DUDE CAPITALISM IS A GOOD THING LMAO

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_capitalism
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

welcome to late stage capitalism, get your money before it runs out

i'd tell you to shoot yourself but seeing that youre in the uk and all...

"late stage"
this isnt a thing

>"late stage"
>this isnt a thing
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_capitalism

>rich person does rational thing
DUDE FUCK CAPITALISM LMAO

AT LEAST IT'S NOT THE GOBERMENT

>late stage
shit lefty meme
kys faggot
>in all fields

inb4 all the betas start shoving capitalist cock down their throats

>shit lefty meme
>kys faggot
see

>equifax is publicly traded
welp, didnt know that. slightly scared

>centralized storage of data
Meh, that's what we hate

time to make an example of these fucks

They acted illegally.
I'm sure investors would have benefited from this information.

>used by neo-marxists
so like i said, its not a thing

its a corporation
the corporation is a seperate entity of the execs, so the execs can legally do what they want with there shares
your grasping at straws

One of them is going to commit suicide, $20 the guy on the right

isn't this the very definition of insider trading?

>names are literally gamble, plodder, and loughran(off with your money)

>British intellectualism

I'm going to Stefan Molyneux this here

Is it really a true, free and open market late stage capitalism if it were even possible that some found out about the leak before others? Without equal access to information, you will never be able to convince me any trade is truly fair.

What you're witnessing is capitalist spun feudalism. They are larping as feudal lords who may do as they please with what's been bestowed upon them by the people.

agreed. looks like the type of guy who goes to the hardware store on the weekend, rents a nailgun, and accidentallys a dozen times in the back of his head

Lol u kiddin m8?

Lol, I'll take 3 guys illegally insider trading to steal a couple hundred thousand dollars from their shareholders over the ENTIRE fucking government stealing BILLIONS OR TRILLIONS of dollars from EVERY citizen of the country. Lol.

DUDE I LEAKED YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION WHICH COULD RESULT IN YOU BEING THE VICTIM OF IDENTITY THEFT AND SOLD OF MY INVOLVEMENT BEFORE INFORMING YOU BUT IM SOMEHOW IN THE RIGHT BECAUSE CAPITALISM LMAO

>consumers are rational and well informed
oops

One of these "hackerz" should dox them so someone can put a bullet in the executives' teeth.

Yes, thats what they did wrong.

anarchy = capitalism
competition = democracy

>before informing public
Pretty sure that's insider trading and is illegal.

"insider trading"

DUDE I'LL TAKE GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS OVER GETTING FUCKED IN THE ASS LMAO

BUT I WANT MY FREE STUFF. GIVE ME FREEFREE OR ELSE I KILL U WITH VIOLENT REVOLUTION REEEEEEE

Wow, got em HAHAHA! You can go to bed now, what an epic pwnage.

Fuck off FBI.

isn't that illegal?

>neomarxists

into the trash

>>>/reddit/

They're literally all white fucking males!!!!!

Wouldn't this be insider trading and illegal?

Insider trading is the buying or selling of a security by someone who has access to material nonpublic information about the security. Insider trading can be illegal or legal depending on when the insider makes the trade. It is illegal when the material information is still nonpublic; trading while having special knowledge is unfair to other investors who don't have access to such knowledge.

Only if you're Martha Stewart

Welp enjoy getting assraped by the SEC.

Ever hear of a trading window?

Sooooo...yes?

>leftypol out in force in this thread
yeah fuck off. Capitalism is working just fine for most all intelligent and productive people. Not to mention, the alternative is complete shit.

this

Regulations should be illegal

...

Often people take ideologies like "capitalism" and "communism" or "socialism", bring them to their most extreme points, and then defend or attack the idea at their most extreme.

Attacking an ideology for their most extreme interpretation is viable when that interpretation is in effect. Which is more or less the case in the example by Same for that shit where people use algorithms to trade in stocks - its so far beyond the original open market idea of investing and growing the economy in that way - its just jackasses skimming money off the top and fucking over literally everyone else who isn't actively doing that in the process because it screws with the flow of money in the economy (especially if that process is backed by bankers who determine economic policy a la goldman sachs).

