Daily Stormer kicked off .lol

New thread as previous one hit bump limit:

So, after being kicked off .com, .ru, and .wang the Daily Stormer has now been kicked off .lol

Link to Andrew Anglin's gab account below and copy of his post on the matter.

This is essentially going against the principle of free speech by denying them a platform.

They are still on the Tor network (dark net) at dstormer6em3i4km.onion/ although the degenerates at Tor even signalled against them, despite never having said anything against the pedos and criminals that make up most of the dark web. Apparently being a white nationalist is worse than being a pedophile now.

This is peak clown world.

gab.ai/AndrewAnglin

Andrew's recent post:

>Welp.

>Namecheap folded.

>They took a satirical quote as an excuse, literally meaning the opposite of what they implied it meant.

blog.namecheap.com/inciting-violence-vs-fr...

>It looks like for the time being, we need a longer term darknet solution.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=fY5pmzmiDO8
youtu.be/-7j9fSkZfYU
123.45.67.89
nearlyfreespeech.net/services/domains
youtube.com/watch?v=cpfLmQZQvRE
youtube.com/watch?v=9ZrAYxWPN6c
youtube.com/watch?v=fUis9yny_lI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

stormfags btfo

Cuck, nigger, chink or Jew? Which are you?

inb4 "ITS A PRIVATE CORPORATION SO IT'S TOTALLY OKAY, GOY"

youtube.com/watch?v=fY5pmzmiDO8

White German/Irish not in the victim mindset. I don't need my skin to give me a sense of identity.

>I don't need my skin to give me a sense of identity.
Great man I'm glad you don't give a shit about your culture your family or your people.

>race is skin deep
nice meme

Ah ok, cuck then. Got it

You're such a cool guy, user. I wish I were as cool as you are right now. Please mail me some DVDs of interracial cuckold porn (the "intellectual fetish" for cool guys such as ourselves) and a size XL buttplug with detachable furry tail.

>dailystormer
>stormfags

As a libertarian this upsets me and makes me want to kill lefties

youre not german or irish or white, youre a cuck

>muh master race
>muh tiki torches
>muh senpai Richard Spencer
>We wuz aryan gods
You're movement is just as shit as BLM. The majority of Americans will never take your side because you constantly embarrass yourselves in public. You infect every movement you latch onto with a cancer that taints its potential popularity. Trump was your chance to at least keep your culture intact but you blew it when dipshits showed up to rallies in MAGA hats heiling Hitler and carrying shields with WN symbols.

Systems are irrelevant. People are the depository of culture, and it's only through continued belief in a system that the system keeps functioning. To know what happened here, we have to look at the people and not the system.

8 days ago, Cloudflare was unconditionally behind free speech. Today, they are conditionally behind free speech, having arbitrarily decided that TDS is worse than literally all their other clients. More and more registrars have dropped TDS.

A strong signal is being sent here: that it is acceptable for crucial infrastructure services to suppress political speech. Now, anyone who supplies technological services to TDS (or TRS, or vdare, or radix, and maybe if the pendulum swings back the daily kos and blm) will find it a little harder to make the free speech argument, because hey, Cloudflare kicked that Andrew guy off. We're not watching a system at work, we're watching a group of people gradually deciding that the opposing side is to be oppressed rather than argued against.

Yes, it is up to a handful of rootless cosmopolitans. The difference is, 8 days ago those cosmopolitans were a little closer to impartial, a little less on the side of the left.

The libertarianism here is more of a personality trait than a complete moral system.

They should use more than one...and why not just use an IP. Not a hostname.

They're not smart. Use an IP and let (many) others use a subdomain or buy a domain and redirect to their IP.

Redirects are not regulated and can be infinite in amount of sources.
Stormfront.1.mysite.com
Stormfront.2.mysite.com
stormfront3.mysite.com
stormfrontA.mysite.com
stormfrontB.mysite.com
Literally unlimited.
youtu.be/-7j9fSkZfYU

I just solved their problem.

Someone email them this, I can't be arsed.

Oh...
FUCK ZOG. God hates fags desecrates the dead nonstop... They're online.

PS. The alt tech revolution has begun.

The revolution will not be televised....but it will be livestreamed.

Not only will we create alt tech...alt banking and alt universities

Alt schools

Then...we may just have alt EVERY THING

Anglin is literally the Canary in the coalmine.

And it just fucking died.

Silicon valley will not be our new overlords.

Could this be a marketing strategy by the DS?

Doubt it, but the Streisand Effect (and banning in general) always helps drive traffic onto whatever is being banned. People naturally want to see for themselves.

>This is essentially going against the principle of free speech by denying them a platform.

It isn't though, since the Jews are the ones doing it instead of the government.

Still unfortunate that they can't have a TLD and a decent host, just because their shitty site hurts people's feelings.

How hard is it to become a name registrar, really? I am seeing $4,000 quoted as startup costs.
Obviously I, a bong, could not do this. But why is a free speech registrar based in the US not feasible? We could all donate to set it up.

