Well... Sup Forums?

...

can a fat nigga f u c k ?

The worker needs to be shown turning on the tap. And big fatty fat fat needs to be shown getting money at the Bank of water plant. But it's ok otherwise

(ME ON THE RIGHT)

replace "mamagment" with "jews"
replace "employee" with "goy"
replace signarute with "Ben Garrison"

And? Luckily the management will soon be able to aquire AI robots to fix that salary leakage. Terrible waste.

Except in reality the largest expense of most companies is paying employee salaries, and a good chunk of the profit goes either to shareholders or back into the company.

Management is a Jew already, look at that nose.

>tfw management
huehuehuehuehue

Employees are generally paid what their worth. If you feel like you're underpaid, discuss it with your boss. If your abilities allow your employer to make a lot of profit yet you're not being paid very much, they'll pay you more or you can find someone who will.

...

Not really what they are worth.
Employees are paid as little as possible. No matter how expensive the product or how much profit they bring in. All employees are replaceable.

Why doesn't the employee build his own profit pipe?

Oh yeah, that takes effort, they'd rather just take someone else's instead, because leftists want all the benefits of capitalism without none of the work.

Why did you cut off the GOVERNMENT tag above it? Because that's the only situation where this is the system.

I am management.

The image should be renamed "very senior management"

...

>implying it's possible for a poor person to start a company
>implying the means of production (factories, farmland, etc) aren't monopolized by the rich already
>implying it's not logically impossible to radically change the ratio of business owners to common workers no matter how hard people work (for every employer there must be many employees)

>The only people who should benefit in a capitalist system are the people who started a business.
>Everyone else is just a leach.
Oh look, a corporate shill in his natural habitat.

Problem is the ones with the biggest pipes lobby government that create bureaucracies to keep out competition.
If you just wanted to make something simple, like produce a drill. You'd spend all your time going through paperwork and getting certificates.

Become part of management if that bothers you so much

>all employees are replaceable

Not even remotely true. While you might be theoretically replaceable the costs of lost productivity and reduced efficiency while finding and training a replacement in addition to the risk of being unable to find a suitable replacement often outweigh the costs of simply satisfying the already functional employee with a raise.

The only case where what you said is true is for shit tier minimum wage jobs where a monkey could replace you.

Retarded anarchist matxist leninist retards need to leave thartprevent all meaningful worker changes with their insanity, workers need to be completely unionized, and any ununionized workers forced into union.

Not accurate at all. Most of the metaphorical water would flow back into the enterprise.

Arxist leninism is a baerocracy not a meaningful ecobomical order for the benefit of the trade ofbworkers, non sense propaganda not even done by workers trades.

reality disagrees

There should ve no minimum wage vecause state shoukd bot ingolve itself with workers trades and management, state and trades remain seperate.

So don't work there anymore.

Why are "cartoonists" unable to describe anything without words?
That is a sign of a bad visual storyteller.

>managers don't receive salaries
And then commies wonder why they can never get anything done

Why doesn't that scrawny retard unionise?

>>implying it's possible for a poor person to start a company
It is. A majority of unicorn companies, companies that are startups that are worth over a billion dollars, required little to no starting capital from the founders. These are companies that you can start with a website and server and can make a profit from day one. Poor people can and did start these billion dollar companies, what the fuck are you talking about?

It varies with the industry and how disposable are the employees.

low-end employees are replaceable and don't contribute in any meaningful way to the success of a company

The people who start companies are taking on the most risk, working the longest hours, and providing a great deal to the economy. They deserve respect

>low end employees are replaceable
99% of people are unionized and control consumption/labor/workers you can theoritically go to trade war with the union thebquestion is why wouldnt you go to negociations rather than crippling your goods and business?

The management built the pipe, and pumped the water.

>conpany black listed by union
>99% of people do not use your goods providing advantages to friendly companies and unfair trade rules to enemies of the union.

you are still not contributing, you are blackmailing, your blackness is showing

If you're replaceable then you're not worth that much

The contribution is the work, if you desire a worker it will be on workers terms.

and thankfully free market works for the work force too.

If tge worker is worthless then you will have no workers, simple.

The workers unionizing has nothing to do with your ability to sell a good or service nor does anything to you.

...

Kek

everyone is replacable

>The workers unionizing has nothing to do with your ability to sell a good or service nor does anything to you.
by your logic the producer should unionize too and fix the price of their products and/or monopolize it.

The union must be 150 million strong in the US, we will control labor and consumption.

The producer could do whatever he wishes, my concern is the workers solely.

What's to stop the employee from becoming his own boss, and doing what pic is related? There's a reason people choose to be employees and don't run successful businesses.

Why should the person who takes on the least risk and difficulty be rewarded equally compared to the person that takes the most risk and difficulty?

Non-starters still benefit by earning wages, but they can't expect to make as much because they just didn't put in the effort. Sorry, but resources are not a human right.

This image very accurately depicts socialism and communist regimes as anyone who isn't completely ignorant of history and economics is well aware.

>isn't completely ignorant of history and economics
You've already lost the leftists

>There's a reason people choose to be employees and don't run successful businesses.
Lack of capital?

>Lack of capital?
not an issue in modern economies, you can find investor under every rock

>the people who take all of the risk get most of the profits
What's your problem with this?

>when you realize the logistics that goes into carrying out and managing a large operation is more than most can handle

>REMINDER

Don't like it? Start a company and give all the profit to your employees.

...

...

...

...

it's more of a spectrum

ok what stops you from becoming the management?
If its so easy, they do nothing and only reap the profits?

...

Then the investor becomes "management" and you become "employee" again.

Good luck finding decent capital without signing away 50% of your company right off the start.

Nepotism

What is stopping you to become the man on the right?

lack of capital / poverty / inequality in education

this leads to you not being able to properly focus on self-improvement / focus on getting ideas / capital for a business

btw im not speaking for myself
I made money with internetbusiness and crypto
but if i wouldnt have had enough capital it wouldnt have been possible

Don't like it? Work hard and hope you get promoted to a management position. Or risk your own capital to start a business yourself.