>European monarchs are all figureheads with no real power
>The Queen is just a dying old lady who lost her empire and has to drink herself to bed every night
>European nobility is now all inbred freaks and jews
>Southeast Asian monarchs are irrelevant degenerates
>Japan's princess is marrying a commoner
>the only monarchs with any real power are fucking Arabs with no real lineage
fucking republicans, man
This is the real reason western society is dying out. The Aristocracy was the only class of people who were bred for morality and real intelligence. The merchant (((bourgeoisie))) usurpation of the aristocracy starting with the enlightenment have destroyed these lineages throughout the 19th and 20th centuries.
There is no one fit left to lead us except for rapacious merchant capitalists. That's why were destroying our nations in the pursuit of profit. That's why hoards of shitskins are being imported to decrease wages. We're fucked.
They were the literal chads of humanity. Bred for greatness. Best genes that this fucking rock could offer. And we turned our backs on them.
It will revive when Europe is in a deep crisis and near death because of it's shit policies
Miss me yet?
er
these monarchy sorts all went along with this shit willingly
I don't think we should go back under the British monarchy, but I do wish we'd snap out of the societal brainwash against the idea of monarchy in general.
Do we have enough pretenders to fill the thrones of times past? I feel like every one of them seems to have (((dubious))) lineage.
They didn't really have a choice after all of Europe saw what the French did
They could have killed the fucking commies
Everyday. The (((Founding Masons))) should have been hanged for treason.
We're gonna have to start new lines from scratch, legitimism is dead. We need dictators to start royal families.
Isn't there some semi apocryphal story about founding fathers considering creating a new American monarchy before deciding on an elected president instead?
I mean, you're not wrong
You say that like it's a bad thing. Monarchies are a shitty government system guaranteed to drive a country into the ground. Liberal democracy, by contrast, creates wealth and improves the life of every citizen by leaps and bounds.
it also degrades societies and couses a quick collapse of civilization. Monarchy is the only good long-term system
>They were the literal chads of humanity. Bred for greatness. Best genes that this fucking rock could offer.
Ever heard of Spain? Constitutional Monarchy is le based bro XDD chan fuck FUCK YOU FUCK YOU
All liberal democracies are shitting the bed after barely 200 years while europe stood for 1500+ years under monarchies...
This
Our biggest problem is that our current elites are almost entirely unaccountable, and you want to make them even more unaccountable?
This is what I mean.
Chadsburg jaw.
>flag
kys please
this is just american (((education))) that told you that monarchies are bad. Democracy is a fucking joke. The only acceptable democracy is one where only white land owning men can vote. Look at how successful monarchies have been throughout history.
This is what happens when inbreeding fucks you up. The aristocratic gene pool was too small. Monarchs are supposed to have like 14 kids for a reason. Now monarchy will die because of this. There aren't enough nobles. Maybe this user is right.
The death of a democratic civ.:
Equal laws for voters>everyone gets too comfy and ever so slighly more lefty>rights for women>much more lefty> weak culture as women don't understand tradition> end of civilization in 200 years or less because of stronger culture
This happened like 350 years ago op. And by the French Revolution there was no possibility of going back
>shitting the bed
>standards of living are continually improving and economies are much more stable relative to the past, when countries collapsed because of a lack of diversification
>wars over territory are becoming a thing of the past under the liberal democratic world order, now is literally the most peaceful time in human history
Oh yeah, real bad shit there. I expect to be begging for an inbred drunkard to rule me any day now.
Neoliberal cuck.
I am a anarcho-fascist-monarchist, it the only true political party that will save the white race.
The monarchs were all devil worshippers anyway, maybe hundreds of years ago there were true benevolent monarchs
>wars over territory are becoming a thing of the past under the liberal democratic world order, now is literally the most peaceful time in human history
Except of the last century which was the most violent time in history and nothing as changed in political systems since then. Also democracies will collapse or change into something else in the next 100 years
>he most peaceful time in human history
It has been only 70 years since the bloodiest wars in human history. During these years there was one enormous superpower, and one slightly smaller one that then collapsed, who controled all the other countries(ie. stability by infomal empire). Add to this the wholly new and very powerful deterrent of nuclear weapons.
