>"I don't believe in climate change because there's no evidence" (there is)
>"I believe in God despite there being no evidence"
Are American conservatives the most delusional people on Earth? We've had literally 3 "one-in-a-century" type Hurricanes within a week of another. When will they wise up to the fact they're being played for a fool by fossil fuels lobby interests?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Fuck off Shareblue.
Sag e
>(there is)
a lot of studies have been proven fake, forgeries, politically motivated with conclusions taken out of context
That's besides the point. The point is that Republicans have a different criteria for determining if there is a flying spaghetti monster in the sky than for determining if climate change is occurring.
Umm sweetie religion and political party preference isn't mutually exclusive.
What is your claim?
Is the Earth not warming up?
Are humans not causing it?
Does putting CO2 in the air not cause the greenhouse effect?
Does melting ice sheets not cause an increase in temperature?
Is there a worldwide conspiracy by climate scientists to falsify research?
There is plenty of evidence all the above questions have answers directly in line with that of the consensus among climate scientists.
The planet has climate cycles. 12,000 years ago there was a massive ice age and there has been a general warming trend since then. Sometimes the climate dips or rises in smaller cycles within the larger trend. At the smallest level of this microcosm we call it weather.
The earth turns and different sides of it face the sun. The climate changes every 12 hours. The earth wobbles and in this sense the climate changes every 13,000 years.
Hurricane Irma's weakness (only cat 4) was 100% undeniable proof of global warming. What I don't understand is why people are against global warming if it weakened the hurricane?