% of the modern US state services or laws like welfare

tolerance is for lil baby and stupid niggrz

how the fuck did jews invent the construct of democracy? In their entire history they were never a democracy. The ancient greeks had the purest form of democracy we know of.

When tolerance is not a goal in itself but only a mean or an effect of indifference about certain questions, there is no paradox.

GOD BLESS THE USA
GOD BLESS THE CONSTITUTION
GOD BLESS THE FIRST AMENDMENT

IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT GTFO

then why are muslims and their shit tolerated?

Conflict is inevitable between groups. What should be worked against is the formation of minority groups inside a nation. Then there can be no intolerance between groups.

i agree,when we kicking out the muslims then?

tolerating intolerance doesnt make you tolerant,it makes you a coward

...

karl popper is a faggot

>Intolerance, violence, and hatred is ok when MY group does it
The actual shame is AIDS will probably kill you before I do

You convinced me. I won't tolerate your NAP.