Clown movie is trying to normalize pedophillia

Mods please don't remove this thread, movies this big have great social and political implications that should be discussed on this board, and not amongst a bunch of faggots from Sup Forums
That being said, has anyone seen the movie 'it'? I dont ever walk out from movies but i could not sit through this one.
There are three scenes that alarmed me by the time i left. One scene has all the children half naked, another has romance being established between the boy and the girl who looks like a boy, in a bathroom, and the third has a kid grabbing his dick talking about how he's fucked the girl who looks like a boy recently. All of these kids are portrayed to be no older than 12-13.
When i went to get my money back, the faggot cashier says to me "well it is rated R....." after explaining to him that i wanted to see a horror movie and not watch kids be sexualized, as he reluctantly refunded me. Kek, were it not for my girlfriend and witnesses i would've started to strangle this motherfucker for saying that.
It started from salon articles, but now its evolved into our movie theatres. Does anyone else get the feeling this movie is trying to normalize pedophillia? What are your thoughts on the social and political implications 'it' has?

Tl;dr
this movie sexualizes kids

Other urls found in this thread:

indiewire.com/2017/09/it-stephen-king-sex-scene-1201874424/
unvis.it/indiewire.com/2017/09/it-stephen-king-sex-scene-1201874424
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>mfw the slippery slope is a fallacy until its true

Fallacies are fallacies

Did you not go through puberty?
That sounds like a pretty accurate portrayal of being 13.
Also you sound like a massive faggot and this isn't pol relates so sage

>ignoring the literal gangbang scene in the book
Lolk

>this movie sexualizes kids

It's much worse in the book.
The kids actually bang the ginger as some sort of ritual.

apparently the book describes in detail a gangbang by all the boys on the one girl in the group

So did this version include the tween gangbang scene from the book?

Someone hasn't read the book.

>t.mohammad

Hows aisha?

If you think that's bad you should read the book and read Kings very graphic description of them all fucking

In the actual book, the 12 year old girl fucks all the guys after deafeating Pennywise the first time so they remeber him. They fucking have a gangbang and it was her idea ...

Blame Stephen King. Anyone who questioned him about the sexuality in the book is him going "Wow why do people care about this more than child violence????"

You're kidding right?

Sounds degenerate, media is hyping this movie so much, i like most people didnt read the book, i was busy reading history. I remember the old movie as far as i remember no sex scenes. I bet over half of the people watching this will not expect it.

>but now its evolved into our movie theatres
they were never your theaters, I don't understand how you could even consider paying a theater for anything to begin with

>gangbang
God dammit, people. It wasn't a gangbang. They ran a train on her. There's a difference.

Haven't seen it yet, but the original film and book had some of this, but it's a movie about kids growing up, and if anything, being an R rated movie, it's likely trying to get you to relate to the characters, not objectify them. I highly doubt it's meant to normalize pedo shit any more than Forrest Gump was, and certainly no more than 90% of shit on the Disney Channel.

Moralfags, get the fuck out

>this movie sexualizes kids
have you not read stefan king? he is the biggest degenerate i have ever had the displeasure of reading. i'm shocked that he's not a jew

Kikefags, get the fuck out.

>I don't ever walk out from movies but i could not sit through this one

Nah you were just a pussy ass bitch couldn't handle a spooky clown

Fuckin hell you can't read a book without having a visualization in your head about what you're reading. That's really disturbing...
How long until actual child gangbangs in movie theatres?

he's a crypto for sure

(((King)))

Read the book. It'll blow your fucking mind.

It's not graphically detailed, but there's a difference between writing something and showing it onscreen.

I'm definitely going to think about seeing the movie now, butthurt moralfag cuck

Why is Stephen King obsessed with sex in all of his books? He gets mad at Trump when he wants to grab a woman by the pussy, but it's okay to write about orgies.

OP discovers what children are like


really fun movie, good shit

Yep. I was going to say this. The book is worse. There are pages and pages describing where each "loser" took his turn with the girl.

