Just started reading it for some reason and it's pretty interesting... cyber.eserver.org/unabom.txt It was published in September, 1995.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM
6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society in general.
7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th century leftism could have been practically identified with socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists, collectivists, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much a movement or an ideology as a psychological type, or rather a collection of related types. Thus, what we mean by "leftism" will emerge more clearly in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology (Also, see paragraphs 227-230.)
8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn't seem to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do is indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early 20th century.
9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization." Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism; but this segment is highly influential.
Parker Morales
FEELINGS OF INFERIORITY
10. By "feelings of inferiority" we mean not only inferiority feelings in the strictest sense but a whole spectrum of related traits: low self-esteem, feelings of powerlessness, depressive tendencies, defeatism, guilt, self-hatred, etc. We argue that modern leftists tend to have such feelings (possibly more or less repressed) and that these feelings are decisive in determining the direction of modern leftism.
11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights advocates, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities. The terms "negro," "oriental," "handicapped" or "chick" for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. "Broad" and "chick" were merely the feminine equivalents of "guy," "dude" or "fellow." The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights advocates have gone so far as to reject the word "pet" and insist on its replacement by "animal companion." Leftist anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the word "primitive" by "nonliterate." They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)
Isaiah Lopez
These kind of threads usually disappear within minutes.
Isaac Morris
12. Those who are most sensitive about "politically incorrect" terminology are not the average black ghetto-dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any "oppressed" group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, white males from middle-class families.
13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals), or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit it to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not suggest that women, Indians, etc., ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology).
14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.
Hunter Nguyen
15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist's real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.
16. Words like "self-confidence," "self-reliance," "initiative", "enterprise," "optimism," etc. play little role in the liberal and leftist vocabulary. The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone's needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his own ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.
Aiden Wilson
He was too redpilled and inteligent for his own sake
Also had traitorous faggot brother who sold him to the police
Joseph Nelson
The ability to string words together into sentences does not necessarily equal "interesting", sane or correct.
You might want to look a little further than Florence Supermax for your next political hero.
Adrian Hill
30. We certainly do not claim that leftists, even of the oversocialized type, NEVER rebel against the fundamental values of our society. Clearly they sometimes do. Some oversocialized leftists have gone so far as to rebel against one of modern society's most important principles by engaging in physical violence. By their own account, violence is for them a form of "liberation." In other words, by committing violence they break through the psychological restraints that have been trained into them. Because they are oversocialized these restraints have been more confining for them than for others; hence their need to break free of them. But they usually justify their rebellion in terms of mainstream values. If they engage in violence they claim to be fighting against racism or the like.
Some of this is so spot on to the shit going on today...
Isaac Lee
50. The conservatives are fools: They whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society with out causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values.
51.The breakdown of traditional values to some extent implies the breakdown of the bonds that hold together traditional small-scale social groups. The disintegration of small-scale social groups is also promoted by the fact that modern conditions often require or tempt individuals to move to new locations, separating themselves from their communities. Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently. In modern society an individual's loyalty must be first to the system and only secondarily to a small-scale community, because if the internal loyalties of small-scale small-scale communities were stronger than loyalty to the system, such communities would pursue their own advantage at the expense of the system.
52. Suppose that a public official or a corporation executive appoints his cousin, his friend or his co-religionist to a position rather than appointing the person best qualified for the job. He has permitted personal loyalty to supersede his loyalty to the system, and that is "nepotism" or "discrimination," both of which are terrible sins in modern society. Would-be industrial societies that have done a poor job of subordinating personal or local loyalties to loyalty to the system are usually very inefficient. (Look at Latin America.) Thus an advanced industrial society can tolerate only those small-scale communities that are emasculated, tamed and made into tools of the system.
Oliver Rodriguez
173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines decisions. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more of their decision for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better result than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.
Evan Fisher
One of the greatest political works ever written.
He foreshadowed an incredible amount of what we now see today
Dylan Bailey
redpilled me in the 90s.
