What do the kikes have to gain by shilling the two slit experiment?

What do the kikes have to gain by shilling the two slit experiment?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc
youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe
youtube.com/watch?v=qCmtegdqOOA
youtube.com/watch?v=AlVuMxt-xtU&feature=youtu.be
hawking.org.uk/godel-and-the-end-of-physics.html
youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s
openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/70208?mode=full
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

what the fuck is that picture supposed to mean

Can you fill me in on what's happening

They claim light beams know when we are watching them, and alter their behavior depending on whether we are watching them. All lies

>he think reality is physical

kek

Why u so stoopid?

lol reality is influenced by consciousness bro, this shit is common knowledge

Non-STEM faggot detected

If you let light propagate through two slits like that, it will create an interference pattern (the dark gradients are where the light "wave crests" meet and the light is most intense). This seems reasonable as the light particles interact with each other like wave of water might.

However, the pattern still appears this way even if you fire particles one at a time. It confused (and still does confuse) many scientists because they're not sure how a wave pattern can appear from just single particles that interact with nothing.

Scientists thought only conclusion was that the particle must go through both slits at the same time, and interact with itself - so they got tricky and decided to put a recorder next to each slit to figure out which one it ACTUALLY went through.

However, when they tried to record which one it went through, the particles changed their behavior and no longer created an interference pattern on the back wall.

This is called the "observer effect", and the best explanation is that interacting with the particle (which is required to observe it) collapses the wave function of said particle. It is already slightly spoopy at that point, but it starts to get real spoopy when you start to see things like "The quantum eraser experiment", etc.

These videos explain these phenomenon pretty well:

youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment

Watching is too strong of a way to say it. To 'watch' photons you have to interact with them in some way.

This is the exact wrong takeaway.

When they start making you buy sunlight, they can charge you for both the particle and wave

>b me
>b observing quantum fields vibrate
>realize matter is just a probability wave
>walk through wall

You are literally the jew if you don't already know reality is manifested in the brain, and the brain is manifested in reality. Reality is literally the 4th dimension folding in on itself. Like the universe. Everything folds in on itself. "you" whatever that is, is the universe experiencing itself. "you" whatever that is, is the unviverse/god/brahman/atman/whatever name you give "it".

Result from quantum mechanics - set up two slits and fire a group at a pair of small slits. If classical theory holds, they'll go through one slit or the other and you'll get a bimodal pattern. Instead you get a diffraction pattern like you would with a light wave, even if you fire them through one at a time. This is one of many experiments that demonstrates an effect called wave-particle duality. At very small scales it turns out matter displays properties of both particles (mass, size) and waves (wavelengths, frequencies).

>They claim light beams know when we are watching them, and alter their behavior depending on whether we are watching them
No they fucking don't

They're hiding something, double slit is used to (((prove))) that electrons/photos can't be located and measured at the same time.

Clearly there's more to photons/electrons the kikes are actively hiding

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-electron_universe

waves go in, waves come out
particles go in, waves come out
observed particles go in, particles come out
can't explain that

...

nah simple, detector destroys quantum cloud, hence ripples. duhhh.

Proof?

>you are the universe experiencing itself
Wow, the universe is a shitty place then.

kek, underrated

That PBS video is bullshit. Delayed choice quantum eraser does not cause anyone who actually understands it to question causality.

you mean this?
youtube.com/watch?v=qCmtegdqOOA

lol why are we, Sup Forums tards, pondering quantum physics?

Fucking lol. Underrated.

Nothing has meaning. Everything in life is ascribed meaning by your conscious mind. German idealism ;)

youtube.com/watch?v=AlVuMxt-xtU&feature=youtu.be

It's almost as if the video is made for the layman or something

The jews are involved

Bump for keks

Kikes defend quantum theory and general relativity because it's unobservable group-think science. Pc culture started with Einstein made general relatvity and kikes wanted the goyim to worship "confirmed" science thats only provable through math equations and not observation. Big bang, Dark matter, and theoretical quantum particles are false models shilled to explain away meaning from the world similar to postmodernism. Hawking knows GR and QP is flawed because it's impossible to unify them both without contradictions because of Godels incompleteness theroem. It's impossible to have accurate models with such large scale systems without leaving out variables that magnify from the quantum level at that size.

