Remind me again

How did she win the popular vote?

Counties won:
>Trump 2626
>Hillary 487
States won:
>Trump 30
>Hillary 20
Electoral:
>Trump 304
>Hillary 227

What?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_California,_2016
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

She won the necromantic vote

California letting illegals vote.

One city district = 35.8 rural and suburban retard counties

the 140% registered voters over actual population in huge cities.

California has legal loopholes which permit illegals to vote.
ID also isn't checked at voting booths in California, so you could fly in from Buttfuckistan and vote in the national elections there if you wanted.

urban retards

>it's another amerifat don't understand their electoral system episode

He does he's shilling for CNN or some stupid organization

aside from illegals it was also her strategy to win big. she spent more money in New Orleans than Wisconsin

Eleven counties in CA had more votes than voters registered.

>all counties have equal populations
>all states have equal populations
>the margin of victory in those states/counties is the same for Trump as for Hillary
God Trump supporters are so fucking stupid
and gullible

i keep telling my friends here in Canada that you dont need an I.D. to vote in California and many us states. they are like, nah that cant be right, that sounds retarded.

yep

...

Large swathes of america are sparsely populated. While the electoral college makes some sense so that dense urban areas don't dominate rural ones, on the other hand it seems odd that shitholes that barely account for 1/3 of american GDP are dictating policy for the tax bases that drive the majority of the american economy. One will just have to hope this is an outlier in the grand scheme of things (exceptions shouldnt dictate the rules).

She won the most populous state by a large margin.

Obviously there is heterogeneity in the size of counties and she won those which are bigger you fucking moron

T. Data scientist

Wait, so all the counties don't count equally, and their populations are different sizes? So states like California have the potential to decide literally every election if we don't have an electoral college, and go by popular vote instead? If that's true, why would anyone care who won the popular vote?

Population density you fucking retard

>So states like California have the potential to decide literally every election if we don't have an electoral college, and go by popular vote instead?


Populations:
California: 39m
Not CA: 323m-39m = 284m

In short: no. Are you 10 or younger?

This is wrong since not all states or counties have equal size

>what is a city?

Identity politics cater to people no one give a shit about.
They should learn from SJW vidogame shit sales

They were all from california

>why didn't trump win the popular vote when clearly more dirt voted for him
>what is population density

California 38,332,521
Texas 26,448,193
New York 19,651,127
Florida 19,552,860
Illinois 12,882,135
Pennsylvania 12,773,801
Ohio. 11,570,808
Georgia 9,992,167

Same concept, add 6 more out of 50 States and they would decide how America could go. Stop being handicapped

>be Sup Forumstard
>fail to understand simple math and population statistics
>try to act smug about it

>California has a pop. of 39 million and 55 EC votes.
>ID, UT, MT, WY, ND, SD, NE, KS, OK, LA, and AR (11 states) have a combined pop. of 24.5 million and 56 EC votes.

The electoral college is an inherently flawed instrument from a bygone age in which collecting a national average vote in a short amount of time was impossible. Anyone who supports it is saying it's okay to have some people's vote matter less than others.

>inb4 muh California would dominate everything
There's a near equal distribution of republicans and democrats in the US. 1 person 1 vote is by far the better system. And it wouldn't end up with swing states deciding every election.

It was all California, she won millions more in that leftist shithole and that's all it takes.

She could've won by 10s of millions more and STILL lose the electoral college, that's just how it works.

The entire state of california could vote for her and Trump would still win.

>people's votes should be worth less because they live in California

>why would anyone care who won the popular vote?

Nobody cares except the losers of elections like Hillary who desperately cling to any kind of consolation prize.

Hilary won California by basically as many votes as she won the general election

>tl;dr
I'm amazed this kind of post still gets all these autistic replies this far after the election. None of you have any life at all.

Are you fucking stupid?

Votes for Hillary in California 2016
>8,753,788

Votes for Hillary in general 2016
>65,853,516

This mental gymnastics to justify the retarded fucking electoral college is getting out of hand.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election_in_California,_2016

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016

>the majority of people would decide how America could go

what an interesting concept

Cry some more. Maybe if those places didn't vote the same way no matter what, them people would give a shot about their opinion. I've still yet to see a legitimate argument for getting rid of the electoral college, they all revolve around "bbbbbut Urban voters should be the only ones that matter!!!!"