The money that is skimmed off the top should be paid out in wages to workers so they can afford to buy the products that are being sold. But instead of doing that, you get:
1) an aggressive marketing push to sell products to people made by cheap foreign workers and resources (ie. globalism, immigration, etc)
2) a push for welfare programs with government money that is not really available by one political party
3) a push to abolish those programs and at the same time refuse higher wages by another party
The conflict between the latter two results in ever increasing inequality in an economy that only grows by concentrating all of the growth in the upper echelons of income

Defending an ideology at their most extreme (eg. this is just the free market and its fine, you gotta look out for yourself!) is so fucking utterly ridiculous. That's the sort thing of like saying "Stalin's interpretation of communism was fine!" when it was clearly incredibly damaging to the economy, short-sighted and caused untold suffering. Just like some of the portions of current-day capitalism are liable to cause severe damage.

Capitalism to benefit corporations and individuals VS Capitalism to benefit the state and people

Why can't people detect these nuances?

sweet argument, man!
while were at it, we can discuss the price gouging laws in florida, the amount of donations im gonna get when my house goes to shit, spending hundreds to be able to shitpost, and plenty of others?

>sell stock after it bombs

are people here really fucking stupid, they would rather jump off a building then go broke.

>fags think late stage capitalism is a meme
The west is fuck, wake up. Neo-capitalism has robbed our people of their livelihood. Blame the kikes and international finance.

> late stage
Oh Sweety, when you're old & look back on life in your death bed I want you to repeat this fantasy so that your kids can die depressed too if you ever have some.

Late stage capitalism, neo-capitalism, neoliberalism, neocons... It all means the (((same thing)))

You want more regulations to make regulations illegal? What are you, a statist?

All meaningless buzzwords.
You know what's funny, Marxists deliberately trying to sabotage the economy just so they can fulfill the prophecy of Marx jthat just refuses to happen on its own.

Ever wonder why central bankers & politicians do the most ludicrous thing, unsustinable destructive things? Hint: They want to crash the economy, they're fucking marxists that can't handle things going wel.

Actually historically the gradualists were quite happy to join with Keynes and use it to implement a welfare state but they want more now they want the final stages and the only way is to break the legs off themselves.

>they're fucking marxists
That is the most ridiculous conspiracy shit I have heard in a long time.

And I just read an article about how the CIA was supposedly working with Seth Rogan to destabilize DPRK.

That's not what they did, they held off on informing users they were hacked for several months to unload their stocks before they actually told anybody and the stock crashed.

...

In a way it was though, there is no good reason that Equifax should have had access to all that info in the first place. The government is just as much to blame for giving them that info as they are for their piss poor security/keeping it under wraps for two months and the hackers for taking the information.

soooooo....how is that bad? BTW back in the freemarlet CEOS were salaried with capped they were given huge stock and bonds options in the comapny, back then companies had an interest to NOT allow CEO to own stock at all or very little and were paid based on eprformance but thanks to "Wegulation" as the toad Barney Fransk used to say it drove CEO's into becoming self stock speculators instead of wise company men....bogus understandiing of our once pre 1913 freemarket is what causes the problems here there are tons of socialist and marxiod things placed on companies the biggest ones exempt themselves of it all and the sub orgs they control and the smaller people are fucked in the ass by them

also execs selling stocks once they here of the info would be noticable...very noticeable it would get out because nowadays unlike decades and 100 years ago execs, CEO wer eonly high salaried and the only time they received bonuses was when something good happened, also there was a ton more turnover

No conspiracy mate how don't you know this stuff by now? Wherea are you from?

Everyone should know Obama & Clintons background, the backgrounds of people in major positions of power, the labor parties of Britain & Australia, how the unions were infected, how the media was infected, how academia was infected, the connections of prime ministers with the Fabian Society & their speeches/internal writtings.

It's no wonder that ludicrous insane decisions are being made because its Marxists making them. I know internet marxists don't like hearing the reality but they aren't in the cool kids club, real marxists are working towards the goals they've set over 100 years ago and these useful idiots just are in those circles.

>late-stage X

It's the kike's new "progressive", "right side of history", "white people will be extinct", "you can't stop immigration", and "it's the current year". A kike-term that conveys that the communist niggerkike takeover is inevitable, so please do not fight it goyims.

It exists because none of those other shitty mantras worked in 2016.

They all have major gay face action

Shut up faggot. Kikes were behind capitalism too.
Pure capitalism is antithetical to nationalism, in capitalism money is the bottom line which is downright degenerate.

The .1% are fucking over the economy because they're in it for themselves, and then they promote "marxist" shit to make the 1-10% pay for their shit.

They are not marxist. They are faking that crap to benefit themselves.

(((the .1%)))

>implying monopolies could exist in a truly free capitalist system

How did they keep their information security team silent?

>it has a wikipedia entry
>it is a thing

liberal logic.

