pol is primarily populist (25%), being about equal amounts libertarian and conservative (14% each),
more likely to be social conservative than liberal (8% to 4%),
and 8x more likely to be paleocons than neocons (8% to 1%).
Pol is more in favor of balanced budgets and low spending (fiscal conservatism) than having few economic regulations (economic liberalism), around 2x so (8% vs 4%),
pol cares surprisingly little about federalism (4%, bet a bunch of euros answered this),
does not think libertarianism and traditionalism can be fused together (or doesn't want to, only 1% in favor of fusionism),
and only a small minority likes social democracy, left-wing populism or centrism (3%, 2%, 2%),
surprisingly seeing the amount of berniebots and leftypollacks here. And finally, pol despises modern liberalism (0%)
Nicholas Carter
thoughts?
Isaiah Reed
Not enough paleoconservatives
Jack Gray
Voted libertarian and paleocon 'cause there wasn't a minarchist option. Federalists are kike-tier nation wreckers. >no national socialism hmm
Juan Miller
federalism just means you support the federal system and states' rights
Grayson Rogers
>democratic party >factions >centrism excuse me?
Gavin Cox
I see the federal system as a categorical infringement on states' rights.
Josiah James
complain with wikipedia's editors
not tha they'll care tho, they're libtards too
Brody Gray
...
Jackson Jones
So kektarian?
Jack Davis
>Strawpoll >pol is >pol
Making sweeping generalisations about Sup Forums on an extremely limted sample set is what the media does, considering you're calling it pol to begin with, it's clear you are an outsider. Neck yourself.
Christopher Lopez
Kys shitposting cunt
Leo Barnes
Go hang yourself with your ground tether you worthless emu cuck
Cooper Edwards
Pic related. It's your wife and her boyfriend
Daniel Roberts
>Republican party >Democratic party
Logan Evans
Only two choices slavshit
Got anything better in ur country? Didn't think so
Samuel Lewis
A two party system is a joke. As far as I understand they absorb all small parties that have some support. You can't have one party represent so many people. Why? Because certain people don't agree with some your positions but agree with others, so a new party would be created for them and they would have voted for that. There's nothing democratic in a two party system since they both know that they will have power on way or the other
Carson Cox
>Got anything better in ur country? If my country had a two party system we would have already declared bankruptcy and we wouldn't be the best Slav country in the world. Considering some governments that we had it's a blessing that we have so many parties. While it's true that there have been people in there since the creation of my country they are slowly being pushed out.
Our country runs on a coalition meaning that no party gets the majority. That means that they have to concede some high positions to other parties that were voted in the parliament. Together they form a coalition and rule the country. The rest form the opposition but can't really do much since they are not the majority. They usually just wait until a scandal brakes out and they use that to their advantage. At the moment our GDP is rising so that's a good thing
Jaxson Wright
>democratic Not in the cinstitution.
And they don't absorb smaller parties, there are over 100 parties, they're just not entitled to people's votes
And since every politician is elected by himself and not in a party list he is directly accountable to his constituents, thi us why american parties are so more diverse than euro single issue meme parties, every district has its own parties fighting for votes in the primaries and generals, thus why far more americans participate directly in party politics and day to day decisions than yuros (french primaries can barely get 1 million people to vote), who can only pick whoever party bosses pusb on them, but end up with big coalition governments ruling together no matter who u vote for. See Germany for ex >coalition meaning that no party gets the majority. That means that they have to concede some high positions to other parties that were voted in the parliament. Aka just like the US, but with politicians picking coalitions post elections after voters have no say on it, while the in the USA people know the coalitions bedorehand
Jason Mitchell
I don't agree with neither Republican nor Democrats, so who do I vote for then? Nobody since my vote doesn't matter since everybody know those two will win no matter what. But if you have more parties your vote actually matters, that way your issues are represented in the parliament. In America everyone know that pre election promises will never be fulfilled, while here they actually some do.
Kevin Gomez
There are no generic republicans and democrats, there are several different factions that comlete in primaries and generals. If no faction ia of your oiking you can fuck off and stay home, same as in europe. In america you know what you're getting, in europe you vote for a meme right-wing party and ends with 4 more years of a socialist-christian-cuckocrat coalition
Camden Nguyen
This shit is gay. These are normalfag tier.
Jackson Myers
>same as in europe in Europe you actually have parties that represent your issues >In america you know what you're getting yes nothing since you know nothing will change no matter if republicucks or democrys are in charge >and ends with 4 more years of a socialist-christian-cuckocrat coalition lmao what? Europe is not just Sweden and Germany you know. We have more than 50 countries here.
