Borderline Child Porn

So apparently this show has pubescent kids jerking off in their beds and talking to their genitals.
I'm no expert but isn't this essentially child porn?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oTC7wQMHHEA
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#United_States
youtube.com/watch?v=hwc6fTnsdBI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Forgot the video link
youtube.com/watch?v=oTC7wQMHHEA

I'll pat on the back to whoever can masturbate to that fucking hideous cartoon.

>First comment

>>Thanks, George Soros!

>isn't this essentially child porn?
First day on Sup Forums?

first day on Sup Forums? this isnt 06 Sup Forums

Get a girlfriend, you degenerate pedophile.

>it's okay because japan does it too

OP's shit is definitely not okay but there's a whole fucking lot more wrong with it than "muh drawings"

I'll give it a shot, wish me luck

gl hf

years ago didnt they throw a huge shitfit and change laws so drawn kids counts as cp, or was that in a specific country? didnt pass? i thought there were laws for this kind of stuff, unless its not hat bad or something

...

"comedy" has always been the forefront of getting people to accept (((social engineering)))
that's why we should all appreciate what our boy sammy hyde does, getting right in the trenches and fighting the beast with bare hands

>It's not out for anouther 2 weeks
god damnit, now what am i meant to fap to?

>making it this obvious you're newfags from /r/t_d

Sup Forums has always liked loli. Deal with it or go back

I think that was Japan and that's why this kind of stuff is allowed there.
Their mindset is that since no actual children are involved then it's ok since it is art.

>this internet cartoon offends me
>somebody do something
At this point I think this might just be Netfkix shilling. "Hey, look at this cartoon, go watch it to see how bad it is", naw fuck off.

Show gives me a Duckman vibe with the animation.

Please don't ruin Duckman's reputation.

Delete your highly anti-semitic thread right now you alt-right scum.

Leftists create borderline child porn shit all the time, pic related

Simulating child nudity is still cp imo

WE ARE REPLACING YOU

We all know it was heading this way. Only two groups left in the acceptance queue, bestiality and paedophilia. They will erode our morals till they can get this shit past the general public.

I'll kill anyone that tries to open a child brothel

>Simulating child nudity is illegal in the United States and is classified as child pornography
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

so cp should be legal? FUCK OFF PEDO FUCK!!

Hag lovers should leave btw

Drawings are not CP, unless they drawings of actual CP
You can be offended as much as you want, but your opinion doesn't matter. The Supreme Court's does.

From that like to dislike ratio, it seems like the people who come up with these shows don't actually want to make money.

It's the leftists/feminists who have been pushing against pedophilia. The raised the AoC/age of marriage, forced girls into schools, encouraged delaying marriage. It's not going to change as long as they're allowed power. When the leftists/feminists are removed things will be ablr to be changed back to how is supposed to be.
>BUT MUH FEELS
Don't you need to be a feminist somewhere else?

Snail is best grill

We forget. These darling tech companies can do no wrong. Netflix and Youtube can serve up CP, piss/shit/sex videos aimed at kids. Facebook and Google can defraud advertisers and serve fake information to millions of users. Every gaming company has turned into a gambling company, many aimed at kids. Not to mention nobody is taking steps to keep porn out of reach of kids, which is now a problem at the grade school level. Oh gee wiz, no big deal in the eyes of the government whose only interest in the internet seems to be data mining the public and letting ISPs rip everybody off. What exactly does the government do these days, anyway? I mean, besides write traffic tickets, rip off hotdog vendors and bust potheads? Fucking faggots.

T-that's actually a boy, isn't it?
>my penus still doesn't care

THATS FUCKING IT!

AAAARRRGGGHHHHHHHH

>Drawings are not CP
They are

>Pornography (often abbreviated porn) is the portrayal of sexual subject matter for the purpose of sexual arousal. Pornography may be presented in a variety of media, including books, magazines, postcards, photographs, sculpture, drawing, painting, animation, sound recording, writing, film, video, and video games.