Now look at the history of democratic countries from the 1700s to the early 1900s. constant war, revolution, tyranny, collapses.
Successful monarchies? Like the Dukes of Burgundy, who were so conquest-hungry that they got their country wiped off the face of the earth? Or the Mughals, whose zealous ruler caused the Marathas revolt that ruined their massivle empire? How about the Habsburgs, a bunch of inbred morons whose abject failures to create sound measures against inflation, instead spending their massive wealth on, you guessed it; moronic wars of conquest, ruined Spanish power? Maybe you mean the Polish Jagellions, who gave so much power to the nobles that they were backstabbed at every opportunity? The Tsars, the only group who gets the distinction of fucking up Russia worse than the Soviets?
Really, give me an example of a monarchy that didn't end up fucking itself over.
degeneration of the aristocracy, the better, is the first step towards the degeneration of society, the lesser, not viceversa
European civilization and its elites exhausted themselves, so monarchs ultimately reaped what they sow, just as the Roman aristocracy once the Emperors(and their armies) slowly took control
People have already got a taste of human rights and voting shitheads out of office.
There's no turning back.
Brithish royalty did a great job and also everyone you mentioned provided more long-term stability and national pride than the democracies so far
What makes you think they ever could be held accountable?
Neoliberal is right. You want an authoritarian ruler to tell you how to live, think, and fuck, but I'm the cuck? Lmao
People clearly don't know how to live
i can't even process the stupidity behind being an american who isn't a royal whining about the decline of monarchy
No it wasn't lol. WWII was the bloodiest war in human history, but that's only in absolute numbers. Relative to population, the last century has been the most peaceful in all of human existence
monarchy in england has been a meme since the middle ages dumbasses. they're the focus of popular histories because people like speculating about their personal lives. they're the kardashians of history.
somehow the sun king has become the archetype of all monarchy.
Unless we purge these ideas with a cult mentality and terror
there was also WWI tho, that's two of the most bloody conflicts in history
British royalty has survived so long because they're figureheads, they stopped wielding true power in the 17th century
>>the only monarchs with any real power are fucking Arabs with no real lineage
Hey now, the King of Jordan is a direct descendant of Muhammad. That's as good a lineage as you can get in the Muslim world.
The only systems that can save our civilzation and culture right now are monarchy and totalitarianism, because the changes would be anti-populistic and since totalitarianism is only a short term fix we actually need monarchy
Eastern Monarchies still had a chance. The allies robbed Japan of their being.
and now they vote even worse shitheads into power. And I agree on the no turning back. I guess dictatorship would be the closest thing even though there haven't been any countries that have had hundreds of years of unbroken military dictatorship.
democracies don't tell you how to live, think, and fuck?
you would have to be retarded to think this. Monarchy and Aristocracy are the natural state of civilization.
it seems the Russians want their czar's back and they even found enough people to resurrect the Romanov line
>France will have a king in my lifetime
Kickass.
source? I like learning about modern pretenders.
He's the peak of human body desu.
a true monarch isn't accountable to the people, but he isn't accountable to newspapers, banks and other unelected power brokers either. he owes his position to nobody. compare that to elected politicians, who are the thralls of unelected, unaccountable degenerates (notice that huge numbers of them are paedophiles - they're only allowed to govern because the newspapers can bring them down at any time).
Daily reminder that the British Army is the only Pro-Monarchy institution left in the world.
When (not if) the filthy republicans attempt to remove the monarchy, the British Armed Forces, and all true loyal Britons, will stand with the Monarchy.
>I expect to be begging for an inbred drunkard to rule me any day now
shall we tell him?
1/3 third of Russians youth want to restatement the monarchy also a lot of the British royals have Romanov blood
Our army, airforce, navy and marechaussee (military and civil police) is still royal as well.
Many institutions are royally based on paper, but that doesn't mean that in practice they will stick with the Monarchy through adversity.