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo pls don't

Jesus you're a snowflake.
Since i sat through the whole movie, I'll refute all the scenes in question.
>One scene has all the children half naked
They're all going to jump in a lake, so they have their underwear on. Big fucking deal. Then, the girl comes and strips to her underwear. Then, all the boys are literally staring at this girl like normal 12 year old boys would.
> another has romance being established between the boy and the girl who looks like a boy, in a bathroom
The girl who joins their friend group had long hair, and then cut it because she was being raped by her father for being "daddy's little girl". She still looks like a girl and there's an innocent "crush" developing between the 2 main characters. they're 12 fucking years old what do you expect this kid has a boner for the only girl they hang out with.
>the third has a kid grabbing his dick talking about how he's fucked the girl who looks like a boy recently
So the kid is showing he's an alpha by saying he fucked the girl in the loser's friend group.
What is wrong with you? Do you have autism?

It's true. She lets them run a train on her to "unite them". Very fucked up.

indiewire.com/2017/09/it-stephen-king-sex-scene-1201874424/

You were a friendless nerd from age 12-13, weren't you?

Archive please unvis.it/indiewire.com/2017/09/it-stephen-king-sex-scene-1201874424

Go spend your money then cock sucking kikefag degenerate.

What the fuck are you talking about? Not everyone on Sup Forums is a NEET, many of us (mostly lurkers) do normal shit outside of browsing this board to enjoy our lives instead of being a faggot nihilist. Movie theatres are ours, what we choose to pay for and support will ultimately shape what we see in theatres, you're sub 100 IQ if you don't understand this.

I walked out mostly because of all the infants and toddlers in the theater. They looked terrified and I couldn't really believe parents (or the theater thought that was okay.

I bet OP would rather have us be into some filthy whore who gets fucked by niggers regularly

>People remember the gangbang scene because some "journalist" talked about it
>Nothing about Henry Bowers getting a handy from one of his lackeys
>Or the leper formed It trying to blow eddie
Read the book. Theres pedophilia every couple chapters

Cringe. Did you forget it's based on a book that's even more vulgar? And that the author made several more books with children that had successful adaptations? Even Wes Anderson movies are more pedophiliac.

Beep beep

>some tweens having sex
>pedophilia

Maybe book burnings weren't such a bad idea.

Go back to wasting money on your washed up whore, faggot cuck.

this. kissless OP sperging out at the movies. oh, and no one believes you brought a girl. but if you did how did it go? t-these kids are waaaaaaaay too sexy

>and I thought it was going to be shit and edgy
You sold it to me OP. Wasn't expecting it to be anywhere near the Tim Curry TVM.

>Not graphically detailed

Didn't it say that one of them had a huge dick?

well there are two actual pedophiles in the film and both are portrayed as creepy and bad people. one of them is justifiably killed by his daughter towards the end of the film. if they were trying to promote pedophilia I don't think these are the portrayals they would have written for the characters. and beverly cutting her hair was the standard trope about removing ones femininity as a means of self protection. your misguided angered would be better directed at films like The Woodsman and Nymphomaniac (you would really be bothered by some scenes in this)

Going to go watch it now, if its good enough, I'll definitely go for seconds. stay mad kiddo.

I'm filing for divorce on my wife because this morning I found out she took our very disturbed 12 year old to see this movie.

13 year olds fuck each other on a daily basis

t.never grew up with friends

>so they have underwear on. Big fucking deal
>so two men want to get married. Big fucking deal

I would probably bully you in high school.

dumbass it's steven king the book was already packed full of it

>All of these kids are portrayed to be no older than 12-13

literal, average 12-13yo's being kids who are entering puberty.

Good movie, better than the original which is hard to say for ANY remake. I thought it was funny that all the losers were in their underwear and it was normal, and the girl walked up in her underwear and they all dropped their jaws. The point was she did not want to be sexualized, she just wanted to be a kid enjoying her summer in the country.

Do not read Stephen King's IT. You will develop a fear of clowns and spiders and become and actual pedophile.

Is the dad also fucking the daughter?

>sexualizes kids
Wow, who could be behind such a thing

>germany
Your mother was getting fucked by ahmed when you were 12-13, wasn't she?

Is this true? I had a friend say the same thing

>movie sexualizes kids

We already have ten year old girls in whore outfits twerking in front of thousands of people, it's nothing new.

>kids

Puberty: 10-11 for females. 13-14 for boys.

The girl is an adult and a woman and the boys would be going through puberty.

So many normalfags and normalfags in here. Thank god you don't watch anime, it's full of nudity of girls even younger than the movie

>sexualizes kids
>the mass orgy scene isn't in it

What did he mean by this?