Michael Young
163. Suppose the system survives the crisis of the next several decades. By that time it will have to have solved, or at least brought under control, the principal problems that confront it, in particular that of "socializing" human beings; that is, making people sufficiently docile so that their behavior no longer threatens the system. That being accomplished, it does not appear that there would be any further obstacle to the development of technology, and it would presumably advance toward its logical conclusion, which is complete control over everything on Earth, including human beings and all other important organisms. The system may become a unitary, monolithic organization, or it may be more or less fragmented and consist of a number of organizations coexisting in a relationship that includes elements of both cooperation and competition, just as today the government, the corporations and other large organizations both cooperate and compete with one another. Human freedom mostly will have vanished, because individuals and small groups will be impotent vis-a-vis large organizations armed with supertechnology and an arsenal of advanced psychological and biological tools for manipulating human beings, besides instruments of surveillance and physical coercion. Only a small number of people will have any real power, and even these probably will have only very limited freedom, because their behavior too will be regulated; just as today our politicians and corporation executives can retain their positions of power only as long as their behavior remains within certain fairly narrow limits.
Dylan Gutierrez
bump
Noah Adams
Depressing.
Is it worth is being "red pilled"? We should stop using that term btw. It's just being NORMAL. Zombies around us are not normal.
They are parasites, who live in the moment, obsessed by their own selfish short-term needs and pursuit of simple pleasures and comfort. Anyone looking beyond that, even a little bit, gets into the "red pill" so to speak.
This guy layed it all down 30 years ago, in plain writing. But he's nothing. Nobody cares about his manifesto. We care about Kim, Kylie, Kanye, Trump and whatever.
That's a signal from the World itself. I have a theory, our Creator doesn't want anyone red pilled. It's not that Youtube is clamping down and 90% of media is declaring us demons for nothing, or because they're EVIL.
Let me tell you a secret user. They are normal and natural, but they don't know it. They steadfast pave the way to the big reset. YouTube censoring and Colbert Oliver culture, they are actually doing the right bidding. They are pushing this wretched train down the tracks towards the non-existent bridge.
We are the ones who complain about bridge not being there. We are the anomaly. This guy, the "UNIBOMBER" hahahahaha....he's the anomaly.
Obama is Nobel peace prize winner.
World wants to burn so it can grow something better from the ashes. We are in the way. That's why we will get taken out if we speak out.
Levi Parker
173. If the machines are permitted to make all their own decisions, we can't make any conjectures as to the results, because it is impossible to guess how such machines might behave. We only point out that the fate of the human race would be at the mercy of the machines. It might be argued that the human race would never be foolish enough to hand over all the power to the machines. But we are suggesting neither that the human race would voluntarily turn power over to the machines nor that the machines would willfully seize power. What we do suggest is that the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a position of such dependence on the machines that it would have no practical choice but to accept all of the machines decisions. As society and the problems that face it become more and more complex and machines become more and more intelligent, people will let machines make more of their decision for them, simply because machine-made decisions will bring better result than man-made ones. Eventually a stage may be reached at which the decisions necessary to keep the system running will be so complex that human beings will be incapable of making them intelligently. At that stage the machines will be in effective control. People won't be able to just turn the machines off, because they will be so dependent on them that turning them off would amount to suicide.
>Why did he do it /pol? A frustrated genius mentally damaged by a government experiment he participated in during his college years. I believe that had it not been for the psychological trauma he endured that he probably could have been an accomplished author and cultural icon fighting against the decline of the west.
>Was he right ? I believe he hit the nail on the head in his cultural critiques. He quite accurately summed up what would happen in coming years, and its all come to pass. Though I suppose when you see yourself on a track you'd be inclined to spend some time thinking about your coming destination. I disagree with him on the point of technology essentially crippling and destroying us. I can see why it would be an easy target to focus on, but I don't think his scope was broad enough. I'd argue that the radio isn't bad, but what plays on it, and if you question whats playing you have to look into whose making it.
His criminal acts became the focus of his life. Its a damn shame too. Violent acts like the ones he carried out are short sighted, ultimately pointless. Its an act of frustration which accomplishes nothing. Killing a few inconsequential people does not effect widespread political change. He spent so much time fixating on minor wrong doings of certain people that he began to see all faults of society embodied in them personally, as if they were an effigy of responsibility for the decline of the country.
