*sips tea*

*sips tea*

Other urls found in this thread:

aihw.gov.au/indigenous-observatory/reports/health-and-welfare-2015/health-and-disability/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

...

Is thee asian a child?

No just asian

>no baby teeth
Nigga what

R-race is only s-skin deep

...

so, that crack never fuses for chinks?

Suffer not a tea sipper to live

I could be wrong but im pretty sure you have that forever as a mark. Maybe its less obvious for other ones.

Aboriginal Australians were, by a huge measure, the most physically and genetically isolated hominids on the planet. If there were any truth to race theory, the Aboriginals would have been the missing link to prove speciation is happening in humans.

But Aboriginals can interbreed with other humans from all over the world just fine. They say there aren't many left who aren't of mostly mixed ancestry.

>If race is real, why aren't Aboriginals a different species?

Do you really expect me to believe that Whites (usually includes Arabs lel), Asians (usually includes Turkics lel), Blacks (usually includes Khoisan lel), and Pacific Islanders (sometimes includes Inuits lel), despite intermarriage for the last 100,000 and spreading/mixing haplotypes all over the Eastern Hemisphere are genetically different enough to be...subspecies or some shit?

theyre both bi pedal though. so same species. fail.

>interbreeding of different species can't happen cause reasons
female mules can sometimes give birth to fertile offspring see crossbreeds such as hinnie and jack. OR hybrids see Positive heterosis; produces more robust hybrids, they might be stronger or bigger; while the term negative heterosis refers to weaker or smaller hybrids.
you fell for jew science lolololololol

>interbreed just fine

aihw.gov.au/indigenous-observatory/reports/health-and-welfare-2015/health-and-disability/

Well done burger.

>don't thread no me! REEEEEEEEEEEE!

As an actual biologist, it's an affront to science that we use the most useless species concept to pretend humans aren't at minimum different subspecies. Or do you think coyotes are wolves?

Pretty weak trolling, man. Not even neo-Nazis are dumb enough to buy the idea that 100% fertility in "hybrids" and extremely rare fertility hybrids is even remotely analogous.

If you're gonna LARP as a Nazi, you've got to remember their rational human beings or you're just going to look like an obvious caricature.

hybrid animals aren't adapt to any environment.

the only thing the have going for them is heterosis.
but that only is truely beneficial in animals like dogs where humans have fucked them up truely beyond belief, that crossbreeding allows the original DNA to take root, and produce an actual functioning organism.

humans don't breed ourselves. we are naturally selected, and hybrid humans have way more confusion in their identity

nice straw man, learn how to quote shill retard
I see why you fell for the jew tricks, lolololol

Maybe I'm fucking stupid, but why do africans and asians both have low nasal bridges, but asians are the ones with slanted eyes? What specific parts of their skull structures creates this but doesn't in blacks?

>be inbred for 40,000 years
>have genetic problems

Wow, you really showed me, racist. Your insightful article that's not at all about aboriginals having children with other ethnic groups has completely changed my mind. Only whites are humans! Am I doing it right?

>humans don't breed ourselves

>As an actual biologist,

The rest of the sentence REALLY makes that believable.

>a poodle is not a pitbull
>both dogos

splain pls

I think it's a skin/muscle thing, not a skeletal thing.

>I took biology at community college and had to sit next to a qt niglet

think of high nasal bridges as the mutation.

High nasal bridges allows more time for air to heat up before it reaches the lungs, because Europeans come from cold, tree filled environments. They needed wide eyes to allow them to have a higher field of view in a tree filled environment, and big noses to help heat up the cold air.

Also whites needed pointy noses to make it obvious which way we were looking. The noses works sort of like how pointing with a finger does. Same with the chin.

what about the jew nose?

>the original europeans were not fairskinned
checkmate race realist bigots

probably to allow longer hairs to grow to help filter out sand.

...

