People are just now realizing that Trey Parker is a good goy

>People are just now realizing that Trey Parker is a good goy.

Other urls found in this thread:

people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

She's fucking hot. Shame about the kids though.

why does his son look like he's going to save earth from an alien invasion in a decade or so

She's a six at best, and that's being generous.

She also has her former pimp's name tatooed on her arm.

Lol you think he lets him watch South Park?

>Man with white skin fucks pale quadroon
>Child is darker than the mom

That's her son, but not his.

It was obvious they were cucks back when they made the ZimZam episode.

Literally nothing wrong with raising your wife's son.

>flag

Is that true? Literal whore into housewife?

She's gross. How fuckin thirsty are you bro?

what a fucking cuck

Thats her son from some black guy, trey and boogies daughter is blonde. Recessive genes won this time.

I thought he was a closeted homosexual.

It can be both.

why does the kid look more nigger than the mom?

She fucked a black guy

Refer here

>raising a niglet step son

what a loser

BowWowWow has super Jew ears. He literally looks like he has a remote controlled ass plug wedged in his bum and she an itchy button pushing finger. What a fucking faggot.

All kids aside. The episode last nite that triggered the amazon and goolag devices through the episode is so fkn funny!!! Still laughing How could you be so stupid to even have these spying devices in Your Homes???!!! Is beyond me. Jokes on you like always!
Double Kek!!!!

No.

He married a coal burner? I hope that c u c k s shots are up to date.

Fucking why

You need glasses he married what looks like to be a pole working piece of coal. He's got save-a-hoe syndrome because he hates himself.

Have to laugh when Nazi rapscallions think themselves possessed of some sort of superior moral virtue on the basis that they don't have a stepson who happens to be half-coloured. What paragons of greatness you are.

What's sad is that anybody cares what these people think, say, or do in the first place.

Are you raising a bastard nigger?

She's an ex-stripper named Boogie. Jap wife left him when she found out he was cheating.

I don't think that being coloured is innately a crime or a mark of inferiority, nor do I think that raising a stepchild is innately a bad thing to do. I do on the other hand believe that Neo-Nazis who earnestly do intend gratuitously to kill or to persecute innocent people deserve to be hanged by the neck until they die.

Oh man, she's really cute.

>t. Nigger raising cuck

Trannies like to smoke cigars as a form of mockery.

He's bald and married to a go-go slut.

Spotted the low-T beta

Don't worry, I won't talk to you or your wife's son ever again.

>six at best
3 at best you niggerlover

Do you imbeciles honestly think that the Creator of the Universe looks down on the earth and judges people's moral worth in terms of ideas like "Nigger-raising cuck" and "low-T beta." Don't you see how utterly twisted and warped your sense of morality is. You try to make yourselves feel superior on the basis of some sort of arbitrary criteria of your own making rather than on what you really have done in the world that is in any way noble or good.

...

>What paragons of greatness you are
thank you

jap was rich as fuck too

Dude has the physique of a lesbian bowling team captain.

This has nothing to do with morality and "God" most of the alt right is agnostic/atheist. Its about genetic hygiene and society. Every civilization that's been heavily injected with inferior blood (a browning) has collapsed.

Also notice his right hand. He feels like he is a piece of shit so he needs to slum to feel justified. My m8's brother is like this. Fatal character flaw.

>went from a japanese girl to a coalburner with a son

JUST

ahh you wittle nazis thought this was real?

That is a false way to account for the rise and fall of civilizations. Mass immigration is a symptom of moral decline and merely gives the final death blow to a people that already is killing itself. Sir John Glubb shows that in his "Fate of Empires."

people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

How will you account on the materialistic genetic hypothesis of race and intelligence for the fact that ancient Greece produced an astonishing number of geniuses in comparison with the size of its population, unparalleled in the history of humankind one moment, and yet degenerated into a mere subject people under the Macedonian, Roman, and Ottoman heel the next? It had a proto-world-war called the Peloponnesian war (431 - 404 B. C.) and brought itself to ruin both by its decadence and its internecine strife long before there was a single Jew in Europe (the first mention of them being there is in the 3rd century B. C.). Again, how will you account for the fact that the Britons, who later built the greatest Empire in human history, were barbarians who practised cannibalism for thousands upon thousands of years, and needed hundreds of years of Roman civilization in order to make any progress?

