What is Sup Forums's opinion on Alexandr Dugin?

...

Insane anti white faggot. Also his bro Limonov literally sucked a niggger dick.

FPBP
>father worked for KGB
>junkie through all of 80s-90s
>did literal gay shit with his buddy Eduard Limonov(Limonov sucked a black cock in NYC - source his book "Ya Edichka") back then
>have been to mental asylum several times
>is a schizophrenic
>his supporters are very very few
>all of them are omega cucklords, that get beaten up by the Russian Nationalists when they show up there
>Dugin believes that having a beard will get you to heaven
>has tatar ancestry
>is anti-White
Why do you even post this cunt?

It seems liek that he sees "White civilization" as Liberal Eurodegeneracy, not nationalism, which is rigth tho because Pan-europeanism is Jewish liberal idoelogy.

kek, he looks like a gay Trotsky

Also isn't most of his supposed "influence" over Putin complete bullshit promoted by Dugin?

russian enemy of Poland, just different flavoured

>russian enemy of Poland

Isn't that redundant?

He has very valid criticisms of liberalism and modernity. I find myself somewhat sympathetic to his anti-Western sentiment at times. From what I've read, he seems to have a pretty good grasp on history, and is able to coherently forecast a fairly interesting future based on historical trends.

That said, his policy prescriptions aren't that great. Nazbol is a bad meme. "Fourth Political Theory"/Duginism is meek, vague, far too mystical and barely coherent. It seems entirely incapable of motivating real world action (assuming the benefit of a collapse of Liberalism), worse yet, even if it somehow succeeds, I don't think it solves the problems we face.

Perhaps it's a better fit for the future Russian political landscape, I'm nowhere near familiar enough with Russian political and cultural history to make any sort of comment as to what their future politics could/should look like. Regardless, it seems completely useless for those of us in America, Canada, Australia, or Western Europe.

White Civilization and West are semi-authoritarian and anti-egalitarian in nature, gun friendly, aggressive, racialist, ethnocentric, imperialistic and classic. That's what true West is. From Normandy to Moscow

/thread
It's pretty clear that he hates White Imperialism and White Purity. Take a hike mongrel
Honorary WASP

A complete schizo clown. How can some people take him seriously is beyond me.
>influence
Nah. That stems form Dugin writing about that Ukraininans need to be genocided, and just 2 years after that Putin invaded Ukraine. That is all.

FPBP
/thread
Genociding Ukrainians is the only pro-White thing Dugin ever said it seems. Ukrainians must be genocided or removed from Europe once ethnic Russian nationalists take the Kremlin back

Boris Malyarchuk, M. V. Derenko, G. A. Denisova, M. R. Nassiri, and E. I. Rogaev. "Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphism in Populations of the Caspian Region and Southeastern Europe." Russian Journal of Genetics 38:4 (2002): pages 434-438. Abstract:

"Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction polymorphism was examined in Turkmens, Eastern Iranians, and Ukrainians. The gene pools of all populations studied were characterized by the presence of European mtDNA lineages. Mongoloid component observed in Turkmen and Iranian populations with the frequencies of about 20% was represented by groups C, D, and E/G in Turkmens, and by M*, D, A, and B in Iranians."

ethnic Ukrainians are nonwhite subhmans. Their home is Central Asia.
Ethnic Russians are European White though (Northern Germanic, Baltic Slavic and sometimes Finnic)

Ukrainians are bunch of try-hard-to-be-European mongrels resulted from Circassians, Pechenegs, Tatars, Armenians and Jews starting speaking Slavic for the sake of convenience

«Укpaїнцi – цe cтapoдaвнi тюpки, якi poзмoвляють cлoв’янcькoю мoвoю»

"Ukrainian are turkics that use the Slavic language" Omelyan Pricak, Harvard University Professor, founder and first director of Harvard Institute for Ukrainian Studies.

Ukrainians (ethnic) are literally more Turkic than Turks.

>White Purity
there is no such a thing as that, whites hate each other more than niggers or chinks

>Ukrainians are nonwhite subhmans
>Ethnic Russians are European White though
The ones with less Asiatic admixture are less European?
>Baltic Slavic
No such thing. Genetically most of them are Baltid while Slavic is a linguistic group only.
Balts and Slavs have very little on common these days.
>and sometimes Finnic
But never Ukrainian?

Baltic-Slavic ethnogenesis is a fact though. Slavic is a race when it comes to Central European and Alpine Slavic groups that spread all over. Some Slavic speaking groups are more Illyrian those in Croatia, true.
>but never Ukrainian
How can ethnic Russians be Ukrainian? Those who mixed with them become mongrels just like Turkranians. Their Turk DNA, origin and ethnic genesis is a fact proven by history and science. They must go back.

Were they any White, we wouldn't have killed them during the WWII

>Baltic-Slavic ethnogenesis is a fact though
Then why does the average Balt look so much different from the average Russian even when Balts have far less foreign admixture?
>How can ethnic Russians be Ukrainian?
Where did I state that? Russia has been under Mongolian rule for hunderds of years. If Ukrainians have to go, then so do Russians. There is no way around it.
And if you go down this path, it will not end there. Finns would be next, then you, and everyone else who has some foreign blood.
>Were they any White, we wouldn't have killed them during the WWII
WW2 as not about any (American coined) whiteness. And every "white" nation was getting killed by both the Nazis and Soviets on their respective sides.

When you realize that it's fucking modern Ukraine and Moscow that was under mongols (not the thing which affected bloodline anyway, since mongs were only collecting the tribute) your argument goes even lower. Ukrainians WERE TURKIC tribes from the beginning. Retard
>American coined
Who speaks about those? Slovenes and Croats just used a good chance to cull mongrels like Ukrainians and Jews

>mongs were only collecting the tribute
Negative. Mongol intermarrying with ethnic women was a very common sight. Having a Russian wife/harem was a sign of higher status.
>Slovenes and Croats just used a good chance to cull mongrels
None of that was was about no mogrels or race, but politics and religion respectively (and territorial disputes for both).
Tell me then: who is white and who is not (and no nonexistent groups like Balto-Slavs please).

Hell yeah. Ukrainians and Tatars will be deported to Kazakhstan where they belong
t. chink
Russkie are more Nordic looking than Balts. Your diaspora is made of Southern "Russians" and Ukrainian ex convicts. Stalin specifically took the worst dregs of society to destroy the rebellious spirit and homogeneity in Baltic nations
Negative your ass. Mongols never lived in areas they had control over and those whom they took away stayed in the steppe.

So your noncitizen diaspora here are represenative of Balts now? Good to know.

try more

That diaspora is more representative of Ukraine and Kavkaz region that Russia

Ukrainians and Jews were killed in Western Balkans because territory dispute - sound about right. Nothing to do with a sense of ethnic superiority at all. Who is White? Not Southern and Southeastern mongrels that's for sure
>Czech flag
>not a Vietnamese or Ukrainian s*bhuman
Statistics don't lie. Suck the nigger dick - follow your leader

Disgusting degenerate obsessed with "We Wuz Eurasian not white" meme.
Typical nazbol faggotry.

Iam whiter than your entire state gypsynigger