NOTHING TO THE RIGHT OF FASCISTS BUT THE WALL, AND WE'RE THE FUCKING BRICKS!
>Brought to you by Slovakbro
This thread is dedicated to the discussion of all things small government, free market, and self-determination.
Welcome: paleoconservatives, minarchists, laissez-faire capitalists, agorists serious about ending the state and not just smoking weed, ancaps, paleolibertarians, constitutionalists, anti-communist militants like ya boy Oscar Perez.
Anybody else is welcome to debate us.
Posting Soviet propaganda with no added information is spam and shall be treated as such.
/lrg/-approved people - Locke, Smith, the Founding Fathers, Bastiat, Hayek, (((Mises))), (((Rothbard))), Pinochet, Timothy McVeigh, Hoppe, Llewellyn Rockwell, Ron Paul, Thomas Sowell, Augustus Sol Invictus, Christopher Cantwell, and the 1st Irregulars. Some of the Liberty Hangout goys are approved too.
Not approved - Anarchyball, Jeffrey Cucker, or reddit anarchists.
All others - ask before trying to use them as a strawman against us.
>SLOVAKBRO'S PASTEBIN: pastebin.com/vriBmd6A
>FOUNDING FATHER'S PASTEBIN: pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8
>BRITISH ADVOCATE FOR DEREGULATION OF ASSAULT KITCHENWARE'S WEBPAGE: libertarianright.org
>DISCORD & BOOK CLUB: /Kd2WD2X
/LRG/ - RIGHT WING LIBERTARIAN GENERAL - DECIVILISATION EDITION
Other urls found in this thread:
morrakiu.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
FAQ:
>Do you support open borders?
No. The rightful owners of public property (including borders) are the victims of taxation. Therefore nobody can benefit from that land save for them. Eventually this issue would be solved by full privatisation, but that's still far in the future. Also we don't like brown people.
>(((Capitalism)))
Locke, Smith and Bastiat, the founders of capitalism as an economic system based off private property norms, were all Gentiles. Acquisition of resources is a vital part of human action and has brought us such wonders like ancient architecture, art, and technology far beyond what we could have imagined a hundred years ago. Jews are interested because it deals with acquisition of resources, like any other serious economic system.
>What about roads?
Since companies need infrastructure to transport their goods to reach people who in turn need infrastructure for their own needs, this system of mutual dependence is the incentive for any faggot with a steamrol-nah I'm just fucking with you. (((Roads))) are the asphalt Jew that limits evaporation from the soil and gives kids autism. We take helicopters everywhere we go.
>LOLBERGTARDIANS R DEGENERATE
Degeneracy is a symptom of r-selected individuals within a K-selected society. Just kick them out, their high time preference and negative externalities caused by their presence and behaviour are a good enough reason for their physical removal. No trap harems for you.
>What about usury?
Banking marketed to ordinary folk was a mistake, so much so that even (((Rothbard))) disapproves of it. End the FED, price war now.
RECOMMENDED READING LIST:
ECONOMY
>The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith
>The Law by Fréderic Bastiat
>The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich August von Hayek
>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
>Man, Economy, and State by Murray Rothbard
>Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell
POLITICS
>Democracy - The God that Failed by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
>Second Treatise of Government by John Locke
>Ethics of Liberty by Murray Rothbard
>Against the State by Llewellyn Rockwell
>Reactionary Liberty by Robert Taylor
>What Must Be Done by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
MEDIA:
GOOD TIER
>Minarchy Memes on faceberg - sometimes posts edgy stuff
>Liberty Hangout on faceberg - libertyhangout.org - adamant fighters against communism
>youtube.com/user/ThatLibertarianT - That Guy T
GREAT TIER
>Hoppean Snake Memes on faceberg - the source of the snake memes we keep posting - keep up, nerd
>youtube.com/user/FreedomFighter631 - radicalagenda.com - christophercantwell.com - Chris Cantwell - host of the Radical Agenda
>youtube.com/channel/UCRr7mGBwURyRGM2BRPV3hNQ - Augustus Sol Invictus' ramblings and other content
>youtube.com/channel/UCIwnY7Ee4Kfn8g6tz9tjfzA - 1st Irregulars - former Cantwell's supporters, decided to go even further right
>1stirregulars.com - 1st Irregulars' main site
>youtube.com/user/stefbot - Stefan Molyneux
>tomwoods.com - Tom Woods's podcasts
>youtube.com/user/Morrakiu - youtube.com/channel/UCqAIvs0vAb71x_ZO10HArhA - morrakiu.com
INFORMATIVE TIER
>mises.org - Mises Institute
>propertyandfreedom.org - Property and Freedom Society
>lewrockwell.com - Lew Rockwell
BANTZ TIER
>Jared Howe's faceberg account
Fuck Cato. Open borders for Israel.
>NOTHING TO THE RIGHT OF FASCISTS BUT THE WALL, AND WE'RE THE FUCKING BRICKS!
so your admitting your our lapdogs?
ARTICLES:
>Murray Rothbard - Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature - mises.org/library/egalitarianism-revolt-against-nature-0
>Murray Rothbard - Race! That Murray Book - archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch75.html
>Murray Rothbard - Nations by Consent - mises.org/sites/default/files/11_1_1_0.pdf
>Jeff Deist - For A New Libertarian - mises.org/blog/new-libertarian
>Hans-Hermann Hoppe - A Realistic Libertarianism - lewrockwell.com/2014/09/hans-hermann-hoppe/smack-down/
>Llewellyn Rockwell - Open Borders Are an Assault on Private Property - mises.org/library/open-borders-are-assault-private-property
I think we need to clarify what's right-wing and what isn't.
No, I'm admitting to be to the right of you in terms of politics.
The idea of the political "third position" is evidence enough that National Socialism and Fascism are mere artificial parodies of the natural order and not properly right-wing.
I'm sure the Fascist guy who hangs around this thread could tell you more.
Why are libertarians so weird like that guy with the boot on his head and the woman who wanted dobby to be a mascot.
VIDEOS/PODCASTS:
>Christopher Cantwell - How I started hanging out with Nazis - youtube.com/watch?v=-Yv9JZiaFUg
>Christopher Cantwell with Wife with a Purpose - radicalagenda.com/2017/05/12/radical-agenda-ep300-dear-momma/
>Christopher Cantwell with Mike Enoch - radicalagenda.com/2017/05/17/radical-agenda-ep302-mike-enoch/
>Christopher Cantwell with That Guy T - radicalagenda.com/2017/05/19/radical-agenda-ep303-articulate-black-guy/
>Christopher Cantwell with Jared Howe - radicalagenda.com/2017/05/24/radical-agenda-ep306-jared-howe/
>Christopher Cantwell with Morrakiu - radicalagenda.com/2017/06/07/radical-agenda-ep313-morrakiu/
>Augustus Sol Invictus - Becoming a Reactionary - youtube.com/watch?v=HPQ9yh0gWoE
>Augustus Sol Invictus - The War on Terror - youtube.com/watch?v=wy2O7CPNmqI
>Hans-Hermann Hoppe - What Must Be Done - youtube.com/watch?v=d_ybi1MeC3c
>1st Irregulars - 1433: National Capitalism and the Correct View - youtube.com/watch?v=eVnDAa1LWpw
>That Guy T - The Case for Libertarian Fascism - youtube.com/watch?v=l2-jH1vFrW8
>Jeff Deist - For a New Libertarian (speech) - youtube.com/watch?v=tsUmV0wNXlc
The Libertarian Party has been infiltrated by leftists who think North Korea and ISIS are paragons of libertarianism. They're clueless faggots and must be eschewed as such.
Was that Vermin Supreme guy a libertarian? Sounded more like a Bernie-bot to me.
MUSIC:
>Eric July - AnCap Rap pt.1 - youtube.com/watch?v=pGuj-Z3PNg8
>Eric July - AnCap Rap pt.2 - youtube.com/watch?v=zqV4RXLX1Hc
>I Need a Pinochet - youtube.com/watch?v=zhrYY3ocQ5o
>Ain't I Right - youtube.com/watch?v=XxIbq7HkalQ
>I'm No Communist - youtube.com/watch?v=gudJgbvBnmo
>Metallica - Don't Tread On Me - youtube.com/watch?v=fh-TKJTCtnw
>Dixie's Land - youtube.com/watch?v=IUjLE_N1Cuc
>Yankee Doodle - youtube.com/watch?v=IzRhFH5OyHo
>Battle of New Orleans (if you counter-signal Jackson I swear on me mum I'll skullfuck you - plus it's a good song so fuck you) - youtube.com/watch?v=50_iRIcxsz0
>Mi General Augusto Pinochet - youtube.com/watch?v=R9R4zPTpS9w
>Adios Mi General - youtube.com/watch?v=5rsb7dT6sEM
>Rhodesians Never Die - youtube.com/watch?v=ecVvLqSJCK8
>Hammer Of The Right - youtube.com/watch?v=Vz_CagU5wjY
>Morrakiu - The Edgytarian Song (/lrg/'s anthem) - youtube.com/watch?v=3qX8B02NDHI
>Morrakiu - Drop It Like It's Hoppe - youtube.com/watch?v=HPKGgo4kGQM
>Morrakiu - Another One Fights The Cucks - youtube.com/watch?v=iYFyUf5SpAU
>Morrakiu - What Would Jeffrey Tucker Do? - youtube.com/watch?v=jdYuGl-FEDo
>Morrakiu - Agreeing with the Liberals for All the Wrong Reasons - youtube.com/watch?v=eASnXIubJEE
>LE NEGRO ANARCHIST - MARCHING SONGS FOR MERCENARIES OF ALL ENTERPRISING MEN OF THE WORLD - anarchyinblack.tumblr.com/post/160501747153/radio-ancapistan-marching-songs-for-the-child
...
