SCIENCE PROVES EVERYONE IS GAY

broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/ypa7vk/straight-people-dont-exist-new-research-says

Well, shitlords?

Other urls found in this thread:

unvis.it/broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/ypa7vk/straight-people-dont-exist-new-research-says
youtube.com/watch?v=0Rnq1NpHdmw
vimeo.com/202594764
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

unvis.it/broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/ypa7vk/straight-people-dont-exist-new-research-says

OP is a faggot, so it's not wrong.

And that's why i don't believe in climate shit,the people that promote it also promote this stuff.

Before Sup Forums gets its panties in a bunch, it's just a misunderstanding of scientific research. As is the norm for science -> news.

The ability to discern attractiveness in same-sex individuals is likely a residual aspect of the "blank slate" embryo the male body has prior to activation of the SRY gene on the Y chromosome, initiating male development. That's all. Move along.

>convince all the evil conservatives christians they are gay
>.....
>they bake gay cakes now
>.....
>utopia

Brilliant plan (((science)))...

...

Would you support a religious exemption for Muslims who want to circumcise their infant daughters to the laws proscribing that?

Next article:
Impartiality and Journalistic Integrity Don't Exist

>VICE
>Broadly

Now, let's look at the data collected from decades before they started playing havoc with our endocrine systems and take a look at THAT data. Oh, it can't be found for some reason? HOW CONVENIENT! Fucking gay ass Jewish mafia death cult. kys kikes.

i prefer this actual study rather than some made up bs from (((vice)))
saged

whenever i see this picture my brain makes the rainbow shirted faggot into a woman. then its a normal happy, well adjusted, and properly developed view of reality.

What the fuck I love poz loads now

So basically you would prefer if all gays were trans because then they would conform to heteronormative narratives about ideal relationships?

Show feminine penis and butt

Do you need a safe space from guys kissing?

FAGGOTS ARE GAY

Honestly, this seems pretty much true to me and is confirmed by what I've observed on this board. When given the protection of anonymity, it turns out that everyone is a little bit gay. After all. sexuality isn't about absolutes but is a spectrum. You just have to decide where on the spectrum you lie. My guess would be that most people on Sup Forums are about 60-40 straight-gay with a big fuzzy zone for traps and twinks in the middle.

It's about time we allowed a little more gay pride here.

wtf i love going extinct now

YOU 1000% SUCK THE COCK

FAGGET

Then
>Christfags
>Homosexuality is a sinful act based on a sinful choice.
>Fags
>No it isn't, I was born this way you can't blame me for something I didn't have a choice in.
Now
>Everybody is gay!

???

SO how does heterosexual patriarchy work then?

Mate, it sounds like you're about 9000% in denial. Don't fight it so hard. All this fighting distorts who you are. It's also a give-away when anyone spells "faggot" as "fagget" -- it's a sign that they don't want to use the real word because it rings too true and is too close to the bone. Isn't that right, faggot?

Post this on every Tumblr tag

This, if I have to think of other hot girls while fucking hot girls, what would I have to think about to cum while fucking a dude?

OH NO, NOW I'M A FAGGET!!

Let me guess: They're using some kind of modified version of the Kinsey scale with fine enough resolution that you can distinguish a 0.001 from a 0 and are calling 0.001's gay.

Everyone loves biopucci, nothing new.

why is Vice even a thing still? Someone needs to bankrupt that rag toute suite

What is biopucci is that a video game

>women
>people

pick one

>OH NO, NOW I'M A FAGGET!!
You said it
Make sure you vote yes.

oh holy shit a "study" said something

Okay, now back in reality they just built a fucking machine that can analyze whether people are faggots with 97% accuracy just by looking at their faces.

So which am I supposed to trust, the machine that we know for a fact can spot faggots, but doesn't ding every human being you put through it, or this sketchy research that makes a completely unfalsifiable claim?

Yes, its like a tamagotchi, but you get to fuck it

I'd rather we just kill them desu, as far as I know shooting them full of hormones isn't going to stop them from raping children and would cost more money.

But I don't care about maggots, rotting flesh or gays kissing. I have zero interest in any of it and my only response would be annoyance that I was asked about it in the first place.

maggot faggot

Yeah that shit is gay. I can watch two dudes jackhammering eachother's sweaty assholes and not be bothered but the moment they kiss that shit is disgusting.

notice how it's always a half naked white girl when it's about sex? It's never a half naked black girl

Gaydar? link?

VOTE YES?

>NOPE

>november 6 2015

I'm attracted to guys sometimes but I'm still a teenager so I think I'll grow out of it. I'm only sometimes attracted to guys my age who look like me.

Women are faithless whores. We knew that. Nothing short but a credible threat of violent death if they commit adultery keeps their legs together for long.

The happy day when the artificial womb is perfected and women can finally be given their free train rides and showers can't come fast enough.

Women are the Jews Hitler warned you about.

Well, they're not wrong. I love women but I would also love to fuck Astolfo's boipussy like there's no tomorrow.