Lying cunt said this season wouldn't be as political

>You try to make yourselves feel superior

I don't try to make myself feel anything, friend. However, even though I haven't the fame nor fortune of that fat slob, I'm not raising some hooker's black bastard child LOL

>arbitrary criteria of your own making rather than on what you really have done in the world

Nah, limey, I'm successful by social conventions as well as biological. In that sense, I'm batting 1000, whereas Trey Trey is only batting 500.

>that is in any way noble or good.

You don't know about noble or good, so please do rim my anus on the way out.

Good on ya for taking the British Piss (I'm hoping you aren't being serious.)

jesus christ

I am sure that when you die, as we all must, that when darkness overflows your eyes and your consciousness departs from this earth for ever and goes before the judgement-seat of God, the Creator will really care about your "success according to social and biological conventions." Meanwhile a great war hero like Sir John Glubb who devoted his life to the service of his country will be considered as nothing when compared with you on the basis that he adopted and brought up three Middle-Eastern children.

>How will you account on the materialistic genetic hypothesis of race and intelligence

I simply look at the world as it is today instead of looking backwards over two millennia to try and make bad point.

Simply put, IQ is real and positively correlates with good life outcomes. There is a measurable difference in population IQs between races, and indeed one can look at the collective accomplishments of the races to see this IQ effect in action.

As for the brown invasion, it most definitely can be correlated to increased crime and other negative societal effects, and Cultural Marxism is real, it is documented, it was created by and pushed for by jews, and the effects are also clear.

Ill read that article and im fairly certain all those are factors to the fall of civilizations. But im still inclined to believe that the IQ and temperament of a people is important and frankly its an important issue as to why every society thats injected heavy doses of subsaharan african dna into its country has fallen. It may be an attractiveness issue as well wish is very high up on my list an all white society with beautiful people will function better than one where I have to look at a fuckin paki to remind me of poop. Robert Putnams 2008 diversity study puts these findings in a less abrasive tone than mine.

I don't believe in your Creator, and I'm doing right by my own Creator, so your concern trolling is misplaced.

Your concept of serving one's country is also wildly different than my own, so see above.

The Swiss were once among the shortest people in Europe, they are now among the tallest. A person looking at them with your mindset 300 years ago would have insisted they were incorrigibly short. An Athenian in the 6th century B. C. might have called the Scythian philosopher Anacharsis a "mere outlier" and denied that the fair-skinned blond-haired barbarians to the north could ever become capable of civilization. "What is, shall be" is a fallacy. Of course there are differences in IQ between different peoples, but what you are wrong to do is to suppose that those are perennially so. "Surveys in the 1920's of mental‐test studies of immigrants from southern and eastern Europe, such as Italians, Poles and Greeks, showed their average I.Q.'s to be in the 80's, occasionally in the 70's." Mass immigration and multiculturalism obviously ought to be resisted just as the Germanic hordes posed a threat to the Roman Empire, but your fallacy lies in supposing that this position necessitates racial absolutism and racialism. That lies completely outside of the European tradition. Hence why Julius Caesar adopted a North African called Juba, Shakespeare wrote Othello, Renaissance Florence was ruled over by a mixed-race Moor, Thomas Carlyle nearly married a mixed-race Indian woman, and Dr Samuel Johnson gave a substantial sum of money to his black servant, Francis Barber, in his will, who had married a white woman and had children by her in his life-time.

You could always tell, even though I like south park early on; Interviews with the guy and some of the dialogue he comes up with he was obviously a weird little bug man.

People on Sup Forums like to shit on others too much for my taste, but that's kinda part of this "culture".
Actually, all people like to shit on celebrities, because they perceive them as dominant members of society or something. That's why those trashy gossip magazines/websites do so well.

If a friend of mine told me that he's raising a black son of a stripper with tattoos I'd probably try to help him and set him straight.
It's just not a dignified way to live, IMO. But none of us is perfect, we all have problems.

>literally tells his audience to vote for Hillary Clinton
yeah no shit

Again look at the case of classical Greece as I outlined before; one moment they were producing geniuses at an astonishing rate and were able to fight off an army of 5 millions with only a few thousand men, the next they were waging suicidal wars on each other, were utterly controlled by the ambition and folly of demagogues, lapsed into the most foul luxury and degeneracy, and came under the subjugation of foreign nations forever more. This before a single black or Jew had come into their society. The race-doctrine does not account for that nor as I have pointed out does it account for the barbarity in which Northern Europe lied for thousands of years, which only Roman civilization slowly got it out of.

