US user, if you were able add one sentence to Constitution back in 1787, what it would be?
US user, if you were able add one sentence to Constitution back in 1787, what it would be?
Other urls found in this thread:
no niggers allowed and free ice cream for everyone else
"We've put a great deal of collaborative thought into this document and, as such, it is not open to interpretation or whims."
No central banking whatsoever.
No government agency or agent shall take any property, including money, from any citizen for any reason with the exception of sales tax.
big shout out to my boy biz markie.
Fucking /thread.
Traps are not gay.
Romanians are also US citizens.
It used to be life, liberty, and property but it conflicted with slavery
This one is pretty good
And likely what they believed
A secession clause for the benefit of ignorant, lamebrain, dumber than a box of rocks Republicans.
I would just remove the ICC
I'd redraft the clause on tariffs to set a maximum upper limit on tariffs of 5% and capital punishment for any member of Congress who would advocate for removing this clause and allowing Congress to set tariffs at level they liked.
Despite winning the war we pledge our undying loyalty to the British empire and will gladly pay any taxes the King requests. You could have had it all in an empire that spanned and controlled the entire world but you chose disobedience over taxes that were much less then you pay now.
All brits are faggots.
Ban all women from voting or having any political power for eternity.
deport all spics and blacks they are killing our people here.
Also
"Under no circumstances shall any financial institution unloyal to the United States shall be allowed to lay foundation within the nation's borders."
"gas the kikes, race war now"
Beat me to it
kill all niggers.
I would add an amendment against borrowing.
We hereby declare that Bill Clinton is a rapist.
No Jew may hold a public office or lobbying group
hungry niggers shall not be tolerated and the nation will not suffer the burden of single mothers demands for assistance
Because apparently "shall not be infringed" is not clear enough, I would say that banning or restricting citizens from owning any type of firearm is unconstitutional.