How is there more than one type of anarchy? Anarchy is just the absence of government. There could never be "anarcho-capitalism" and "anarcho-communism" and "anarcho-pacifism". Any state of true anarchy would simply result is whatever the fuck human nature is at heart. Anarchy is the absence of any type of government-imposed order, therefore tacking on your favorite brand of government-imposed order after the word "anarcho" doesn't magically make it possible.
Fucking autists.
By your logic, there are no types of anarchy.
Human nature created rulers.
>by your logic there are no types of anarchy
yes that is exactly what my entire post was about. There are no types of anarchy, just anarchy.
What I mean is anarchy isn't something that exists.
Every ideology is a hypothetical about human nature, not anarchy istelf.
>Anarchy is the absence of any type of government-imposed order
But not the absence of order or rules for that matter.
a new method for Shareblu / ANTIFA to try and break Sup Forums
how cute.
It all ends in chaos. The different colors they have show why they "support" it but its all the same shit.
Anarchy is a meme.
As long as there's more than 1 person, a hierarchical relationship arises.
Tasks get assigned, and before you know it, it's not anarchy anymore.
Anarchy is chaos, because it means everyone is out to kill you.
Of course there are multiple kinds of anarchy. In a world without rulers, people will still want to live in close cooperation with other people, and they will choose all manner of ways to describe these groupings, with all manner of definitions for "cooperation". I just think my own is the most cooperativest, that's all.
Well said fellow burger.
It's because some politics are conflated with religions. Anarchism, and it's different types are utopias. Entirely theoretical, based in their own logic, and without justification.
Anarchism = developing economic systems that liberate people from coercive hierarchy.
"Chaos lol" and "people naturally become bosses and servants" are pathetic strawmen. You're better than this, pol.
Wrong, the state is the meme. A hierarchy has convinced the masses that they are needed in order for goods and services to be exchanged "fairly". That is a lie. Nature never needed human control for anything else, why in this instance?
>How is there more than one type of anarchy?
It's to show how retarded and mentally ill anarchists are.
there's a distinction because anarcho-communists/anarcho-socialists/anarcho-primitivists/anarcho-feminists/queer anarchists all want to destroy the state and replace it with a new immortal and unquestionable illegitimate hierarchy that goes against the natural order
they aren't real anarchy
as far as i'm concerned, anarcho-capitalists and anarcho-pacifists are the only real philosophical forms of anarchy that stay true to the original meaning
Society is organized into governments because there are tasks impossible to achieve by limited communities.
It should be a no-brainer, really.
People accept it because they see the benefits.
They understand that shit needs decision making, therefore a governing body.
No, anarchy is the absence of rulers.
>Human nature created rulers.
That is anarchy, period.
Anarchy always end with a ruler who is the strongest and can put down trouble makers the fastest. The idea of a no ruler world is a utopian dream of children who never experienced chaos and those who are using the utopian idea to become the new rulers.
It depends on the conception of human nature. An ancap believes the human is naturally capitalist for example.
Anarchy used to be for middle class spoiled brats and morons who dont realise it would literally mean their own death warrant, not to mention it is an impossible aim, the stongest would immediately force their will on others .. and set up... a form of governemnt, their version.. and so it would go on.
All anarchists ive met arnt really when talked to for a few minutes, at least they used to be open to talking, these days probably not so much.
we already have rules and laws and punishments for them and people still break them. so lets say in your anarchist society you have a serial killer who has killed 10 people in 6 attacks already and you have no idea who it is. what organization would even go about finding this person? How would they be paid? Who is going to judge them and what will you do with guilty criminals? where is all this money coming from?
>Human nature created rulers.
That's the obvious conclusion, but rulers created corruption and betrayed the people they ruled over. At least people couldn't be jewed without corrupt rulers over them.
>is a utopian dream
All political system is an utopian dream. Nothing works as planned when carried out.
>what organization would even go about finding this person?
A group of people who want to do it.
>Who is going to judge
Everyone (in the majority of anarchist systems), it will be a vote.
>and what will you do with guilty criminals?
Depends on the vote. and the type of anarchism.
>where is all this money coming from?
Not all anarcist societies have money.
>serial killer
This only happens in your retarded country. Who is retarded enough to kill random people without reason, for the sake of killing? In Europe this has only happened in counted occasions. And it would be the community the one responsible to enfore the natural law. If somebody kills without reason he would be killed for being a threat to the community.
Or you could say that anarchy is all that exist.
All of the states of rule are products of anarchy.
Anarchy is probably a state of future human development. Human nature isn't one thing, its a changeable amalgamation of biology and civilization. Its been shown how civilization changes our genetics. There's no reason an anarchist society if it exists in the future will be any more less based in "human nature" than any other form of organization.
...
So why is there both communist and fascist totalitarianism then? Think of what you're saying, if anarchy is simply a lack of government, any kind of social ideology or non-coercive organization can exist within it, so just as there are different flavors of authoritarianism, there's difference flavors of anarchism. Don't see how this is difficult to understand.
Anarchy is a meme, except when its not which Sup Forums wouldnt recognize if it walked up and shot them in the pepper balls
>Conflates economic systems and government
Tard confirmed.