Well libertaritards?

Well libertaritards?

nope, private charity is fine

Free market. Cuck.

And if no one donates? Or funds are misused?

fpbp

>And if no one donates?
y-you'll donate, wont you user? there problem solved!

>funds are misused
literally the definition of socialism

>no one donates
even with the government taking 1/3 of our income we are the fifth more charitable country in the world
>misused
while I can't tell you there aren't bad charities i can tell you that the government is definitely corrupt hence why 80% of the welfare budget goes to administrative expenses

>And if no one donates?
People donate to africa and no to texas, fuck off concern fag.
>Or funds are misused?
Then you find another charity or do it yourself.
And unlike funds misused by the gov't all was given freely and you can always stop contributing.

There's a reason people donate to the Red Cross and not the government.

>funds are misused
Because the government could never waste money

The churches will take care of it, don't spend federal money

>You'll donate
I don't have enough money to solve a national crisis. I'm already donating to other charities as it is. Charity is just another word for a free market where the company doesn't pay taxes and you get no direct benefits.

>Misused is socialism
Nice strawman. Implying Capitalism always used funds in a way that'll maximize utility for society. Markets maximize profits, much better than socialism or Communism ever can, but max profits does not equal good for Humanity.

Yeah yeah we get it.

You want to exploit the suffering of those in Texas so that you can continue a slippery slope argument down the line to get some gibs.

Scum like you deserves what is coming.

I vote free market

all of those examples are the direct result of government you fucktard

>charity is
no! just no. charity is business and profit.

>max profits does not equal good for Humanity.
max population does not equal good for Humanity either. The next generation will know to buy home insurance.

Why do people believe this? We see all the time for churches, especially mega churches, are blatantly wasteful with money. And yet we tell ourselves, "find a better church!". What's wrong simply with "building a better government!?

Who the hell wants to maximize population? There's ways to reduce the population without relying on natural disasters to kill people. An advanced society, usually, doesn't let nature dictate it's trajectory.

>doesn't let nature dictate it's trajectory

good luck with that inevitable population collapse. In any case, HOME INSURANCE. if you didn't buy it, you shouldn't charge me for the excess!

Let's just not clean up after the storm.

I don't get why we keep on restoring coastal Louisiana and Texas every few years when it's destroyed by weather. I mean, we *know* that any city built there will be destroyed again the next time there's a hurricane, and it's only getting worse.

>There's ways to reduce the population
Don't have children people! We're killing the planet!
>Oh no, we don't have taxpayers!
Quick import from the third world!

Yeah, fuck off, the gov't only creates problems.

Socialism doesn't even work when the situation is normal, why would we even rely on it in times of crisis?

Asking as LITERALLY millions pour in from private donations.
Yes, if the government were a fraction of it's current size, people would still get the help they need.

>Le socialism never works me
The free market also creates problems. What's wrong with having both socialist and capitalist policies?

Take you shitpost back to Late stage capitalism fag

AH, give it to the market, im sure it'll fuck it up beyond repair.

Nothing because they're already in place ya fucking brainlet

You know, if capitalist entities didn't have influence over anti Climate Change propganda we wouldn't have to worry about hurricanes coming though every decade. Those areas rarely experience mega storms like Katrina and Harvey prior to the 2000s. Why is that?

>Implying they can't be improved

>well [insert something here]?
This pattern means you literally have nothing to argue and that you're just looking for (You)s
2/10 made me respond and want to gas myself

Improved how? The system is fine the way it is and is already being taken advantage of
We don't need more European type policies being that the country was founded as being separate from the Old World

Social programs/emergency aid =/= Socialism

How is the government better the insurance and charity?

How is it fine as it is? Our country wouldn't have elected a (false) right wing populist if everyone was fine with our economic system.

Because poor people can't afford good insurance. Charities will focus on their wealthy donors before focusing on the poor. Government assists poor people more readily than markets and charities.

The economic system we have in place is the most profitable in the world, there is nothing wrong with it, those who don't succeed in the system are a result of either lack of effort or misguided effort, and guess what? The world needs ditch diggers too so pick up that shovel and start digging, and the next time youre about to complain about the current system, think back to all the shit you should have done but wasted it

protectionism isnt socialism

retarded nigger cunt:
you are so sick and retarded you don't know the difference between public and private property
private property will clean themselves
insurance will pay for those who have it
ROADS
YOU NIGGER
FUCKING ROADS
THAT WE ALL PAID FOR
FOR THE GOOD OF ALL
(OR HAVE TOLLS)
YOU FUCKING DUMB NIGGER
WILL BE
CLEARED
AND
MAINTAINED
USING
THE
FUCKING
SYSTEM
WE
HAVE
IN
PLACE
I WILL FIND YOU AND DRILL A HOLE INTO YOUR FACE AND FUCK IT UNTIL YOU'RE DEAD

Yes they did. Galveston, TX was completely destroyed by a hurricane all the way back in 1900. That storm was just as strong as Harvey.

>Because poor people can't afford good insurance
Well then they dont have much to replace

>misusing funds is the definition of socialism
I guess Pinochet, Duvalier, Mobutu, Marcos, and Suharto were really socialists then.

>Pinochet,
Free helicopter rides are a good use of taxpayer dollars

>when your shitty system ruins things but there's still a government so it's not real capitalism so you try again and your shitty system ruins things but there's still a government so it's not real capitalism so you try again and your shitty system ruins things but there's still a government so it's not real capitalism so you try again and your shitty system ruins things...

lel, the commie thinks it can reverse the meme

We can't trust socialism to keep people fed without a natural disaster, why make a hurricane worse than it is?

capitalism is not a utopian idea dipshit

I'm not communist.
It is when you have the unrealistic goal of abolishing government in the economic realm, and you blame government for everything wrong.

Holy shit, this is all my cringe, take it and leave me in peace user . . .

Welfare capitalism isn't 'socialism'.

Capitalism - buy insurance
Capitalism - use insurance money to buy new trailer.

3/210 troll harder newfag.

>It is when you have the unrealistic goal of abolishing government in the economic realm
I just want to abolish it in the social safety net realm

Let the free market take care
Just make sure not to tax them on 110% of their gains
Plus on a free market society those people would most likely have insurance
But no, the state will steal from the other states to pay for my shit, why bother

>knee-jerk anticommunist meme
Triggered much?

Spotted the loser "downtrodden" every man

>/leftypol/ 101: When you can refute 100,000,000 murders, tell them they're triggered
Every time.

yes you are