Ignore the gay shill. Do not reply to him. He's not even Australian. Simply report him for spam and move on. Do not engage, do not give him attention. Do not let them win.
Jeremiah Bailey
man we have to do something about these apex nig nogs
Camden Martin
FUCK AUSTRALIA
Josiah Mitchell
Time to join the civillized world bros
Benjamin Carter
What the fuck is going on with that self-produced child abuse shit? Are you telling me kids are willingly becoming degenerate?
Jordan Martin
Poof marriage by christmas m8
Isaac Rivera
give me a nuke
Benjamin Butler
Only way to escape the dole
Elijah King
...
Jose Thomas
Other than getting a job
Did you miss the memo where we said don't fucking post gay marriage shit?
Jack Thompson
Time for another hep c vaccination test, just like you guys did back in the early 80's.
Benjamin Torres
Huuuuur duuuuur
Eli Campbell
stupid people are not looking at what their kids do online. So pedo fucks are using the internet to get them to make pedo porn for them
Brody Hernandez
>kind of is though since HIV is an infectious disease that can be passed onto babies in the womb. I still don't see how that effects you. They suffer the consequences, you don't.
Jayden Richardson
Your kids are going to get gay married by centerlink workers
Levi Martin
You said: >Are you telling me kids are willingly becoming degenerate?
Then you said: >Did you miss the memo where we said don't fucking post gay marriage shit?
Your first post is somewhat related.
It is the affect of cultural marxism.
Aiden Bell
pol could have put a dent in this if we'd paid more attention to the spiderman/elsa threads... thats probably a part of it. then again its probably Sup Forums that brought it to light in the first place
Landon Morales
yeah next time i see someone dying in the street ill just walk past because it doesnt affect me... great society we'd have there.
Lucas Nelson
You don't die from hiv anymore (if you catch it in time)
Benjamin James
Received a request for information from centrelink I know I reported all my employers payments.
William Stewart
you dont die from getting a limb amputated either. i know youre not serious but fuck off all the same
Asher Morris
If you're encouraging your kid to upload videos of themselves to youtube or livestream, regardless of their nature, you have failed as a parent.
Juan King
That reminds me, I'm pretty sure Frozen is like a beacon for pedophiles what with all the merchandise and how little girls love it so much
Robert Foster
Do you not know how hiv works?
Samuel Cooper
Reminder that homosexual sodomy is one of the chief vectors of infectious disease, and therefore violates the NAP.
If I wanted the news as you've presented it I'd just got to Just In on the abc site.
3 fucken threads of this shit?
Ryan Johnson
So apparently the Desert Tech SRSA1 is now a Cat D in NSW because it happens to look like a chink Semi auto rifle. Regardless of it being a bolt action repeater.
Isaac Lopez
cunt youre not going to convince me that HIV is safe and OK.
Carter Davis
This is true, when I was 12 or 13 me and my mate posted a video to Youtube of us fucking around thinking we were funny as fuck and my Dad almost dropkicked me.
Robert Wright
...
Angel Robinson
And you return to your silence.
Let it be known that the Gay Marriage Shill that is infesting all of our threads has absolutely no argument against polygamous marriage and doesn't even attempt to make one, the Slippery Slope isn't a fallacy, and that the government legislating marriage makes it meaningless. Voting Yes in this plebiscite will not be the end.
Cameron Fisher
Why the fuck are they contacting I know I reported everything correctly in my tax report.
Benjamin Campbell
more reason to buy the steyr hs 50 m1
Owen Adams
This is the second attempt to escape from discussion of faggotry and as you can see it's failing.
Jackson Perez
>Hand fucking phone posters
Chase Martinez
To survive, laws need to pass the so-called rational basis test. Laws must be rationally related to a legitimate government interest. For example, if a law could help citizens avoid harm, it would pass the rational basis test. One of the reasons gay marriage was legalized was because opponents failed to show that it was harmful to anyone. In order to stand up in court, a challenged law normally needs only to survive what's called a rational-basis test. That's a low bar: the government merely needs to be able to claim that its law is rationally related to a legitimate government purpose. The trouble that gay-marriage opponents kept running into was that they could not surmount this very low bar, because they couldn't explain how preventing gay couples from marrying served any of the state's claimed goals. Nor could they show any plausible harm from gay marriage. Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion for the majority in Obergefell makes this point explicitly: "With respect to this asserted basis for excluding same-sex couples from the right to marry, it is appropriate to observe these cases involve only the rights of two consenting adults whose marriages would pose no risk of harm to themselves or third parties."[1]
It would be possible to argue that polygamy is harmful in ways that gay marriage is not.
