Russia, explain this

...

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genrikh_Yagoda
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union
blacksacademy.net/content/3519.html
histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/tol/ger/eco/nazi-eco.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Operation_of_the_NKVD
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia
jstor.org/stable/2117258?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

cause Stalin did nothing wrong and rampant jewish agenda are coming to end.

Less and less people are alive who actually remember stalin history gets hazy when people are just regurgitating what they read online

Old people die and kids don't know shit.
>14% -> 22%
They're trying to guess the correct answer just as they did with tests in school. After all it makes sense to kill off top political leaders if you're a dictator
>11% -> 20%
Basically idunno. This bunch is at least honest about it.

The correct answer is "Real enemies" by the way.

Stalin did nothing wrong, expect one thing: He preferred to fight with Germany, than to unite with Hitler.

If Stalin and Hitler created a really strong alliance - modern world will be much better.

Not shitty Molotov - Ribbentrop Act, but really alliance.

That was Putin's secret policy all along

can't make an alliance with someone who considers you Untermensch. I would have personally gassed Hitler on the spot. USSR was able to make many great things, if anything Hitler stunted growth by 50 years.

Helicopter ride for both

Communists and Pinko apologists need to be dragged out of their homes and shot in the back of the head.

Funny meme

Communism, although it's a destructive ideology, sounds good to stupid poor people.

Stalin killed 20 million christians and set your country back a century you commie headcases

At least Hitler actually had a good economic policy, the war ruined Germany, the USSR was ruined by being left alone for fucks sake

Checked
It really does seem that sub 100 IQ people are much more likely to be commies.
I think they actually believe they will be getting free shit

Kinda makes you think

Russians are simply bitter that they don't know how to organise their inner life and they turn that bitterness into brutality and envy. It's a common russian pattern

>2017
>caring about plebs "opinion"

wow pole trying to look smart

lol

>Jewish Liberals say Stalin was bad
>Russians think that Stalin was good since Jewish Liberals say Stalin was bad
>nobody actually gives a shit
It's hilarious in a way.

This

>USA and the West shit on us regardless of what we do, they only loved drunk clown Yeltsin
>USA supports moderate beheaders in muslim countries and it creates problems for us, Europe and our allies in the Middle East
>people stop caring about public image and trying to be friends with the West, they want safety and strong hand

You can clearly see how this corresponds with Arab Spring and American media accusing us of all possible sins

How do you spell
Dindu Nuffin
in Cyrillic

Диндy Haффин

I miss when Russians were supposed to be becoming Ultranationalists instead of dumb fuck Stalinists.

...

Russian expat here

The main jews behind the bolshevism were purged by the machine they were happy to create. read about sodomite jew Yenokh Iyeguda (who constructed the labor camp system) on his trial, its funny.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genrikh_Yagoda
Meanwhile, Stalin got redpilled and antisemitism became widely accepted among government officials after WW2. I myself have read lots of Russian Jewish biographies, and they comment on the 1950s Russia like "oh no, its like anotha Shoah, my 6 million!" and Btfo to Israel.
Feels good man.

lol

On 12 January 1931, Stalin gave the following answer to an inquiry on the subject of the Soviet attitude toward antisemitism from the Jewish News Agency in the United States:

National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of cannibalism.

Anti-semitism is of advantage to the exploiters as a lightning conductor that deflects the blows aimed by the working people at capitalism. Anti-semitism is dangerous for the working people as being a false path that leads them off the right road and lands them in the jungle. Hence Communists, as consistent internationalists, cannot but be irreconcilable, sworn enemies of anti-semitism.
In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty.[9]

I hate how cyrillic doesn't have an "ugh" sound so I have to use "ah"

>On 12 January 1931
Which was before his purges. You should know better than trust Stalin's words.

I hate questions like that though. They're designed to give biased answers that misrepresent what the respondee actually believes.

It says with "no justification." You can find a justification for just about anything, whether or not you agree with it. Stalin clearly had reasons for doing it, so if I was asked this question, I would respond "no," despite the fact I despise communism and believe Stalin was one of the worst criminals in human history.

It's the same reason why I hate that video Ben Shapiro did on the "Moderate Muslim Majority." He uses a question that asked "honor killings and suicide bombings are sometimes justified," and then claimed the high response rate of "yes" as proof Muslims are radicalized. However, the quantifier "sometimes" is misleading. What if a guy the next tribe over raped and beat your daughter within half an inch? Yeah, I would say you'd be justified to kill that fucker. What if you were invaded by a foreign power who was going around raping and killing civilians, and you had no weapons to stop them? Then yeah, I could see how a suicide bombing might be one of the only tactics against them.

>tl;dr
Polls that use ambiguous questions like "sometimes" or "without reason" are completely worthless.

It's very simple. Most of repressions were deserved, and a few errors were well, lesser of two evils. The only problem was that Stalin was too kind -for example he should have deported all Germans from the eastern Germany, and also their allies, but he didn't do this. Also he died too early.