There is a lesson to be learned here apart from his critiques on modern culture, and its that assassinations are a tool that only work when employed by the government themselves. Lashing out in frustration at the world is an impotent act. I sympathize with and respect Ted a lot. I wish he had made different decisions in life. I wish he never went through what he did.
John Nelson
Not everything though. He had resentment towards it. That's the selfish me me me generation, that all of us are a part of.
He keeps thinking in lines with "what happened to the way of life I had when things were simple and acceptable". Well - sorry bloke. You know how farmers deal with grass and weeds every season?
They got 2 options. Let the cows take care of it (slow) or burn it.
We are going from cows to fire - but something better will come out of it.
We 're just mad that we'll miss it because in order for it to happen we need to destroy ourselves. But such is life.
Fight against hetero normative, masculine, macho, gym culture!
Nolan Collins
>For a time, he was housed in the same unit as Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh and World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Ahmed Yousef. biography.com/people/ted-kaczynski-578450
Jackson Kelly
Kaczynski is serving eight life sentences without the possibility of parole as Federal Bureau of Prisons register number 04475–046 at ADX Florence, a supermax prison in Florence, Colorado. When asked if he was afraid of losing his mind in prison, Kaczynski replied: >No, what worries me is that I might in a sense adapt to this environment and come to be comfortable here and not resent it anymore. >And I am afraid that as the years go by that I may forget, I may begin to lose my memories of the mountains and the woods and that's what really worries me, that I might lose those memories, and lose that sense of contact with wild nature in general. >But I am not afraid they are going to break my spirit. Kaczynski has been an active writer in prison. The Labadie Collection, part of the University of Michigan's Special Collections Library, houses Kaczynski's correspondence from over 400 people since his arrest in April 1996, including carbon copy replies, legal documents, publications, and clippings. The names of most correspondents will be kept sealed until 2049.
Oliver Richardson
Kaczynski is a fascinating character without a doubt. But as much as he shits on leftists, you obviously wouldn't like his conclusions. For his conclusions were not simply "fuck leftists" but rather "fuck techno-industrial society because it turns humans miserable and mentally ill, of which leftism is one prominent symptom."
He may well be right. Human cultural evolution has jumped light years ahead of our biological evolution, so the way billions of people live today is likely inappropriate for our species. Our minds and bodies evolved for a hunter/gatherer lifestyle out in the savanna, not for soul crushing wageslaving confined to a drab overcrowded asphalt jungle.
Still, there is no turning back the clock. He was deluded to think he could ever overthrow the modern way of life with his insignificant bombing campaign. But then again, the CIA fucked with his head, so who can blame him for having a few screws loose? He's an impressive mind and a tragic figure nonetheless. Just wanted to live innawoods in accordance with his natural instincts but techno-industrial society just wouldn't let him. He's the sort of maniac killer you can sympathize with and wish he'd gotten off scott free.
Liam Lee
One of my favorite essays. Worth reading, even if you disagree with his conclusions, his analysis is on point
Isaiah Diaz
>the CIA fucked with his head
?
Cameron Kelly
Raised in Evergreen Park, Illinois, Kaczynski was a child prodigy and accepted into Harvard University at the age of 16. He earned his B.A. from Harvard in 1962, then his M.A. and Ph.D in mathematics from the University of Michigan in 1965 and 1967, respectively. After receiving his doctorate at age 25, he became an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley but resigned abruptly two years later.[6] As an undergraduate at Harvard, Kaczynski was a research subject in an ethically questionable experiment conducted by psychology professor Henry Murray, which some analysts have suggested influenced Kaczynski's later actions.[7][8][9]
>As an undergraduate at Harvard, Kaczynski was a research subject in an ethically questionable experiment conducted by psychology professor Henry Murray, which some analysts have suggested influenced Kaczynski's later actions.
Xavier Barnes
>Nobody cares about his manifesto that is in fact not true at all Dr Kaczynski manifesto will out live him he is the poster boy for mentally unhinged geniuses
Nathan Ramirez
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Murray >Henry Alexander Murray (May 13, 1893 – June 23, 1988) was an American psychologist at Harvard University. He was Director of the Harvard Psychological Clinic in the School of Arts and Sciences after 1930.
