Charlottesville, update james field is innocent

Can we make this video viral to show that James Field's attack was an accident & not an terrorist attack
>youtu.be/CYBIaKWef3U

Other urls found in this thread:

hooktube.com/CYBIaKWef3U
youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0
youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g
youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ
youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_traffic
theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/aug/13/fatality-car-attack-anti-fascist-white-supremacist-rally-charlottesville-video-report
twitter.com/AnonBabble

they'd have to prove it was planned in the first place anyways, which isn't likely.

The fact that nothing is being reported on it should tell you the outcome.

The mental gymnastics are astonishing

Which is?

bump

the public opinion on it is fucking ridiculous tho. they believe the media's insanely biased reporting. even trump called him a murderer although that might be 4d chess
>The Supreme Court has held that if adverse pre-trial publicity makes it impossible for an accused to be judged on the basis of the evidence, then the accused cannot be found guilty, no matter his actual guilt.

he's guilty though , he clearly began speeding , ran over the people and fled the scene afterwards , it's even on tape.

Can someone make a backup on Hooktube . Youtube might delete it

No conviction. The prosecution would be playing it up in the media for election if they had something.

hooktube.com/CYBIaKWef3U
Click the download button.

When youtube deletes the video they eventually also delete the streams which hooktube uses. It doesn't mirror.

However he did it in a panic mode not like your guys in .Nice,Barcelona,Berlin.... who drove on Vehicle prohibited areas

Yet the street was a one way one and they were blocking it.

...

May God bless you with a beautiful Aryan Wife & plenty of Aryan children

It's a poison pill for the prosecutors. They don't want to be the ones that publicly lose the trial.

Try actual gymnastics libfat

Maybe you can avoid cars next time

what you're doing is mental gymnastic , are you underage ? do you have a driving license ?
i drive and i know it's IMPOSSIBLE to panic like that ,he purposely began speeding when he saw them intending to run them over.
inb4 "he panicked" , yeah ? and ? the brakes are there for you. when you're about to hit someone you hit the brakes as hard as you can ; he did not , he ran over them without using his brakes and then he fled.
you guys just want to defend him because he was an identitarian.
you're literally nigger tier.

no, he's a complete faggot and he's going to jail

This isn't fucking mental gymnastics, look at the width of the street, were there lines signifying that there could be ingress or egress of traffic, like normal roads in the USA? Just by looking at the footage from behind the car you can see that it is only a one way street.

the retard stopped then hit the pedal to the metal.
it's on video.

See the picture here and specifically behind the stop sign

Morons. You can't actually believe he's gonna be free.

Nope, we know he will get time for his actions, but this will at least solidify how batshit insane Antifa and BLM are, both sides take casualties.

you mean the us soldier who committed this false flag attack is innocent and some kid from a masonic family is taking the fall for it.

No one is chased by a mob on a daily basis while driving

He slowed down but he never stopped

What was the cause of death?

what does it have to do with anything ??
it's a one way road , so what ?
i've already drove in a city in the evening and had to brake because a little girl suddently ran on the road to catch her ball , i didn't hit her (stopped 1 meter from her) even though it was a one way road and the visibility wasn't good , i used my brakes and all (and it was just a family car , not some muscle car with very good brakes) , so now why would a guy driving at daylight in a visibly crowded street began speeding suddently and hit them hard without braking (in his muscle car that surely has good brakes) and then fled the scene as fast as he could ?
you can't defend that or you're nigger tier.

It's about (((their))) globalist agenda. They want to run a prison planet of race-less, culture-less, nation-less, identity-less subdued sheep. They make up less than 1% of the world's population, yet look at all they control from the world's finances to the media that brainwashes us.

In short, they use the entertainment and news media to encourage globalism and discourage nationalism and traditional western values. They distort and lie about the present and past in that effort.