Whoa there, fash.
Surely you mean conservatives? Libertarianism isn't right or left wing, and we don't see colour, that's why we party members and Tuckerites like to whore ourselves out for communists and niggers, hehe!
G*d, the Mises Institute and Hans-Hermann Hoppe are such statists! Wouldn't you agree?
MEMES:
>Hoppewave - Physical Removal - youtube.com/watch?v=u-wMmYSG9JQ
>Cato's Speech - Let's get Physical - youtube.com/watch?v=XMqPWqOCGJU
>Hoppean Snake Memes - Let The Commies Hit The Floor - youtube.com/watch?v=yy9VvAuCCEg
>Stefan Molyneux - In-Depth Analysis of Marxism - youtube.com/watch?v=SGunPi4G2Ns
>Hoppean Snake Memes - Shadilay (Meme War against Agoristball) - youtube.com/watch?v=8xBsJUYySNo
>Hoppean Snake Memes - Snekintosh 420 - youtube.com/watch?v=JJMdttBmtsY
>That Guy T shitposting about the Alt-Right - youtube.com/watch?v=77CdqY4IdgU
If you hadn't already posted the Cantwell quote, I'd have responded with that.
On March 4, 2016, he switched his affiliation to the Libertarian Party, claiming his rightful position as Sage and Oracle for Libertarians throughout America, and possibly Belize as well.[43] He received the vote of a single delegate in the first round of presidential nomination voting at the 2016 Libertarian National Convention.
en.m.wikipedia.org
He is one for now.
We’ve seen terrorism, race riots, false flags, and now shots fired. We’re not going to sit here and watch you topple an elected president, waiting to see what Democrats prefer to democracy. We will smash, stab, shoot, and bomb you in a manner that will make the Islamic State look civilized by comparison. We will slaughter your males, rape your women, and leave your children in the company of the pedophiles you set free on our streets. If anyone is going to impose an unelected government in North America, it’s going to be us, and the only thing we’re going to be more liberal with is the death penalty.
- Christopher Cantwell
...
...
>Libertarian Party
>libertarians
Anyone who denounces Timothy McVeigh without practicing white taqiyya to further his politically extremist goals is a cuck and not to be trusted.
One obese Latina at a protest in California shouted "We can't just do rallies. We have to fight back. There will be casualties on both sides!"
Well, if leftists want private sector violence, if they want casualties, I'm all for it! I consent. I will meet you on the battlefield you worthless pig! You think there will be casualties on both sides? Perhaps, but I'll make certain you're on the heavy side of that scale young lady, though you're probably used to that by now, aren't you?
Name the time and place, bring whatever weaponry you can muster, I'll do the same, and for every man I bring, you can bring two men, and two women, and even one non binary person just to make things comfortable for everyone alright? And with 5-1 odds we will mop the floor with you and use your bodies as mortar for our big, beautiful wall.
- Christopher Cantwell
Those darn conservatives!
...
People say violence isn't the answer, but I don't think they really understand the issue. These people want to fight us, and if we don't fight them, then we lose that fight. Whether you like it or not, there is violence. Violence is the question that was asked, your enemy has just answered yes, and that means that you do not get a vote. Your only choice now, is whether you win or lose the fight.
So what's it going to be?
- Christopher Cantwell
>tfw your ideology doesn't exist irl
nibba get a more HQ background and have outlines on your text for God's sake
old cantwell is best cantwell
...
...
FREE CANTWELL
/ourguy/?
...
...
...
Would civic nationalism work if the society is properly educated and the children weren't educated by communist teachers? Would removal of communist teachers be the first goal of a right libertarian society that focuses on the individual who bring prosperity and good morals to it?
Basically why aren't we dropping communist teachers and reworking are educational institutions?
Oh, and for that commie LARPing as a NatSoc, google the Property and Freedom Society. That's an openly anarcho-capitalist white nationalist group run by Hans-Hermann Hoppe himself.
I'd prefer real nationalism either way, kick those commie teachers to the gutters where they belong.
Too bad dropping communist teachers out of helicopters is illegal.
Largely, I think most societies would be racially, as well as culturally homogeneous in a natural order.
>Nationalism
As a fellow Murican it would best to avoid such branding due to the Nazicucks ruining everything as usual. Use the word Patriot instead. A Patriot isn't someone who blindly believes there country is the best. A Patriot believes that their country, with all it's issues and downfalls, is as best as it can get and that they actively work towards methods to fixing such issues.
>is illegal
Figuratively I meant.
>Largely, I think most societies would be racially, as well as culturally homogeneous in a natural order.
This is actually something that happens by de facto already is something that can't be claimed as racist unless you have heavy government intervention that forces a near perfect mix of races. In large cities there is already areas where races gain a majority in that area. Such as China Town, Little Mexico, etc.
I don't give a shit if people call me a Nazi. I'm a Nationalist.
Appreciate the effort, Slovakbro
>bump
...
...
>Choosing to have your beliefs die because of the (((Nazi))).
>commies voted more for trump
My beliefs aren't dying. Nationalism is part of the natural order and will arise even after we get nuked.
>As a fellow Murican it would best to avoid such branding due to the Nazicucks ruining everything as usual. Use the word Patriot instead. A Patriot isn't someone who blindly believes there country is the best. A Patriot believes that their country, with all it's issues and downfalls, is as best as it can get and that they actively work towards methods to fixing such issues.
As I see it, a patriot loves his country like he loves his parents. He admits it can be wrong, he doesn't want to subjugate other countries to it for the fun of it, and he doesn't pretend that him and everyone in it are one big family. Instead, he loves his country because it's his home and the place where he grew up. Patriots are the real sneks, they play nice and do no harm until you step on them, and when you do, they bite worse than any nationalist. It's possible to tell a nationalist in a conquered country that he must change his way of life for the good of his nation, but you can't pull that with a patriot.
>It will come back after the nuclear holocaust
>Not extreme Anarchic Capitalist state
Thank you for putting it in such beautiful way.
Check'd
Communists will call you a Nazi regardless.
You don't have to become a Nazi, but compromising on your stance is cuckery.
I'm trying my best, my man. I don't have any proper graphic design software so my tools are limited. Would it be better if I redid that like the Cantwell on?
...
This is the most retarded image ever, you understand neither anarcho capitalism or national socialism.
What a bullshit interpretation of the chart. The vertical scale is not the scale of authoritarianism, but the scale of "social acceptance" (i.e. if you like trannies, shitskins etc). So yeah, right-wing libertarians are pretty much in the red cloud.
I agree. Political charts are all kinds of fucked up.
Funniest thing is that germany took massive loans to employ everyone and build their factories.
Considering their belief of the international jewish bank system they literally jewed themselves by loaning from jews to exterminate jews.
Do you see why they failed?
You're welcome!
Check'd. No matter how often I see it, I just can't get used to how true the stereotypes are. Says quite a lot about an ideology if only degenerates embrace it.
>mixed markets
Aww shit nigger you didn't
How come natsocs always try to be as radical as they can, but when it comes to economics, they suddenly embrace middle-of-the-road bullshit?
>comes to economics, they suddenly embrace middle-of-the-road bullshit?
They're purple pilled as fuck. I don't understand how you could be smart enough to embrace nationalism, but too dumb to erradicate the economic Jew ie; socialism
Why would you even try to put mixed markets and economic prosperity in the same place? Let alone interest free loans...
You are away Corporatism is an economic plan where the state is unified with the largest corporations, quite literally the nazi economic plan?
And why on earth is 'never ending NAP violations' not on the side that completely rejects the NAP?
That's really just the most obvious contradictions, seems like you have some 'self-refuting memes' yourself.
9/10 made me reply
...
>interest-free loans
if you can't be assed to reward a person for lending you money, you don't deserve their service either way
Is Hoppean Snake Memes dead?
...
>muh open borders
...
...
NatSoc is middle top, Strasserism/NatBol is where NatSoc is at.
...
natsoc is leftism. kys. see
from your chairman's mouth
the jew thrives in a libertarian environment
the collectivist thrives on misery. kys.
Wow, those unsourced quotes that ignore that they didn't mean Marxist socialism sure convinced me, user! You are all intellectually dishonest.
The jew thrives in a libertine enviorment. which a libertarian enviorment is not.
>le roads thread
Take your cuck thread to Sup Forums
>not real socialism: the post
you lefties are all the same. copter ride for you, commie.
muh NatSoc isn't socialist because hitler isn't a classical marxist.
he's more of a tank desu, embrace it faggot
What about when his parents stab him in the back again and again and again, destroying his future, his present and his dream of the past
>ignoring the content of my post
Intellectually dishonest, yet again.
pic related for the helicopter meme
>muh NatSoc isn't socialist because hitler isn't a classical marxist.
Correct. Night of the Long Knives happened for a reason you fucking idiot.
>that pic
spanish poster was a cuckboi. I knew him. I am for killing marxists.
whatever, muh "third position" is also bluepilled as fuck, but generally speaking, natsoc is modern socialism.
>>ignoring the content of my post
not at all. it seems more like you didn't read the first 2 paragraphs of your picrelated
>you must help your comrade in need and work together ... for the betterment of the nation and the state
so you MUST help poor people who are in need. also the products of your work are not yours to keep but are used for the STATE
so what we have here is a big government welfare state with coercive means to finance the whole thing
this is text book leftism. and it doesn't matter that "but it wasn't real socialism" or whatever cheap excuses you come up with. if it quacks like a duck it's probably a commie and deserves a copter ride
now get out ... I'm sure you stormfag nazilarpers have some shitty natsoc general thread where you discuss the left without realizing that you are leftists yourself
>I am for killing marxists.
Most Libertarians and AnCaps are not. Most also believe in the Civic Nationalism meme, and are constitutionalists. Your entire ideology is controlled opposition. Even if you form a Libertarian or AnCap county, you at best just revert America to the way it used to be, ripe for another take over. AnCaps and Libertarians will never gain power or form a state because they can't agree on social matters and you need a group to fight another group.
Too much individualism makes you weak in this way.
>so you MUST help poor people who are in need. also the products of your work are not yours to keep but are used for the STATE
Correct, except the products of your work are still yours. We don't redistribute property, only make people chip in a little. It doesn't matter if you have to give a little if the quality of life is so good that you can spare it. That's the "covenant" you make by living in this society, except it's actually enforceable, unlike in AnCap.
>so what we have here is a big government welfare state with coercive means to finance the whole thing
You need to realize that there can be good government, and bad government, similar to how there can be good companies and bad companies. The goal of NatSoc is to use gov. only when necessary to make sure the free market is actually free and not rigged.
It also wishes to instate a bare minimum for things like moral standards so people aren't shooting each other, stealing from each other, conning each other, etc.
Part of this is for you, not that you'll read it.
>Most Libertarians and AnCaps are not.
Most ancaps who think that killing leftists is immoral never thought about it really. No matter how you look at it - the logical conclusion is always that killing leftists is moral and justified. Even necessary to protect liberty.
But then again ... rigid reasoning doesn't seem to resonate well with most people.
>it's not socialism even though we act like socialists
yeah sorry, theft is immoral. doesn't matter if it's "just a little theft". your original picrelated even states that
>natsoc is socialism within the national frame
so ... you post "proof" that explicitly states it is socialism to prove that it isn't socialism?
>there can be good government
yeah, we only have like what ... 5000 years of recorded history that proves that it's mostly not good and a rather shitty deal for everyone involved. but hey ... if you try it it will be different. (just like all those lefties who babble about not real socialism because if they tried it would totally work this time)
and if you really believed in the covenant model you would have pissed off a long time ago. you are not welcome here, commie
Most """(((libertarians)))""" are a bunch of faggots, controlled opposition, or confused communists. agreed.
all I can say is that we're a special breed here at /lrg/ and you'll have to take my word for it or fuck off.
>it's mostly not good
kek, it's been mostly good. Things like the Soviet Union were a rarity, meanwhile, all AnCap and Libertarian societies have been conquered or subverted.
>Most ancaps who think that killing leftists is immoral never thought about it really.
The point is, even people in your own movement can't even agree on your own rhetoric or BASIC policies. That's never, ever, a good sign for the stability of a movement.
>yeah sorry, theft is immoral. doesn't matter if it's "just a little theft". your original picrelated even states that
It's not theft. You agree to chip in by living in the NatSoc society. If you don't like it, get
>so ... you post "proof" that explicitly states it is socialism to prove that it isn't socialism?
You are completely misinterpreting what it says. It's saying the way Hitler refered to Socialism is completely different than what the Marxist definition is, and what you are thinking of.
>Most """(((libertarians)))""" are a bunch of faggots, controlled opposition, or confused communists. agreed.
That's the thing. AnCap and Libertarianism can only work if EVERY SINGLE PERSON in the society thinks exactly the same way. It even just ignores problems like if children are free to have their own NAP. Like, how can they "consent" to being born or living in your AnCap community? Would they be kicked out, or would they have to listen to their parents if they don't agree with shit?
AnCap doesn't work economically or socially. It's kind of like Communism how you just expect people to get along and be rational and moral for literally no reason.
>free to have their own NAP
No, you either respect property rights or you don't. If you don't you're helicopter bait.
>expect people to get along and be rational and moral for literally no reason.
Our particular brand of anarchy has nothing to do with lawlessness or chaos, we want to enforce property rights. if you don't respect property you have to be removed. you're a threat to civilized society.
>Really thinks all Libertarians are like that.
>Believing in the most cucked ideology before communism.
kys
>No, you either respect property rights or you don't. If you don't you're helicopter bait.
There is a difference between respecting the concept, and worshiping the concept, believing that it can do no wrong. If a kid is vandalizing shit, you take his property to make him stop. Throwing him out of a helicopter isn't the right answer.
>Our particular brand of anarchy has nothing to do with lawlessness or chaos, we want to enforce property rights. if you don't respect property you have to be removed. you're a threat to civilized society.
Property rights are not the only thing in the world, user. You have to deal with outside threats, keep communities happy, and be moral. Libertarians failed to do this in the 19th and 20th century, and that led to the massive amount of Marxists both then and now.
Oh boy, more fallacies. It's a language only Libertarians and Communists speak apparently.
You haven't given me reason to believe otherwise. In fact, according to this user
I was right on the money that most Libertarians don't agree with you.
>If a kid is vandalizing shit
he is violating someone elses property. I say we at least lock him up and tell his dad.
>You have to deal with outside threats,
yes we know, we're not pacifists
>keep communities happy
only the community I live in. and sure, not a problem
>be moral.
you got it.
>most Libertarians don't agree with you.
whats your point? they're not really libertarians who understand the implications of property rights. crypto-commies imo. they're a bunch of useful idiots for our cause.
All arguments aside, if we only used 10% of libertarian economics we would be better off. So why don't start with that.
>only the community I live in
This is the problem. If you don't keep communities near you happy, then you get commies everywhere. White middle class americans were, for the most part, happy. However, ignoring the plights of those beneath them, while ignoring the subversion of education, led to the massive increase in Leftist retards.
>whats your point?
Your community is outnumbered by the neighboring ones. No matter what you guys say, you can't stop an invading country, or prevent others for gaining sympathy for others. The group always beats the individual, even if the individual is in the right.
>ignoring the plights of those beneath them, while ignoring the subversion of education, led to the massive increase in Leftist retards.
thats still my community, not outside communites. I would outright ban subversives in my community.
>Your community is outnumbered by the neighboring ones. No matter what you guys say, you can't stop an invading country, or prevent others for gaining sympathy for others. The group always beats the individual, even if the individual is in the right.
And I'll be plenty nice and beneficial to them trade with them and all, we're not aggressive warlords like communists. We know how to make friends.
If you're implying I need to give other nations gibsmedats in order to not be murdered you're dead wrong.
...
>I would outright ban subversives in my community
I'm sorry, who made you king?
>And I'll be plenty nice and beneficial to them trade with them and all, we're not aggressive warlords like communists. We know how to make friends.
And what if you don't agree with them? What happens when they see land with limited defense, no governing body, and a shit ton of resources? See the colonization of Africa and America as examples. Even communities that traded with colonists where eventually colonized themselves.
hierarchy>individualism
>If you're implying I need to give other nations gibsmedats in order to not be murdered you're dead wrong.
I never said that, only that you can't make everyone in your own communities happy. The problem is you allow societal problems to fester while being vulnerable to outside attack at the same time.
...
...
Has anyone asked Hoppe his opinion on the fact that (what the media would call) "internet nazis" have associated him with violent and extremist ideas such as physical removal understood as death squads, admiration for Pinochet or helicopter rides? Not that I have a problem with that, but I imagine he might not really like it.