>If there were any truth to race theory

ofcourse there is truth to race theory, race is not the same as subspecies. Mostly it is just a label for the genetic differences across the human species.

explain this

Whoah, Armenians have fucked up domes!

>Gotta love strawmans
You're response was literally name calling and putting words in user's mouth

...

>If there were any truth to race theory, the Aboriginals would have been the missing link to prove speciation is happening in humans.
Ok class, today we discuss how to spot question-begging. All we have to ask ourselves is "Is the consequent of the conditional possible not true?" If the answer is "Yes," then this conditional begs the question.

You're also equivocating race and subspecies. No one claims abbos and humans can't produce viable offspring. That is a straw man. The claim is that genetic difference of populations is significant enough to distinguish races.

There are around 340 different breeds of dog, with many different groups of pupper that can interbreed without having deformed babies, with me breeds likely on the rise categorizing the many different doggos would be painstakingly difficult, while there are only around 5 human ethnic groups (possibly more if you count Polynesian and abo)

Asians don't have slanted eyes unless they've got Downs or something. Most lack that fold on the eyelid though which can give the appearance of a slant. Quite a number of asian populations DO have the eyelid fold though. Any race can lose the fold though if they squint a lot for most of their lives.

Why don't haplotype studies back it up except in the most isolated populations?

Why don't the isolated populations have difficulty in interbreeding with other "subspecies"?

Why is there no consistency in the grouping of ethnicities into races among race theorists? I.e., the X are not white problem.

Why do race theorists always ignore or dismiss the Baldwin Effect?

Subspecies has always been a nebulous term, too.

isnt the belief that fairskinned was evolved to better support a diet of grain?

We're all just living creatures, trying to survi-....

Test

Why are skulls so happy? They're always smiling.

>being this retarded
DEY CAN BREED, DEY R SAME SAME

what about a macaco diet?
UMA DELICIA

because they're white

They've taken up the sweet embrace of death

So sad to see my people having to eat each other.

Literally no one gives a shit about begging the question outside of pseudointellectual internet arguments. It's a rhetorical device, not muh logic.

And I'm not intellectual enough to be pseudointellectual.

This guy is more on my level.

...

>ifunny

though you could easily have classified Europeans and abbos as different subspecies at one point.

Subspecies are the same species and they can always breed without problem when placed together. The biggest factor is that they don't breed together due to living in different regions.

So in the past abbos were a different subspecies, but now that europeans have move to australia and cross bread with them, you no longer can.

the european skull looks like a normal skull while the other ones look like the odd shaped skulls of missing link animals

at least the buses are still running and you aren't a retarded girl in morocco

back to plebbit, you misshapen loser

It's just the angle. If they both had the same hairstyle you couldn't tell the difference

>Literally no one gives a shit about begging the question outside of pseudointellectual internet arguments. It's a rhetorical device, not muh logic.
>t. idiot
False dichotomy. Begging the question is as logical as it gets, because it is equivalent to the probability of the truth of the major premise of a syllogism, which is implicit in the conclusion of any conditional. The probability of the truth of premises, i.e. their soundness, is always pertinent.

Damn thats a sexy turk

...

Damn those African nostrils though. Imagine the airflow!!!!!

Horses and donkeys can interbreed too. So can various species of birds.

So can various species of elephants.

and feline species.

Just depends on how far back on the tree you go.

I know you dont like science, it upsets you, but check it out sometime.

I am an actual biologist. AMA

it's been a while since I've thought about this topic, but IMO the problem with this entire argument is the definition of a species. It's not so easy. A simple go-to definition of a species is something that can interbreed and produce viable offspring. There are exceptions to this rule. It's really weird and complicated really. I believe that there are real differences in race based on the environment they evolved in and what skills were needed there to survive. Blacks and aboriginals and definitely the same species, but to say that all races are equal intelligence wise is just wrong and I hate when people pretend this is true. Whites and asians may be better at math, reasoning, etc, but blacks are clearly more athletic which is what was necessary for them to survive. They didn't experience the ice age like whites/northern asians and Neanderthals did. The ice age required a different set of skills to survive and I believe we see the outcome today.