The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice explained:
>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

The Jewish role in the refugee crisis:
>youtube.com/watch?v=IfCOO7Z39j0

Leftist subversion explained by former KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov:
>youtube.com/watch?v=2hWYgPDVX_8

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
>youtube.com/watch?v=PFHa4db3hA0
>youtube.com/watch?v=A94smJ9QJ5g

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com/watch?v=hvNNtBmA3SQ

The Jewish role in the porn industry:
>youtube.com/watch?v=gwd_Iofr6ZQ

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:
>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
>youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160

If the justice system works as it is intended to he will go free. They over charged him, just like zimzam. They have to prove he committed murder and judging by the video evidence there is more than enough doubt to cast on that accusation.

If he loses, he either had a very bad attorney or they simply wanted to make a political example of him.

and ? is it reason enough to kill run over someone and kill them (putting yourself at risk since the police was there , remember Nice ? the terrorist in the truck got shot and killed in his truck).
the mob didn't attack him , if getting insulted by random strangers is enough to hurt your feefees then maybe you should vote democrat.

Why did she die?

If you watch the video, frog, you can see he did brake. He only speeds up after being hit hard in the bumper by a bat. So yes, the mob was assaulting him and they assaulted him after the crash as well which gave him more than enough justification to leave the scene.

They were protesting in the middle of a one way street, you do realize at the very least on a 2 way road, you can avoid traffic. They deliberately placed themselves in harms way.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_traffic

...

Yes. In America, you can get away with murder.

If it was a "murder", they'd be in joy to tell you every detail about how the vilain neo nazi murdered the gentle communists.

He had people on all sides of him. I suppose Euros just politely wait for mobs to break their windows, drag them into the street, and tear them apart.

Meanwhile we get the chad plow.

Actually, they do.

>race jewellers

uh oh

This.

>he
you don't even know who (((he))) is.

so where in this video do you see any intent of not running over someone ?
theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/aug/13/fatality-car-attack-anti-fascist-white-supremacist-rally-charlottesville-video-report
(i know it's the Guardian but it's the first video i found so ...)
as you can see he slows down a bit then rams them at full speed and then flee the scene as fast as he can.
how can you even defend this ?

their fat protected them.

Just ask HRC.. she's our nation's largest active serial killer.

I won't defend his actions.
However these dumb shits were on a road, cars drive down roads herp derp.

tbf I watched the video, by the sound of it, you can hear him accelerate before his car gets hit in the bumper in the back, also we can't see the brake lights

>Intent
Very difficult to prove user. FBI standards are grey in that area.

so if the little girl i almost hit once purposely cross the street to get her ball in a one way low visibility street and if i see her but purposely avoid braking and instead start speeding up , it's her fault if she dies ?
lol mate , i think the police will say otherwise.

...

Yet the street wasn't one way in your situation, also it was someone who was getting her ball because she lost it on accident, these are people who chose of their own volition to stand in the road on purpose. Big fucking difference here. One was circumstantial, the other is deliberate.

The police in France might. America? More delusions.

it will get bumped down to involuntary manslaughter, the trial will take a year or so, he will be in custody all that time. The sentence will be for a year or so, so it will be time served and he walks out of court.

probably not solely from the impact, pic related.
No airbag deploy and damage looks like less than 20mph.

except in our country , our own citizens don't act like rabid niggers and try to kill you because when they do the police intervene and put them in jail.
as far as i can remember , the last time someone attacked a car and tried to get inside was when an antifa threw a molotov cocktail in a police car , the policeman was burnt (don't remember if severely or not) but he didn't die , after that the police found the guy who threw the molotov cocktail AND his friends (like 3 or 4 of them) , they were all arrested and went to prison.
and the crowd didn't try to attack the people who fled the burning vehicule , except the antifa and his friends but they fled because the police tried to caught them on the spot (they got found later).

>that doesn't happen here
>except the time that it did

Okay?

So, is the claim that the FBI and Homeland security and a host of other alphabets and security systems in the US declaring Antifa a domestic terrorist organization true or not?