>I'm no expert but isn't this essentially child porn?

no

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#United_States
Go be a retard somewhere else.

In US, the situation is a bit complex. In theory, lolicon/shotacon products which can't pass the Miller's test are considered illegal. ... It's technically illegal(USA), but seldom prosecuted. IT IS ILLEGAL!

Op, stop being a faggot, thats not even remotely close to childporn

Did the supreme court seriously address loli cartoons?

thats a bs double standard based on your and yours countrymen feelings

I don't know if it's CP, but I know I don't regret cancelling netflix after the Bill Nye gender debacle. This just reminds me that I made the correct choice

faggot
Sup Forums has never been pro pedo
since the days of art admirer and freedom fighter getting BTFO in every appearance
deal with it pedo scum

RRRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Miller's test is hilariously subjective though

>He gets a girlfriend like you told him to
>You call the cops on him

If Sup Forums always liked loli than Sup Forums always liked murdering/torturing animals.

There has always been big groups on both sides. Just because moot was a pedo doesn't mean that Sup Forums has always been pedo

>Literally Baphomet in the very first seconds
>"Look Children! It's Uncle Bapho! I wonder what his today's advice would be!"

Obscenity is a meme that is near-impossible to prosecute and by definition applies on a case-by-case basis.
Any blanket ban against any form of artistic expression is inherently unconstitutional.

Actual child pornography is inherently illegal because its creation necessitates the abuse of actual children.
Simple drawings, animation, and other descriptions do not necessitate this, and so cannot be generally outlawed.

>You and your countrymen should be governed by my standards of moralfaggotry rather than the founding principles of your republic
Fuck off

Our courts also ruled that cartoons isn't cp so there

>Not to mention nobody is taking steps to keep porn out of reach of kids,
It's the parents responsibility to monitor what their children do. No one else is obligated to parent your children for you. This is the problem nowadays, lazy parents not giving a shit about theur kids but expecting other people should for them.
>not knowing Ilya
The fuck, man?

>his today's advice

What did he mean by this?

>tfw my GF or family have no idea how many hundreds of doujins i have

>muh strawman
Your cognitive dissonance is amusing.

Fuck you nigger

Half the shit on /gif/ /aco/ /d/ and /h/ don't pass, basically anything other than the norm.

a piss fetish doesn't pass

>its creation necessitates the abuse of actual children
>all sex is abuse
No. And even if it was, what about solo stuff girls make themselves?

jokes on you brah

I hope you die in your sleep tonight

I really hope so. I would kek pretty hard

I mean can you imagine Justice Scalia sitting there listening to a case about a dude jacking it to anime of any sort?

>I'll pat on the back to whoever can masturbate to that fucking hideous cartoon.

will you pat me on the front?

>its creation necessitates the abuse of actual children.
And yet simple possession is criminalized
Do you also support drug lwas?

>Not having your gf act out doujin scenarios

I bet you've only had vanilla sex, fag.

Then they call it self-abuse or something. Kids can also be prosecuted and become sexual offenders and branded as pedophiles for life over having sex with each other or recording themselves.

Ingenious, isn't it?

He's probably never seen her naked lmao
When are you going to come out of the closet to them user?

Always keep the anime strictly to yourself and the unfortunate souls who read your shitposts my man.

I actually thought it was pretty funny thill the mirror part. Seems very legally questionable. Here's a hypothetical question: If netflix airs this, and everybody that watches it views that scene, what if the FBI decides that it is, in fact, cp. Could netflix and ISPs be taken down for cp distribution? And would anyone that viewed it be charged for viewing cp? Obviously there would be a huge database of everyone that has seen it, and would be easy to prove

The Supreme Court has already said otherwise.

You guy's can watch this shit if you'd like, but I'll be watching my high quality netflix show youtube.com/watch?v=hwc6fTnsdBI

>netflix
>"quality"

sorry, im an idiot, and I don't follow cp law. What are you refering to?