Your very poor understanding of the double slit experiment doesn't mean "it's the joos." Science and Technology is the white man's secret weapon to fight the jews.

Truly understanding QFT and correctly understanding its implications is very redpilled.

I got to witness the very recent Wheeler's delayed-choice gedanken experiment with a single atom. I'm convinced Quantum Retrocausality is the simplest and best explanation.

>walk through wall
walk through wall with eyes closed*

So my reality is the 4th dimension because it is the universe experiencing itself, then what does that make my Tulpa? Is it in the 5th dimension

Since you had two slits, your wife has to have two dicks. It's an elaborate scheme to force cuckoldry on goys.

this

>GR and QP is flawed because it's impossible to unify them both without contradictions

Its not impossible, and if there is one or two fixable things about them, they are not entirely flawed

>because of Godels incompleteness theroem.
not really

>Kikes defend quantum theory and general relativity because it's unobservable group-think science.
>There are dozens of observations demonstrating GR effects, and countless examples demonstrating QM effects.
>All modern digital technology is based on quantum principles
Look, I don't like quantum physics - it's complicated as shit, especially if you're stuck using Zettili as a grad text... but it fucking works.

Why does it agree with experiment then?

>pol solves physics because of a blanket paranoia of Jews being involved

Good explanation, take a you

...

Yeah, (((einstein))) is right cuz he's da based joo. Einstein built upon newtonian physics which works well. But when you decide to base everything on the fact nothing is faster than the speed of light. You're going to have paradoxes.

hawking.org.uk/godel-and-the-end-of-physics.html

>Not really
Wrong.

>youtube.com/watch?v=8ORLN_KwAgs
>At the end of the video he replies to a furfag
Credibility discarded.

Godels theorem has nothing to do with reconciling gr with qm.
Also
sage

>with a single atom
what does that mean? I thought the experiment has to do with entangled photons? Your entire post is suspect. Made more the evident by this:

>Quantum Retrocausality
You are trolling. There is only one direction of the arrow of total time. You can influence things behind you in space if there is some objectness mutually touching. If there is a ball on the ground and you run 10 feet past it, and there is a 20 foot wooden plank touching the ball and right at your feet 10 feet from it, and you kick the plank you can move the ball, even though the ball is behind you in space and time.

If certain supposed theories of quantum mechanics are true, then the universe is certainly a simulation, which may be the answer to the OP. I am an extreme unbiased thorough skeptic who has seen know absolutely conclusive evidence any of those such claims are true.

>Kek guided us towards electing Trump

>Now Kek guides us towards unlocking the quatum secrets of the universe

Wew lad

No it was made to get clicks from redditors who want to feel smart

>Because there isn't infinite theorems possible other than quantum mech to explain the double slit
This is the shilling i'm talking about.
Next, you're gonna tell me quarks are real.

The reason they are ununified is not necessarily becuase of godels theory. It is possible they can be unified without contradictions. Godels theory more implys it is possible to know the absolute truest total theory of all possible universal physics, and well his theory is much deeper than physics, because his has to do with the infinitude of numbers, physics is much less than infinite infinities, but yeah maybe it is difficult to ever answer metaphysically 'what actually is an electron'.

>Yeah, (((einstein))) is right cuz he's da based joo.
Yeah, hes right because hes a jew, thats the only reason hes right, if he were right.

Einstein contributions have to do with photoelectric, the quantization of light, and the mediumic nature of gravity, to name a few.

No, i mean, in semiconductor design, and the thousands of other every day real world uses of quantum mechanics.

we're being bogpilled

>He says angrily on a Moroccan suitcase packing enthusiast forum while attacking a video which exists to explain science to non-scientist viewers

when we "watch" things we need to bounce particles off of them, that particle changes the state of the original particle.


Look up the pilot wave theory, it has promise for ending uncertainty in physics

...

>not turn 360 degrees and walk away
the fuck is wrong with you?

because joe rogan had a quantum physics guy on his podcast and the dude weeds are tripping out, man

No no, retrocausality is clearly not a thing unless you're talking about the crazy world of QM. that's why I said Quantum Retrocausality.

>What does that even mean
They used a single ultracold metastable helium atom as an atomic analogue of Wheeler's original proposal.