Big if true

Ummm, this book ends with what is essentially a gangbang with all these kids, you know that right?

No there's a full blown preteen orgy in a sewer

Not joking, I was just about to go watch the 1990 old IT.

Is it really a movie about pedo disguised as horror flick?

Yes it's true. The girl lays down in the sewer and they climb on and fuck her one by one. The bully kids also touch tips. Very degenerate

I think that's the difference between the cocaine and vodka addicted Stephen King of those days, and the sober old survivor of automobile induced head trauma that he is these days.

I do not want to "hang labels" but its seems like everything is written on Stephen King face.

Was the leper jacking off like in the book?

Jesus. Right Wing Death Squads when?

Sure is burger. When the losers finish BTFOing pennywise in the sewers for the first time they have to "deepen their bond" or some shit and they figure the best way to do that is to run a train on Beth. Stephen King was a fucking madman back when he was ripping fat lines of coke. I wish I could have seen the look on his editors face when he read that shit

Ya, it's part of them trying to make themselves less of "pure children" so the monster won't eat them. It preys on innocence.

Screens that are hundreds of feet (many meters) across and state of the art, building-shaking sound systems that are usually illegal to use to their full potential in residential neighborhoods. You can go a couple weeks after opening weekend for a matinee and have giant theaters almost entirely to yourself and your date/group.

I still watch most movies for free on the internet (various sources), but I saw the 70mm format of Dunkirk in a theater all to myself and it was fucking fantastic.

Some theaters still do a very good job of selling the "experience" of "going to the movies" in addition to seeing the feature itself. You can even find a lot of non-pornographic "adult theaters" that have full bar (even restaurant) service at your seat.

These are just a few ideas to answer your question. Yes, Hollywood and all these theaters might by owned by Jews. They don't own my ability to have fun pretty much any way I choose, yet.

not the 1990 movie, no. the book and the current movie are

The scenes depicting sexual behavior are really pointless like they do not effect the plot at all so take that for what you will

The book and the movie are about childhood trauma and how people deal with it. This includes violent trauma but also sexual trauma.

So the 1990 version is just a regular spook "what hole will the creepy clown crawl out of next" type of shit?

Why do you think King was so vocal against Anti-establishment Trump?

It this movie really so degenerated??

I have not seen it and was not planning ever watching it.

The original movie was made for ABC in 1990 tho so obviously it had to cut a fuck ton of content

We'll, fuck. Guess I won't see it then

It's a pattern, not muh slippy slide.

to be honest, i don't remember much because it's been years since i've seen it. and you probably don't want to know that much about it before watching it, you'll get spoiled. but there isn't any pedo shit as far as i recall

No. OP is just a faggot who has a thing for young boys

He look so much like Steve Buccemi to me. His brother played Floki on Vikings and imo would have been a better cast

Yes exactly.

I get the impression that regardless how liberal he says he is, King fears being killed by black people.

I hope OP is joking this is embarrassing

Its basically that, topped with some sick bdsm shit

Christ, look at all the shills in this thread.
>grow up as a normal kid who played video games and sports with their friends
>call out movie for trying to normalize degenerate adult behavior in children
>lol what are you OP, a loser?

Many of you should kill yourselves.

>Cut the gangbang scene
>Still somehow promoting pedophilia

Hmm.....

No, it fucking doesn' t.

Tfw all these anons saying normal sex is had at 13 n shit.
That makes me lose faith in people for sure more than I already have.
Why are even kids raised so poorly these days?

I want to but am convinced the only reason it's getting positive reviews is to trick people into seeing it because Hollywood is going broke right now

>one eye on the streets
>one eye on the kids

Fuck me, this is bait but if it's real It's like you were never 12-15 years old.
Although the movie was scary it had it's luke warm, nostalgic and very beautiful moments like when they were playing together in the water.
I remembered doing that with some friends and two girls throughout this one summer.
Did you never talk about girls or make shitty adult jokes you learned from south park as a kid either?
The movie slightly sexualizes the girl in the group who's played by a 15 year old btw, not that bad. It's that way because every boy in the loser group is basically in love with her.
I can't imagine how much you'd be sperging out if you'd read the book.
Stop trying to sexualize children, you disgust me.

Found the loser who didn't have sex till college

Actual book ending.
This was pedophilia before the film.