I answered the morons question while you just answer a question you arbitrarily made up yourself. Kys brainlet

>More populated states get more votes

Yes user, this is the foundation of democracy

>but muh dirt should have a vote

Massive amounts of fraud that nothing will be done about because Republicans aren't a real political party.

>muh flyover states

Illegal voters:
>Hillary several million
>Trump 0

lol are you a bot?

The electoral college works exactly as it is supposed to work. Democracy always leads to the downfall of civilization. The poor always vote for gibs from the rich until there are no rich and then, while everyone is starving, revolution happens and something that is not democracy rises....Voting should be limited to the property owner and the tax payer...accepting any form of welfare should exclude one from voting for 10 years minimum.

illegal votes.
not to mention that some big cities voted for her, which is why the electoral college exists

America is proof that elites can manipulate public opinion to support blatantly harmful policies.

In any country where universal healthcare is seen as a bad thing, but using a ridiculous system of 538 people to decide the presidential election is fine, you know something has gone wrong.

>muh algorithms

Cities don't vote user, people do. And 3 million more people voted for Hillary than for Trump.

No matter how you slice up the electorate, the simple fact is that the current system is anti-democratic.

>Republic is bad!
>Direct democracy only!

Take off your meme flag, leaf.

>So it's okay to make individual's votes not count equally,

Where do Americans get their food? Is every vote really equal? Should the vote of a farmer count the same as the vote of some Starbucks barista?

bot

>Anti Democratic

If that were true there's be no voting at all, leaf.

>Should the vote of a farmer count the same as the vote of some Starbucks barista?

Yes, because lord knows if we start creating a caste system based off occupation, farmers will be at the bottom with the barista.

all of those counties are full of suburban and rural retards that voted for Trump
counties with educated city people voted for Hilallry

The point of the college and not pure democracy was that the broad mobs of people are fucking stupid and easily brainwashed. They're more likely to vote ingroup. That's why the founding fathers wanted to distribute power among the entire country as much as possible. What aren't you understanding.

>the simple fact is that the current system is anti-democratic.

As it should be. Take your mob rule elsewhere, faggot.

This thread attracted every bot on the board. Look at all these bizzare context-free replies and nonsense conversations being had.

That's great because the electorate is not democratic for a good reason, if not any

Remember those recounts that were abruptly ended when they were turning up massive irregularities in Her favor? Yeah, that's what happened.

Blah Blah Blah thats all I hear anymore about this topic that should be dead. Hillary lost get over it maybe it wasn't fair or was corrupted or whatever but I really feel like its time to lets this go. For what ever the reason Trump is our president fairly or not who really knows but he is our president and there is a reason maybe it is unknown to us but there is. Support our country instead of wasting effort complaining about the election that is over and done with nothing is going to change accept it.

Illegals in Commiefornia, Jew York, and other leftist bastions had illegal and dead people voting for them.
>Illegals and dead people can't vote, by the way
>inb4 Alive-ism or some retarded leftist mental gymnastics that justifies the dead voting and voting left

Without California Hillary lost the popular vote. I wonder. How many dreamers voted with someone else's social

>>people's votes should be worth less because they live in California

Absolutely.

>How many dreamers voted with someone else's social
That's what the recent credit bureau hack was about. With (((leftist))) vote cattle being deported, because they're illegal, (((they))) stole SSNs of citizens to give to illegals. Spread the word.

This would make sense with an even distribution of population.
If 50% of americans lived in rural areas and 50% of americans lived in cities, then using popular vote would make more sense.
The issue is that people in these areas dont know about each other. People in rural areas dont know how spending tax money on a new subway system would effect people in the city so they dont vote on that kind of stuff.
People in cities dont know how banning certain fertilizers effects farmers so they dont vote on that stuff.
This is why the electoral college exists, and arguably US States and the republic too.
Unlike Communists, we are willing to admit that pure Democracy doesnt work very well. It's been tried and usually goes downhill pretty quickly. The founding fathers based our system on ancient (failed) systems and modified them to work. That's why our capital buildings look like ancient Greek/Roman structures and why you see the Fascist Axe symbol at the capital.
It's not to say that the electoral college system is perfect. It's susceptible to abuse just like any other system and Democrats have done so. Trump was already at a massive disadvantage before the election even started. Trump had to work 10x harder than Hillary. The reason Trump went to the states he did was because those states could go either way and he needed the points. He appealed to people on a more personal level, because in each county, the popular vote actually does matter. Most of Clinton's 1.1B campaign was spent on propaganda. Go watch the debates again. She didnt even try. The whole time she was thinking "I got this in the bag. Trump cant beat the media in my pocket." She was even as bold to signal the debate moderators when needed. Like people dont see that kind of shit. "Why arent I winning" wasnt directed at the people. It was directed at the media. The media has come to play a major role in our elections which is why Trump treated them as an opponent. 2020 will be the same.

