What's the endgame for the West?

We will reach a critical point with cultural marxism/post-modernist thought sooner rather than later. What do we do from there to avoid going the way of Rome?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=RikBsB7_Tbk
independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-developing-nation-regressing-economy-poverty-donald-trump-mit-economist-peter-temin-a7694726.html
archive.is/Qpmod
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

youtube.com/watch?v=RikBsB7_Tbk

Vid related

The worst part about this approach to philosophy is how much conviction people can have for these ideas. Why not approach these ideas like they're theories or hypotheses instead? Pseuds only treat philosophy with conviction, the intellectuals remain sceptic

>Pseuds only treat philosophy with conviction, the intellectuals remain sceptic
Why shouldn't I be a "pseud", then?

You have every right to be but some people will view that as insufferable. But why does it matter what they think anyway (I assume that's your prerogative)

accept that society is always a theocratic dictatorship and choose wisely

Which ideas and theories are you referring to?

Conviction leads to victory, analysis leads to paralysis.

There is an old story about the Romans, who, in deciding to invade the Peloponnese and the Spartans who lived there-in, reached out to the Athenians, who were the historic rival of the sons of Lycurgas, for support. The Athenians debated but finally acquiesced to the Romans and decided to support the Romans in their invasion. The Romans sent several legions to invade the Spartans, ultimately subjugating them. When the Romans learned that the extent of the Athenians support was a strongly worded letter against the Spartans, immediately invaded the Athenians as well and thus began the entire subjugation of the Greek peninsula.

You can be as intellectual as you want, but when against force conviction is necessary.

Nuke everything

Optimism is cowardice.
Stay at your post.