Look how wide that niggers nose hole were. Proved yourself wrong op.

I-I want to save this .png but i don't want to get a CIA trojan and end up in some watchlist

Its their own self imposed paradox. You have missing links but having thooose missing links would be racist. As far as im concerned the argument has been done and over for a long time.

you're already on the list from posting in this thread. embrace it

why do you suspect this png has trojans? By the way people used to think pic related had a virus lol

cia are niggers

Given that you are completely neglecting culture, institutions, and learned behaviors, I now believe you are an actual biologist.

Apologies, m'lord. Tell me more about how IQ testing isn't indistinguishable from SAT testing.

Skulls are different because one was hunting lions and eating hard meat/rocks for hundreds of years while the other skulls were eating rice and fish so their features aren't as developed as, say, the africans.

It's like trying to say why asian eyes are like snake eyes it's because they're missing a tendon that pushes back a crease in the eye like a white man.

Exceptions in other species are the rule in humans! Have I seen the light, race theorists?

if i cut the tendon will i become asian-looking? WHy do they have yellow skin?

>some american fucktard making us look bad
>le epic simbsons reaction image hehe xD
fucking hell

The genetic variablility is on par with other species that get broken up into subspecies.

No you won't because there is also a part in the eye that extends further out giving it the sharp 45 snake look. You'd have to go under the knife.

>why do they have yellow skin
pigment...

I might add that since humans are probably the most discriminatory animal theres a good chance that we are all so divers by the simple fact that niggers in africa chased us out to begin with. let that sink in.

The reason races are not considered different subspecies is because some people thought that the idea could promote racism

Yep. Funny how different subspecies races was excepted and totally normal back before those (((people))) took over the institutions.

opposite. modern humans emerged looking kind of like somalis or yemenis in and around egypt. those that would become european and asian moved north and back south again to form the early dynasties

those Tat would become niggers literally went back to africa and mated with semi ape people, hence their larger diversity of basal types but narrow distribution of y haplotypes

RACIST!

no. its the bridge of the nose.

you can change the eye fold with tape too.

A lot of anons are not into genetics here

You're a shining example of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

neither does he. you are both shills.

species with different numbera of CHROMOSOMES can mate and produce fertile offspring. people with trisomy 21 can make fertile offspring

offspring is not yhr primary barrier to defining a species

True, Bears and Polar Bears have less genetic variation and yet they are not only seen as a different species, but protecting polar bears from interbreeding is something we care about.

>Austrailian

Why does this guy look Jewish?

he was an inbred hapsburg

inbreeding tends to cause the same phenotypical characteristics everywhere as phenotypes collapse into basal types, sich as narrow eyes, smaller forehead, larger noses, prognathism, etc

Can we please stop and take notice of that "leopon" on the bottom of the picture?

...

...

>Race is skin colour

Nope.

What are you even talking about? Its clearly an insanely more complected topic than one post can explain. You could take multiple courses on the topic and it still wouldnt be fully explained. Fuck off. You are a fucking idiot because culture is greatly influenced by environment. Learned behaviors all comes down to environment. How old are you?

Children born on the equator have a smaller brain volume than those born on the northern hemisphere, this is true for all races as black people born in northern hemispheres have a larger brain volume. The average skull shape of humans changes very quickly the changes can be seen by comparing old photographs to modern people.

Phrenology is a failed science by the way many geniuses have smaller than average brain volume.

...

That explains why niggers ended up so different from up, huh? The inbreeding.

I've been saying it for years but nobody in my commie stronghold will listen! Everyone posts that copy+pasted skeleton meme to "prove were all the same inside"

EVOLUTIONARY BREAKTHROUGH

>The average skull shape of humans changes very quickly

Lamarckian evolution is a lie.