Except, your know, major cities are where most people live. As usual, Nazi fucks misunderstanding the argument.

>it's okay to have some people's vote matter less than others.

Interesting point, so how do you feel about the fact that even if the illegals aren't voting (and there's mountains of evidence they are) their warm, useless bodies give their locality more weight in elections, thus making some citizens' votes matter less than others?

this

Voting is based on geography and population density which determines normal voting culture. You fucks don't always get what you want.

You didn't understand at all, did you?

Trump won the popular vote if you consider every state except California. Once you add in California, Hillary took the popular vote. Coincidentally, California has taken every step to allow illegals to vote in nationals elections short of granting citizenship, which is something they cannot do.

She only won areas with high population density

Interesting observation.

trump did really well in vast empty stretches of land where dirt roads are still common.

>That's what the recent credit bureau hack was about. With (((leftist))) vote cattle being deported, because they're illegal, (((they))) stole SSNs of citizens to give to illegals.

Interesting premise.

>>How did she win the popular vote?
population density. Those little speckles of blue conties that she won along the coastal states are densely populated areas, States like montana/wyoming/the Dakotas are like ghost towns compared to New York or Southern California.

Some of those counties are worth more than others. In the sense that they contain millions more votes.

What they really mean is "popular people" vote.. all the cool edgy lesbians

AKA the important areas who fucking cares about small towns with 100k people

Project Veritas exposed the big fraud in the DNC

I was following election night and trump was up the whole time until trumps win was official. He was up in popular vote until a day later, somehow. Maybe because of "absentee ballots". Maybe because of illegal immigrants and dead people votes coming in late

California

Tectonic shift when?

Reddit tier post

California
/thread

fuck commiefornia

You will care a lot about those towns when there is no food or fuel moving into the cities...

>fuck the State who mantains your country.
Yeah let's get rid of NY too, so your dirty rednecks asses figure out how to survive.

We survived just fine before California was a state. You know, back when we had actual industry and manufacturing before the fucks in California voted to give all that to spics and poos
>California maintains the US
lmao. All they make is avocados, shitty indie video games, and overpriced aluminum electronics that are designed to fail within a year so you buy the new one. I can live without those, thanks

Don't forget exporting world degeneracy on a massive scale.

Lol everyone outside burgerland considers it the best state due to its world famous unis, silicon valley and general wealth.

Your GDP will decrease 20%, and PPP will decrease almost 22%, you will lost a majority of worlwide known brands and the most important technological place in the world.

>"A minimum wage worker that lives in a concrete cube should have more say regarding the politics of this country than the people who chop your wood and grow your food.

Why liberals think their hipster sjw bullshit matters 35 times more then regular, hard working people - The Post

>"A guy who contributes almost nothing to economy should have more say regarding the politics of this country than the people who maintain this country.

If the guy who chop your wood and grow your food stop working, nothing will happen, we will start importing wood and food, if the guys working on manufacturing companies stop working then the country will collapse, because the economy will colapse, investros will go to other countries, no more wages, no more taxes, etc....

Because the Dems have won the popular vote numerous times. Gore won the Pop and lost the election. Population has changed past what the founders laid out so that the electorate college favors certain states with a population ratio than the actual population.

You're too dumb to argue with. You have no idea what goes on outside your bubble. You think everything can be handed to you if you wish it to be. Like some magic fairy imports all the commodities you use everyday.

If the shit hit the fan the only people who would survive in a city are those who were smart enough to leave. You's would all starve in a few months.

We are not talking about a war, we are talking about separating California from the rest of the States, and how wage workers and farmers compare in economics.

Damn that sucks. If only we couldn't move those industries to 49 other places