If the south is so great, how were they BTFO by a bunch of liberal hipsters?

If the south is so great, how were they BTFO by a bunch of liberal hipsters?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/_ThaS47rqlE
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Order_No._11_(1862)
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

They were btfo by hordes of irish and german immigrants

The south BTFO them in direct combat casualties but they had an army that was over twice the size so it was a matter of time until the zerg tactic was able to bear down on the rebels

This.
Stop pretending that rank and file Unionfags were made up of the brightest and best of America. All rank and file troopers are just illiterate cannon fodder made to die in the meat grinder at the behest of (((them))).

overly cautious leadership. they really almost won the war. they couldve won practically after teh first battle if they just marched into DC before the north got a chance to mobilize. the union army was routed at bull run and nobody was guarding DC and everyone was deserting and panicking and mixed up and fucked over

if the south had just pressed on and followed the retreating union they could have marched straight into DC and captured lincoln and the capital and smashed any sense of union army. they had a few other chances to win the war as well. oh well, hindsight is 20/20

Wasn't the CSA's strategy contingent on whether Britain decided to get involved on their behalf?
Practically speaking, there was just no way that the CSA would have outlasted the Union, unless they fought the greatest defensive war in human history.

Just like the hordes of blacks and mexicans will btfo next war.

>everyone in this picture is dead, including doggo
I miss my dog

Either way both CSA and Union were judaized trash, any contact with afrixa whether domineering or otherwise contaminates you.

>Friendly reminder that our Irish volunteered to the fight, unlike their Yankee counterparts who were drafted and rioted over being drafted

yes, they CSA could have never kept up, the longer the war went on the worse their odds as union manufacturing caught up.

the south actually had better rail systems and organization early in the war, and a stronger military with more weapons and supplies and organization, and arguably the superior leadership

they could have certainly won the war if they played their cards differently, or if britain got involved to a greater degree. britain basically just sold them some arms, they didnt end up providing much material support or personnel. if britain had loaned their navy, things could have turned out very differently. the union blockade on CSA imports was extremely effective, and added to the war of attrition

the south wasn't that great, they needed slaves to make money because their business models were trash. now they have the rust belt and opiates to pacify them.

Stopped butt cold in PA
on PA ground by PA Krauts

PA MASTERRACE

The North was an unstoppable industrial and logistical machine who had an extremely well disciplined and brave army but leadership that was plagued by irrelevant politics and overcautiousness. Grant was not a great tactician but it took him getting joint command to get the army to exploit its strengths.

The South had much better and bolder leadership, but suffered from an agrarian system that just couldn't hang with the powerhouse that was Northern industry, and to make matters worse the North had them blockaded (though there were many British blockade runners, and this was a low risk job as the North just let them go without punishment when caught as to avoid pissing England off).

Honestly it's really neat researching the strengths of each army. The South also had a huge advantage in cavalry because being an agrarian society they pretty much all knew horsemanship going into the war where the North had to train them, and as a result cavalry was much better employed by the South.

The rust belt is in the north, you dumbshit

The North overpowered the South in war thanks to the support of the Eternal Jew and the nations controlled by the Eternal Jew.

The fighting spirit displayed by the North was pathetic in the same way the Allies fighting spirit in WW2 was pathetic. In a fair fight the side with the Nationalist-Racialist spirit wins every time.

The North was fighting a "Gibs me dat" war, they wanted material things (Southern land, economy, etc) while the South was fighting out of ideology. North = Feminine side / South = Masculine side. So of course the Eternal Jew had to help the North.

Ruse Belt isn't even in the South retard.
also pic related

Union lost every battle at the start. Only thing Grant can be attribute with really is that he figured out he had more troops so didn't matter. Just keep sending them in!
And its reflected very well in the tally.
US(Union) 2.2 million casualties
Confederacy 1 imlllion

...

And to think the south lost because it needed shoes..hence gettysburg

Union population: 18.5 million
Confederacy population: 5.5 million (and 3.5 million slaves)

Also, nearly all of the arms factories and railways were in the North. To be honest it's a miracle that the south lasted so long and even got close to winning a few times.