>tfw i dont exist
>tfw when i dont have a face because i dont exist

So Vice is saying gays don't deserve rights for being gay? Sounds bigoted

Faggots definitely have a certain look, I can always spot them instantly before they even open their mouth. But not all gay/bi people are faggots.

>women are hornier than you think

Congrats on "discovering" this fact that has destroyed half of the great civilizations of the world.

t.homo

>straight people don't exist
>can't get off to porn with dicks of any kind
>can't get off to porn with flat chested girls
>can't get off to porn with women with toned asses
>can't get off to porn with women with broad shoulders
Being fully straight is a curse. I can only watch lesbian porn.

W E W
E
W

Ok, so we all learn to be heterosexuals... this means that gay people can go to 'special camps' and learn how to be heterosexual?

hahaha you are gay
as a teenager i could not stop thinking about pussy
all i wanted was pussy, all i thought about was pussy and all i got aroused by was pussy. I cannot even watch straight porn because dicks spoil it for me.

>Being fully straight is a curse. I can only watch lesbian porn.
this so much. kek

Don't be such a downer, user.

>I'm only sometimes attracted to guys my age who look like me.
This probably means that you're more narcissistic than guy, though it certainly does open up your sexual options for a while. Congrats, user.

Pic unrelated

Pretty sure that you just have some mental issues

You're still just getting cucked by that other woman. The only porn you should watch is from the POV of a glass dildo.

HOW IS BABBY FORMED?!?

>Straight People Don't Exist
I'm a mythological creature now, apparently.

I hope it's something cool, like a Leshen.

you forgot masturbation porn. im in the same boat, at least regarding the any kinds of dick thing

Next they're going to tell me that there's no such thing as niggers

The article said that straight men dilate their pupils in response to being shown men masturbating, indicating some sort of arousal response.

you'll grow out of it, teenager.

>Another episode of OP posts articles from a dying websites to get clicks
Fuck off alredy you cunts, your website is gonna die soon enough anyway.

their soulless eyes

Gender is a social construct. That's why men make the best women. CISpigs cannot compete with sweet traps.

doesnt make you gay though

did they ask the guys afterwards if they want to take a cock up the ass and suck a dude off?

really activates the old almonds

Wtf is a boipussy? Is that how you cope with being a faggot?

t. p-hacking genderstudies "researcher"

this explains everything

Neo-Marxist propaganda masquerades as science, New Research Says.

youtube.com/watch?v=0Rnq1NpHdmw

Literally this.

>straight people don't exist!
>white people don't exist!

Who's next on the oblivion train, I wonder?

witness the cringe

vimeo.com/202594764

Means you are a little gay. Not enough to want to go through with it but enough to become physically aroused. That is why I define being gay as being preferentially emotionally aroused by men, not just physically. If you have no desire for intimacy with a male, assuming you are not just repressing, that's what I consider straight. What they are saying it every male is capable of incidental homosexuality, at least physically, because they get aroused by it enough.

Still proves the study's point. You weren't aroused.

That is one hell of a problematic study. Pupil dilation is not exactly a precise measurement of attraction and could be a reaction to the nudity itself. You see what they did not show or seem to account for is whether men habituated to the male master action vs maintaining dilation with the female masterbation.

To drive my point home imagine seeing a nude pic in an unexpected place, you would feel surprised at first, so your pupils dialate. Now what if it was a nude male, you should feel the same shock but over time you would become disinterested or even annoyed. The point being I don't think they are considering alternative and are instead more politically motivated. Bad science to be honest.

(((Vice)))

WEW LAD, you can't get more credible than that!

>tfw not gay enough to be considered healthy in germany

>women hornier than we think
god damn how horny can they be

...

> machine accurately recognizes when people are gay
> gay people must have a certain 'look'
> mfw people ask me if I'm gay
> mfw I say no
> mfw I actually am a little bit gay
> mfw I have gayface
> mfw I have no face

I find sexiest that pic, they should be two black males.

real talk, my floor was partially covered in maggots last month. I had to pull my shit together before vacuuming it up.

That came first with the whole "race is a social construct" bullshit.

(((science)))

Well I guess if some science says it that makes it true.

Watch solo porn,user.

this chart suspiciously leaves out what percentage of gay/bi people actually have aids
it uses misleading stats like "1 in 5" to make you think it's a scarily common thing but it's actually talking about a fraction of a fraction
And they're not telling you what that first fraction is
What are they hiding?

THANK YOU for the rational post.

Science would be wrong then. The very though of having aby sexual contact witha man I find sickening.

...

Dumbest false equivalency ever. Stupid homo.

Still just talking about risk (which is just a primitive application of the stats) and avoids talking about the quantity
Tell me exactly how many people in the US have been diagnosed with aids and what percentage that is, and what percentage of those who identify as non-het are infected. I'm not claiming it isn't an issue, I just genuinely want to know and these diagrams are more about fearmongering and persuasion than actually telling data

Mass suicide when?

What percent of the population would you then claim is gay to make that statistic. That's controversial in and of itself.

Well would you be content with taking the number of new HIV infections and dividing by two since that is approximately how many new infections are carried by MSM?