I can't find any reliable source either way, and not just because I am phenomenally lazy.

you got me, im convinced and ive fucking known this from the start.

how the fuck do i redpill

the point is :
i couldn't see her until the last second in a low visibility near-nighttime situation , yet i managed to brake and not speed up to kill her.
but the guy in Charlottesville was in a high visibility daylight situation with people CLEARLY visible , yet he sped up to ram them over and fled.
how can you be so blind ?
also his braking light are NOT visible on the video , he never used his brakes.

do you even have a driving license ? (protip , you can't get one without knowing the driving code)

yeah : once in years and you ?
several time each year.
it seems the road aren't safe in America.

The guy who made this video is completely retarded.

> Making a Murderer
Can someone be any more of a bitch to rip off a retarded series.

> NETFLIX on top left
Again, how cringe can you be to include this.

> 0:48 "No one lecturing about the rights of the accused"
Why would anyone lecture or bring up the accused's rights if they haven't been infringed. We have a system, there is no need to remind everyone how the system is meant to work unless the system isn't being adhered to. In this case, the system is being adhered to, thus there is no need to gain traction in order to bring attention to the due process.

> 0:51 "The immediate coverage of the car crash sounds like a banana's republic kangaroo court. Not a Western nation built upon the Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus and all our other legal principles."
Media coverage is not the same as the courts. The media has a different agenda than the courts. The media intends to generate profits through viewership. The courts intend to uphold justice and the law. The immediate coverage does not have any bearing on the state of the Magna Carta or the Habeas Corpus. I fucking hate when pseudo-intellectuals throw in random jargon to sound credible. Neither the Magna Carta nor the Habeas Corpus play a distinctively important role in this case.

Magna Carta - Used to be an oppressive law which served the barons and lords. Now only three tenants remain. The only that relate in this instance is the right to due process, which the accused is granted.

Habeas Corpus - In the USA this is civil law which grants the courts permission to hold an individual. This means setting bail, determining jurisdiction, etc. In this case the courts have probable cause to believe he is in fact the accused thus they can hold him in detention until the trial.

I stopped reading here. I fucking hate pseudo-intellectual bullshit.

You're correct the roads are not a good place to hold a protest. You might get hit by a car.

>streets aren't safe
That's why he was trying to get away Francis.

You might be a retard.

Refer to:

This.

The narrative has been that he is a "nazi terrorist", so anything less than 2nd-degree murder WITH intent is pretty much an acquittal.

And they can N E V E R prove intent.
Not unless he actually confesses to planning the whole thing.

When you smear someone like hell before a trial how do you think that they would do in a jury of their peers?

Would be funny if he admitted to purchasing that vehicle solely to run down communists in the street.

Girl in blue is okay the fatty who died was dressed in black

Starting to look like there may have been some intent involved but it may not have been on the part of the poor clod who was driving the Dodge. Some sort of sick humor but think about it, "Dodge".

wud b laff ye

>Some sort of sick humor but think about it, "Dodge".
Would've been sicker if he were driving a "dodge" "ram".

Firstly, the jury is selected from individuals which have not heard the details of the case. They are all screened ahead of time.

This causes a few issues, the only people who haven't heard of the case are legit mongoloids, or hermits, and old people. What ends up happening is that most juries are filled with old people and idiots.

Even if an individual has heard some of the basics of the case beforehand and is selected. It is the responsibility of the individual to be objective. They are explained what needs to be proven for different convictions. The requirements are literally spelled out for even the stupidest people. Then the individuals need to make sure that all these requirements are met in order to sentence the individuals.

We can argue about the legitimacy of the jury system. However, that is not why we are here. We are discussing the bullshit which is this video.

so why are you evading the point ?
he purposely ran over people , he did not brake at any time.
antifa or not this is murder , innocent people passing by could have been killed , you guys are like the shitheads defending jihadists who run over people.

...

His name is Fields

Yes detail about the case but not someone who watched CNNs coverage of it or quite frankly any coverage of it because no one defended him.

There was a video of him speeding down the street and slamming into them from a different angle

So if the brake lights lit you must acquit?

Yes

Oh please, they refused to even give the guy a lawyer for the first week because they claimed the public defender would be bias against them.