World War II, Office of Strategic Services, 1939-45 During World War II, he left Harvard and worked as lieutenant colonel for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). James Miller, in charge of the selection of secret agents at the OSS during World War Two said the situation test was used by WOSB and OSS to assess potential agents. In 1943 Murray helped complete Analysis of the Personality of Adolph Hitler, commissioned by OSS boss William "Wild Bill" Donovan. The report was done in collaboration with psychoanalyst Walter C. Langer, Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research, and Dr. Bertram D. Lewin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute. The report used many sources to profile Hitler, including informants such as Ernst Hanfstaengl, Hermann Rauschning, Princess Stephanie von Hohenlohe, Gregor Strasser, Friedelinde Wagner, and Kurt Ludecke. The groundbreaking study was the pioneer of offender profiling and political psychology. In addition to predicting that Hitler would choose suicide if defeat for Germany was near, Murray's collaborative report stated that Hitler was impotent as far as heterosexual relations were concerned and that there was a possibility that Hitler had participated in a homosexual relationship. The report stated: "The belief that Hitler is homosexual has probably developed (a) from the fact that he does show so many feminine characteristics, and (b) from the fact that there were so many homosexuals in the Party during the early days and many continue to occupy important positions. It is probably true that Hitler calls Albert Forster "Bubi", which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners."
Oliver Lopez
Harvard human experiments, 1959-62[edit] In 1947, he returned to Harvard as a chief researcher, lectured and established with others the Psychological Clinic Annex. From late 1959 to early 1962, Murray was responsible for what have become ethically indefensible experiments, in which he used twenty-two undergraduates as research subjects.[4] Among other purposes, experiments focused on measuring people's reactions under extreme stress. The unwitting undergraduates were submitted to what Murray called "vehement, sweeping and personally abusive" attacks. Assaults to their egos, cherished ideas and beliefs were used to cause high levels of stress and distress. Among them was 17-year-old Ted Kaczynski, a mathematician who went on to become the Unabomber, a domestic terrorist targeting academics and technologists for 18 years.[5] Alston Chase's book Harvard and the Unabomber: The Education of an American Terrorist connects Kaczynski's abusive experiences under Murray to his later criminal career.[5] In 1960, Timothy Leary started research in psychedelic drugs at Harvard, which Murray is said to have supervised.
Ayden Kelly
I seem to recall this was part of MK Ultra although wikipedia doesn't make mention of it anymore. Some fucked up shit either way.
Anthony Bailey
He was accepted into harvard at age 16 because he was a math prodigy. I'd be willing to bet he was on the spectrum and targeted in these experiments because he was autistic.
Anthony Taylor
>be a Sup Forumsack >worship a mentally diseased man
Wyatt Allen
So the government is causing Autism and they targeted ted to see if they could control them as better societal cogs
Dominic Walker
>I'd argue that the radio isn't bad, but what plays on it
If you believe that, then you didn't comprehend what he said. Ted stated that machines will control us. Whether its degeneracy playing on the radio or right-wing messages strictly controlled by the state, it hsd already changed human society and will be the impetus for human control. If you strictly control media to the point that opposing viewpoints are antagonized, then you have become nothing more than a tyrannical society. If you just allow degenerates to do what they want, it gives fringe and immoral people to do what they want, giving these machines and the people behind them wide impact. And that's just with the radio. Things like means of production, your means of living and whatnot have an even bigger impact. Look at the internet, it has already made people sedentary to the point of being lazy neckbeards. What about AI? Already automation is threatening jobs. Factories? It has made human beings nothing more than disposable cogs in the machine. Ted is right. Allowing unchecked progress in technology will only destroy us.
Ian Hill
Ted was wrong to use violence and it has tainted his ideas, which have some merit.
Violence will not get us out of this mess.
Hudson Kelly
Nice analogy. I prefer to add that this world can also be diverted to a different track. With the established powers keeping the train going at such a momentum that most railroad switches are ignored.
