Brit/pol/ - Penda of Mercia edition

>Conservatives were just 533 votes from Commons majority
unvis.it/ft.com/content/07e75438-836d-11e7-a4ce-15b2513cb3ff

>UK General Election 2017: 1.8 million Scots votes 'wasted'
unvis.it/bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-40991615

>Quantitative easing is like heroin, says former Treasury official
unvis.it/theguardian.com/business/2017/aug/21/quantitative-easing-heroin-treasury-lord-macpherson-qe-financial-crash

>‘Scandal’ as £3.6bn handed to three firms
unvis.it/yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/scandal-as-3-6bn-handed-to-three-firms-1-8714156

>“It was like a religious ceremony”: What happened at Big Ben’s final bong?
unvis.it/newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/08/it-was-religious-ceremony-what-happened-big-ben-s-final-bong

>UK Supermarket ‘Sold Sausages and Ham Infected With Hepatitis’
unvis.it/novinite.com/articles/182502/UK Supermarket ‘Sold Sausages and Ham Infected With Hepatitis’

>Brexit: UK publishes more EU negotiation plans
unvis.it/bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-40997985

>Prince Charles's popularity slumps to new low ahead of anniversary of Diana's death
unvis.it/uk.news.yahoo.com/prince-charless-popularity-slumps-new-low-ahead-anniversary-dianas-death-103834088.html

>Tony Blair should be prosecuted over Iraq war, high court hears
unvis.it/theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/05/tony-blair-should-be-prosecuted-over-iraq-war-high-court-hears

Previous edition

Other urls found in this thread:

dropbox.com/sh/4by48e2cjy3ax4z/AADW5fTa8MP7lsuQJX1gUBHZa?dl=0
archive.is/P2dMe
archive.is/lVwfK
bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40999000
thetimes.co.uk/article/824e5b90-86ab-11e7-a8f3-117a3aea90d9
youtu.be/wWoE7aNaKHI
newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/08/it-was-religious-ceremony-what-happened-big-ben-s-final-bong
archive.is/dc0Jy
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

dropbox.com/sh/4by48e2cjy3ax4z/AADW5fTa8MP7lsuQJX1gUBHZa?dl=0

Daily reminder to hate Tony.

Hello.

No spiders this thread, please.

What he described, monarchism tinted with parliamentary democracy is what we have you mong. Giving the monarch its constitutional duties back, the entire point of having a balanced constitution in the first place, would only be of benefit. There's nothing fantasy about it.

The monarch currently has no right to exercise any of their powers.
If you think they do then you're blind.
I'd love for the queen to die and for Charles to just disband parliament, but they'd never let him do it.

>If you think they do then you're blind.
I just said the opposite and spend most of my time arguing this in this thread you complete mongloid. Your reading comprehension is embarrassing, as well as your presence in these threads. Reread what I said, applying even a wist of intellect and you may understand my point, I will re-iterate it in simpler terms.

The UK has what is known as a 'balanced constitution', where the various institutes check each others powers. Those being public assemblies and the Crown. From 1688-1850, the power of the Crown was reduced to nothing. First with the supremacy of parliament when they overthrew a monarch and invited two new monarchs to rule under their terms (Bill of Rights 1689). Through the Act of Settlement 1701, Queen Anne's refusal of Royal Assent, Act of Union 1707 and Queen Victoria dropping signing Royal Assent in person.

Nothing was changed though. Legally, the Queen still holds all Prerogative powers which allow refusal of law to dissolution of parliament to rule independent of parliament. It's both precedent and parliament's supremacy which questioned those rights.

I advocated for returning it.

why is Mari so based lads?

Monarchy started with a protectorate. A LEADER who you respected, supported and would protect you, or at least die trying. An example being King Harold.

This sounds fantastic. But what happens if the King is Mad? The Heir is a Woman? There is NO war because the Royalty realise some of them are disappearing? The Kings and Queens unify and decide they like the power just a little too much.

Jews, suggest Democracy, a system that cannot fail, as both sides are bought in to the corruption, and most politicians are only nominated if they can be blackmailed.

Gee, sounds like the basis for a good system. And death is assured if you criticize it. Marvellous.

Proper discussion. Much better than last thread.

Archived those links for you

archive.is/P2dMe
archive.is/lVwfK

>tfw you called me a cunt in the last thread

Not even sure why I'm responding to this. It sounds arrogant as fuck but it's honestly below me but let me start by saying that you're equating British monarchism (which is what all my opinions are centric to: Britain) with 20th century dictators and modern Prime Ministers hold more direct power than any king or queen in English history, arguably forever, but definitely since the 13th century.