For example, you could argue that polygamy most often occurs when high status men take on multiple wives, leaving low status men wifeless and unhappy, which leads to a dramatic increase in crime, among other things. Further, you could argue that it hurts productivity, children and gender equality. This is backed up by studies, e.g.
the study finds significantly higher levels rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures. ... these crimes are caused primarily by pools of unmarried men, which result when other men take multiple wives.
Ian Parker
By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, institutionalized monogamy increases long-term planning, economic productivity, savings and child investment, the study finds.
Monogamous marriage also results in significant improvements in child welfare, including lower rates of child neglect, abuse, accidental death, homicide and intra-household conflict, the study finds. These benefits result from greater levels of parental investment, smaller households and increased direct "blood relatedness" in monogamous family households,
By decreasing competition for younger and younger brides, monogamous marriage increases the age of first marriage for females, decreases the spousal age gap and elevates female influence in household decisions which decreases total fertility and increases gender equality.[2]
On a broader note, gay marriage was legalized partly because it had support of the majority of Americans. Group marriage is supported by a small minority of Americans, but that percentage is growing.
Mason Williams
Group marriage advocates may argue that increasing people's freedom to consider group marriage offsets the negative consequences of group marriage.
Regardless, group marriage advocates face a number of distinct legal issues that gay marriage advocates did not — and a number of unique challenges with respect to public's perception of group marriage.
Parker Roberts
Hear hear
Mason Roberts
>cunt there it is!
Of course it's dangerous, but it's manageable. You can take PrEP to drastically reduce the risk of catching it. If you have it, you can take medication that lowers your levels to such a minimal amount that it's nearly impossible to transfer to another human. If you don't catch it in time then kiss your momma goodbye cuz you will get aids and die.
All three of those arguments strike me as wrongheaded.
I suspect that there are still strategic reasons for gay-marriage advocates to refrain from pushing for plural marriage; there are numerous rational arguments against state endorsement of group marriages; and having a polygamous marriage recognized and incentivized by the state is not a human right.
The law should, I think, allow groups of people to sleep in the same house, engage in group sex, and enter into contracts or religious arrangements of their liking. If a polyamorous family lived next door to me, I’d welcome them to the neighborhood and champion treating them with love and respect. But I think it would be imprudent to include their arrangement in civil marriage, with its incentivizing benefits, because if group marriage were to become normalized and spread beyond a tiny fringe the consequences for society could be significant and negative.
Colton Bell
Stop! Let the poor aussies have a break for a little while then come back later. Just let them breathe.
Adam Cox
they should just start making assault rifles with wooden stocks. cunts wouldnt have a clue what they are. the qld gun laws are strange too, you can have a .45 revolver with a removable stock like a wild west meme sharpshooter in a clint eastwood movie and its classified as a single shot rifle. you can also just get a lever action shotgun and they think its somehow different than a pump, which you cant have at all. whoever is in charge of this shit is a fat pogue for sure. probably a chick with a gunt
Jacob Foster
But plural marriage is associated with those negative outcomes even in cultures where it is or was neither taboo nor illegal. Says De Boer, “The truth is that we don’t know what a wealthy Western society like America would look like with polygamous marriage because conservatism has prevented that society from existing.” He is right that we cannot be sure what the United States would look like if polygamy were legalized tomorrow, and perhaps America would be exceptional. It is also possible that the vast majority of plural marriages would occur within fundamentalist religious groups, as happened in the past; and that those plural marriages would be as coercive and destabilizing as has typically been true.
