2000 Years of Cuckstianity BTFO

...

>I contend

top kek, pseudo intellectual faggot

A flawed statement, I see religious sects and symbols as mere finite representations of the same indescribable infinite we sometimes refer to as "God".

I remember when I was 14

Now I know better than to be so arrogant

this

this, but like also, this is essentially a form of post-modernist relativism that says all impressions of divinity are equal and just.

>why you dismiss all the other gods

So atheism is faith after all?

(2/2)
I mean to say, just because you both are based enough to see the pluralist approach to divnitty, that you guys can see the common patterns and create an amalgam of all these impressions into your loose definition of 'god' does not mean that all people who use the word 'god' mean what you mean.

we are spoiled by intellect and world history, in a way. it makes us soft and forgiving.

>so atheism is faith after all?

oh this old bag again....yes you are right....atheists do often become religious (in the sense that they can become just as motivated by dogma as a traditional religious person). I'd argue that this is because all humans are innately religious in the most essential use of the term; finding transcendance and a meaningful existence through speculation, meditation, a community, and a mindset of improvement.

but this doesn't mean that our universal tendency to be religious makes all of our strivings and efforts equal in quality or equally true.

an atheist can have just as much faith based rhetoric as a religious person, but faith means different things to these people. the atheist has 'faith' in what can be shown to be true, the traditional religious person has 'faith' irregardless of direct experience.

there is merit to both, and much overlap, but they are NOT the same.

false equivalence though it's born from the same human instinct

Wow the atheists are out in full force tonight

>I hate Christians who force their beliefs on others!
>tries to force atheist beliefs on others

Actually, as I believe Augustine puts it, all men are drawn to God, but ignorance of the one true Lord is the father of the Pagans.

>i hate anyone who tries to persuade anyone

why don't you just never have a conversation ever again? you're welcome to try and convince me otherwise, I happen to be insulted by people who think they truly understand god's word but then they never share it ;)

seems like if you were confident in your convictions, and thought you had a better way of life, it is the morally correct thing to do to try and spread the gospel

Atheists spend more time thinking about God than anyone else I know.

I thought in the thread's earlier discussion we were talking about 'God' as an amalgamtion of that which is mysterious, eternal, unifying, and 'divine'

if this was the case, it would be arguable that to get a full picture of 'God', one would also have to include the pagan gods, along with our comic book heros, your mother, donald trump, ants, bears, trees, whales, etc.

what if god is the sum of all parts? or is that too much pseudo-intellectual pluralism?

>"Prove God doesn't exist"
>"You can't prove something doesn't exist. You have to prove it does exist"
>"So your belief system is just as faith based as any religion?"
>"No, because if you can't prove something exists then it's safe to say it doesn't real!"
>"What if we just don't have the means of doing that yet? We now know Jupiter has existed longer than us, but we couldn't prove it's existence until we had the means to do so. Does not having the means to do so mean that Jupiter didn't exist prior to its discovery by Galileo?"
>"B-b-b-b-but muh big bang!"
>"What about it? Doesn't science state that you can't get nothing from something? If that's the case, and the big bang created everything, then what created the big bang? Either something existed before it to create it, as per science dictates, or it did create everything from nothing and science is wrong"
>"F-F-F-F-FUCK OFF CHRISTFAG!"
>"I'll pray for you"
>"REEEEEEEEEEEEE!"

I pity atheists, I really do. I think it's very sad that they treat the God Delusion as their own Bible, treat Dawkins as a demigod, hang on his every word purely because of the status they've bestowed upon him and meme on about being free thinkers while only ever quoting the God Delusion and Dawkins.
They're the flip side of the militant religious fanatics coin, but they're too stupid to see it. Blinded by their own open mindedness that rejects everything they disagree with. (((Atheism))) is literally religion for goys just as (((Commnunism))) dictates.
How can that be anything other than very, very sad news?

Just like the anti-racists who bring race into everything.

>Believers are always thinking about non-believers! it's almost like THEY ARE NON-BELIEVERS.

>america spends so much time thinking about ISIS, maybe they are ISIS!

>the jews think so much about enslaving the goyim, maybe they are the goyim!

your logic: if you care enough about a conflict (either material or metaphysical) it means that you are actually the opposite of what you think you are

Oddly enough. I think there is a lot of truth to your argument, in a cosmic//poetic sense, but I think you would do well to turn the crosshairs on yourself every once in a while

You're so full of anger and hate. Very typical though. Sad.

>anatics coin, but they're too stupid to see it. Blinded by their own open mindedness that rejects everything they disagree with. (((Atheism))) is literally religion for goys just as (((Commnunism))) dictates.

i agree, atheism can create dogmatic nutjobs who are the intellectual equivalents of religious nutjobs.

but surely you have experienced religious folk to which all that you just said (above in greentext) could also be applied to them?

this does not disprove the validity of religion, btw, but pointing at rigid/close-minded thinkers who are prone to idol worship is a really, really precarious argument to make on the side of pro-religion.

OP admitted himself that it is faith.

You have faith that there is no God. You certainly don't have evidence for this positive claim.

If you merely lacked specific belief you would merely be an agnostic. If you claim definitively that there is no God, you are making a positive claim which requires either evidence or faith.

t. not atheist

if you read any of my posts, you would pick up on that. sad :^)

I just was pointing out your clichéd argument that you are parroting from a million other relgious folk doesn't hold much weight.

forgive me, my god teaches me to help those in need, so i felt morally obligated to rectify your idiocy.

What about Paganists who believe in their god personally but dont deny the possibility of the existence of others?

White supremacy, white nationalism and National Socialism is a breeding ground of anti-Christian radical leftism. They ally themselves with Marxist atheism and are useful idiots in the Globalist's war on national sovereignty. The shutdown of Stormfront and Dailystormer and youtube censorship IS NOT ENOUGH as their behavior on Sup Forums proves time and time again and they don't care what happens to this website. Christians should be helping in every way possible to make them extinct on pol. Their degeneracy needs to be purged from this board forever.

I have faith that humans are religious creatures, because this is a provable claim. i think there is 'proof' of god because all cultures throughout all time, including myself right now, have a sense that there is something mystical and transcendant about existence.

but this acknoweledgement of the divine cannot save you completely from earthly suffering, so i can also see how some people say, quite justifiably, that the world certainly appears to function as if god does not particularly care about alleviating human suffering.

i have plenty of evidence for a god that doesn't care, just look around you. look at all the senseless death and violence, the 198.000 years of human history before 'god' decided to intervene with monotheism, look at unanswered prayers.

and listen, i know religious folks have answers to the problem of evil, and I've heard all about free-will necessitating pain and consequences and all about the redemptive capabilities of suffering, but you certainly cant say that someone who doesn't believe in the monotheistic god doesn't have good evidence for NOT believing.

just like how i wouldnt deny your moments of transcendance that you attribute to the three letter word 'God', in a way those moments are evidence for the existence of god

i believe god exists and he doesnt exist, and the word is mostly metaphor---an amalgamtion of all that is divine and creative.

but there is certainly a lot of mucky muck and destruction, too.

>tfw Zoroastrianism got it right

B R E A K I N G


redditor gets banned from /r/Christianity, vents about it on Sup Forums.

N E X T U P

Nuke suits in vogue? (((Experts))) weigh in on how to dress for post-apocalyptic success when it finally H A P P E N S?

Humans can only choose one god.
Religions aren't allowed to be mixed.
>you can't get anywhere with a foot in each boat.