It'll take a few more sites to go down (which they will, now the precedent is set), but eventually it'll happen.

we should make its own domain registrar

I never even visited The Daily Stormer until this censorship started. Now I think it's pretty funny an worth checking out from time to time.

Gotta love the Streisand effect, goys!

>Streisand effect
Exactly, and Andrew Anglin has become the canary in the coal mine, because if he doesn't have freedom of speech, *I* don't have freedom of speech.

>streisand effect
>inaccessible site
This isnt working

Why wait? We should do this now.

Electronic Frontier Foundation

stop speaking of this trash heap as a martyr of free speech. he's no more a martyr of free speech than an islamic extremist is a martyr of religion.

why dont they just 123.45.67.89

link

Regardless of what he says, his speech must be protected as long as it doesn't put anyone in immediate danger (see Brandenburg v. Ohio), naturally freedom of speech isn't to protect politically correct speech but politically incorrect speech, because you're on Sup Forums I assume you see the value in us having a place to discuss un-PC topics. Anglin is hilarious btw.

oy vey, shut it down

great article on there how tucows refuses to host the dailystormer, but does host pedo site nambla

>Regardless of what he says, his speech must be protected
His speech is protected. It is protected from government interference, not private companies. Which is why your right to protest doesn't extend to shopping malls.

See Center v. Robins

They refuse to be a DNS registrar. It's not the same thing as a host.

I thought it certainly was when they went with Google after GoDaddy dropped them. But, at this point, they are almost assuredly being deplatformed against their will.

cuck boy

His speech is not protected. Coming out as gay is protected. Your boss can't fire you and Google can't boot you. This is not protected

They could try nearlyfreespeech.net/services/domains
If that doesn't work, then zeronet.

We need to start putting together a list of other sites like NAMBLA that these places are happily hosting.

Literally Nazis btfo. Go home

This

"Please send shekels so I can continue larping as a nazi"

When will nazis realize nobody wants them. You lost. Please go away.

Yes, I can say whatever I want on public land for example. However, the government has become so "involved" in the economy that it has gotten sneaky ways of coercing companies. The reason that companies cuck out to SJWs is because they're afraid of real, economic ramifications. For example, I worked for a company that went to the expensive of converting a ladies' room to an all-gender restroom in the midst of laying off thousands of employees, very suspicious. So I'm afraid that we're up against more than free companies in a free market making rational decisions. You see my point?

Ohhh noooooo

If they buy a domain to redirect to the ip it gets shoa'ed that's the issue. And I'm pretty sure you can only have one registrar for each address.

Weev is really good with this stuff and he deals with all the tech stuff there, so if it's anything obvious he would have thought of it.

he isn't employed by anyone he wishes to have a platform on. I thought you were all patriots? what happened to "you shouldn't have to bake a cake for a queer if you don't want to?" but now because it's your nazi buddy you've gone all SJW.

youtube.com/watch?v=cpfLmQZQvRE

Political speech is the most highly protected speech in the Western World.

The situation is much more dire than you think.

No need to register it, it's a subdomain. It's a folder in your domain with a redirect code to the IP.

Regulatory not involved

>Redirects are not regulated and can be infinite in amount of sources.
then they probably just get mysite.com dropped, and no subdomains work without the main domain

they are a host for NS(name service) queiries, it's a form of hosting

treu, but how do we find them?

This how I feel about niggers lol

...

The key would to crowdsource it...ask people to make a subdomain for you.

Yeah, but if the domain it is a part of gets shut down then all sub domains are also shut down.

Sure....it's a protest. Are they going to deplatform every one.

It's a statement

SSPX Latin mass communities already have their own schools

Aren't they also hosting Islamic extremists?

I don't think that's compatible with ddos protection. the protection is a form of filtering proxy that intercepts dns queries and supplies it's own nearest proxy to teh web client, who then connects to the proxy instead of the real ip

Why was he banned? Wrong think? Why shouldn't I have to bake a cake for fags? Because I don't want to go to hell

Yes, see

I don't see what's stopping them from seizing/dropping any domains that link to tds

That's what I'll saying. It's a complete double standard for anything pro white

agree. that would be something peopel can do instead of going into tor, which they are not going to do.

anchor tag with their site name but just go directly to the IP address

>they are a host for NS(name service) queiries, it's a form of hosting
No, they refuse to be a registrar. Running name servers is not a problem, literally anyone can google "how 2 use bind". However, you need to be an ICANN-accredited registrar to delegate authority.

I hope they do. It's a tarp.

The first amendment only guarantees freedom from government censorship. It does not mean that corporations have to host your ip.

The spirit of the 1st A is to allow speech even if you disagree.

That's our culture.

It's not legal argument , it's a political one.

what of the glue records?