Angel Jackson
He was right though. Things won't change unless the current social order is violently overthrown. He was just wrong to think even for a second he alone could do it. A one-man revolution is an impossibility.
Ryan Mitchell
Hello there FBI. How much are you getting paid by the shitpost?
Luke Russell
I really wonder if ol Ted was on the spectrum.
Jason Smith
I find it amusing though that one of the previous president's top advisors, Valerie Jarrett, said Mao Zedong, one of the biggest mass murderers in all of history, is one of her two favorite authors, yet never got called out from it (aside from the impotent and incompetent conservative media), yet agreeing Ted brought up some interesting points likely puts you on a blacklist.
Aaron Morales
I had read it fully two times in my native language.
more important part is power process and how modern society prevents people to go thourugh it.
Asher Roberts
Did he name (((them)))?
Carter Roberts
I do not think Ted ever mentioned the Jews or Judaism as far as I know.
Chase White
His discussion of technology does not include the problem of multicultural, pan-racial access to our technology. Besides national borders and ethnic citizenship, governments have a responsibility to protect the technologies of the creator group from being sold or stolen into other groups. In the same way that miscegenation is an offense against nature, so too is the mongrelizing of a people's technology into other groups who had no role in creating it. If our technologies and knowledge investitures were strictly conserved to the groups that developed them, there would be less threat and danger to other groups and more importantly, our own. Monarchies used to protect ethnic investiture as a part of their role. Now we are in a place where not only do all of these jews and foreign nationals have to go back, but our knowledge disciplines and technology must be be clawed back from these groups. In this pursuit we reclaim our natural relation with nature and evolution, while restoring other groups to the true content of their evolutionary trajectory.
Jackson Watson
The parts about leftism are essential Sup Forums reading. The unabomber was a bit eccentric, let's say. But he also had genius level IQ and his analysis of leftism is spot on. And I say that as a former, politically active leftist.
Levi Hernandez
> traitorous faggot brother right.
Kevin Ross
>faggot brother
This asshole wrote a book about how he did it, and how he was confused and suffered and all this shit. Buy a special edition pls.
Eli Sullivan
No he wasn't. You can't expect people to return in caves voluntary, same way you can't make all nonwhites leave, as alt fags want.
There are lot of people able to describe problem, but when it comes to solutions they behave pretty much shchizophrenic.
Aaron Taylor
this is astonishingly accurate
Brandon James
>Beyond that, a technological society HAS TO weaken family ties and local communities if it is to function efficiently. Uber, Tinder, and this board are great examples of tech strengthening community bonds. The real problem is it amplifies messages to the point of being trapped in an echo chamber. *Cough* Anyway, remember he was anti tech, and his bombs we're against tech players and universities, and so he is biased against them.
Adrian Peterson
Fuck off sharia blue antifaggot
Brayden Butler
lmao if you think Tinder and Sup Forums stregthen community bonds.
Ethan Flores
He was right about a lot of things, except his solution of primitivism is wrong. We need an agrarian society. Pic related is similar to the Unabomber Manifesto except it is more philosophical and it is correct on the stance of agrarianism over primitivism.
Levi Flores
I am noticing a lot more shills and falseflagging recently.
Andrew Perez
He never strictly proposed primitivism. He divided technology into two categories: System building technologies and personally empowering technologies.
Dylan Scott
>tfw the Unabomber was actually right all along and he was the good guy trying to save the world
what timeline am I in?
Jack Reyes
Yeah he's a pretty smart guy. I don't entirely agree with his anarcho-primitivist views, I wonder if they've changed with the advent of genetic engineering. I'd like to mail him but I'm already on enough watch lists as is.
Austin Brown
He was well aware of the advent of genetic engineering. It can easily be read in 1 or 2 sittings. Actually go read it before posting in Ted threads.
Brayden Bailey
He specifically talks about genetic engineering, man.
Julian Price
It looks bigger than it actually is because he filled it with bibliographical citations which take up a number of pages. You can skip those.
Aaron Cruz
I have all of his writings in a black binder notebook neatly organized by timeline.
Daniel Rivera
google.
