NatCap vs NatSoc

Are we Pinochet or Hitler here?

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/13819643
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

FREE

...

GAS

Hitler capitalism is unseemly in its evaluation of the human life

POWERED

JEWCOPTER

>no Rockwell
>valued private property
>valued his people
>hated the fuck out of communists

you had one job

FILLED

WITH

REDHEADS

I'm ok with throwing Jews out of helicopters

>Hate statists
>supports the government killing people
I dont get ancaps hypocrisy, at least us fascist are honest about our loyalty to the state. Ancaps and libertarians are full 1776 muh liberty let freedom ring but then go full authoritarian whenever someones refuses to suck ((capitalism)) cock.
Pinochet was globalist cuck who sold out his country to multinational corporations for a few shekels, but it's ok because he killed college students am I rite?

I am Mexican and I even I say sieg heil, gas the ancap kikes

Ask yourself this answer: Which one made his country great, and which one lead it to destruction?

Throwing people out of helicopters who don't respect human rights is self defense.

Also, fuck Hitler. His economic """""""miracle"""""""" was a result of employing countless people in government programs/workshops, devoting a substantial portion of GDP to military spending, and magically lowering unemployment rates by not counting unemployed women as unemployed. Keynseian magic.

>unintelligible text
>I am Mexican

Sounds about right.

Something in between. Basically national capitalism with a purpose.

But naturally Sup Forums thinks in extremes like this: >Ancaps and libertarians
Those are nothing like natcap and it's idiotic to really compare those two to natcap. The only similarity is the basis of the economic syste, the mentality is completely different and would result in a radically different culture and society

Good point

>Which one faded out after a brief stint and is completely unknown outside of a small internet sub-commity
>the other built up his country to fight with two weak allies low in raw resources to fight the three largest,industrialized, resource full countries with massive population advantage overall in a 6 year war that was actually somehow winnable,winning countless victories against lesser foes

>Also, fuck Hitler. His economic """""""miracle"""""""" was a result of employing countless people in government programs/workshops, devoting a substantial portion of GDP to military spending, and magically lowering unemployment rates by not counting unemployed women as unemployed. Keynseian magic.

Sperging. The economics work. You actually didn't say one bad thing about Keynesian economics, but did manage to misspell it.

It's pointless trying to differentiate national cap vs soc because both put the needs of the nation first and respect the individuals rights.

Pinochet as a last resort.
Which for America, is appraoching.


Besides, Pinochet is the only "successful" modern dictator saving his country from the ills of socialism and returning it to a democratic state when he was no longer needed and Chile was a substantially better off place than it was before.

Hitler drove his country to ruin, after the stereotypical short term rise socialism promotes.

One is known for resurrecting his country and dying at an old age loved by most despite the fact he was a dictator, and one is known for losing and everyone hating him.

One's country is doing great today with a completely organic ethnically homogeneous freedom zone, and one is inviting in hoards of muslims to replace their culture.

I think we know who was better.

There is no such thing as Capitalism. There is only Crony Capitalism. This is inevitable.

Pinochet

ITT: FUCKING FAGGOTS THINK NATCAP IS A REAL THING AND THAT PINOCHET WASN'T A JEW PUPPET KEK

Pinochet is a gigantic red pill.

His regime has been slandered and people are pretending that Allandes wouldn't bankrupt the country like the commies did in Venezuela.

strawpoll.me/13819643

...

When your only argument against capitalism is that Ayn Rand, Rothbard etc. were Jews and that Jews support globalism while not showing how in any way the system would support Jewish globalism. When Jewish globalists support Keynesianism and central banking in every country it is found in, I don't see how, in any way, that free market capitalism supports Jewish globalism.

>loved by most despite the fact he was a dictator

This is how I know you've never spoken to a Chilean. They hate his guts. Most of them are normies. The ones that hate him more think Allende and the commies were boss and blame America for putting him into power. Overall he used to look autistic before the redpills started flowing. Friendly reminder, Pinochet was voted OUT of office.

The whole reason Germany and the west is cucked right now is because of lolbertarianism.

"do whatever the fuck you want, you're entitled as long as everyone consents"

This taught individual entitlement. It's ok to gay pride parade,because people could not participate. It's ok for private colleges to create safe spaces, because they're private. Central bank? Fuck it, let'em launder. Maybe get rid of it and let the banks that benefitted from the central financier zionists continue their work in a decentralized mode since they've already established themselves.

Fascists and commies fighting? Ha, only a fool fights for what they believe in.

Lolbertianism is the ideology of pure cuckery.

*spills shit*

The only arguement against Capitalism is Aym Rand being a kike? You don't see how Jews can maintain a monopoly in a free market? Do you huff paint?

www.thezog.info/list-summaries

Never post again.

Look up the people running the federal reserve. They're all zionist jews. They lose money routinely, and congressional hearings don't do shit to them. Where does this money go? Well, it doesn't matter, because libertarianism doesn't have jack shit to say against it in the first place.

Let's say there's a tribal group, and several other groups not looking out for their identities. That one group is at an advantage against every other group. Libertarianism and cucked centrists let it happen.

