If there's only one race then what's the correct term?

There are biological differences between inhabitants of different continents

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jeb09GS7ids
genome.cshlp.org/content/14/9/1679.short
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Race is just a common term for a human subspecies

We are all human, we are all the same species, cro-magnon aka Homo Sapiens-Sapiens

in biology they have what's called the 75% rule (some prefer 90%), either way, if you can separate a group of animals into their own sub-groups with up to 75% accuracy just by looking at them, then they are classified as separate subspecies.

Clearly, it's not difficult to separate Africans from Asians from Caucasians from Aboriginal Aboriginals from American Indians.

It gets a bit harder when you start to drill down among those groups, but even then we have the ability to do so with genetics.

So it really just depends on where you want to draw the line, but realistically humans can be divided into separate races or sub-species in the same way we do any other species.

If you'd like a more thorough explanation of how scientists determine sub-species, and how that applies to humans, you can watch this video:

youtube.com/watch?v=jeb09GS7ids

*Australian Aboriginals

nothing more than a noble lie

All humans share 99.9 of the same DNA

And?
Did you think you just made a point?

Yes I did, I we weren't the same species we wouldn't be able to interbreed with a 100 probability of success

yes we also share 96% of our DNA with Chimpanzees, and a significant amount of DNA with fucking trees.

Watch the video and see if you can tell the difference between the bees or birds he shows. Having trouble? Well, they are still considered separate species! If we can do that with insects and animals we can do it with humans, in fact we have been doing so for centuries before the cultural marxists came along and decided to pretend race doesn't exist.

...

And we share 50% DNA with bananas, but that is only because we all made from the same fundamental molecules called nucleotides and come from the same original organism

>we wouldn't be able to interbreed with a 100 probability of success

Possible between different SUBspecies

again you're talking out of your ass, if you want to get scientific you need to look into how biologists actually classify species and sub-species as separate groups.

generally speaking when a population of a species extends across a wide enough area for a long enough time, you are going to see sub-species develop to suit the local environment.

The reason sub-saharan africans are so stupid and ugly compared to the rest of humanity is because they were cut-off from all the out-of-Africa races by the SAHARA desert.

>grizzly-polar bear
>homo sapian-neanderthal
>wolves-coyotes-dogs
That statement isnt true, and its liquid trash popscience to think thats a hard and fast rule, it isnt

In Finnish, races are actually called breeds. Just like doggos and cates :3

>If there's only one race then what's the correct term?

It doesn't matter, one term is as good as the other. It's not the term itself that is relevant but the patterns, traits or whatever else it is referring to.

Don't expect libshits to ever understand that though.

Thank you leaf

Some human vegetable shares 99.9% of your DNA, too.
It doesn't matter how much you have in common, the relevant part is how much of an effect the differences make. More than 90% of the DNA doesn't even hold any information that is processed by your cells.

This is like arguing that all Latin-based languages are the same because they use the same alphabet.

Languages, like genetics, is information. When everyone is literate and there are thousands of books, the language remains more consistent -- however, not 100% as we see today with all sorts of new words entering the English lexicon.

During the middle ages, when only the priestly class was literate, language was much more fluid. When people spread out, changes in pronunciation and new words came about much more quickly. Eventually nobody could even understand the Latin sermons in Church any more, and if someone in England traveled to Germany he couldn't understand anyone.

Are you starting to see how evolution works?

If humans are all genetically so identical, why is it that we don't see an even split of Asians, Whites, and Blacks in the NBA?

Why don't we see an even split of Asians, Whites, and Blacks working in Silicon Valley?

Why are Himalayan Sherpas able to withstand high altitudes so much better than the tourists they guide up Mt. Everest?

Why are almost all of the world's fastest sprinters of West African extraction?

So should bananas and chimpanzees have constitutional rights or should we accept that these small percentages make a significant difference?

Even when albinos have the same skin color, hair color, and eye color, it is still possible to sort major race groups (asians, caucasians, africans) according to the 90% rule.

In fact, a forensic scientist / CSI working on a murder can tell a white and black person apart just from a fingerprint. They can also tell the race of a victim from just the skull or parts of the skeleton, like the hip bone.

If they can do that we are clearly sub-species.

And what about the pygmies?

We consider pygmy elephants a separate sub-species, what about pygmy humans?

Clearly there is enough genetic drift here that there should be no question in your mind that humans are not all one race.

So Asians are the superior race and not whites?

FUCK NIGGERS!

You are all racists!

But he said "subspecies" not "species"

>unironically posting lynn
please
PLEASE
refrain from ever posting again

we're all the same species that's a fact, we can interbreed but we're different subspecies. like leopards and jaguars

subspecies

What's the word?

>a leaf is the best contributor of the thread

I thought I would never see the day

this isn't about who is superior, because none are superior across all domains...

like I said, West Africans tend to be the fastest sprinters... while East Africans tend to dominate long distance running.

Or Asians are smarter than whites, but whites seem to be more creative and invented most of the world's technology.

And Australian Aboriginals can sniff petrol, but North American Aboriginals can sniff even more petrol.

we can interbreed... but should we?

That girl has /fit/'s dream jaw

Bump

Ethnicities?

Um why is this guy such a fucking racist

what is surprising is that asia is a complete shithole and everybody wants to flee to white countries

Usually continent of origin or just continent.
genome.cshlp.org/content/14/9/1679.short

i don't think leopards and jaguars are the same species. i think they can interbreed but their offspring is sterile
the definition of a same species is that it's members can have functional offspring that is not sterile
for example. horses and donkeys can have babies, but they're not the same species because mules and hinnies are sterile (but they are completely functional in all other aspects)

Bump

White Europeans have more in common with East Asians than Sub Saharan Blacks. It's a shame these conversations aren't being had more often or publicly as it's interesting.