IF North Korea is attacked, what happens?

>ITT War predictions: length, causalities, lost cities and military property, results, geopolitics moving forward

I wish that he would attack the red states that voted for trump, but theres nothing of significance in any of those states. Just meth and white trash.

Very little. Decapitation attack is most obvious. This leaves about 20 million people literally without direction. Millions will migrate South and North.

>IF North Korea is attacked, what happens?

China's gonna start behaving themselves in a hurry.

They won't. They're playing duck duck goose.

You're not doing a fantastic job at hurting us Antifanon

no more Mario games.

Nothing will happen, this problem gonna be solved with a non-military way

If norks get pinged Seoul will become a crater. They have so fucking many artillery pieces ready to go.

>what if
I PARTY HARD

drumpf will be impeached

kpop refugees welcome at my house.

We will sneak-attack NK and surprisingly the war will be short and an easy victory for the US, South Korea, and Japan. Yes.

All this: OH shit they will wipe out the south in an hour...blah blah...is hype.

nobody does anything until a mercenary shows up and does a bunch of busy work for various factions and captures all of norks chain of command

this. first to go will be the dmz in an all out strike. i'm getting hard just thinking about this. second to go will be pyongyang and a few key military strongholds. it wouldn't take long as long as the usa focuses on higher up leadership. if we do the dick around boots on the ground, tiptoeing around international fee fees thing we're doomed.

Hauptsturmführer Steiner will gas some bolchewist niggers

What happens with N.Korea going forward?

that's not a "real" HK, no offense.

so what happens after so-callled "victory"? who's gonna pay for reconstruction?

well, they won't want to be a part of china, so eventually the would merge with the south. it would probably be a similar situation to east and west germany when the wall fell. the north would drag down the south economically for awhile. but, south korea would gain all the resources the north has so it would probably be a wash.

i'm sure some thought the same about vietnam and afghanistan

Oh, you know that we will, but that will come cheap compared to the cost of an American city ruined by a MIRV on top of an ICBM. And yes, Un will have those too if we wait.

Imagine one strike from NK utterly annihilating an entire state the size of Nevada. Yeah, let's just kill them now and not worry so much.

Our Tax will go into peacekeeping, rebuilding and modernizing NK
Some companies and certain people will make lots of money while we get the bill

>well, they won't want to be a part of china

why?

well that's because we fought the journalist cucks as much as the actual viet cong. it needs to be blitzkrieg style. fast and total.

I agree. We go in hard, smart, and high-tech or not at all. Hit them with everything but chemical, biological an of course nuclear weapons.

what would NK have to gain by nuking us?

culture. chinese and koreans don't like each other much. they're only unified in their hatred of japan.

China and Russia allow the US to flatten the regime.

Shockwaves through China/South Korea as they deal with millions of immigrants who need to be adapted into their respective societies.

China and South Korea argue over who the space belongs to, at which point things start to heat up again.

so basically iraq 2.0?

>chinese and koreans don't like each other much.

only SK koreans though. i mean, SK and NK's are so different, what's to prevent them from descending into civil war?

South Korea gets bombed, everyone else is fine, NK gets flattened because China isn't actually willing to go to war over NK

boots on the ground should be used only to dole out food and win over norks following the initial strike. even then i think the south koreans might be better off handling the ground aspect.

Nothing, but Un is a man who killed his own brother and uncle.

If a neighbor threatened to shoot me, I'm not going to wait until he actually does it before I call the cops.

no, the norks don't like china much either. they have a weird relationship. i suppose china could claim the territory. it would be better to live under china than north korea.

I'm of the mind to flatten everything in the North until nothing moves, then think about boots on the ground. (sorry, innocent civilians, eggs, omelette.)

What do they have to gain by being crazy as shit and getting sanctioned to the point of botswana-tier GDP?

It's all about self-determination.

>LGBT fag
>Mental dissorder
Opinion is invalid

Fancy weapons aren't going to save you in total war. The Nazis learned this lesson 70 years ago. A few tiger tanks might win a local engagement, but they won't turn the tide of the battle when the enemy has total operational superiority. The call of duty playing millennial generation American soldiers, who had grown up in an age of low intensity conflicts and precision munitions, are in for a rude awakening when they are mercilessly crushed by the Korean People's Army.

The Korean People's Army is a mechanized juggernaut possessing thousands of artillery, tanks, and is made up of milions of men and women who are determined to carry out the orders of the supreme commander at any cost. it's game over for the Americans and South Koreans as the KPA ground forces mops up any remaining resistance that survive the artillery. The Korean People's Army is capable of conducting a shock and awe campaign that will make the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan look like children's games.

Socialist Korea has not only the military might, but more importantly the political will to wage total war against all imperialist forces and South Korean traitors until the final victory.

Maybe somebody should tell the fat orange fuck in the White House

That North Korea has 1.2 million active duty soldiers in its military, and 10 million in reserves.

that Seoul is 35 miles from the North Korean border and North Korea can decimate Seoul with rockets and artillery, that they have nuclear weapons ready to be unleashed.

That their people will handle war far better than the South Koreans, they have no electricity to lose.

That millions of people could die if we start shooting cruise missiles at North Korea and all hell breaks loose.

Or maybe that doesn't matter to the great and glorious Trump?

but the qt nork wimunz. there have to be some up there.

>that Seoul is 35 miles from the North Korean border and North Korea can decimate Seoul with rockets and artillery

Nigga your artillery can't even reach seoul from where it's positioned, and your slow ass tractors will take a week to get them down there.

>the norks don't like china much either.

why would they want to be an american puppet state?

>reconstruction
NK has nothing to reconstruct

>What do they have to gain by being crazy as shit and getting sanctioned to the point of botswana-tier GDP?

how're they crazy?

food maybe

I reckon Trump would let the military go super hard to stop any change of nuclear detonation in any shape or form. Probably drop all 14 MOABs left using some sneaky shit and strike every military area which may hold nuclear facilities within the first hour. Then they will probably wait for a couple hours on the defensive just to make sure no weird nukes pop out of nowhere. Then it would just be a clean sweep through.

Over the next few years it will be China bickering about their right to North Korea, while Russia will also be annoyed they are cut out of trade deals. South Korea will push for unification and the UN will allow it. Japan will take in refugees from Korea but it will end up being heaps of Chinese trying to usurp Japan.

China will act terribly during this whole thing and the western world will begin to realise they have to bring China to heel. Especially when the sjw thing is over in a couple years and we realise that India/China/Africa will be contributing to the pollution of the world more than anyone else. "Conservitards" will be vindicated and revitalised as they will present an argument which isn't Reductio ad Hitlerum. Environmentalism and conservatism will go hand in hand which will gut the left. People will get sent back to their own countries and we will actively help each other to establish a sustainable ethnically and regionally diverse planet.

Also China will probably devolve into civil war soon because their homogenised culture will fracture into the previous ethnic groups and they will all realise they're being fucked over.

ok, sorry. construction then. do you want to war with NK and absorb them?

>1.2 million active duty soldiers

Who all more or less look like this

...

Lol commie larper has commie larper understanding of war.

you caught me, the 1488 jew. reunifying korea hurts the jew, genius. they don't want south korea burdened.

do you even geopolitics?

WHERE MY LARDPEDES AT?!

Shadilay muh dudes

Once Kim is taken out right away, his Generals will most likely tell soldiers to stand down

I don't think it'll be that bad.
The "insurgents" had a common cause in Islam
N.Korea is literally a dictatorship that runs everything.
If you chop the head off the snake, the snake dies in this case.
I don't see the N.Koreans having years long guerilla warfare. Maybe a few commie holdouts, but that's it.

Better take care of Kim sooner than later. No one truly wants war here but if it is the only solution

A horrible bloody war that ruins Korea both North and South, plus huge US & Australian casualties, as we'll get sucked into this bullshit because of the ANZUS treaty like the last Korean war.
Most likely China won't allow that shit on their doorstep, and at best we'll be fighting a proxy war with them in Korea. At worst complete WW3 and mutually assured destruction.

They are über hot, but I'm thinking like Spock right now about this situation. It would appear the question are how many are to die, not is anyone going to die.

Frankly, the South Korean women are the same phenotype so except for a huge loss of life, technically in a worldly sense, we'd be losing nothing of value. I'd prefer Un to come to his senses, lay off the rhetoric and we can let him have his shithole country. War need not happen, I know.

Poor bait, Antifanny

*questions

Slow down, dumbass me.

>reunifying korea hurts the jew, genius.

how?

but what kind of gear is their army using? isn't it like old ww2 era guns and such?

it kind of does have to happen. we can't let them have nukes. they have nukes, so we bomb them. that's really how it has to be. this has been building for 50 years.

>reddit spacing
Get. The. Fuck. Out.

iraq fell pretty quickly, but the bill was still $10 trillion

...

fight your own wars faggot. desu, i'm sick of being the world's police

>what is brinkmanship

read a book sometime

Yeah, I agree! It's just that Un is nuts so he takes the peaceful route out of the equation.
You get me, right? If I were president we'd already be safer.

this war isn't about north korea, it's about american influence in asia. we don't want to lose that, especially in japan. north korea is going to serve as china's proxxy threat maker to japan.

>killing your brother with a brainwashed bitch using a banned poison in an international airport in another country

That's when he got his balls and realized they aren't about shit.

we could prevented this if we had bombed the nuke making facilities initially. it's too late now, who knows how many he has. the only logical option is war.

what's the worst he could do? nuke commiefornia? i'm devastated

And moreover I want to vent about how pissed I am that the Clintons gave the norks their reactors which led to this horrible decision they left to a conservative president. Once the North Korean started their threats backed up with real nukes, that is when I would have told my generals to prepare a sneak-attack while I instruct the media (basically) to believe that I'm naive and really think diplomacy would work.

Sadly, Trump has shown his hand and we're all just waiting for him to play it because if he doesn't, well, I hope you like being NK's bitch.

>we don't want to lose that

(((we))) with taxpayers footing the bill. kys

>we should allow him to destroy part of the country because China controls the situation

Backed into a corner and you don't even see it.

Unfortunately for the sake of peace and human life, I agree with you. No time machine in sight, but at least we know kicking that can down the road is unwise at best.

>iraq fell pretty quickly, but the bill was still $10 trillion
Over the course of a decade.
I'm not saying it won't be a disaster.
I'm just saying I don't see the Norks mounting a prolonged guerilla offense in single celled operations all under a common ideology.

America has the wartime operational rights of the sk military. Its entirely up to you

get off my dick, fag. you're retarded for real.

lol. what faggotry is this?

>I'm just saying I don't see the Norks mounting a prolonged guerilla offense in single celled operations all under a common ideology.

They've been training for that more than any population in the last couple hundred years has.

They are indoctrinated FAR more than any enemy the U.S. has ever faced.

It'll be interesting.

so where is trump in all this? he should attack today. just get it going already. he's losing all element of surprise and initiative. i can't stand these useless cucks.

This probably isn't really a prediction but it's what I want to happen.

this eternal bullshit finally being over.
that's what going to happen.

who the fuck would miss NK at this point?

Good one, but you won't do shit.

They die.

korean war 2.0 but way more deadly and this time NK might win

I was looking forward to a dance off.

>north korea starts war
>tanks run out of gas
>spunk leaks from their ass

>They've been training for that more than any population in the last couple hundred years has.
Valid point.
>They are indoctrinated FAR more than any enemy the U.S. has ever faced.
Perhaps. But will they die for it? That's the question. I guess I have more faith in west Asians being a more passive stock at their core. May be wrong though.
>It'll be interesting.
Agree.

because i don't want to be indebted to (((them))) for more (((regime change)))? tell me, what geopolitical objectives did destabilizing iraq accomplish on my dime other enrich a bunch of jews and unleash ISIS?

>who the fuck would miss NK at this point?

They're just worried about China's reaction.

It's the only reason it isn't already done.

China controls the situation, and I think it pisses off the generals more than any other situation in the last decade. Been a while since they had to seriously consider defense.

Im 100% sure there wont be war
so nothing gonna happens,

yeah, we need to cut you loose

He's right where you think he is! He must decide to attack the minute they test another ICBM, if not, a standard will be set, any country with a nuke can threaten us. I would not risk American, South Korean, or Japanese lives on the assumption that tests are always tests.

war with north korea:

south korea nuked, japan nuked, guam nuked.

everyone condemns donald trump for being a fucking retard and starting shit with a manlet (the psychos of the political world). USA slowly fades out as the sole super power as countries don't want to side with a nation that will literally use them as shields against nuclear bombardment. chinks dominate the world for 300 years.

>If North Korea attacked
They wont. Unless provoked.
North Korea isnt a country. It's a business.

just nuke them

I've been wanting to return to some manner of isolationism for a while now.

I hate the global police shit.