Im fortunate to have pictures of the ones from our family that served in the 28th bloody bucket.
they say we have no culture. Shit I can show you the culture. I could rub and africans face in my people culture.

>liberal hipsters

You mean starving Irish fresh off the boat who didn't have enough money to buy a substitute and be used as cannon fodder

Literally Boat Loads of Germans

That, and when the CSA rank & file kept getting word that whole towns worth of women were being crammed in cattle cars & shipped north, desertion rates spiked.

How the fuck is there that big of a difference between the pops? Weren't the North states just everything along and north of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Washington, and then to the west with Illinois, but from there it was sparsely populated when going to the land farther west.

McClellan apologist reporting in

George was a competent tactician but was far too compassionate for his men and didn't want to see large amounts of men die in vain as was common in the war. This resulted in him being overly cautious when his force far outnumbered the Army of NV.

He was an absolutely brilliant logistician, utterly unmatched in that aspect by any general in the war. If there had been some way to quell his ego and have him be the man in charge supply and training but someone else more strategically inclined in charge of that aspect, the war would have been over in a year.

I live in the South. I hate to break the news the civil war was rigged from the beginning. The Southern Generals were Jew Freemasons, lee and pike=jew born in boston. The North had all jew freemason generals also, hence meade.

it was designed and started to have goy murder goy, I'm surprised more of you haven't figured the jew out on this one.

ww2 Truman stalin and Churchill all 33rd degree jew masons.

chris colubus was a jew freemason.

George washigton jew freemason

I can go on and on.

The Union Army was hardly liberal hipsters. Even Grant and Sherman had Confederate sympathies at times. But they won because more men and more industry plus the Confederacy had many setbacks like losing valuable generals, supply shortages, and state militias not wanting to really cooperate.

They had false hopes of the union crying Uncle.

Soros funded them

Money, Next question?

Here is how you won the war.
youtu.be/_ThaS47rqlE

Liberal hipsters is a cute name for typhoid, typhus, and dysentery

The biggest riots in US History to this date, are the NYC Draft Riots.

Un-judaized Anglo-Celtic spirit standing up to the judaized Anglo-Celtic spirit my friend. Honor, dignity and culture versus the nihilistic, cold and brutal spirit of the (((dollar))). That what it was all about.

The good guys always win

>state militias not wanting to really cooperate

this is a largely overlooked thing. Southerners valued their individualism far more than Northerners did, and many times this resulted in their armies not being as well disciplined, and this is not a good thing in a war where the grunts falling in line and being part of a machine was key for infantry tactics.

4 of these guys are Irish

>arguably the superior leadership
That was established in 1861. Cemented the following year. The blockade was really effective the entire war.

Well they were significantly outnumbered if I remember correctly and I think they took out more union soldiers than the union took out confederate soldiers,

didn't matter Robert lee (south) and meade (north) were both jew freemason, the civil war was designed to murder goy from the north and south. jew freemasons all lived.

Britain didn't get involved because America was the only nation on earth with ironclad ships in their navy, so the British navy would have got absolutely BTFO if they attacked the Union

>arguably the superior leadership

no arguably about it, and I say this as a proud yankee. both sides had issues with politics getting in the way of their military aims but the South was much more effective at getting the right man to the right job. The Army of Northern Virginia was a dream team at the time of Fredericksburg and Chancelorsville.

>BTFO
if they were destroyed so bad how come they killed more yankees than anyone else in history by a factor of at least 5x?

Lee had Irish roots and was devout Christian. Read his letters, there is an entire book on them

nice shilling, faggot. That tin-foil hat is getting a little tight

Thomas Reade Rootes Cobb was an interesting fellow, as were all the Cobb's, really. TRR Cobb formed Cobb's Legion, romanticized in Gone With The Wind. The Legion was a brilliant idea, which consisted of a single integrated command, with individual components from the infantry, cavalry, and artillery. It had flashes of greatness early in the war, but its mobility was hampered by the always lagging artillery.

They weren't. If those northerners were alive today they'd be chastised for being evil racists

A Rothschild ran a fabric mill in Columbus, GA for the CSA. At the end of the war, he fled to NYC.