On another note, the terms for removal of a Monarch were set out in the Rex v Rex trials that came after the English Civil War. The entire point of a balanced constitution is to check the power of both institutes, and to assure a ""mad king"" does not come to power, and if he does, his power is not so absolute that he can operate like the aforementioned 20th century dictators and be removed, if need be.

>muh jews

The Monarch has no power. Gee, if only there was a way we could get around that, presuming that your non-factual statement had any significance in reality anyway. Strange also how the Offshore banks are almost all Crown Territories.

Sorry, Senpai. Fresh wounds and related image.

>Not even sure why I'm responding to this. It sounds arrogant as fuck but it's honestly below me......
The best King I met was the last King of Thailand, you arrogant Fuck. The Queen drove past as I assembled my class, didn't wave, and scuttled off as fast as she could to unveil a plaque, and then get the Fuck way as fast as she could. Everyone in the class and school formed an opinion on that day.

>Muh Jews
Kindly explain the City Of London

What am I meant to respond to? You didn't even attempt to respond to my arguments.

>Kindly explain the City Of London
There's this I assume, which is sort of a response to what I said, but only one bit of it and taken out of context.

You said
>Jews, suggest Democracy
I said that's a ridiculous way of looking at it. To begin with, there are at least 30 variations of democracy in place in the world today, and ours, parliamentary, was originally answerable to the Crown through their Prerogative powers (which remain in place in theory).

>Muh Jews
L.G. Pine, Editor of Burke's Peerage, "the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual." He went on to say that for every Rothschild or Disraeli, there were "10 cases of Jewish connection which are now forgotten. The reason is that in many cases "Jewish origin is concealed."

>make argument about monarchy
>lose argument
>cherry pick 2-words out of a 3-paragraph argument that were irrelevant to the initial point and fixate it

How to win an argument 101. Fuck off. My point was that English parliamentary democracy wasn't born through Jewish influence but born through the Magna Carta (1215), the Provisions of Oxford (1258), the Provisions of Westminister (1259), the Statute of Marlborough (1267), Habeas Corpus Act (1679), the Bill of Rights (1689) and the Act of Settlement (1701).

>What am I meant to respond to? You didn't even attempt to respond to my arguments.
>>Kindly explain the City Of London
>There's this I assume, which is sort of a response to what I said, but only one bit of it and taken out of context.
>You said
The BBC has infiltrated your rational thought: that, or your schooling. Your arguments were what again? The Queen is useless. She did nothing for Rhodesia, and let the EU overcome Britain.......I could go on for a long time here, but I won't. What she did with Rhodesia alone is enough for her beheading.

Again, not a single argument relevant to the institute of the Crown, the concept of a balanced constitution or British monarchism. Stop telling me a load of rubbish, some of which I partly agree with, but simply to change the topic away from your original point that was badly written, badly thought out and you subsequently lost - which was about the institution of the Crown.

What the Monarchy was and is, are surely two different entities. I believe that we belong to Rome according to King John making England a papal fiefdom in 1213. Or do we? I'm not sure about your Argument 101 thesis.......I didn't run away. I'm still here. Perhaps our opinions are coming at things in different tangents, but to then say I won, Fuck Off, seems pretty desperate, and I have never seen this option in a live debate EVER. Good luck with that thought pattern in everyday life.

This isn't a debate which is why I evacuated it. We are speaking about mixed governments and British monarchism, you responded to none of my points and instead focused on 2 words "Muh Jews" I said with no context to it.

I'm going to sleep.

Sleep well. I did not fully understand your argument anyway. I agree that there are many forms of Democracy. My point was that they are all controlled, and give the impression of Democracy but is NOT Democracy. I think this country would have been a lot different if Edward VIII had remained on the throne, and for the better. Unfortunately (((Democracy))) got the better of him.

I woke up at 4-ish and everyone's gone to bed? Fuck sake, lads.

Not all, potty mouth.

I'm still here.

Good.

Is anything you want to talk about?

you're not fully there are you, you big Anime nonce? Or do you want to play Hitler Anime for a while?

Tabbed out of my Hoi4 game at the moment but fully here nonetheless.

Sure. It's a topic that has been done to death, but let's give it a shot. What do you think will happen with Brexit?

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-40999000

>those jokes

christ almighty

Never going to happen. It is as simple as Cameron wanting IN with selection and May wanting out with selective options. It is 1984 Double Think for 2017. The Government is cleverly employing NGOs in every capacity to establish links in a non-governmental way. LOL.

Personally, I am fairly certain that in the end we will secure a Norway-tier deal. The establishment (including the so-called "Conservatives") don't want to leave the EU properly.

In the end, it might anger Brexiteers, like myself, but it certainly won't cause a civil war or anything like that. Life will continue as normal and this country will slowly destroy itself.