Yeah I see what you're saying, I think more accurately the say 100 most powerful people in the world don't really follow an ideology necessarily, they are in it for their power and they are colluding.

I don't know how sure we can be of how exactly they connect to the rest of them; whether they're just funding divisive ideologies to keep the sheep fighting, if they're lizardpeople, prophetic jews, secret society leaders, just historically powerful people continuing on throughout the ages but I'm more talking about these people in positions of power and their ideologies, their actions whether they make the ultimate decisions or not.

This could have easily happened to a government institution.

Yes it is.

t. Finance fag

They sold stock, are they not investors? It's not the company responsibility to give out every single news of info to investors you stupid fucking idiot commie loving regulation crazy stupid fucking nigger regulation lover wipe ass.
But yea it isn't insider trading. And the only way this will never happen is if the owners have had no clue, how can the owners not know about their business? If regulation happens where owners can't sell despite a breach, then how will little businesses survive when they get sued and only way to make it out alive if to sell stock..just stop man seriously you are a faggot loving refugee Uncle sick fucker.

Go start a business stupid fuck

Top b8

>communism kills tens of millions
>occasionally the finance sector commits fraud
GUYZ CAPITALISM IS EVIL

It is insider trading. They traded on material, non public information.

The truth isn't b8 m8.

DUDE you're going to jail!

And here we have a retard

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn

> having power in capitalism means you could get scared and people lose some money
> having power in communism means everyone could get the bullet
> kikes were behind people making bread & trading it for other things they needed
> kikes were being people getting pissed off when other cunts took the stuff they worked for
These kikes you speak of sound a lot more moral than the dark overlords Icke & Jones describe.

you have to understand that right wing retards and conservashits have been trained to obey their corporate elite billionaire globalist masters

that's exactly how fuckers like equifax execs are allowed to get away with shit like this. they have an entire useful idiot army of hillbillies, rednecks, rural and suburban retards

the only reason it would not be a thing is if economic growth was to end

Old white cunts like this is why white men are so hated now. These pieces of shit make the rest of us look bad with their greed.

> How can they get away with this theft!
> Tax every cunt, I want free shit!

the only reason it would not be a thing is if economic growth never ended

Said it before, I'll say it again. Ancaps are the worst of all right wing retards. Your flag needs to be changed to "billionaire globalist shill"

It literally is the textbook definition of insider trading, dumbass.

It is the very definition of insider trading, jfc. It's illegal in the US to trade stock using information unavailable in the public domain and executives of the company in question are exactly the INSIDERS the law is meant to target you absolute retard.

>Remember to buy our premium encryption protection upgrade goys and girls

THEY'LL CHARGE EM

THEY GOT SHKRELLI, AND MARTHA STEWART

EQUIFAX EXECS DUMPING AHEAD OF ANNOUNCING IS TOO BLATANT, ALREADY GETTING HEADLINES

You think rich people & corporations could survive without the violence of the state?

Funny, I don't see any of these shill leftists trading our decadent capitalist lifestyle for North Korea. I wonder why? Could it be because they merely want to seize the means of production for their own indulgence? Or perhaps their so stupid, they just don't know what they want or what they are doing?

looks like we've got a legal expert and an expert on the stock market. Wow. Stock holders are allowed to make trades based on information that the market doesn't have access to. This circumstance leaves nobody in legal standing to sue for insider trading.

You must have an incredible portfolio, young man.

I want people to be able to afford food, modest housing, a cheap car, and education for their kids based on a 40 hour work week without having to go to the government for handouts.

I don't think you should have to "rise" in the economy in order to be able to afford these basic things that I described. I think it should be available to anyone who works 40 hours a week. Whatever job they might have. This does not currently appear to be the case.

I don't care about taxation for the wealthy as much as I care about the notion that currently - with the rules of the stock market, banks, other financial institutions, and large corporations as they are - it seems almost impossible for common people to live a simple modest life because they are not paid fair wages (wages that could be taxed).

Instead, they are paid below a livable minimum wage without benefits and require handouts which the government can't afford because there aren't sufficient people who work jobs that can be reasonably taxed because they're living under the poverty line. Do you see the cyclical problem here?

Forget this nonsense about left and right. It's irrelevant. All it does is provide a scapegoat and creating pointless tribes.

>DUDE COMMUNISM IS A GOOD THING TOPKEK

Why are you faggots so simple-minded?
Has it occurred to you that capitalism is simple a PART of a functioning democracy? Just like government regulation is?
It's not an all or nothing choice.

you think showing evidence of greed and lack of ethics in executives is going to make me think that shit will go away under any other financial system?