If the South was so great, why did they have so many kikes fighting for them? Why was their Secretary of State a kike?
If the Union was so bad, why did they expel the kikes from parts of their conquered territory?

for reference on the latter: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Order_No._11_(1862)

neat, I'll have to read up on them, thanks user. I just got my free audible credit for the month, any recommendations on ACW reading?

I find it odd that arms markers in Jamestown, NC and Augusta, GA went untouched throughout the war.

stop watching porn

looks like nicholas cage

Wrong.

>TFW
You're Fired

nah m8, Britain was just about to intervene and BTFO out of the North until Antietam happened and Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, which meant that entering the war against the North would have meant they were supporting slavery, which was a HUGE nono in European politics.

this. the union were not liberal or left wing like we know it today. like at all. once you take away slavery stance and government intervention, democrats and republicans were practically the same.

Three hundred thousand Yankees
Is stiff in southern dust
We got three hundred thousand
Before they conquered us
They died of Southern Fever
And Southern steel and shot
I wish there were 3 million
Instead of what we got

I'm not sure what that is? I've got 130 books on the Confederacy & Georgia History. What's your interests? Alexander Stephens wrote a book in 1868, and it's very interesting. It's basically a conversation between him & 5 other people about the Constitutional reasons for the war.

textsA constitutional view of the late war between the states : its causes, character, conduct and results ; presented in a series of colloquies at Liberty Hall

Fakin kek

>"Their investigations certainly exposed considerable discrepancies in the American’s favour. At the very end of 1864 some seventy-one of the Union navy’s 671 vessels building and afloat were ironclads, against a mere thirty in the British steam navy of 417."
-Historian Kenneth Bourne

it's an audiobook service.

I mostly am into the military aspects of the war but I did read McPherson's Battle Cry of Freedom which included a bretty gud overview of the societal conditions before and during the war. Maybe I'll see if they have anything on Bleeding Kansas.

Bleeding Kansas is Harsh. "What the Yankees did to Us" by Stephen Davis is good. "Decision in the West: The Atlanta Campaign of 1864" by Albert Castle is the best book in Atlanta.

The Civil War by Shelby Foote is a Classic. These three pic related are about the coming war, 1816-1861

that was a bit later in the war after from when they intended to intervene, but still a pretty neat little fact. sort of related, in 1851 at the Great Exhibition (the equivalent to the World Fair at the time) we actually showed Great Britain up quite a bit to their shock, and it was then that they realized that we were about to become an industrial superpower that wasn't to be trifled with.

if only the british would have helped

oh wait they ARE the union

thanks

You want Bleeding Kansas? It doesn't get any more real than this.

man i wish they had this one. ill have to get a physical copy because this is right up my alley. thanks again.

Jefferson Davis ordered Robert E. Lee to stay on the defensive for the second half of the war, in which case, the south would've won.
Because Lee was a Christian, and was tired of the bloodshed, he surrendered his sword to Grant.
The South was outnumbered, starved, and sick. Yet, per capita, they managed to kill more Yankees than vice versa; 300,000 to be exact.
This time around, however, the majority of southerners are war veterans, hunters/fisherman, or just preppers in general. In today's world, we have scopes on our rifles, not black-powder muskets. Keeping this in mind, it's safe to say we all know the outcome of the next civil war.

Liberals, leftists, niggers, Jews, etc; our enemies are everywhere. But they have another thing coming. They've been biting the hand that feeds them for far too long.
More white men are waking up, and it's only a matter of time before the federal government confiscates our firearms, or some nut-job starts a revolution, leading up to the ban on firearms.
Prepare yourselves physically, mentally, and spiritually.

God bless the Adamic/Anglo Saxon race!

It's hard to read. It's not a very well written book,as it's mostly newspaper articles from the period, and it's not structured very well. Also, the shear brutality that is reported is stomach churning. But, I guarantee 90% of that book things happened that you never knew about. Im glad I own a copy, just for historical reference alone.

Guy in back is hiding hand in jacket. That's masonic. The guy in front of him is making what looks like a '33' hand sign. Also masonic. The Civil War was fake as fuck. Look up the meaning of the word 'Confederate'.

Gods and Generals and the Killer Angels by Shaara