Thomas Peterson
I thought this was a parody at first. I'm speechless
Cooper Lee
This century's greatest philosopher.
Nathaniel Morales
>Uber >Tinder >Sup Forums >strengthen community bonds
Jaxon Collins
Everything here must be checked and counted for.
Joseph Allen
The internet would probably fall under both categories.
Daniel Garcia
Is it futile then, anons? To be fighting against the scourge of leftism? Is leftism the future? It seems to be, to me, and even though I feel it may be futile in the long run, I can't help but fight it for I know it to be an evil.
Julian Wright
The one thing that may be leftism's undoing is despite all of its howling about racism it is actually an incredibly racist ideology. It refuses to see non- white people as moral actors, which is why you never see them criticize Islam or Chinese social conservatiism.
It is overly focused on only stamping out heretic Europeans, but turns a blind eye to the tribalism and illiberalism of non- European groups.
Denying how man is wired is what ended the Soviet project.
Julian Clark
It amazes me the power the left wields, in politics, universities, and through the media, esp online now. I actually fear a bit for the future. (to be fair, I live in CA, so that may have unrealistically increased my fear, as I am surrounded by many of these types).
Nathan Sanders
I live in bum fuck nowhere in the Rockies and liberalism is on the rise here too. It's everywhere user, it's weird into all media now. My only hope is that they over played their hand. Even my liberal little sister is starting to complain about white guilt.
Adrian Moore
The guy is an idiot.
Sheltered in academia, when someone with money buys land, instead of going "WELL I GUESS I SHOULD MAKE MONEY" he decides to go on some autistic bombing spree.
His "manifesto" is the definition of TLDR and reads as if it's some shitty academic paper.
If he had $$$ he would have outbid whoever bought the land to the plateau that spurred his bombing spree.
Leftists like to think that "public land" will always remain public, and that the "law is the law", but that's not how the real world works lmao. Leftism is a mental disease.
You can buy off anyone with the right connections. If not with a carrot, then a stick.
Brandon Miller
They realize that the internet allows for dissent and non approved materials to get out, which is why they going full shut it down mode.
White nationalists are simply the first to be purged. Anyone left of John McCain will eventually be on the chopping block.
This site with all of its faults is the last bastion for free speech.
Nathan Carter
I mean right of John McCain.
Owen Murphy
the virgin extremist McVeigh is the Chad's choice
Robert Perez
This post is how I know you're not part of the upper class.
Andrew King
>be ubabomber >be mindfucked by mk-ultra >the ordeal is like taking the world's largest red-suppository >write glorious political manifesto >strong arm (((them))) into distributing it to nearly every citizen in the country >the people who you sacrificed so much for to educate mostly respond with "tl;dr" JUST
Luis Green
fuck you and your ironic meme flag choice faggot.
Noah Johnson
>He may well be right. Human cultural evolution has jumped light years ahead of our biological evolution, so the way billions of people live today is likely inappropriate for our species. Our minds and bodies evolved for a hunter/gatherer lifestyle out in the savanna, not for soul crushing wageslaving confined to a drab overcrowded asphalt jungle.
Very well put.
>Still, there is no turning back the clock. He was deluded to think he could ever overthrow the modern way of life with his insignificant bombing campaign.
I believe he was called out on this (he communicates with anarchists, apparently) and concluded that the best we could hope for was small scale hamlet/village agrarian set ups. This of course, would be overrun in about fifteen minutes by those who kept up with modern warfare technology.
Juan Morris
honestly he was right
our models of economy have led us to inevitable disaster of population growth, global climate degradation and the destruction of the White Family unit at the hands of the globalist machine and the guilt of the ever increasing, unquenchable hordes of brown
best we can hope for is that some disaster (superbug?) wipes out most of the worlds population if humanity is deserving of any sliver of hope
the jaws of the elite have neutered and enslaved any chance of going back on our own accord
if anything he is (was? does he still believe there is hope?) to hopeful
Brody Gomez
yes yes doesn't mean you can't discuss and create a new humanistic framework. jordan peterson is working on this and covfefes these topics in his youtube blurbs. make a new religion, it can't be that fucking hard. we almost did until youtube jewed everyone.
agree, but the solution for this is population control. if we continue to shit out billions of useles amoeba we will drown in our own shit (or get exterminated by AI for our and the planet's own good if we become "boot stamping on a face" forever, then fuck it, we'll die out in 60 - 100 thousand years anyway. supervolcano, astronomical event, mad-made catastrophe, 200 million years is the MAX a species can make it on this planet. expand or die, i think we'll expand and fuck whatever rules we try and make.
thanks OP, i hadn't read that before.
