Were they suppose to represent gay adoptive parents?
Were they suppose to represent gay adoptive parents?
Other urls found in this thread:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
ibtimes.com
rightwingwatch.org
archive.is
washingtonpost.com
archive.is
slate.com
archive.is
huffingtonpost.com
archive.is
advocate.com
archive.is
prc.utexas.edu
prc.utexas.edu
icpsr.umich.edu
prri.org
aacap.org
whatweknow.law.columbia.edu
dx.doi.org
williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
twitter.com
There is literally nothing wrong with homosexuals adopting children.
I remember coming to the conclusion that they were gay hippies when I was 19. I even bragged about my insight on Sup Forums.
I...was less smart then. Thanks Sup Forums.
1488. We take pride in our race.
Nope. they represent the temptation to hang with the bros and neglect a life of family and responsibility.
Lion King is the BEST Disney movie.
There was subversive stuff in there but nothing on that level. it was a simpler time.
This flick came out 50 years ago. Youre 70 now
No. They are supposed to represent platonic friends helping one another out. Simba doesn't even treat them like parents, but like older brothers.
if the parents can expose their kids to female/male role models, but most faggots live lives isolated from their families
Oh no! You'll be right in 20 years...
Oops, meant 40.
Glad I still can't comprehend that much time...
True, there may be nothing wrong with homosexuals adopting kids, but there's something wrong with homosexuals, and homosexuals being parents.
Welcome to our swamp. It's gonna be a fun ride.
They were literal rated G Ren and Stimpy stand ins.
Those nasty hyenas that live in the elephant graveyard thing are symbolic of Jews trying to ruin Simbas kingdom with trickery and deceitful kike spellcasting. White nationalist lions should be free to live without jewyenas ruining everything. Really makes me sad.
Debunking Regnerus:
rightwingwatch.org
huffingtonpost.com
88 out of 248 of the respondents that were counted as "Parents are of the same sex" responded that their parents were never in a same sex relationship while they were living with them though they had same sex relationships while they were growing up, ie their parents divorced and they ended up with the straight parent but they were still counted as having parents of the same sex
Source
>prc.utexas.edu
>a. Parents are of the same sex
219 active and 29 withdrawn panelists, from Page 3
>prc.utexas.edu
>S8 Did you ever live with your mother while she was in a romantic relationship with another woman?
40 said no, from Page 4
>S9 Did you ever live with your father while he was in a romantic relationship with another man?
48 said no, from Page 4
Yes, that is the official study results
1/3 of the kids counted as living with gay parents in that study never did, per the study itself.
they were rosencrantz and guildenstern, i thought
The Lion King is redpilled
They are the only whites in the new remake. Whats the meaning of that?
role models
if you're only exposed to male or female role models, you're lacking in personality and/or intergender relations
homossexual parenting wouldn't be bad if they ensured their kid was exposed to heterossexual members of the family, so that they could learn how heterossexuals act and the gender roles of men/women in case their parents are both women/men.
Intereaction with family is important, even more so in children raised by homossexual couples.
Yes there is. It's fucking disgusting.
here we go again...
Study conducted by fags and funded by fags defends fags. There's a surprise. Given most researchers are Marxist degenerate cocksuckers it's actually expected.
this, they are bros. more like MGTOW than full on gay
Sure thing, bud.
This. A serious cartoon about the circle of life, not some sobby whiny MAH SOCIAL JUSTICE bullshit
What a stupid bait thread
This one was not:
7% of millennials are gay:
prri.org
Millennials draw no distinctions between discrimination protections that should be afforded gay and lesbian people, on the one hand, and transgender people on the other. More than seven in ten (73%) millennials support legal protections against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing for gay and lesbian people. A nearly identical number (72%) of millennials say they favor these same protections for transgender people.
While no significant racial or gender differences exist on either question, there are large religious divides in support for expanding nondiscrimination legislation. Roughly eight in ten black Protestant (80%), white Catholic (82%), Hispanic Catholic (81%), religiously unaffiliated (83%), and white mainline Protestant millennials (78%) favor laws that would protect gay and lesbian people against discrimination in jobs, public accommodations, and housing. About two-thirds (66%) of Hispanic Protestant millennials also favor such laws. White evangelical Protestants are closely divided on this issue, with a slim majority (51%) favoring laws that would protect gay and lesbian people against discrimination, and 47% opposing them. Among religious groups, the pattern of opinion about non-discrimination legislation protecting transgender individuals is nearly identical.
Since 97% plus of kids are straight, 97% of kids would benefit from growing up in a household with a mom and dad rather than two dads or two moms, assuming all other things being equal. Though I suspect 2 decent homos are better than an awful straight couple.
HETERO SEXUAL LIFE PARTNERS
7% per above.
ibtimes.com
www.asanet.org/documents/ASA/pdfs/12-144_307_Amicus_%20(C_%20Gottlieb)_ASA_Same-Sex_Marriage.pdf
Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 252-264.
dx.doi.org
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
Actually I think they were supposed to represent a meerkat and a wild boar