PORTUGAL NO

PORTUGAL NO

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/cEySg
archive.is/mKGrK
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

lmao

...

this would actually be fun to watch during the intermission...

Can someone pls translate?

Fucking kek our children are better than this
>mfw im dead serious

...

All you need to know is that the left book is marketed as "for boys" and the right one "for girls"

The local feminists and marxist lefties have been reeing over this. As usual.

Portugal YES! Because the books were unfortunately already removed at request

>Book publisher Porto rto Editora has already suspended the sale of the books of activities accused of having easier exercises for girls than for boys and of following discriminatory prejudices - and "will transmit this indication to the bookstores and other points of sale."

>This decision comes shortly after the CIG - Commission for Citizenship and Gender Equality recommended that the books of activities of Porto Editora be withdrawn from the points of sale, considering that the books accentuate "gender stereotypes" and present "different degrees Difficulties in some of the proposed activities for boys and girls. "

>The publisher also explains in a statement that it "welcomes" the Commission's proposal to work with the authors of the two books to review the exercises that may be considered discriminatory and will suggest "scheduling a working meeting as soon as possible."

Translated and archived link (Observador): archive.is/cEySg

Thanks. They were probably triggered by the mazes and even the pirate ship vs. the crown.

But they are both equaly easy if you think outside the box

At least the winner is completely unpredictable. How do bookmakers calculate odds in that situation?

accurate


the pirate life ain't easy

THICC CHEST

Title: Porto Editora's workbook suggests that girls are more limited
Archived, translated but disformatted page : archive.is/mKGrK

>However, Porto Editora edited two exercise books for children from 4 to 6 years old who distinguish boys from girls - in color, in the associated imagery but above all in complexity.

>The distinction is not new, but this time the controversy broke out on social networks. The Youth Network for Equality, a non-profit association that defines itself as the promoter of "gender mainstreaming in youth", was the first to report the case. On her Facebook page she explains that it is a "gender stereotype" that has "a limiting effect on society at all ages but is particularly dangerous when it influences education in this way."

>The Commission for Citizenship and Gender Equality (IGC), also on Facebook, says it is already "analyzing these publications, to act accordingly", which confirmed to JN.

>"For the bright minds who thought of them, girls and boys can not do the same. To brighten things up, girls' chores involve princesses looking for crowns in basic labyrinths, while those of the boys summon sailors looking for boats in labyrinths More complex, all classified with blue and pink so that there is no gender confusion, "criticized the" Capazes "Feminist Association.

Being a pirate is way more difficult than being a princess, I don't see anything wrong.

>Sara Falcao Casaca, a teacher and specialist on gender equality issues, also left a protest in the networks. "We already knew how the same publisher described woman and man in the dictionary. She did not learn, despite the complaints."

>Porto Editora rejects charges

>"Discrimination and prejudice in our editions? No, at all." So begins the answer to the controversy of the publisher, published via Facebook.

>The company explains that the issues were published in July 2016 and "aim to develop certain essential skills at preschool age, namely attention and concentration." And she adds that "in both editions the same skills are worked on in the same sequence and with similar exercises.The difference is in the illustration and the artistic approach that the different illustrators did.And if there is an example where the exercise in the case of girls Is apparently easier, there are several others in which the exercises are apparently more difficult, "he says.

>That is why, continues Porto Editora, despite understanding "the concern that will be the source of this controversy," since it is also identified "with the values of equality and diversity," which the company ensures that "publications do not reflect A discriminatory and prejudiced view "

WE

of course the Jew would go for the money

Thanks. Looks like the government twisted the publisher's arm.

WUZ

>take gold chest
>travel to nearest port
>buy as many wenches as you please
of course the muslim just wants to rape the first piece of ass he sees

>help Francisca find her princess' crown drawing her path trough the maze

WE

>specialist on gender equality issues

Genocídio das fêmeas quando?

>unironically defending a Jew
what're you doing

PORTUGAL NO!!!

This never gets old.