Drawings are OK

Cartoons can't be CP, the courts have ruled on this. It's called the CONSTITUTION

that has to be one of the worst fucking trailers ive ever seen. All the jokes were just cringey "HAHAH PUBERTY MAKES U SO WEIRRDDD LOLOLOOLOLOLOL"

Why not.

Ok, seems like this has been blown out of preportion here so lets have a look see at what we have in that video that was linked.

There is no indication that the series or movie or whatever the hell it is is child pornography in any way, shape or form. The topic is about children going through puberty, not having sex and it seems like its done in a pretty humerous way too. If it was to be comcidered child porn that would lead all other movies and series (simpsons, alot of anime, several comedic movies for example) that touches the subject to be banned aswell.

underrated kek

Sauce?? What's the case?

Just don't watch it?

Stop playing their game. Let the beast exhaust itself.

There is certainly an argument for legalization of simple possession. Unquestionably, less restrictions on pornography leads to less sexual crime. This is a plain fact repeatedly demonstrated in societies around the world.
But ultimately society's laws are determined by what people think is right, and it's certainly understandable that it's seen as a step too far. Even if, from a purely objective and utilitarian standpoint, it could be a net boon to society, it's simply unconscionable. A "moral evil."

At any rate, between drawings/animation and the near-future of sex dolls/robots, I think we have acceptable substitutes that ought to satisfy any reasonable urges without necessitating abuse of real children at any point.

It takes a community to raise a child. If the culture and environment are seeped in degeneracy there's only so much a parent can do.

Are people actually so retarded that they think Netflix would promote and distribute something legally considered child porn?
People need to get a fucking grip.

They are testing the waters, if this doesn't get enough negative reactions they'll gradually produce more kind of these films.

I dont understand why you fucks have been freaking out over this for the last three or so days. If someone really does get turned on to children by a banal "DUDE BAGINA HORNY TEENS LMAO" cartoon, chances are they're the kind of fucks who'dve found loli hentai in a couple of months, tops. If they weren't already beating off to that in the first place

*tips gf-less virgin fedora

Holy fucking shit. This is not child porn. It's not even questionable. There are three factors when it comes to what is, and isn't child porn. First, is it a real child? If it's a DRAWING no it's not child porn it's protected under the first amendment. If it's a real child then is the child naked? Naked children might seem like the only marker for child pornography but eveyone's parents probably have a picture of them in the bathtub, or national geographic type shit where the nigger babies don't have clothes. If the child is naked then the final thing that would in fact make it pornography is if the photo emphasizes the child's genitals, or depicts them in a sexual nature. Your kid in the bath is fine, but a close up of your kid's dick in the bath isn't.

Wew OP, you are in for a treat.
Welcome to Sup Forums, now fuck off.

What's it matter anymore? Things have to get much worse before the pendulum swings back our way. I've all but given up at this point. Let these psychotic degenerates keep pushing their shit and see what happens. It will be terrifying---- for them.

>He isn't a virgin
How embarassing

...

What about highly photorealistic 3d?

Cartoons can'e be child porn, OP, because there are no children involved. They're drawings.

I fucking love Prisma Illya.

and you all call the left snowflakes...

Cat cow pose on yt

How many millions of children do you think have been raped and abused in Europe in the past few years?
People aren't outraged. The government isn't stopping anything. They're actively covering it up, letting those who get caught off with a slap on the wrist, and arresting those who complain. We know this, all of this, and still NOTHING.

The storm isn't coming. They are the dead.
What makes you think we'll fare better?

hey guys whats goin on in this thread?

Not much.

Meanwhile in Area 11, rape went up only after the youth law of 2014.

No. You're just getting your panties in a bunch because It's Netflix. It's objectively not child porn, and it actually looks marginally entertaining compared to the (((usual))) garabge Netflix puts out.
Now run along and jerk off to your loli.