If you know anything about police you would know that they subjected him to eight hour interrogations with out a lawyer every one of those days to get him to trip up and admit to criminal intent.

The guy is fucked and especially in that city seeings as how the judge for Cantwell denied bale because of "MUH HATE SPEECH"

He actually did brake too you can see that the break lights are lit.

Well, the act is indefensible. He is a criminal and the shitiest tier of human being.

Do you also ask for a fair and balanced coverage when it comes to the terrorists. Like the San Bernardino shooter, or the Pulse nightclub shooter, or the Barcelona attacks? Of course not, fuck those guys and fuck this guy. Be objective for a while big guy, it'll serve you well.

I even heard that he did a no contest plea without a lawyer Idk if it's true but that's what I've heard

He won't be convicted of murder and he's going to take Trump to the cleaners for defamation when this is all said and done.

actually yes , IF he was just driving at high speed in the street and if he braked when he saw people but hit them while braking that's clearly an accident.
but you're still evading the point : he sped up when he saw them.

>le pic taken at the right moment meme

theguardian.com/us-news/video/2017/aug/13/fatality-car-attack-anti-fascist-white-supremacist-rally-charlottesville-video-report

so where do you see the lights from 00:04 to 00:07 ? also why do we hear the engine speeding up ?

the evidence speaks for itself and shouts through the zig zig knit of the bs in the video.

i fucking lnew from the start the whole incident was way too fucking convenient.

and now i am certain it was an "i need to get the fuck out of here" situation.

pseudo intellectual, sure. but the facts speak for themselves.

Lol yes if CNN went on weeks after the San Bernadino shooter saying that he was a terrorist sent by the Saudi Royal family to start the American Caliphate I'd be fucking pissed. I'd want them to do fair coverage of it because when it goes to court the truth will come out whether they smear the guy or not.

You mean that self hating gay man and the terrible Asian driver incident?

It probably is true, the guy seems like a retard.
People need to understand that you do not talk to cops, not even if you are innocent.

I don't think he is intelligent enough to do that.

Memba when the deep state was just a conspiracy theory? Memba when that script flipped, oh man....

>comparing a shooter to a car surrounded by angry protestors.

objective? xD

100% no matter how innocent you are you need to plea the Fifth Amendment and demand a lawyer.

He braked momentarily but he was being pursued by people with weapons. You can clearly see them running after him in some of the footage.

>except in our country , our own citizens don't act like rabid niggers and try to kill you because when they do the police intervene and put them in jail.
This. In France either you let yourself be assaulted, or you go to jail. Take that, savage americans.

>a redditor's first day on Sup Forums, trying so hard to fit in

...

shills don't want us to bump. likekeep her bumped

what weapon ? flagpoles ?
gee , a guy runs after my car with a flag and hits it ... better run over those guys in front of me and kill as many as possible ! (even though they didn't hit my car and only the ones behind me did)
that's probably the reason why the peaceful truck driver run over people in Nice ? he saw them waving flags during the 14 July and felt threatened , so he decided to kill as many as possible by running over them at full speed , poor man , the cops killed an innocent yet again !

hahahahahahahahahhaahaahahaha

neo-nazis support a murderer neo-nazi. color me surprised. if that guy was antifa you would all be screaming for the death penalty now

>except in our country , our own citizens don't act like rabid niggers and try to kill you because when they do the police intervene and put them in jail.

> the evidence speaks for itself
What evidence? He killed someone on video. He was not in immediate danger. Regardless of the conviction attributed he will still get convicted of at least manslaughter.

> "i need to get the fuck out of here" situation
This is speculation, and doubtful speculation at best.

Fox News and Breitbart literally did do exactly that. CNN has its agenda, other networks have theirs. Each are to pander to their viewers. So why do you not get outraged at Fox News, Breitbart or Alex Jones. These channels are the moral equivalent of CNN.

I guess you don't remember that the Asian driver incident was actually blamed on the Asian by the media because only the first part of the video was available at first. A few days later the media found out that a few of the bikers were undercover officers and more angles and the longer version became available.