Is this the call that began it all

He also brought upon the masturbation of "confirmed" science you see in gender studies and other purely theoretical science fields in unis today. Funny, no one hasn't mentioned that from the first post.
There is no answer to Dark energy or Dark matter. It's mathematical fixing of equations to keep a dead system alive. Big bang is a false idol as well but this shit is being taught in schools like there's any evidence for it. It's more beneficial for space agencies to shill false models and keep getting government bux instead of doing real science based on observation.

>it is the first and the last call you will ever receive

Thank you

Thank you

>Look up the pilot wave theory, it has promise for ending uncertainty in physics

Pilot Wave theory actually does a really bad job at explaining this stuff. This kind of stuff leads to the evidence (ie. quantum entanglement) that directly hinders the plausibility of Pilot Wave theory.

There is a very simple answer to this mystery. It's a common answer to much that we read about science.
>there is something at play affecting the world experiment that scientists don't understand
This common mistake, assuming we know it all, is the reason science journals are constantly changing the absolutes that existed the year before.
Human nature is the unmeasured factor involved. Ego etc.
We always know it all and are perfectly correct even when changing yesterday's perfectly correct answers.
Really when you think about nerds is it suprising? Prissy, isolated, egotistical, dishonest, socially illiterate, bitter, etc. They have the worst characteristics to be doing what they are doing bad reporting upon it.

...

>What do the kikes have to gain by shilling the two slit experiment?
When were kikes "shilling" Thomas Young's double-slit experiment?

offer the kike some free ham. watch his head explode. steal his shekels. problem solved.

witnessed, satan

Witnessed.

Go read a book, Tyrone.

I think the pilot wave theory (bohmian mechanics) is the answer. But for kike reasons most scientists don't want to believe in a perfect system.

Funny how all the shills claimed godel's incompleteness is irrelevent to the paradoxical nature of mathematics and by extension QR and General Relativity which is thousands of orders magnified in these systems.

But muh
>No, Goyim, We are always right. Trust us.

>reality is influenced by consciousness bro
Incorrect. This is a quantum model accepted by only a tiny minority of quantum physicists and riddled with self-contradiction. Just because the Science Spokesnigger tells you that's what physicists believe, it doesn't mean they really do.

>I think the pilot wave theory (bohmian mechanics) is the answer.
Bad news: Bohm and Aharanov were both kikes. When someone tells me they have made a perfect solenoid, I know I'm either listening to a kike or a retard. "There was no B-field!" BULLSHIT!

Delayed choice requires 2 separate 'beams'/particles. So how is it done with 1 atom? The entire experiment is creating an entangled pair and sending them down different paths.

Quantum retrocausality, is nonsense, because time is only one direction, even in quantum mechanics. The past cannot be changed, because every planck second, which is continuously occurring, the past no longer exists, it cannot be alterable.

Thomas Young sounds pretty Aryan to me.

[spoiler]I have no idea what apartment buildings look like or how to recognize one.[/spoiler]

No. Go study.

Science is subverted from the very basics.

I agree to some extent, I have spent some time trying to think of how to solve the major problems/questions/mysteries of the current theoretical fundamental physics paradigm, I have opinions on dark energy and dark matter.

There are definitely subtle and not so subtle inaccuracies in certain accepted ways of thinking.

Whats so hard about this? Just imagine the line hitting the inside walls of the slits and bouncing around, of course it'll become a wave again

...

Is the law of conservation of energy upheld at a universal level? Did the initial singularity contain exactly as much energy as is now present in the entire universe?

caught the shill, I knew it from your first post, the 'joos', and the image you chose gave you away. (and the wrongness of quantum retrocausality and 'single atom'...fucking absolute idiot)

The idea behind "the observer effect" being propagated by consciousness was written by one guy a long time ago and has been debunked. Basically his paper said "I don't know why this happens therefore magic".

In reality, it's impossible to "observe" some quantum mechanics in action because doing so would require interfering with the mechanism in a way that unintentionally changes the actual process of whatever is being measured/observed.