Sit back and enjoy the show as we lower ourselves to Sweden's level in regards to immigration and diversity.

Sad, isn't it? I was foolish to enough to think this country has been saved on the day of the referendum results.

*had

Nice.

You have to remember The City still has clout. It is the harbour for most offshore tax, all aligned to the crown. There are trillions of play money in the system, and the system said IN. The reason most people voted was immigration, and this will mean non-Europeans now, as immigration is needed to support the ponzi schemes that need never-ending finances to survive. We have been played big time. You be the judge.

Fucking anonymongs letting the thread die again reee

Where the fuck is preuB by the way. I need to hear her talk about her car to get hard.

Do you own a pet kangaroo?

Morning, Colonial. Still loving britpol.xyx, great work. The less I have to look at outer/pol/ the better.

Britain saved yet?

No.

Soon as pubes at starts lad

car**

Might go back to bed after that autocorrect

Isn't she dead? Triplords seem to be endangered atm.

Think the same case for me that anonymongs were reporting our posts for off topic at the weekend hence 3 day temps

>our
...

WAKE UP BRITAIN WON'T SAVE ITSELF

Nonce.

No.

Yes.

Seriously consider suicide or transferring to a school that specialises in your unique brand of retardation, kid.

>Conservatives were just 533 from Commons majority
Nigger that reads as they only had 117 seats, assuming you know there are only 650 UK Commons seats. In reality they were 10/12 away from a majority government.

Learn to English faggot.

>European Investment Bank cuts off cash for British building projects due to Brexit
thetimes.co.uk/article/824e5b90-86ab-11e7-a8f3-117a3aea90d9

Also the biggest funder of social housing projects in the UK, whoops. Looks like we'll just have to build this year's council house ourselves then. We can just divert some of that £350 million from the NHS.

Cheers lad. Good morning back at ya.

Since when do you think Britain can be saved at all?

Forgot trip.

Since I watched a video of Enoch Powell jumping on a pogo stick through the British countryside on YouTube.

hmmmm.

youtu.be/wWoE7aNaKHI

>What happened at Big Ben’s final bong
There's something wrong with that link. This one works better newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2017/08/it-was-religious-ceremony-what-happened-big-ben-s-final-bong

Remember to archive
archive.is/dc0Jy

haha

i thought you thought Britain couldn't be saved?

meant for

See

Nice, another archiver. Good to see.

The clickthroughs from Sup Forums to these websites are completely irrelevant, I don't see why people care.

>S-sucked in The Guardian, my link archiving means you lose 0.2 pounds per day.

Archiving is to create a record in case they delete or edit it. Unvis.it is recommended to stop them getting as many clicks.

Pointless? I don't think so.

No-one outside of Sup Forums cares if they edit or delete a story, I fail to see how it gains anything meaningful in the long term personally. Feel free to disagree though, I'm not interested in debating it.

...

I pay the guardian 20p everytime I click on their site?
WTF I love Norbert now!

Ok mate.

...

What is this language?

You say some very suspicious things. You don't know how many people are lurking and clicking those links. Anything we can do to decrease their funding, anything we can do to decrease apparent interest in their stupid articles and curb their encouragement to write more of the same, we should do.

Archive and Unvis their links up, always.

>ex-gf cheated on me with her roommate
>Break up but a few weeks later my Benis feels weird
>12months on and my balls are getting more painful by the day
>Head of my Benis feels itchy

Just stay a virgin lads, now I'm worried it's given me a long term condition

You need to get yourself tested, long term sexually transmitted diseases can have a negative impact on your general health when left untreated.

Agreed, there's definitely something off about him now that I think about it

...

>le say controversial things because I've based my entire career on it lady
Sad.

...

How it looks .

How it feels.

>Wings Over Scotland blogger arrested over alleged harassment

Diane Abbott downloading the latest party line from Labour HQ. Pic related

>isis promises to take all muslims in europe back into their state
>in exchange the west must let the caliphate stretch across the whole muslim world from pakistan too morocco
>western armys must defend isis from any threats
Do you accept?

No, wipe them out. It can be easily done.

Yes, just let them spare Iran and the christians. Bonus if they take Israel

I'm loving the Trump-Afghanistan news, it's like the wool has been pulled from the yanks eyes and they finally realise what the rest of knew all along - Trump is a kike traitor like the rest. It certainly took them long enough.

Do you think they'll notice?

This is one of ((((((trumps))))))) few correct foreign policy decisions desu
You've seen what had happened to iraq after the americans left

> they finally realise
Not likely

Are you cunts leaving the EU already, or do you need to vote on it agian?

Yeah I went to /ptg/ and like usual you're right.

Fuck me.

...

>Americans clapped at the eclipse

...