>This is how I know you've never spoken to a Chilean. They hate his guts. Most of them are normies.

Have you actually been to Chile? If you are talking to the Chileans who fled, then it's the reverse situation to Cubans, who are typically right wing and against socialism. As they would have stuck around Cuba if they agreed with it. Same deal here, Chileans who fled are likely socialist in nature, thus would be against Pinochet, or they would have stayed.

Oh, and the cucks let it happen because they think everyone is winning equally, even when it's apparent that isn't happening. Libertarianism is supposed to be about opportunity, but if we're all playing a rigged game, and the people rigging the game are telling every other individual and tribe not to rig it, then what are ancaps and lolbertarians going to do about it?

Less regulation or something, because the individual is more important than the nation or it's cohesion, or any sense of value. Your individuality doesn't even count for anything because the game is rigged.

Hitler

Chileans from Chile, over the internet, and Chileans who left to America over the past decade. They didn't "flee" anything, they just immigrated.

I agree, the federal reserve is awful and we should all go to the gold standard again. We also shouldn't be giving jews control over our currency in any way, and the best way to do that and to stop the jews most efficiency is to stop ANYONE manipulating our currency.

Yes, I'm so sorry, Aym Rand isn't your only argument as you clearly outlined by saying tha joos and ending there
What wonderful dialogue we're having here and what an amazing refutation of my point you have there

Never post again and learn to spell Ayn Rand.

>gold standard

Here we go. The problem is that the most developed and IQ high countries would be screwed. Countries with large gold reserves would pump it out and devalue Eurasian monetary value-not to mention everyone here would become more worthless. The only difference between fiat and gold is that fiat keeps the world stable. The value in gold is just as imaginary as fiat. There's nothing intrinsically valuable about gold.

Keeping a central bank, headed by the government, means decentralized banks can't manipulate the market or currency. Getting rid of the central bank would fuck us over harder than keeping a zionist thief one.

I guess my typo completely invalidates my argument. lol

Hitler was a Jew puppet to destroy Europe's imperial power and to give the Yankees a window to fill that vacuum. Fucking stormfags and their natsoc/natcap cancer.

>All we need is a strong dynasty, mercantilism, colonialism and imperialism.

We need a 2nd scramble from Africa, the old world needs to come together and wipe the USA from the face of the earth, and fight eachother in the new, empty continents, like we did before the Germans went autistic and started fighting wars in Europe.

That's a legitimately good point but how would we stop Jews from becoming in charge again?
Without explicitly saying no Jews because no one would go for that.

this.

You literally didn't have an argument to begin with. It was just you describing Keynesian economics and saying the Germans used it. The misspell was just mentioned in passing. Instead of getting hung up on your spelling mistakes, why not just post a real argument? Wouldn't you have done that instead if you have one?

Telling.

...

We're Augustolf Hitleche

Could go the secret society route

You're a fucking faggot. Peruse the link I posted you inbred.

Or the religion route.

The jewish religion is entirely folkish. It's about the race before anything else. Aside from reform judaism, it literally requires a jewish mom to pass it on. It's given rise to the temporary phenomenon of jew as a non-religious ethnic unit.

Keynesian economics are bad as they encourage reckless government spending that has no chance of being repaid
All you do is build that debt in order to jog the economy from the bottom, all it does is jogs large companies and the Jews that own them

The other retard can't argue his point so I argued his for him

National Socialism is more collectivist and tribal, National Capitalism, whatever that specifically is suppose to be is more individualist scum.

The debt is imaginary. Japan has three times it's debt than it's GDP. Debt is a joke non-issue.

Appreciate it. You're constructive, that's what this board is missing

Plutocratic capitalism (there is no other kind) and the hedonist-materialist culture that it naturally spawns is the greatest force for evil in the history of man. Pinochet to the firing pit.

Jews are smart, they're just LARP'ing as victim, for the Jews WW2 was a win-win
>Splintered Jew families were killed off so pure Jewish skills are bound to 1 small elite-clique
>Amazing sentimental PR for Jews "muh 6 gorzilliob"
>After the Nazis fell, only Jew puppets were left, USA Vs CCCP

Are you guys to simple to look through these strategies? You always say the Jews are smart with high IQ's
>Nigger-white = white-jew

Treat them like that idiots.

Hitler is literally /ourguy/

Hitler was a beta cuck faggot who had to hide behind "muh german people" was an idiot who sucked at diplomacy and that as soon as he took personal command of the army he made everything autistic reflecting his personality and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of german troops by having them autistically sit in cities declaring them "fortresses" to get bombarded and raped by the soviets every fucking time failing.

Pinochet was a real alpha man who cucked and removed all commies, built a strong self-maintaining free economy.

God quads confirms, capitalism a shit.

Hitler obviousl; Pinochet is the "knock off Hitler" for fags who don't want their parents to disown them when they find pictures of Dear leader on their laptops.

GDP Growth in Chile was on par with the rest of Latin America and now the country is drifting towards socialism, and right-wing ideology is stigmatized thanks to Pinochet being a corrupt faggot. Good job. Great guy.