...
Hey (((atheists))), how are stars formed?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
quora.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
space.com
twitter.com
In Hollywood
By getting a grammy or an oscar
Gas or something
Btfo
...
Universal flatulence.
By Yahweh talking.
Stop making fun of OP, he clearly understands that atheists are smarter than him and therefor ask them the hard questions his parents cant answer.
You might want to google things tho.
Faggot. I hate you more than Muslims.
((((("""stars""")))))
Genesis 1:14
And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:
Genesis 1:15
And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so.And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also.
...
...
...
...
Revelation 12:9
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
wtf is this
Man, I sure want to worship and kill my fellow white people over this thing.
>how does light works
>what is the colour spectrum
Job 9:9
Which maketh Arcturus, Orion, and Pleiades, and the chambers of the south.
i dont know, but i would also like to know, because im pretty sure no telescoped were used and no real stars were used either, but i feel like water was a part of the process.
OP
This is not Sup Forums political topic you moron.
Go to /x/ or /sci/
...
Every word in Hebrew means "to deceive"
Thanks for the support brothers in Christ.
Looks like we rustles some jimmies.
(((Carbon dating is accurate and Christianity is based off these carbon-dated predecessors)))
How new are ((((you))))?
...
Your religion comes from the holy land Palestine, which is now occupied by Jews. GOD would not approve, if he existed.
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
See psuedo-intellect, appeal to authority and (((nat geo))).
Did you even watch the video? Explain how a star is formed
*tips fedora*
wtf is this
Based Trump!
instructions included
->youtube.com
Besides the only person to see The Father was Moses and it was only his back
No man has seen the Father.
Abraham saw Christ in Genesis 18.
Isaiah saw Christ in Isaiah 6.
Gonna need a verse about Moses.
gravity compresses a constant nuclear exspolsion creating different elements until iron is created once iron is created. once iron is created gravity wins over the constant exspolsion compressing the star so much that it explodes into a massive dust cloud of raw elements known as a super nova
depending on the size of the star iron might not be the end of the stars life
larger stars continue to burn and fuze elements into heavier elements like gold or silver but when thet star eventually goes super nova it can end in a few other ways like a white dwarf or a black hole
stars are kinda boring though if you want something cool try looking up dark stars
Any what part of scientific method can be used to verify this hypothesis, considering this has never been observed, demonstrated or recreated.
Nice try Goldstein
should be a thing
Also, now that I've read your comment:
Do you even gravity bro? Gas clouds
you gotta love this guy
alright so
>gas chilling in the universe
>gets disturbed by the gravity of an object passing by
>gas starts clumping together here and there
>as clumps grow, so does their gravitational pull
>pressure builds up near the core where gravity is the strongest
>eventually fusion happens
>after reaching critical mass, the baby star lets out a huge fart as it enters adulthood
This process takes much longer than your meaningless life lasts
Cool story bro, then why isnt every planet a star?
And again: considering Scientific Method is a STANDARD, how can you turn this hypothesis into a theory without the ability to decreate, demonstrate or observe the claims?
You are a middleman for gay Jew larping
>then why isnt every planet a star?
they are see
Did you really not learn the differences between a gas and a solid in school?
Are you so far up your ass you will defend abiogenesis right here, right now as well?
I can't, can you demonstrate that god created stars?
...
Wew, sounds like we both follow Faith-based religions.
Please tell us about abiogenesis
stars come from nigger kings in egypt
>Wew, sounds like we both follow Faith-based religions
The difference lies in that science doesn't care about being told it's wrong while you're obviously butt-blasted about people not believing in your holy scripture.
>Are you so far up your ass you will defend abiogenesis right here, right now as well?
>Please tell us about abiogenesis
I won't, but is this bait?
Ancient (future) NazBols went back in time and made them.
Light distortion from atmospheric haze.
>The difference lies in that science doesn't care about being told it's wrong while you're obviously butt-blasted about people not believing in your holy scripture.
Edgy. In America, we pay the government to teach your religion and to suppress mine. Is your country the same?
>I won't, but is this bait?
It's more of a prodding to see if you even know where your Faith lies. Pleb.
underrated
Nice use of the word edgy, friend.
>It's more of a prodding to see if you even know where your Faith lies. Pleb.
I have no faith, I'd just rather hypothesize on the origins of the universe instead of chalking it all up to God, it's more entertaining.
I care very little about who is right though
>hahaha atheists you can't explain this
>it's been fully explained decades ago
>ohshit.jpg
>no it hasn't that's all lies
every time
en.wikipedia.org
To assert your initial post as unequivical fact is Faith that it is unequivical fact. Yet it fails Scientific Method.
This wouldn't be an intellectual thread without some shit-eater linking (((Wikipedia))).
1) go to dentist
2) get off Dawkins dick
3) show me how this Theory "has been proven" without Scientific Method
He asked the opinion of (((atheists))) so I'm giving him the best guess science has. Do you know how scientists came up with this "hypothesis"?
nobody can look upon God and live
Again, you're trying to tuck your dick between your legs, as if you didn't imply in your first post that this was unequivical fact.
Gravity
Oh
How about you answer my question?
I'm borrowing your tactic. What is abiogenesis to you?
And it doesnt matter, if you had anything observable, recreatable or demonstrable to prove star formation, you would've mentioned it. Anything else does not matter.
What tactic? Why are you trying to change the subject to abiogenesis?
I'll ask again, do you know how scientists came to this conclusion?
Are you an actual retard?
It doesn't matter. If you had any ammo in your pocket in the form of any semblence to Scientific Method, you would've shown it by now. The fact that you havent and keep baiting shows your blind faith.
Those are refraction in water.
Math, they used math based on our current understanding of physics. So it's a theory not a hypothesis. also
>plebbit spacing
I always thought it was weird that people blindly believe anything someone says when SCIENCE is plastered on it. Just act like you know what you're talking about, have a lot of people agree with it, show some charts and numbers and BAM.
Math means you can skip 3 steps involved in Scientific Method. The universal standard.
Ok Jew
>pic related
serious answer, clouds of matter like hydrogen and helium, for one reason or another, compress enough and in large enough quantities that they start holding themselves together with their own gravity and heat and pressure gets high enough that fusion starts to occur, and then it grows from there. that's an extremely simplistic and layman description but it's the general idea
They lust after intellectual superiority.
Romans 1:22-28King James Version (KJV)
22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,
23 And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things.
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
>what is a theory
You're gonna have to bait harder if you want to rustle my jimmies, pal.
the earth is flat
You are actually retarded.
Who cares about Experiment, Analyze and Conclude?
>"We dont need to observe, recreate or demonstrate when we can just use math."
Ok Goldstein
>Nazi
>Christian
LMAO, there's some historically illiterate American behind this post
A Cloud of hydrogen a little more than the mass of the resulting star gravitationally collapses in on itself, the pressure/volume change causes the temperaure to increase as per PV=nRT
once it increases past the point of nuclear fusion, Hydrogen fuses into deuterium, which fuses into helium-4
you mean air
>being this retarded
LMAO at being this fucking brainwashed, how was any of that tested?
Prove that. Scientific method is the universal standard.
If you dont know it to be unequivicallgytrue, say so before you unveil psuedo-science.
Fuck if I know fission or some shit
With particle colliders?
The energy is heat instead of kinetic for stars, though
prove what? that gravity and nuclear fusion exist
We have never seen a star form. The only equivilency given by science is this:
"The energy creates by 20 supernovas can, theoretically, form a new star"
We see stars explode all the time. Why have we never seen one form. The Sun in shrinking as well.
The current leading theory is that enough gases in one place create a gravity well strong enough to violently compress until enough energy and pressure sparks fusion.
The proof is rational and mathematical in nature. Unless you deny the existence of rational evidence, in which case you deny the model of epistemology that enables you to claim the existence of God.
Science and religion are not mutually exclusive. Figuring out how things happen is not the same as understanding why they happen and take the form they do.
Please quit your D&C shilling, we're on the same side.
space.com
Star Caught in Act of Birth
A Spitzer IRAC band 3 (5.8 μm) image of the L1448 complex. The youngest future star, known as L1448-IRS2E, is located in the Perseus star-forming region, which is approximately 800 light-years away, within own Milky Way galaxy.
Credit: Xuepeng Chen/Yale University
This story was updated June 22 at 12:40 p.m. EDT.
The youngest unborn star currently known ? an object so early in its formation that it isn't fully developed into a true star ? has been caught on camera in a new study.
Astronomers glimpsed the future star using the Submillimeter Array in Hawaii and the infrared Spitzer Space Telescope. The object, which is estimated to be only a few thousand years old, has just begun pulling matter in from a surrounding envelope of gas and dust.
"It's very difficult to detect objects in this phase of star formation, because they are very short-lived and they emit very little light"
(i have no idea what your supernova energy shit means, expand on it please)
well fuck, copy-pasted more than i thought there...
I'm not shilling. Undermining Genesis casts doubt on the entire Bible.
Shit-eater with shitteeth reposting shit he just googled.
1) "If you cant explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
2) Title of article directly contradicted by content of article
3) Just under 1 septillion known stars in the universe. Guess this page found the only new one.
>that flag
>mind filled with western propaganda
checks out. christian tenets were a core and integral facet of hitlers national socialism, you history-deft twat
>implying we can see all stars all the time
>implying we can see where a star is going to form ahead of time and point a camera there
>implying we can see all of those stars all the time
Cunt, you asked for why we've never seen one form. it's not like some kind of 10 minute thing that is visible everywhere to the naked eye.
now explain to me what "The energy creates by 20 supernovas can, theoretically, form a new star" means in terms of where it fits into the discussion. what is it meant to proove, what do you mean, where are you getting it from?
Newtons law of universal gravity states that matter is attracted to itself. Using this observation, we can explain how star formation works.
Under intense gravity and pressure, clumps of hydrogen gas will begin fusing. This fusion is what powers stars. When a star gets old, most of the hydrogen has been fused into helium. The star then fuses the helium to make heavier elements, and so on until the star reached iron.
Iron is a very heavy metal. Eventually the combined gravity of the iron overpowers the force of fusion, and the star esplodes.
Not only is this observable, but its somewhat testable in the lab and in physics. This isn't some mumbo-jumbo that someone came up with. THe understanding of stars has come from generations of breakthru science and physics.
>nuclear fusion has never been observed or recreated
I guess you think fusion bombs are bullshit, too? Good luck trying to "save the white race" and/or maintain any sort of technological advantage over other cultures whatsoever after throwing the past 100 years of scientific advancement wholesale. Idiots.
jew god only has one nut?
what are you a cop.
Shut the fuck up you misquoting moron.
To state that star formation is the reault of nucmear fusion is the most unscientific, psuedo-intellectual, spastic, kike-worshipping shit you can say.
And I'm have Asian.
The creation of the universe is not the important question that the bible answers, too much autism in christianity is the reason why everyone has turned atheist in the weest.