The problem is Yagoda became director of NKVD under Stalin. And then the guy who replaced him, Yezhov, also became director of NKVD under Stalin. It's not like Stalin couldn't stop this devious Jewish plot. People who say that Stalin was Ordnung personified fail to explain how killing off half of your country's military and scientific leadership before a war is orderly in a any way.
But that's just ancient history and people mostly care about symbols where Stalin is that guy who kickstarted Soviet industry, won the war and built better housing than Khruschev. Can't say I blame them, studying Soviet history is a chore.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism_in_the_Soviet_Union
>Antisemitism in the Soviet Union reached new heights after 1948 during the campaign against the "rootless cosmopolitan", in which numerous Yiddish-writing poets, writers, painters and sculptors were killed or arrested.

But that's just Antisemitism. Think about degeneracy of the Jewish thinkers. Member of Orgbureau, A. Zhdanov started the trials against such writers like Zoshenko (Who used Jewish-Freudian rhetoric to "destroy the barriers to happiness" in his book "Before Sunrise") and stupid cunt Akhmatova.

Purges started bad and ended good.

>jewish agenda coming to end

no dimitry, its the exact opposite

(((Liberal))) Soros propaganda from 90s is starting to die down. Plus we badly need another purge for some (((elites))).

>20 million christians
Oy vey, don't you mean 100 million, Robert?

>set your country back a century
I guess that's why we became a superpower that rivaled the whole West and despite huge devastation from the war beat US who were literally untouched and even profited from the war to space.

Mate, communism was designed for one purpose, to overthrow monarchy/government.

The revolution was instigated to punish the Tsar for vetoing the original UN, destroy him and his descendants and to put a rothschild central bank, using fractional reserve banking in your country.
The bolsheviks? Led by kikes, look it up, leadership was 80% jewish.

Your ''''superpower'''' isn't even a first world country, and the economy was so shit in the USSR that it collapsed with zero intervention, you delusional slav peasant

Maybe you should read something other than Sup Forums memes.

Refute a point I made faggot, that isn't an argument

>radioliberty

fuck off, and take all your shitty westerners

>The revolution was instigated to punish the Tsar

Russia was ruled by Kerensky, when Bolsheviks took Winter Palace

>collapsed with zero intervention

so as your empire

>Hitler actually had a good economic policy
The Weimar republic was actually well on it's way to recovery when the Nazis came and ran the economy into the ground. That's why they had to resort to starting wars to sustain their economy. As the went on, the Germany economy basically became North-Korea tier where the people barely even had any food to eat.

Literally doesn't contradict anything I said

>The weimar where child prostitution was rampant and drugs and pornography was mainstream was going great! Hitler ruined it.
kek
From 1931, where the currency crisis was so bad that a million marks couldn't buy a loaf of bread to 1939 where the economy was booming, unemployment was non-existent and Germany was a powerhouse of europe, really terrible fiscal policy that.
It was literally called the German Miracle by the press, nothing like that has ever happened in history.

Monarchy had already been overthrown in February Revolution because literally everyone got tired of the tsar's shit.
Stalin purged most of the kikes which is why they hate him so much.
Gee, maybe that has something to do with the war that killed off almost 30 millions of working age people. That's not even mentioning many other wars including economic and cultural and natural disasters. Funny how stormtards praise muh shitler for making Germany so strong that all other powers had to oppose it to defeat it, yet refuse to admit the same for USSR.

Nazism only benefited the rich while the average people were worse off. After the nazis came to power the real wages of workers went DOWN while working hours increased. Management salaries and dividend payouts both rose dramatically.

Source: blacksacademy.net/content/3519.html

histclo.com/essay/war/ww2/tol/ger/eco/nazi-eco.html

Stalin genocided ethnic minorities before Hitler did.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Operation_of_the_NKVD

>Funny how stormtards praise muh shitler for making Germany so strong that all other powers had to oppose it to defeat it, yet refuse to admit the same for USSR.
You both will be thrown from helicopters

Woot we're getting our nemesis back just like the good ole days!

We've missed you dirty commie scum, now lets go fight a war in some irrelevant shithole.

You mean somewhere like Syria?

>lives in Russia
>dreaming about lolbertarianism

The February revolution is the revolution I am talking about for fucks sake, the peasants didn't just get tired of the Tsar's shit, they didn't even want to do shit, that's why the bolsheviks had to use violence to coerce them into joining up.

The Tsar was the last bastion of value based economy (obviously it was corrupt as fuck, but that's just russia for some reason), there was no central bank and no fractional reserve banking, and the Tsar shot down the first attempt at a League of Nations, as proposed by Immanuel (((Kant))).

By doing that he was so hated by the internationalist bankers that they vowed to destroy his family, and spent 100 years trying to do so, eventually they used their kike controlled black hand to start a world war, dragged everyone into it on the premise of destroying the powerful German economy and military, and used it to drum up support for a revolution.

Communism is just the progression from that, whether Stalin became redpilled or not is irrelevant, he still promted atheism and massacred christians and anyone opposing communism, which was an invention of the kikes, weaponized marxism.

>there was no central bank
Umm, try again sweetie.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia
>founded in 1860 as The State Bank of the Russian Empire

Exactly. There's literally nothing wrong with killing Russians and Germans. If anything, Stalin didn't kill enough of your kind.

Not a rothschilds central bank, not a private bank and it didn't use fractional reserve banking did it.
That is not the same thing in the slightest.

USSR central bank wasn't a private bank either. It simply absorbed all banks of the empire and was completely government-controlled.

jstor.org/stable/2117258?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

>muh rothschilds
Prove it.

Explain what?

Shame that not enough 55% amerimongrels have died yet though.