It is fucking working. archive.is/kYPtO >One wonders how long before all retailers - most of whom are notoriously strapped for revenues and profits courtesy of Amazon - and other "power users" of online advertising, do a similar back of the envelope analysis, and find that they, like RH, are getting a bang for only 2% of their buck? What will happen to online ad spending then? And what will happen to the online ad giants, if the vast majority of ad spending that justified their hundreds of bilions in market cap is exposed as "bloat"? As Friedman politely, yet sarcastically put it, "Googles market cap might go down"...
>AdNauseam?
AdNauseam is a privacy tool that protects you from Google stalking. It also works as an ad blocker.
It works by clicking on every ad in a secure background process. This obfuscates the user data Google secretly collects about you thereby protecting your privacy. Optionally it also blocks ads from appearing similarly to any other ad blockers.
It also has a secondary effect of generating many clicks Google will have to refund to the advert placing companies, however this effect is not by design but simply a result of Google adopting a flawed model. The more people use AdNauseam, the more Google will have to refund, and the more exposed the flaws of the Google's advertising model to companies. Metaphorically it is a privacy tool that protect and also attack.
Therefore many people discontent with the constant and invasive surveillance are starting to use AdNauseam, as ad blocker, and as a method of voicing their concern to Google.
>What browsers does AdNauseam work with? >AdNauseam is compatible with all Chromium-based based browsers (e.g. Opera, Iron, Comodo Dragon, Vivaldi, etc), as well as Firefox and its derivatives (e.g., Firefox Mobile, Waterfox, etc). It requires workarounds on Google Chrome (and on a certain ad-supported Firefox derivative), where it has been disallowed. If you are interested in working on a version for another browser (Safari, Edge, Brave, etc), please contact the developers directly (do NOT create a github issue for such requests).
Tyler Brown
just use it on waterfox, best of both worlds
Mason Robinson
If I was Google, I would actually invest in AdNauseam. Not publicly, of course. This is an excellent way to dominate the market even harder and stomp out the competition. All you need is to fill the internet with more white noise which others will have trouble filtering. Google, with its machine learning, won't.
The only people who can really fuck over Google are so called blackhat marketers. They are real pros. To generate fake clicks, they have an arsenal of sophisticated botnets and they often use malware on normies' computers. They're not volunteers, they have a strong financial incentive for click fraud. AdNauseam is baby-tier. Google has seen it all before. It has fought click wars for more than a decade.
Those refunds you keep talking about do not even come from AdNauseam traffic. They come from professional blackhat botnets that imitate user behavior and are only detected post factum. AdNauseam doesn't even load the page. AdNauseam follows primitive, easily recognizable patterns. AdNauseam traffic is filtered immediately.
Do you think that amateur AdNauseam fanboys are smarter than blackhat gurus? I don't think so.
So, what do we have in the end? Google's competitors who use outsourced pajeet coders make heavy losses, advertisers just flock to Google because it's the one who can combat click fraud best. Google strengthens its monopoly. Wow, what a victory.
The only thing AdNauseam really does is playing into Google's hands. I am pretty sure the thread is full of Google shills who promote AdNauseam to kill competition and advance their "anti-hate speech" agenda. Every AdNauseam shill can be declared a Google shill at this point.
Oh yeah, have fun passing your real IP address, location and ISP each time an ad is clicked. You are truly doing a good goy's job.
Michael Gonzalez
What happened to the other pasta?
Ian Russell
Anyone got a redpilled browser to go along with adnauseam? I'm using jewrome at the moment
Kevin Ward
Keep it up bro. We can literally destroy Google's entire business model. We can take billions and billions of dollars away from them just by doing this.
Next step is to get dedicated machines up and running these fake clicks at a massive volume 24 hours a day.
Then publicize to advertisers how badly they are being ripped off by Google. Once we destroy faith and trust in Google's advertising model they will disintegrate. They will be considered one of the biggest rip-off artists in scams in modern history.
The bigger they are the Harder They Fall
Advertisers are already starting to catch on. All we need to do is keep pushing it and within a short while Google will be on suicide watch.
Use Amazon's cutting into retailer revenue to leverage these retailers pullback on ad spending: they have less to spend on ads, so don't waste it on digital ads with goolag
Recommended browsers: Waterfox (acceptable only after tweaking, tweak like Firefox on privacytools.io, also install Random Agent Spoofer) Opera (built-in VPN for added privacy) Vivaldi (install AdNauseam manually) Firefox (acceptable only after tweaking, see privacytools.io, also install Random Agent Spoofer)
Jason Johnson
It's another showa add blockers are antisemetic Oyvey.
Hunter Phillips
This is fucking stupid, Google doesn't give a single fuck about it and you're only fucking advertisers' lives. Yeah I get it they will "complain" and stop paying for ads if this keeps happening so Google will lose 0.0001% of their clients and revenue. Incredible.
Landon Hill
HELEN STOP IT HELEN YOUR SOFTWARE IS GARBAGE HELEN YOU'RE A FUCKIN JUDAS GOAT HELEN.
Lucas Russell
You're allowed to operate on cripchan, do NOT get out of your place again. LEAVE 4POL NOW
>whats going to happen ads are going to become even more intrusive and unstoppable, news "articles" will be even more just plain ads barely disguised. Monitors will be built with a 2nd panel for ads that pops out of your first monitor while shooting a car horn
Dylan Phillips
>You're allowed to operate Allowed to what?
Sup
Carson Lee
Need to make a cryptocurrency that hashes using adnauseoum. Grind out some coins while fucking the jews over.
Charles Jackson
Bitcoin don't even work like that
Julian Flores
winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm AdNauseum is unnecessary and exposes you to liability. Build a host file for your machine. Keep it on github. Do a little bit of work to refine your tools instead of relying on pic VERY related to trick you into doing dumb shit.
(((they))) don't want you to control your own machine. taking control of your own system is how you kill google. Clickspamming is an extortion technique, the same as DDoS, this isn't even a new scam. Retain command and control control of your machine and it's actions at all times, any one telling you different is a scammer.
Kayden Morgan
Was a joke. Though some autist might be able to figure out how to tie proof-of-work to clicking on ads.
Isaiah Torres
>Unnecessary Google is unnecessary. Google is liability. Google is extortion. Google is scam.
>bang for only 2% of their buck
Adrian Hall
Interesting turn of events
Daniel Williams
killing small websites will only profit to big websites that means all alternative websites are in danger that will profit the MSM, and web giants
Asher Nguyen
ADNAUSEUM DISTRACTS KEY RESOURCES FROM MISSION CRITICAL PUBLIC INTELLIGENCE FUNCTIONALITY. ADNAUSEUM DEGRADES THE OPERATIONAL SECURITY OF A SYSTEM NODE TO UNTRUSTED-UNSECURE. ADNAUSEUM WILL BE DENIED A PLACE ON THIS BOARD. WHY IS THIS user USING ALINSKY TECHNIQUES TO GET OTHER ANONS TO INSTALL A BROWSER EXTENSION? NO ONE CARES THIS HARD WITHOUT TRANSHUMANISM. WHY IS THERE A COINTELPRO DEVELOPER SPREADING COUNTER FUD ON 4POL?
ASK YOURSELF THE HARD QUESTIONS HERE, user. WHY ARE THEY SHILLING HERE? YOU ARE BEING SOLD SOMETHING BY (((COMPUTER SCIENCE ACADEMICS))), BUT WHAT COULD IT BE?
BINGO.
Carson Diaz
Solution is simple you know that right? Go on BIG SITES and use AdNauseam there, BAM big sites will be getting chargeback'd for fraud clicks, go on small sites and small sites will get chargeback'd.
Though neither of the sites will get chargebacked for actual legit clicks, which will remain about the same.
Cooper Rodriguez
Lol no you can't do shit
Daniel Reyes
...
Levi Scott
Your caps lock is on, do you want to turn it off?
Blake Lopez
>The PPC industry is lobbying for tighter laws on the issue. Many hope to have laws that will cover those not bound by contracts.
>A number of companies are developing viable solutions for click fraud identification and are developing intermediary relationships with advertising networks. Such solutions fall into two categories:
> Forensic analysis of advertisers' web server log files. > This analysis of the advertiser's web server data requires an in-depth look at the source and behavior of the traffic. As industry standard log files are used for the analysis, the data is verifiable by advertising networks. The problem with this approach is that it relies on the honesty of the middlemen in identifying fraud. > Third-party corroboration. > Third parties offer web-based solutions that might involve placement of single-pixel images or Javascript on the advertiser's web pages and suitable tagging of the ads. The visitor may be presented with a cookie. Visitor information is then collected in a third-party data store and made available for download. The better offerings make it easy to highlight suspicious clicks, and they show the reasons for such a conclusion. Since an advertiser's log files can be tampered with, their accompaniment with corroborating data from a third party forms a more convincing body of evidence to present to the advertising network. However, the problem with third-party solutions is that such solutions see only part of the traffic of the entire network. Hence, they can be less likely to identify patterns that span several advertisers. In addition, due to the limited amount of traffic they receive when compared to middlemen, they can be overly or less aggressive when judging traffic to be fraud.
GIVE THE ADVERTISERS ALL YOUR SERVER LOGS, WEBGOYIM, OR YOU'LL GET DEMONETIZED
Hunter Reyes
Caps lock, sauce.
Jackson Anderson
>HAHA LETS RUIN COMPETITION >WAIT NOW THE WHOLE AD SPACE NO LONGER GETS INVESTMENTS You stupid fucck
Carson Gray
MUSHON, CAPSLOCK IS MORE HONORABLE THAN A MEMEFLAG. YOUR JEW SPELLS ARE INEFFECTIVE HERE BEGONE.
Isaac Jenkins
Quick. Give me a website with a lot of ads
Landon Brooks
Xhamster, Pornhub, news sites like NY Times, Washington Post, etc.
Gonna start running this now. Hopefully I can shill it to a couple of my right wing friends who don't use Sup Forums
John Cooper
>ads are going to become even more intrusive and unstoppable Then even the normalfags will get fed up by it, thats gonna sink goolag even deeper.
Jack Watson
Anyone else getting stability issues? The average memory used by FireFox has jumped from about 1.2GB to 3GB when I started using AN. It's not too much of a problem because I have 16GB but still, it's causing firefox itself to randomly crash, even when everything else runs fine.
Jonathan Nelson
block-this.com
Kicked out of the play store because it works.
Creates a VPN and blocks all ads
Elijah Ortiz
>whats whitelist?
Nolan Williams
What exactly is their machine going to learn? You're either A) Sending bullshit or B) not clicking/viewing ads (ublock is built in). They lose every way if you install it. You are under no obligation to structure your clicks in a way so that google can parse them easier.
Bentley Edwards
Use a VPN. God your annoying, go away shill.
Ryder Stewart
Google is pic related atm.
John Collins
this is a good thread.
Henry Gonzalez
heh
Isaiah Long
I'm cointelpro now? Sweet.
Evan Edwards
I have been running it for a few weeks and im at almost $8,500
Gavin Rodriguez
We're in their ooda loop now son. We've got them dancing to our tune.
Keep up the great work.
Evan Thomas
This might be completely unrelated but I have Adnauseam on Firefox and now I can't access jewtube. Is this a Firefox or Google problem? Or is it Adnauseam?
Charles Morales
I am running windows 7, firefox and adnauseam and youtube works fine for me
Luke Turner
You're certainly playing the patsy for a COINTEL[RO op, I hope you're getting paid something at least m8.
Bentley Lopez
How does this work on lefty sites and MSM?
I block CNN at the hosts file. What happens if I start going to their site with Adnauseam? They get views, of course but does it do damage?
Serious question.
Ryan Sullivan
Got it working again. Think it was firefox.
Bentley Martin
They get views, they pay goolag per click then they find out some of the traffic was fraudulent, goolag reiinbursts them only a fraction of the money, then they get pissed of at goolag
Chase Scott
I don't understand how they blame goolag.
Lets say I go on cnn.com, then all ads on cnn gets clicked by Adnauseam. Retailer number 1 gets a click, retailer number 2 gets a click, etc. Is googlag in the loop here? How will the retailers determine that their visit is via Adnauseam.
Thanks in advance.
Ayden Rodriguez
How? I did it all on my own time when I was bored.
Ian Diaz
Flag checks out
Carson James
use adguard's dns on your router and block ads on all of your devices at once. no need to installed anything else.
Google it if you want to know more, im not going to spoon feed you. Willing people will do it anyway. :)
Good luck user.
Also OP is a fucking retard. This user is closer to the truth.
Adnauseam literally downloads ads and scripts from google and 3rd parties into your browser. It is not safe at all! Even though if we assume it's effective (it's not) you are going to hide* ads only on your browser, your family still will see and click ads, unless they too are conscious about it. By using dns blocking through router, your whole family is protected against ads and malicious scripts. You can use adguard's or block-this's dns, it doesn't matter. Looks like they both does the job done.
Dominic Reyes
...
Jayden Taylor
Habitual use of github and suckling at the FOSS teat usually creates a fairly usable volunteer patsy. That’s why it got invaded by SJWS and traps! So they can harvest useful idiots such as yourself.
You make me sad, codefag.
Logan Bailey
CNN uses Google servers (and others) to serve ads. So yes.
Sorry about your sadness. It must be all the censoring they have.
Kevin Clark
heh kys newfag
Oliver Smith
The thing that's sad, honestly and truly, is that self-reported 'codefags' would sooner help idiots run a dangerous browser addon than go down into the RFCs and pull out something great... I think you're over-reporting your code faggotry, and what's worse you've resorted to namefaggery in order to do it.
I feel that you have no station, poor judgement, _and_ no honor. You act before thinking. It's not looking good for those that trust you.
Bill, you and codefag up here stink like Reddit, hit the showers, ya queers.
Easton Watson
You're insane.
Jace Bailey
The scripts never see DOM you luddite.
Daniel Walker
Scammer says what without proofs?
Jason Nguyen
...
Henry Stewart
In a darkened room somewhere, two Google technicians are plotting their next move against the ad clicking internet criminals...
>Hey they won't take any of the derailing or arguments, nothing works, they are not stopping!
>Let's use the last resort.
>What is the last resort?
>Call them... gay.
>Gay? That is hardly offensive... I am one myself.
>Call them gay, and... Reddit.
>No. No. That is too much! We cannot use that word!
>Do it. Use the word... call them... Reddit.
Luke Walker
Adjust that narrative a little bit for daddy.
Jack King
...
Colton Ross
>Call them... no, call ourselves daddy!
>Yes daddy!
Austin Hall
>Adguard DNS
Trying this now. So far I like it. I had been using adnauseam for a while and was up in the air whether it helped or hurt google. It seems that they should be able to detect a simple non-page loading ad click by now and that all adnauseam does is alert them that you are using it (unless behind VPN).
