How do you argue against this?

How do you argue against this?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/hashtag/DACA?src=tren
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/892741272259133441
youtube.com/watch?v=sZBpr2Dt1pk
nytimes.com/2012/06/16/us/us-to-stop-deporting-some-illegal-immigrants.html?pagewanted=all
archive.is/yvxhX
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>no criminal record

citation needed

100% are breaking the law by being in the country.
91% are illegally employed.

100% of dreamers crossed the border illegally
last time i checked illegal immigration is against the law
which means they are all criminals

[citation needed]

This literally isn't true at all.

Like no Dreamer has ever been charged with drunk driving, assault, theft, drugs, etc., etc.??

There's supposedly hundreds of thousands if not millions of Dreamers and not one has ever been arrested or charged? Bullshit.

Easy.

1. 100% having no criminal record is impossible.

2. 91% having jobs means that they are unemployed at twice the rate as the general population - 4.4% v. 9%

I'm gonna rob a bank and buy my kids cars. You better not take them away from them because they didn't do anything wrong...

I think it's a rhetorical trick. Their dreamer status is probably rescinded (I bet they're not deported though) if they commit another crime, therefore no CURRENT dreamers have a criminal record.

All illegals are criminals.

How to respond -
>wrong: 120% of dreamers have no criminal record
>150% have jobs
>167% of Trump rallies end in gunfire and mayhem
>Fact: every Trump voter has murdered a minority
Etc

i see now. thanks.

DACA is a world wide trend on twitter right now

twitter.com/hashtag/DACA?src=tren

you will be raked last, friend

>stats faker than female orgasm

>show me the statistics

twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/892741272259133441
Drumpf sucks ass. Bigly

Literal Nigger babble

Correct

>argue
youtube.com/watch?v=sZBpr2Dt1pk

Its all just some BS the dude is spouting. When Dreamers commit a crime, they are no longer eligible for the "dreamer" program

100% of dreamers are illegal anchor babies that were raised with OUR tax dollars by 100% criminal parents.

What the actual fuck is this reasoning?
So because we came from Europe we don't pay taxes and have no drawbacks???
Since when???

That tweet is a damn lie.

> 100%
extraordinary statements require extraordinary proof

100% are illegal
100% used tax payer money for education
100% are still in violation of laws
100% took resources away from legal immigrants and US citizens

so if I go to Mexico and have no criminal record, is MExico mine?

No human is illegal

>really wish natives had weapons and weren't friendly back then
>do you kno ur history

>checked

>Europe is a country
>Niggers are the same as natives
>Natives were nice to foreigners and got BTFO so whites today should repeat their mistakes


Such a strange thought process...

so let me understand this.

e.g A mexican jumps the border, gets pregnant and *from that moment* the baby is already illegal ?

Lol

>no criminal record
>are literally here illegally

>implying natives didn't regularly raid early colonial settlements and rape/kill women and children
>they were all just friendly and peaceful

Ez.
An equal amount of actual American citizens are without jobs due to these illegal immigrants whose parents knowingly broke the law, left their country instead of stay and fighting and working hard to make it a great place like america, came to America with zero regard for our laws/people, put themselves first, went out and had the audacity to have kids (sometimes 2,3,4,5,6) kids.. Fucked an American's kid over and now they want us to have a pity party because (no criminal record) and because they've stolen America's jobs. This is not their country. It is only the country of American Citizens. Their parents came here, broke the fucking law, skipped in line and said fuck everybody else. Their country is the place of origin of their parents. Fucked up? Yeah, these should be furious that their parents didn't even have the decency to think maybe they shouldn't bring kids up in this environment. Shows the utter disregard and selfish mentality of illegals...

Am I done here or nah?

It's a lie. 100% have committed a crime of illegal entry, some have committed other crimes, and 73% are on welfare.

winner
Shit it down...
Sage the thread

This guy is really making me agree with him by talking shit and making assumptions about me and other Trump voters!

t. nobody

ya just go visit NK and walk around for a bit, tell us how legal it was for you to be there

The trumpers are unemployed BECAUSE of dreamers taking the jobs. Twat.

but many are deported

Dreamers aren't anchor babies.
Born in USA makes you USA citizen.
Dreamers is a lib tard term for young illegals.
Their parents fucked them over by making commit the crime.
However, working in the USA without citizenship is also a crime. Otherwise, I could get me some fancy greenbacks instead of my shitty Monopoly money.

ding ding ding.
A leaf gets it

OMG TRUMP IS LITERALLY DEPORTING CHILDREN

>average age is 24
>there are literally "dreamers" in their 30s

Yup. Just scream that you're human and something about breaking up families. I'm sure that the Mexican government, natives, and cartel will accept you honkey.

>How do you argue against this?

DACA is unconstitutional.

You know you are a failure when an illegal takes your job.

I love the left sometimes

>ILLEGALS DO SO WORK AND PAY TAXES EVEN IF THEY AREN'T CITIZENS!!
>Wow, I wonder if they're voting illegally as well?
>I...UH...NO, THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE DUMMY, THEY AREN'T CITIZENS!!

By telling you to take your bullshit back to your DUmpster.

So why was created then?

>literally breaking immigration laws
>no criminal record

to get votes

Mexico would benefit muchly from such outstanding citizens.

They need to go back to make Mexico great again

>how do you argue against this
I, for one, point out that we have this thread multiple times daily, that you are likely just a slider and the best case scenario is that you should lurk way moar.

Because Obama routinely wiped his ass with The Constitution

Because Obama wanted as many illegals as possible to stay in the U.S. and have kids so that states like Texas will go blue in 20 years.

Does Kaivan Shroff have evidence to back up his claim?

>Transplantation of 1.000.000 democrat voters
>Transplantation of 1.000.000 non ethnic europeans to subvert the ethnic matrix of america
>Illegals should get rektd forever

>No criminal record
>100% of dreamers entered the country illegally

Wtf is that supposed to mean

No, but it is illegal for certain humans to be in certain places. If, for instance, I wandered onto a US military base and someone were to ask for my papers, I couldn't simply say, "tsk tsk, Lieutenant. I have every right to be here. Don't you know no human is illegal?"

Let me make this abundantly clear. "Illegal" is a modifier on their status as "immigrant" not their status as "human." You could as easily use the word "trespasser" or even "invader."

The reason I hate the, "No human is illegal," quasi-argument so much is because it misses the point. It's not illegal for them to BE. It's only illegal for them to be HERE.

100% because if they commit a crime they lose their status. It's like saying 100% of people alive haven't been killed.

That being said I don't believe those statistics anyway.

This. "No potential brown voter is illegal."

but what about them girls who are hot as shit?

Yet.

Obama. He violated the constitution on a daily basis.

See Article 1 Section 8 and Article 1 Section 9

>DACA is unconstitutional.
Then why did it take Trump nine months to finally do something about it? And why is Trump given a six-month extension before actually doing something about it? And why have not the American people flied a lawsuit against our government for not doing anything about an unconstitutional law? What the heck is going on???

>people continue to espouse this rhetoric while wondering why people voted for Trump

Outside of Jew privilege, how did this jerkoff get an MBA from Yale? He always tweets nonsense.

Essentially I see this as a law vs. compassion problem. If a homeless man steals from a store to feed his family, should he be given a break?
I assume most liberals would say yes, but they never think about the store owner who has his own family to feed so the homeless man should be punished. Otherwise this sets a precedent for "Compassionate" stealing and a break down of law and order.

...

Ok, "criminal immigrants" then. Sounds better than illegal anyway

Why did obongo promised to close Guantanamo and failed?

Mexico is a shitlib utopia. Strict gun control, free socialized healthcare, and almost no white people exist there. They should be overjoyed that the dreamers will be fortunate enough to be sent to live in such a magnificent country.

>being this dumb on a slide thread
Have a (you)

>using 100% at all

>Then why did it take Trump nine months to finally do something about it?
Who knows, should have been a day one rescinding.
>And why is Trump given a six-month extension before actually doing something about it?
If I had to guess, probably to give time to those to get their affairs in order. Have to ask him.
>And why have not the American people flied a lawsuit against our government for not doing anything about an unconstitutional law?
80%+ of population have no idea what the constitution even says.

How can their necks be red if they don't work in the hot sun? Redneck was literally a term invented to mock working class whites.

>slide thread
not really

tpbp

>free socialized healthcare
but is shite and oversaturared

Exactly. I should be okay with taking that guy's house. I'm not illegal, I'm human.

>natives where friendly
lmao where did this nigger even read his history?

>The reason I hate the, "No human is illegal,
That is the game communists...er, globalists....er, democrats...play. They change the meanings of words, and mix words together and change create a new perception of them. Anyone with common sense and a bit of logic understand exactly about the play on words, "No human is illegal" and that is has absolutely nothing to do with illegal immigrants in a country. But, mess with words, change their meanings, create new meanings and definitions, and be sure to throw in a ton of emotions associated with it all, and you have a recipe for what we see today.

Just like the "We are all the same" being said at the same time of "Diversity is great."

Ah, the ol' "Do yo' research, look it up, know yo' his story" conversation escape tactic. Classic.

You'd be okay with me coming into your house unannounced, right?

>dreamers
>undocumented illegal aliens
>no record in general

Literally American education. The natives are portrayed as a peaceful, nature loving people that saved the colonists by teaching them how to grow corn by placing a fish in the soil. Then they were murdered and put on the trail of tears. Nothing in between.

If you commit crime you are dropped from the dreamer program. DREAMERS HAVE committed crimes, they just loose the title after it

>NO dreamer has a criminal record
laughable
>liberals complain that Trump is about to sign executive order dismantling DACA
>liberal argument against this is that executive orders are unconstitutional
how the fuck do you think it came about in the first place?
nytimes.com/2012/06/16/us/us-to-stop-deporting-some-illegal-immigrants.html?pagewanted=all

Archived that
archive.is/yvxhX

>implying you need anything else

Including literally Hitler?