If conservatives don't need big government and small state governments are sufficient, can you explain why red states need more federal aid while contributing less than blue states?
Oh yeah, it's because conservatism is a cult of culture rather than a well thought out economic viewpoint.
right wing retards sure love their gibs
For your reference, look at this correlation
>military bases
>large expanses of public lands/parks
>agricultural subsidies
plus pic related
what is highest nigger population
corporatism makes all big companies stay in new york, san fran and los angeles.
if you look at median and per capita taxes paid you see that red states are a lot better, also in terms of crime rate and social cohesion. blue states are trash heaps.
because conservatism was always about socialism, right-wing retards can't into economics
Ever heard of niggers and spics?
this
It is because big government has been fucking them in the ass for decades while smiling and telling them "everything is great, we're the most prosperous we've ever been!"
well said comrade
social republicans unite
>NEED
>GET
/thread
>Spending includes Military Bases
Montana has 80% of our land based ICBM's.
>The states that receive the most funding have also the highest Black population
Gee, it seems that niggers take THREE TIMES the funding that other races do and only %20 pay taxes.
>Farming subsidies
Enjoy not eating.
I'm surrounded by white trash and niggers that are given my tax dollars to sit on their asses all day and have twelve kids they can't support and you wonder why I hate big government?
>>NEED
>>GET
Sounds pretty socialist to me, are conservatives the real socialists despite claiming liberals are?
It's funny because liberals want socialism for the good of others - conservatives want socialism for the good of themselves, and reject it when it's for the good of others
i mean it's always about fear of MUH SOCIALISM and not actual economic theory
Based Obamaleaf, help me BTFO some right-wing retards
>state revenue
>not doing per capita
Kansas and North Dakota, liberal utopias!
It's probably got more to do with population density and wages for tax revenue.
Federal highway funding is going to be higher for states that have more miles of highway, a whole host of aid programs.
It's a nice bait thread though.
>OY VEY GOYIM DON'T LOOK AT THAT
Why are North and South Dakota complete opposites?
>the states with the most minorities and most subsidized farmland get the most federal aid
you don't say
You're a really bad troll
This.
If I could find Obamaleaf and beat him within an inch of his life for all the lies he blast on here, I would.
argusleader.com
According to this, South Dakota takes in less state taxes therefore their ratio is far higher because they require more aid
Funnily enough, Washington literally has no state income tax yet they still take in a low ratio of federal aid. Maybe there's something to that good old fashioned liberal intellectuality and forward thinking...
Well California and New York take more welfare than most of the Union so probably not. Seriously, with the insane business and tech sector, how the FUCK are you still needing welfare?
How much of that is gibsmedats to the reservations?
modern day liberals hate blue collar jobs of any type. Niggers don't/can't work them, it the destruction of the working class is effectively anti-white, aka white genocide.
now show me the number of niggers in washington state.
i would wager the federal aid most of these states receive is a lot lower than most of the blue states, even if their percentages are higher.
Red states are the breadbasket of your country. They get more subsidies so that they can sell food at affordable prices. Otherwise they'll ramp up everything by 30% and all the homeless plebs are going to work twice as hard to earn that daily hot dog.
It doesn't matter, all that matters is the ratio of received to contributed
A state with 10 people receiving $1m in aid each and contributing nothing will have the lowest total received aid of any state
i don't even know why people continue to move there when they can't afford to live there. it's the highest cost of living, and they barely qualify for mcdonald's.
...
Why do they need subsidies? I thought conservatives valued pulling yourself up by your bootstraps and don't need the federal government's help
Population, you fuckin' retard
...
federal regulations and taxes cost money, gotta compensate that somehow.
>Facts don't matter, I'm right because I said so
>s-stop laughing at m-me.
The absolute state of the left right now.
why doesn't it matter?
Cali has like 2 booming industries propping up the state, but with millions of other people/sectors on welfare. To say that's not a problem is stupid.
jew york just pushes papers around is that more important than growing food?
>farmlands receive farm subsidies
IMGEN MUH SHOK
>I can't into math
>I don't understand percentages and ratios
Farm subsidies exist to keep food prices low. Remember, farmers can just increase their prices to the point where they're actually making money if needed. It's not like you can stop buying food.
>all that matters is the ratio of received to contributed
we could kill all the niggers, that would help. Do you want that user?
Because red states are full of niggers.
>Still doesn't show proof of OP's retarded graphs.
LMAO
Its the Niggers
Name one thing thought out and economic about liberalism? Try to justify open borders and free healthcare on the basis of economics. Your mouth is your ass.
a lot of red states depend on agriculture, also this
, a lot of (((companies))) remain new york,san fran,los angeles etc, but still these states have a lot of welfare, and crime.
You overlook the FACT, of course, that in both blue and red states, conservatives pay the taxes, and Dems get the government checks. You can retire your low IQ attempt at a meme now.
you're being a retard. aid isn't just sprinkled over the entire state equally, it's funnelled into certain industries or welfare programs.
...
cool. so why do liberals want a big fed tax? why not let the state keep the money and decide how to use it? don't you want to punish these republican voters?
I'll tell you why - niggers will flee red states and all move to blue states, LOL.
This.
You don't think having a healthy population with easy access to free preventative care, lessening the rate of late stage developed medical issues, has economic benefits?
You don't think spending lots of money on public education has benefits?
You think there are economic benefits in keeping the population uneducated and unhealthy, to save the money that would have been spent on educating and healing them?
Literally kill yourself, you are mentally deficient
hey bro i gotta run some errands but ill be back in a bit
hahaha you went and looked for a startrek image. what a fag.
Actually I just went in my pictures\reactions\star_trek\smug\data\ folder
>implying that's better
wew autiste
>Republicuck can't refute OP
Everyone in the south is fucking retarded, everyone knows southerners are the niggers of the anglosphere.
NASCAR SUCKS
TAYLOR SWIFT SUCKS
60 OZ SODA SUCKS
HAVING A SHITTY CAR SUCKS
GOING TO CHURCH SUCKS
This is such a intellectually dishonest way to consider things. States are going to get a certain amount of federal funding no matter what, but if the people of that state are content with having lower state taxes and fewer overall services it is going to make the federal funding a larger percentage of their budget despite quite possibly having similar or lower per capita federal aid coming into the state.