I can't speak for the Dutch armed forces, but I know with absolute certainty that the British Armed forces are Loyalist, and will always support the Monarchy, to the point of preventing usurpation.
>Lost her empire
WHEW
LAD
Theres a reason Mk Ultra Monarch Programming is named after Royalty
Trump's incompetent, but the USA will survive any damage he does: he's limited by our Constitution. The same can't be said for historical monarchies, who have often brought their own countries to ruin via mismanagement.
Fun fact about pretenders:
This fella is technically the Catholic pretender to the Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland
Yeah it was DLC for Assassin's Creed 3.
I hope that when the queen abdicates (christ that word makes me shudder) and charles gets rid of parliament that the British Armed forces will protect the crown from the inevitable hordes of cucks and foreigners that wish to impose sharia law on the greatest empire in history.
>when the queen abdicates
She won't. That's not how we do it. Edward VIII was an exception.
>the British Armed forces will protect the crown
They will, absolutely. But they wouldn't need to because the (admittedly, numerically lacking) true loyalist Britons would defend their rightful king.
>This fella is technically the Catholic pretender to the Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland
But the kingdoms of england . Scotland and ireland not longer exist right?
True, but "existing" is a subjective concept. The Jacobites never recognised the Acts of Union, because it was passed under the authority of a Protestant monarch.
Tech Tech Tech
A king now would have exponentially more power than a king back then.
one man could rule the world when before one could man could barely rule a region.
>A king now would have exponentially more power than a king back then
If this thread was made a hundred years ago it would still be late on the news
I still think Absolute Monarchy is the best form of government, even if the world doesn't think so
Who is that?
Just land on a beach and say you're the king now deal with it.
What if I told you plebs that the Monarchy has always been in power throughout the West and is using Jew families as a buffer shield to deflect against public focus (literally Rothschild=Red Shield). That they want to perpetuate their "houses" while demolishing the genetic potential of all the peasant "houses" on earth while having all secret societies answer to them?
>Our kings have been shit for 200 hundred years
>Both first and second republics have been nothing but a fucking disaster
I don't care at this point
Franz, Duke of Bavaria
Franz, Duke of Bavaria, heir to James II of England (last Catholic monarch of England/UK)
Are you talking about the black nobility?
Yes. correct
I used to be more pro-Absolute monarchy, but I've found there needs to be a certain degree of autonomy in every man's life. Having some kind of Bill of Rights and constitution to protect the aristocracy from a purge by the monarch should be in place.
Do you know any good videos ,sites books about that?
>He thinks economics are more important than culture
Brainlet detected.
A good start is to watch the show "Borgia" on Netflix. Hollywood always leaves clues to the pleb masses on who rules them but the donkey masses ignore the clues!
well you need both. your culture won't mean shit if you can't even arm yourself against invaders. and you can have all the guns you could possibly hope for but still get your ass beat if your people are a bunch of limp-wristed faggots.
And yet Queen Elizabeth II is the second most liked person in the world, and you all know what someone means when someone says "The Queen", despite her not being your Queen.
God Save the Fucking Queen
That's real history. Some like Hamilton was for crowning Washington as a constitutional monarchy with Congress serving as a balance but Washington refused and insisted on a Presidency.
> Rules the planet through the British Commonwealth
> Controls the financial markets via the Freemasons and the City
> American bonesmen bow down before her and obey her commands
> Jews live in a meme country at her pleasure
> Bullied the Mafia and Triads out of the heroin business.
> Anglos celebrate her birthday and their eternal supremacy over lowly Catholics at least twice every year
> Starves the Irish when she feels like it
> Has a squadron of RAF bombers on standby in case the Germans forget who is boss
U fucking wot m9
God bless our gracious Queen
>He took my bait
Great metric there. An arbitrary designator that is impossible to subjectively categorise sure is the perfect way to measure advancement. You should take this to university economists - they've been doing it all wrong this whole time. You've revolutionized the way we look at societies, now we'll just use what conservatives and basement-dwellers like to determine what a society should be.