Other races are inferior

>other races are inferior
>white privilege isn't real

so, which one?

Other urls found in this thread:

politicsinn.com/48-percent-of-u-s-billionaires-are-jewish/
thezog.info/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Race doesn't give you any advantages
>IQ does
>White people on average have higher IQ than other lesser breeds

White privilege is a thing made by up by jews for niggers.

saying your IQ is superior to blacks and then denying you have a genetic advantage is an oxymoron.

>>other races are inferior
Natsoc claim

>>white privilege isn't real
Libertarian claim

Sup Forums is a mixture of National Socialists and Libertarians

Who gives whites these privileges?

So if Race = Higher Average IQ = Advantage then Race = Advantage. It's a simple formula brother.

Neither. The Jews are clearly superior, and East Asians seem to be about white level.

White privilege is clearly real. WHat the hell do you think we are defending here?

God

from my googlefu research it seems actually having to prepare shit to not die in winter will make your race actually to care and build a civilization.

this doesn't mean however that there wasn't civilizations in black africa before whites.

Both statements contradict each other.

fair enough.

however you guys need to stop propagating the blacks are useless meme.

there's plenty of african history in black nations, maybe you should teach it so blacks stop the slavery meme.

Whites have a higher AVERAGE IQ, meaning some blacks have higher IQs than whites. So the priviledge is high IQ, which whites are just more likely to have. I would argue american niggers are more priviledged as nature intended them to die of hunger and aids in africa, but instead are living on the backs of whitey in the us.

>other races are inferior
I am a genuine racist yet I find this statement retarded.
East Asians have, on average, longer torsos and shorter femurs. In addition, their hip sockets are more shallow and angled slightly more to the side (compared to Europeans). Does this make East Asians superior to Europeans? No of course not, because no race is inherently superior or inferior. Any race is only, on average, superior or inferior at a certain task. The physical difference I described above gives East Asians a distinct advantage in squatting, and this is one factor (but certainly not the only one) that contributes to Chinese and other Asian countries dominating in the lower weight classes of weightlifting. So these peoples are supposedly "superior" in this specific task. But that doesn't make their race superior as a whole than another race.

Similarly, white people are superior to blacks in tasks that require intelligence. But that doesn't make our race objectively, inherently superior than blacks. Differences between races are not the same as some kind of racial dominance hierarchy.

so you're not a racist, but a race realist, like me.

most of nigger behaviour is 100% fault of bad parenting and poverty.

Not that kind of privilage,when BAMN or faminzis talk about white privilage they talk about the system being made for whites,system is fair for everyone(most of it) if niggers can't make their way trough it's not whites fault,i see no asians complaining at least not nearly, if any compared to niggs

Privilege literally means "private law" as in, separate codes of laws for separate classes, castes or races.

There is a single code of law in the US for all races.

At most, you could argue that law enforcement officers, politicians and the very rich have privilege in the US.

No matter what your postmodernist overlords tell you.
Advantages =/= Privilege
Natural superiority =/= Privilege

E ,E i stead of A,i fuck it up most of the time cause of my language

White privilege is not about individual privilege but actually systemic privilege.

Africa didn't receive investment in social infraestructure like roads, hospital and schools until china started to develop them.

So, is more an issue of western institutions being the dominant ones, at the expense of non white civilizations.

If you go from europe to latinoamerica, asia, india or africa, you can't avoid to see the diference in quality of living.

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING' If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique is not exposed to the public. To trigger a 'forum slide' and 'flush' the critical post out of public view it is simply a matter of logging into each account both real and fake and then 'replying' to prepositined postings with a simple 1 or 2 line comment. This brings the unrelated postings to the top of the forum list, and the critical posting 'slides' down the front page, and quickly out of public view. Although it is difficult or impossible to censor the posting it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and unuseful postings. By this means it becomes effective to keep the readers of the forum reading unrelated and non-issue items.

When people talk about "white privilege", they're not talking about genetic differences, they're talking about sociopolitcal or cultural advantages

The same people who complain about "white privilege" will continually deny racial differences (unless it makes nonwhites look better)

The same people who complain about "white privilege" will ignore Jewish nepotism and domination of institutions.

The same people who complain about "white privilege" will ignore whites are the only ones who have their countries being flooded by migrants, and being forced to be ethnically replaced.

They will ignore all the institutional discrimination against whites like affirmative action, diversity quotas, wealth redistribution, political correctness, open anti-white rhetoric in media, academia. etc.

They will only complain when whites are pro-white, or work as a cohesive group in their own interest, but never when other groups do it. They will also ignore "nonwhite privilege" in nonwhite countries, because they're just anti-white really.