Either way, it is incomplete at best to assert that it is impossible to know what a polygamous society would look like “because conservatism has prevented that society from existing.” There are strong conservative arguments for risk-aversion and against experimenting with legalized group marriage, but there are equally strong technocratic, feminist, and progressive arguments against incentivizing polygamous marriage. If plural marriage is recognized by the state and practiced mostly in Berkeley and Williamsburg, those left-leaning arguments may well go unarticulated. I expect that they’ll be made forcefully, though, if the result of normalized plural marriage is, for example, a spike in the number of middle-aged religious conservatives who coerce their first wives into letting them marry teenagers summoned from fundamentalist Mormon sects or polygamous tribal societies abroad.
Nathan Rodriguez
Ignoring the religious paranoia about muh gay marriage the process itself instills legal rights that gays do not get. It genuinely is a human rights issue. Are you saying men or women don't deserve these rights because of Tyrone plowing them up the bum? It's not even binding anyway so I dunno what you're worried about.
Ayden Davis
Man-Bruce and the Masters of the Shitpost here to combat the pooftery.
Jace Morris
Where plural marriage exists in America, this is already happening. As The New York Times reported in 2007, “Over the last six years, hundreds of teenage boys have been expelled or felt compelled to leave the polygamous settlement that straddles Colorado City, Ariz., and Hildale, Utah. Disobedience is usually the reason given for expulsion, but former sect members and state legal officials say the exodus of males—the expulsion of girls is rarer—also remedies a huge imbalance in the marriage market. Members of the sect believe that to reach eternal salvation, men are supposed to have at least three wives.”
Isaiah Baker
This shit looks interesting though
Kevin Wilson
> shilling faggotry this hard There's a reason no one wants to fuck you, pozz carrier
Henry Clark
Report the shill.
Logan Murphy
ANYONE HERE A BUG CHASER?
GOT SOME A+ POZ LOADS
Michael Reed
Agreed let's take a little looksee
I've done that so many times already
Ethan Ward
>made the gay marriage shill list the benefits of heterosexual marriage kek i'll respond properly in a second.
Ayden Sullivan
I was reading through it lol sounds fishy but interesting as well, you can never know on Sup Forums
Logan Sanchez
I'm not against heterosexual marriage...
Jason Taylor
you could also just try to not be gay and try women out. heres why faggotry sucks and leads to suicide:
family unit: mum, dad, brother, sister mum and dad eventually die. extended family of uncles, aunts, grandparents and anyone who would care for you dies before you because theyre older. your nieces and nephews arent exactly going to be looking after you or seeing you when youre older. youll just be their "uncle" when youre 80, tagging along at christmas as the loney faggot who nobody really cares about. thats how you end up dying alone in your house and nobody finds your body for 3 weeks. OR, you could become the patriarch of a house and have an entire set of descendants, grandchildren, their neices and nephews and cousins all gathered around your deathbed so you dont die alone in a dingy flat like a retard. theres a reason why family is important and faggotry should be discouraged. its actually bad for people. you die alone as a faggot. you need a younger generation thats loyal to you, anyone your age or older will just die and youll be alone as a shitcunt. if you live in a country without welfare youre screwed and youll be an 80 year old beggar. the family is there for a reason, and not building a family is the most retarded thing a person can do.
faggots should suppress their urges, bite their tongues and just find a wife and marry them. its a practical thing entirely. hardly surprising that certain political parties push for gaydom, they want people more reliant on the state and not their own families.
Owen Foster
>there are numerous rational arguments against state endorsement of group marriages; and having a polygamous marriage recognized and incentivized by the state is not a human right. bro, youre just like us. this will be you in a few years, getting REEEEEEEd at about polyamory. cant you see that?
Isaiah Anderson
>>Metro Trains and Yarra Trams win new Melbourne public transport contracts with tougher targets
> "on time"
Defined as up to 6 minutes late.
Elijah Flores
>this offends Australians Why are Australians so uncomfy
Jackson Diaz
Gays are 7% of the younger generation. What percentage of the population is desiring polygamous marriage? I would bet less than .01%.