Sebastian Reed
Never read this. It's like he was a time traveller.
Zachary Carter
McVeigh was a literal virgin too and unlike Ted has the blood of children on his hands.
Christopher Cook
nothing is absolute. he identified some legitimate shit but his own personal redpill consumed him. and his brother was cunt. seriously, fuck that guy.
no one, anywhere, any how can predict what fuckups and glories our collective stupidities will achieve. we embody chaos.
a lot of us are only still living because we want to see what happens next.
Kevin Perry
nice deflection. so very civilised.
Ian Ortiz
He is great. Don't forget to read "the System's neatest trick" too. It's only 14 pages, you can find a pdf online. It explains the mechanisms that cause the SJWs to be the suckers for the system they claim to oppose.
Hudson Gomez
What is the synopsis of it?
Justin Mitchell
We really do need decentralized internet/youtubes/twitters etc. It always amazes me that Sup Forums still persists (and I am grateful that it does). I'm not big into Nazi stuff, but its funny to me that I no longer believe the holocaust happened the way I was taught, and funny too how rabid many people would get if I denied that it happened the way it was taught. Disagree about the vietnam war, desert storm, korean war, and it's not a big deal. Holocaust and people flip out. I'm wondering if the left purposfully and conciously ratcheted up their timeline, or if it was an emotional response to Trump's election? Will america retain enough saniity to allow people to keep their freedom/power? ---or will the left, through use of government and media, seize freedom from the people?
Brayden Bennett
how jewish was this guy?
William Fisher
you know your flag is ironic hey?
so many layers .... much deep ....
Henry Brown
Normies have no capacity for independent thought. These are the people who would have marched and died for destructive ideologies if they lived under them.
If support for all our rights being stripped away was supported by the media, entertainment, government, and education complex, 80% of normies would be okay with it.
This is one of the most bitter blackpills to swallow.
Daniel Mitchell
Sup Forums is priceless for free speech
regards to your nazi point, to see who controls you, find who you cannot criticise
Levi Lee
The CIA broke him with one of it's mkultra projects and he went to live in the woods.
Jason Long
I'm actually re-reading it. I got a nice authorised new edition of it, with new notes writed by him, in my language (he speaks fluent spanish). Now i'm mature and understand more, also his words are proved right everyday. Few more letters of him: archive.is/oyrRU There's also a library with copies of all his letters and the people who writes him, Chicago? i don't remember. If someone can tell. Pic has his history (and a few others) Damn boy, you must have hope. We are rising, everyday more people wokes. But i like your point of view, we are the right ones, we are the example of how a man should think. But Ted had an impact, he's the first redpill for a lot of people. There's a discovery tv show about him now, it will attract more people to his manifesto. Let's see if the tv show talks about mk-ultra and how.
Angel Hill
It's pretty good except that he makes a HUUUGE jump from 'industrialization is against the aims of the individual' to 'we will use technology to destroy technology and then when we have full and supreme power and are the only ones left with technology well will destroy it' ???
its communist tier retarded.
Connor Murphy
I think it's not so much a single entity, but an ideology. The ideology of leftism, over the last (45?) years has come to rule. No civilized man can say publically that he thinks homosexuality is degenerate behavior (even if a multitude of studies infer that it is). Likewise, no civilized man is able to point out deficiencies in women or in any race other than the white race. It's a hush hush undercurrent of a rule. Such is the culture that has grown around us, and taken hold of government, media, and schooling.
Caleb Morris
...
Gabriel Morales
HAHA that is so clever. You not only made a funny, but you did it in SUCH a clever way. HAHA, which way to the burn ward, am I right!??? HAHAHAHHA