Other races can be at certain things. East Asians generally have higher IQ, niggers often run faster, etc. That's not the "privilege" Marxists talk about though. They see people as blank slates, and think everything is a product of environment, upbringing or culture, which is retarded and shows no understanding of basic biology.

If the concept of privilege wasonly rooted in biology, then you would have "beauty privilege", "intelligence privilege" (if your parents have a IQ of 150, it's likely you're gonna be smarter than if you were born to sub-100 IQ parents regardless of race), "tall privilege"... and that's when you realize how absurd the concept of "privilege" is because people aren't made equal, and someone will always be naturally (or not) better at something than you. "Privilege" is another Marxist concept created by Jews (and never applied to them) for losers who want to bring everyone else down

>White privilege is not about individual privilege but actually systemic privilege.

Then why aren't you talking about affirmative action, "diversity quotas", wealth redistribution from whites to nonwhites, the PC establishment that chases out any white "racist" while letting any nonwhite "racist" slide? That's the real "systemic privilege" that exists and is codified into law and regulations.

>Africa didn't receive investment in social infraestructure like roads, hospital and schools until china started to develop them.
Whites brought civilization, modern medical care, education, etc. m8 you have no clue what you're talking about. They only cut aid after they were kicked out and whites were being killed.

>So, is more an issue of western institutions being the dominant ones, at the expense of non white civilizations.
That's not an issue at all. European-derived groups created better institutions over the centuries. If other groups had done it, they would be dominant, and wouldn't be nearly as kind to them as we were to them.

>If you go from europe to latinoamerica, asia, india or africa, you can't avoid to see the diference in quality of living.
It's almost like whites are generally better at creating successful civilizations, and if you replace whites in Europe and America, you're gonna have the same problem as third-world countries.

I do agree is an issue of western civilization being superior.

however, there's not a definition of western civilization and much less this definition is dependant on genetical diferences.
(there's not genes for democracy, liberalism and so on).

However, these same western institutions are hostile to non western nations trying to have their own destiny (see any nation that doesn't want to play by the western rules).

whites are extremelly pieces of shit towards any country that wants to take over the petrodollar, by example.

Western civilization: the philosophy in practice of the ancient Greeks, usually with heavy Christian influences, that came about around the Renaissance and shaped most of Western Europe and North America since them. Built by Indo-Europeans/white, it is absolutely based on race, partly. Look up the Naturalization Act of 1790. There are tons of things you take for granted that are easily defined as part of the broader "Western civilization".

>whites are extremelly pieces of shit towards any country that wants to take over the petrodollar, by example.
You ignore that most of the establishment pushing those wars are Jewish, going back to WW1. Most people just believe what the media tells them. They were behind the push against Iraq, Iran, Libya, Syria, etc. We are puppet states of banking institutions we don't control. Most people didn't want Gaddafi gone either.

So basically we're back at blaming the joos.

Your logic doesn't work out. A person born into the upper middle class is a sense "privileged". He grows up with advantages and eventually gets ahead because of that. Doesn't make him inherently superior to those below his class.

He is "privileged" yet not inherently superior.

Although I will say that those from the higher classes do breed higher IQs. I believe that it's not only race with inferior genes, but those of inferior class as well.

And you're back to blaming "whites". That's what you've been doing this whole thread. They created the "white privilege" meme, they're behind most of our wars.

That's the main thing brainwashed liberals never talk about. They talk about "white privilege" while ignoring that a lot of those whites are Jews (who hate whites), and how overrepresented they are.

politicsinn.com/48-percent-of-u-s-billionaires-are-jewish/
>48 Percent Of U.S. Billionaires Are Jewish

thezog.info/

Showing that they're either ignorant, dishonest, anti-white, and/or have no integrity. And it's usually Jews complaining about "white privilege", ironically enough.

I'm not blaming your average redneck in some basement while collecting welfare because he's an overweight piece of shit.

I'm talking about the western international institutions.

>I'm talking about the western international institutions.

Moving the goalpost Moshe. You are blaming "whites" and their "privilege". That's how you started the thread you little faggot. Why should I not believe you're anti-white when you stereotype the average white as a "redneck collecting welfare" (even though whites are by far the least likely group to claim welfare) and an "overweight piece of shit"?

You can't talk about "Western international institutions" like the EU or Goldman Sachs without mentioning who specifically is behind them.

You should probably kill yourself since you haven't said anything of substance except blaming "whites" and "the West" during the entire thread.

So the ones to blame are the jews like pol always claim?