Oliver Cook
>All three of those arguments strike me as wrongheaded. >I suspect that there are still strategic reasons for same-sex advocates to refrain from pushing for gay marriage; there are numerous rational arguments against state endorsement of gay marriages; and having a gay marriage recognized and incentivized by the state is not a human right. >The law should, I think, allow groups of people to sleep in the same house, engage in gay sex, and enter into contracts or religious arrangements of their liking. If a gay family lived next door to me, I’d welcome them to the neighborhood and champion treating them with love and respect. But I think it would be imprudent to include their arrangement in civil marriage, with its incentivizing benefits, because if gay marriage were to become normalized and spread beyond a tiny fringe the consequences for society could be significant and negative.
see what i mean?
Brody Lopez
>you could also just try to not be gay and try women I never said I was gay. Stop caring what people do. If they want to be irresponsible and catch an std or virus, then they're going to do that. If you really want to send a message, then remove ALL vaccinations for stds. Let them suffer the consequences. I bet that'll really shake people up to be more conscious about their sexual activities.
Andrew Walker
We have evidence of stable gay relationships. All the polygamous marriages have so far been religious ones that result in "lost boys".
Ian Thomas
what about a childs right to a mother?
Jose Ortiz
FUCK. OFF. GAY. SHILL.
STOP REPLYING TO IT YOU FUCKING FUCKHEADS!
Adam Sullivan
is it legit or a high-level larp?
Luis Bennett
Snow is unnatural and I won't have it in my country.
i have a very rare blood type. i should sell vials of my jizz on craiglist and say its a "rare strain" or something
Ayden Anderson
No one pays to read these, you know that right?
Blake Hall
i assumed you were gay. either way, ill leave it there for any gaywads to read
Nolan Lopez
because not having both parents in the household leads to massive crime first of all. could go on and on
John Howard
I have no idea really, the OP predicts shit and gives info on stuff but says can't reveal documents because of safety concerns. At least thats what I got from it.
David Jones
Right that's it I'm leaving
These faggots are such selfish degenerates that they can't just let us have ONE thread without faggotry
On top of that, some of the people in this thread just can't help themselves and keep responding to this rampant shilling
I can't wait for the inevitable 'No' vote so that Sup Forums gets littered with monuments to your failure
Jackson White
You just type the link into sci-hub.bz and it gives you the full pdf for free.
Samuel Garcia
It marks the climate of the white man. No snow = nigger country tbqh
Gavin Rodriguez
...
Kevin Harris
Can you describe, in detail, how New Zealand has declined since the adoption of gay marriage?
Christopher Bell
one night stands dont count as stable relationships
Aaron Gomez
What the fuck is this witchcraft??
Dominic Butler
have you cunts heard about human decanting? faggots pay some cunt to have his bladder filled with wine and then they drink it out of his cock, what the actual fuck?
Matthew Russell
How the literal fuck does that even work?
Kayden Bailey
>gay marriage was legalized was because opponents failed to show that it was harmful to anyone. So it's on you to show that polygamous marriage is "harmful" to people. >Nor could they show any plausible harm from gay marriage. A difficult task given that we have no examples of gay marriage to draw conclusions off before it's made legal in the first place. We need long term data on the differences between children raised in same sex households vs opposite sex households for example, and how can we demonstrate the harm before we have sufficient data?
>For example, you could argue that polygamy most often occurs when high status men take on multiple wives You could argue that, but you ought to prove that it's what must happen in Australia. And what then is the argument against keeping 2 men 1 woman relationships from marrying? >the study finds significantly higher levels rape, kidnapping, murder, assault, robbery and fraud in polygynous cultures Polygamous cultures such as...? I'm assuming Muslim majority countries, which already have high rates of crime. Really in order to demonstrate the harm of polygamous marriage we would need to legalise it first in order to gather long term data on the issue. We cannot prove that polygamy in high functioning, tolerant societies in the western world would cause any harm at all. Arguing over the Mormons is a different issue, as they're encapsulated in a cult-like bubble, circumstances different to secularised and open Australia.
>Group marriage is supported by a small minority of Americans, but that percentage is growing. Exactly. >having a polygamous marriage recognized and incentivized by the state is not a human right. and gay marriage is? and if so, how is it fundamentally different?
you're not doing your argument any favours.
thanks for pic related btw.
Levi Reed
That's the real argument. You can't force a private company from doing anything if they're not violent in the first place. That violates the NAP.
Jace Watson
Partners National Survey of Lesbian & Gay Couples 1988:
