Did he do it?

Did he do it?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=yTjz7rfPjfQ
lesvisible.net/DOCS/MastersOfDeception.pdf
victimsofcrime.org/docs/default-source/ncvrw2014/urban-rural-crime-statistics-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2p
addiction.com/3441/urban-vs-rural-drug-use/
reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/6zdvtz/工_凵与已_匚卄工几毛与毛_与丫川阝口乚_了工入已_门巳_长丹万门丹/
youtube.com/watch?v=PZJUnZbg6QA
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No, there's footage of him reading a book about goats at the time. He probably wasn't there.

I don't know, to be honest.

But what I do know is that the only people who voted for Donald Trump are rural and suburban retards who wish they could fuck their own relatives.

City people and intelligent people all voted for Hillary Clinton.

yeah maybe i dont know probably not.

but boy is it fun to think so!

Whatever you say leaf. You didn't vote at all.

Yes

youtube.com/watch?v=yTjz7rfPjfQ

yep

He had a guilty look on his face when that lad came in and whispered into his ear.

The lone gunman episode 1

Crafty alibi

He was in on it but not his idea, not his plan. Just did what he was told. To develop a public alibi for his whereabouts at the time of the deed, and then "lead" us into war.

Like how when some guy walks over and tells you the country is under attack but you don't ask any questions like, is anyone doing anything or who is doing it?
>best not scare the children by standing up.

How the fuck did this guy get elected? He sounds like a retard.

Too stupid

question is did he don't do it?

(me)
>you don't ask any questions
yeah, he didn't ask questions and he had a pall over his face when he was told because he knew damn well what was happening and what was to come.

lesvisible.net/DOCS/MastersOfDeception.pdf

Of course not

Israel did

Exit polls say differently

Trump won the white educated vote

He also won all four income brackets above 50,000$

Keep in mind that an educated vote can mean a degree in disability studies, gender studies, sociology, General arts, liberal arts etc. etc.

The income brackets are what matter

- convoluted urban superiority idiology:

victimsofcrime.org/docs/default-source/ncvrw2014/urban-rural-crime-statistics-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2p

- FBI reports the 2011 rate of violent crime known to law enforcement within metropolitan areas was 410.3 per 100,000 persons.
Rate of violent crime per 100,000 persons in cities outside metropolitan areas was 382.1, and for non- metropolitan counties it was 186.1.1. (Wow)

- In 2011, the rate of violent victimizations reported by victims to the NCVS was 2,740 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older
in urban areas, 2,020 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in suburban areas, and 2,010 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in rural areas. (Wow)

- FBI reports metropolitan cities had a murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate known to law enforcement of 4.9 per 100,000 persons in 2011. Cities outside metropolitan areas had a murder and nonnegligent manslaughter rate of 4.4 per 100,000 persons while non-metropolitan counties had a rate of 3.1 per 100,000 persons.

- FBI reports the rate of forcible rape known to law enforcement within metropolitan areas was 26.4 per 100,000 persons. The rate of forcible rape in cities outside metropolitan areas was 40.7 per 100,000. Non-metropolitan counties had a rate of 20.7 per 100,000 persons.

- the 2011 rate of rapes and sexual assaults reported by victims to the NCVS was 110 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older
in urban areas, 70 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in suburban areas, and 130 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in rural areas.

1

The FBI reports the 2011 rate of arrest for forcible rape was 6.3 per 100,000 inhabitants. In cities under 10,000, the rate was 6.3 per 100,000; in suburban areas, the rate was 4.9 per 100,000; and in large cities (populations 250,000 and over), the rate was 9.2 per 100,000. (Wow)

• FBI reports the 2011 aggravated assault rate known to law enforcement within metropolitan areas was 249.1 per 100,000 persons. The rate of aggravated assault in cities outside metropolitan areas was higher at 181.0 per 100,000 persons. The rate of aggravated assault in non-metropolitan counties was lowest at 146.8 per 100,000 persons. (Yikes)

- The 2011 rate of aggravated assault reported by victims to the NCVS was 540 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in urban areas, 320 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in suburban areas, and 420 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in rural areas.

• The FBI reports metropolitan areas had a 2011 robbery rate known to law enforcement of 129.9 per 100,000 persons, compared to a rate of 56.0 per 100,000 persons in cities outside metropolitan areas and 15.5 per 100,000 persons in non-metropolitan counties. (My Goodness 8.3 times higher!!!)

• The 2011 rate of robberies reported by victims to the NCVS was 330 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in urban areas, 170 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in suburban areas, and 120 per 100,000 persons age 12 or older in rural areas. (Holy Molly more than double)

• The FBI reports a total of 5,086 bank robberies were reported to law enforcement in 2011. Of these, 46 percent occurred
in metropolitan areas, 34 percent occurred in small cities or towns, 18 percent occurred in suburban areas, and 2 percent occurred in rural areas. (Ouch)

• The FBI reports the national property crime rate known to law enforcement in the United States in 2011 was 2,908.7 per 100,000 persons.

2

addiction.com/3441/urban-vs-rural-drug-use/

- Folks in the city and in the country are not abusing the same substances. Rural treatment programs saw the greatest number of entrants seeking help for the first time due to alcohol abuse. Rural residents were also more likely to seek help for abuse of non-heroin opioids (prescriptions painkillers) and stimulants.

Urbanites, on the other hand, appeared more prone to abuse cocaine and heroin. Rural users reportedly used their substances intermittently rather than daily which is somewhat good news, but on the down side they also started using drugs at a younger age, often between 15 and 17 years.

- There was an age and racial gap between urban and rural drug treatment admissions. Rural admissions tended to be younger (not surprising since they also start using at a younger age) than their urban counterparts. However, rural entrants also had more education and were more likely than urban ones to be employed at least part-time. Those entering treatment in the country were generally non-Hispanic and white (over 77%) compared to urban admissions (38%).

- Essentially, the TEDS report said that rural residents were more likely to abuse marijuana, alcohol or prescription drugs. Rural-dwelling citizens often start using substances younger and seem to generally only seek out help once they have broken the law. Education and intervention programs in rural areas could become more targeted with this information in hand.

By contrast, urban drug users come from an ethnically diverse background, have low education and employment and tend to use harder drugs like cocaine and heroin. Prevention programs targeted toward these clients might do well to partner with other programs which address social plight issues that may be contributing to drug use.

3

He is trying really hard to look like he isn't freaking the fuck out. He definitely was.

reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/6zdvtz/工_凵与已_匚卄工几毛与毛_与丫川阝口乚_了工入已_门巳_长丹万门丹/

He just didn't know what to do and was freaking out. Being president is essentially doing what he's doing right here. Looking a certain way for the public. He had absolutely no clue what to do because he was a globalist puppet so he read with the kids, was charming, and let others handle the situation.

We all know who did it, user.

youtube.com/watch?v=PZJUnZbg6QA

he's far too stupid to do it. at best he served as a useful idiot

It was Rove and Cheney. How fucking old are you niggers?

Report this faggot. He's posted this in literally every new thread.

No, but he covered for the guys who did.

>idiology

yeah no, you rural bumblefucks have way worse problems than violent crime

No. He might've been involved in the coverup afterward but there's no way in hell this dipshit orchestrated the entire thing in the 8 months he was in office.

The ball began rolling in the Clinton administration, maybe even before that.

I don't know who all is responsible but I don't think it's as simple as "Osama bin Laden was butt hurt".

KYS leaf

His CIA father did, with Dick, Don & The Generals

So, yes.

>no, but he deflected for the guys who did to guys who didn't
Ftfy

no. the jews did. he just covered for them and let it happen

same leaf faggot posts this every time

the jews in his head told him to do it

I don't think so, he was just the one holding the bag