Imagine leaving a glass of water in a semi insulated room overnight only to discover that it froze into ice by the next morning, every day consistently. If you were to want to observe the time that the water started to freeze but the only way to do it was to sit in the closed room all night with a lamp and a computer, you might discover that the water never freezes at all. Do you think it's because the water gets shy or do you think it's because your body heat and the heat from your equipment prevents the ambient temperature from getting below freezing? Obviously in this situation the act of observation directly influenced the outcome of the mechanism, and that's basically what happens in the double slit thought experiment; the only way to observe a phenomenon on such a microscopic level is to introduce a foreign element that can react with the mechanism in a way that produces a desired measurement.

This is a very simplistic way of describing the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. I'm not smart enough to explain the actual mechanics of it, but it basically means in order to measure one aspect we must influence another aspect, which taints the measurement of the aspect that was influenced.

entanglement is just 2 particles changing eachothers' spins

1) Try it yourself
2) See the interference pattern
3) Realise you're a Jew
4) KYS

>turning 360 degrees and walking in the same direction you started.

Can you even calculate a volume l4 in 4 dimensions ?

You fucking mongrels have not the slightest conception about science and the nature of reality..

...and when some patient anons try to explain, the response is predictably : substance idealism and pseudoscience.

>you require a lamp and a computer to tell time

well alrighty then

eventually if one zooms out far enough, if there is 1 universe, or 10, or 1000, one will reach and infinite expanse of nothingness. If one keeps zooming out, eventually the totality of stuff, will exist in a relative location, compared to the infinite expanse of nothingness you are zooming out into.

There exists an amount of energy. How could it be created or destroyed?

Its all right there, it can expand outward, it can interact, but object in motion remains in motion.

Maybe eventually every single bit of substance will decay and lose its momentum to the smallest bits, and there will only be specks of dust.

maybe then there would be less energy... Less kinetic, and less potential, if theories about (heat death, and) the arrow of time toward increasing entropy are sensical.

If everything decayed into the littlest specks of dust, then maybe there would be less odds of it being able to come back together, and do extreme energetic things... I dont know.

If you missed the point of my hypothetical then this conversation is too advanced for you.

There is no such thing in physics as infinity.That remains the fallacy of mathematics.

I saw a series of videos made by a guy named David LaPoint on Youtube. His voice is monotone, sort of like Ben Stein's (the Clear Eyes guy), but his videos kind of opened my mind a bit. He calls his idea the Primer Fields Theory, and basically he believes the subatomic to the macroscopic take on these bowl-shaped magnetic fields.

youtube.com/watch?v=lpI6ikj1G-s

There's the video concerning light. So basically he uses bowl-shaped magnets and pairs them up (north and south), and runs electricity through them and creates shapes which are similar in appearance to the rings around Saturn, and even shapes little beads of plasma between them which he likens to a photon, planets or even certain features we see in space like nebula. He believes the magnetic field around a photon is undetectable to our instruments, so this makes edge defraction difficult to explain, so we need to come up with Rube Goldberg-like explanations in Quantum Mechanics to explain it.

Anyway, check out his videos. I think if some real academics were to look into his theory then we'd find something there. We would possibly unravel some shit that was intentionally buried by the gods or whatever, and then you would find the answer to your question, OP.

You can explain that if you look at it from a simulated reality perspective. That experiment proves that materialism doesn't exist.

Newfag

Sorry, I meant to say that the magnetic fields around photons aren't necessarily undetectable, we merely don't see them as the bowl-shaped fields that they are, and instead claim light is both a wave and a particle. The photon itself is the bead created between the bowl-shaped fields, while the bowl-shaped fields are what we detect as the wave. Our understanding of the anatomy of light is off. It's very similar in nature to that of the atom.

fucking read nigga. read

openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/70208?mode=full

Wheeler and Feynman themselves proposed a form of retrocausality. Quantum Mechanics simply has the right properties to allow for backward causation.

Retrocausality is often associated with nonlocal correlations that arise from quantum entanglement including the delayed choice quantum eraser where it is particularly pronounced. Retrocausality is *encouraging* of current work and models of entanglement and at no point does it suggest bypassing the no-communication theorem. It's simply the best and easiest explanation. You can find all my personal agreements in William R. Wharton's 'Backward Causation and the EPR Paradox.'

...

The dualistic nature of of whatever as opposed to the dualistic nature of god. Again they take something and try to make it antichrist. Many such cases.