I can't see the point really, just got up though, maybe I'm being retarded

Get use to it. We're going to put you back under your rocks.

is it ok to refuse electricity, telephone or water services because they don't like you? you know, cos it's not the goc doing it, and private corps can do what they like?

But we are talking about monopolies collaborating to suppress one specific person. It's unheard off

Would be a PR nightmare for them.

Absolutely a double standard. Get use to it Nazis.

>Why was he banned?
because it's a private company and they can do what the fuck they want? Isn't that what the argument for having a platform on their service is? that you have the right to do wtf you want? muh first amendment? well you can't do wtf you want on/with other peoples stuff.

youtube.com/watch?v=9ZrAYxWPN6c

A leaf

what of this

LMAO all these hurt feeling
>what am I if not just white?
that's a sad existence fampai

It's not a legal argument.

It's a question of our culture and values.

The 1st A shouldn't be interpreted to start regulating private businesses....that's not to say the Values or the Morality of the 1st A doesn't apply.

Let the battle of ideas flow freely...even from dumbasses you disagree with.

Yes we know that, Bong.

Go back to getting your doors kicked I for Twitter posts in Bongland

that's not answering my question

Expressing your opinions is not a requirement to survive like water.

Degrees

It is in a democracy

neither is electricity

Ok...How many days can you go with out shitposting before you die?

youtube.com/watch?v=fUis9yny_lI

It's not a bad idea. We should start spreading the idea, but I think we'd need a couple more people purged before we could raise the money needed; I suspect it would be more than 4k.

Not many. I hope it's never tested

His speech was protected since 1789. But to protect your rights these days takes a lawsuit.

Notice since just the late 1990s we have been pressured into willingly giving up our free speech socially.
I remember like Cassandra. One day out of the blue there were memos coming down and people sent to seminars to learn how to be politically correct. Social support of, and RESPECT for 1A was no longer the acceptable paradigm. Ethnic jokes disappeared overnight. Mandatory diversity classes were drafted for every course curriculum. The administration said the new policies were to make for a more inclusive campus, but everyone quickly realized their job would be on the line.

Do you get what Im saying? Before that milestone, the First Amendment was socially respected, supported and protected. If you said something someone didn't like and they complained to your boss, your boss just shrugged and said 'Its a free country. They're a good worker. Go back to work'. Enforcement of the Freedom of Speech was on society, but society did their job to uphold it..

And that's how the globalist-communist-anarchist cabal has gotten in. Free speech is no longer canon; P.C. is. Its not 'his abrasive personality' where Trump was showing us how to reclaim our right to speak freely. There are more and more young people raised to see 'hate speech' as a criminal exception to the 1st A. They not only have willingly thrown their own basic civil rights to the wolves, but like Mao's Red Guard, intend to punish you if you violate the new regime. We could have won over the globalist-communist-anarchist, Soros-funded cabal. But can the Constitution withstand its own citizens trying to get rid of it out of their stupidity and lack of foresight after a decade of indoctrination? Not forever.

I respect what DS has to say. As a website among millions, it has helped me understand the world a lot. Maybe they should sue these companies into the dust, and/or get on zeronet or aspire to become a registrar. The alt-right definitely needs a registrar and donations systems. Hail Victory!

>because it's a private company and they can do what the fuck they want?

so the private utility company can just cut off your electricity or gas or water if they dont' like what you say? they have a right to not do business with you?

You sound like a moly fan. Well said

Being a registrar puts you at the mercy of ICANN. If you host a lot of non pc domain names they could pull your accreditation, which would mean that all of the money that you spent (on the application, payroll, physical address, etc.) would go to waste - potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars. Check out the ICANN application sheet, they require you to have an existing company and a business plan.

They're fools if they think any significant percentage of their audience is going to surf the dark web to find them. They might retain 1% of their viewership

>There are more and more young people raised to see 'hate speech' as a criminal exception to the 1st A

yep. and they will keep moving that line further and further left. so everything is hate speech if it doesn't conform to what antifa is fighting for. your kids will all be trannies by then if you don't put up a fight

>But to protect your rights these days takes a lawsuit.

If he wanted to prove a point it would take a very expensive lawsuit based on an already established supreme court decision that competes with another already established supreme court decision and they would surely lose. If you're wondering what it is, it's that the supreme court have ruled that freedom of association is integral to the first amendment and the right to free speech but it competes with the right of a private individual and would surely lose. If whoever owns twitter wants hate speech on their platform then they can have it, but it's their business and if they don't want it then you can't force them.

Wouldn't work, if they handed out their IP they would be DDOS'd into oblivion. That's why Cloudflare cancelling their membership was such a big deal - it's essentially a monopoly and absolutely necessary for controversial sites.

>t. CIA

Your time will come faggot

>would go to waste - potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars.

dont' worry it will be crowdfunded so nobody will lose a lot of moeny

>you lost
>still here
>still putting fear in the hearts of bitches like you
>please go away
>please
not only are we not defeated, we have been vindicated and proven correct in the 75 years since