Proposed DNS workaround:

No, DNS turns your hostname (www.google.com) into one or more IP's that are authorized to represent that domain name.

the answer is REGULATION of the internet companies as the utilities and monopolies that they are

What's to stop a search engine from making that association?

300Kb/s is maybe acceptable in Australia, but not in the rest of the world.

Yes. And we can surely count on the integrity of politicians to stand up to their donors.

>proposed DNS workaround
>what is DNS?
>Why do we even need DNS anyway?

Basically it's a "I'm twelve and tor is cool, I have no idea how networking works and I could give a shit about the difference between class C and class A addresses, lul" thread.

Also

>We're making Jew-censored content ALREADY ON these networks more accessible.
>I want to view more jew material
>You're all nazi larpers

You're fucking retarded, get out of here with your stream of subconsciousness.

>captcha: stop sign

Jews control every aspect of the communications system.

If someone is trying to make a call they don't want to happen, it won't happen.

Nothing really, but a search engine isn't the best place. Think about how many domains your computer looks up per web page you visit. Trying to hit a google page to answer DNS queries is very costly. The DNS protocol is designed to provide that information as quickly and as minimally as possible.

Your http website can be megabytes, whereas a DNS response can be just tens of bytes. Do you think adding five orders of magnitudes to every DNS query is a good idea?

Bump

Fuck off kike. Nobody wants your kind here.