I have a strong feeling that you're not in disagreement with the reality of race you just believe that you can change it with proper intervention and policy change so your spouting a bunch of mental gymnastics to get thru the loop.

>recessive genes won
it's still a subhuman. whites lost this round

Decent thread on Sup Forums right now. Mods for some reason not fucking cancerous NeoGAF faggots who delete for no reason.

>She's a six at best,
A six? Are you blind or desperate? She looks like a man who looks like a lesbian. She is not even trying to look like a pretty female.

Poor Trey, he totally lost his looks, too.

hideous

>In that sense, I'm batting 1000, whereas Trey Trey is only batting 500.
And yet he's the co-creator of the most successful animated show since the late 90s, which tackles a shitton of social issues in a very anti-authoritarian and no-holds-barred kind of way, while you may as well not exist. I'd wager that a large majority of this board (no, make that "website") either grew up watching South Park, or at least knows what it is. Nobody knows who you are and your "social conventions" mean nothing in here. This is a website governed by meritocratic discussion and your worth is equal to the worth of your words, so in your case you're utterly fucking worthless. People say that Sup Forums ruined this website, but it's people like you, who think that anybody gives a flying fuck about their identity or real life.

>The Swiss were once among the shortest people in Europe, they are now among the tallest.

That's a cool factoid, but I'm interested in IQ, not height.

>An Athenian in the 6th century B. C.

Again, I'm not interested in discussing the current races and nations. The white ones have created the prevailing culture and prosperity. The brown and black ones have not. And they were around even back when your Athenian was scratching his balls wondering about Scythians.

>"What is, shall be" is a fallacy.

Sure, in a pure LOGIC sense, however I can tell you with 100% certainty that the lead in your house will not transmute to gold. This same principle applies to the IQs of black and brown nations not suddenly rising and allowing them to join the first world by their own devices.

>but your fallacy lies in supposing that this position necessitates racial absolutism and racialism.

I don't suppose that, but I prefer it. My nation was at its strongest when it was 90% white. I don't think 100% white is necessary, but it's a good starting place in a negotiation for the public mindshare.

The rest of your stuff is just tiresome sophistry. Go have some tea.

Ew she's not cute :/


Is Matt Stone married to the black woman then?

The barbarity of ancient Europeans along with harsh winter environment is what lead to their success. All those people died so whites can look good and innovate. War is biggest driver for innovation and europe was fuckin savage. My ancestors died so I can live in the best environment and look better than others. im glad they were brutal and paved the way to civilization in blood so i dont have to look like a mango eating pygmy or an aborigine.

No, I believe that we make ourselves what we will be. The racialist materialist says, "Nothing can help the black man. He is innately inferior." The socialist materialist says, "The black man can only be helped by changing his environment for the better. Therefore we need to implement socialist programs to "make" him better. I say, "Neither genetics nor environment "makes" us who we are, because all men have an immaterial and immortal soul. Genetics versus environment is a false dichotomy produced by a godless age. The black man will improve just when he chooses to improve himself."

Again, the racialist says that blacks are more criminal, have a lower average level of intelligence, accede to a low level of culture etc. because they are innately so, the socialist because of his environment; I blame him for his own actions, and say that he has the power to better his race if only he wills it to be so. It is the same with men. Observe the difference between a man like James Ferguson, who began life as a simple shepherd living in the most humble of circumstances in the Scottish countryside, and self-educated himself into one of the most eminent scientists and men of letters in his day, and a man like Lord Byron's father, who squandered his entire fortune, was an abject drunk, womanizer, degenerate, and a murderer. Nations, which merely represent men in the mass, rise or fall in exactly the same way.

>And yet he's the co-creator of the most successful animated show since the late 90s

I'm not denying that, but the man is literally raising a hooker's nigger bastard. He hates himself, and no amount of fame and fortune will change that. That's what this discussion is about.

I don't feel the measure of a man is his pocket book, and quite frankly I find South Park to be highly overrated (it was funny when I was 18 and before the shitlib preaching infiltrated it.) The point stands that the slob behind it is a self-hating c u c k of the worst type.

>who think that anybody gives a flying fuck about their identity or real life.

Your English comprehension still isn't proficient enough to be flying around in here like this. I never implied I care if people know who I am, I'm simply responding to another user's arguments.

It's funny that Poland thinks anyone will listen to them, anyway lol

How do I get Trey Parker's attention? I think I'm a better catch than the racially ambiguous hooker.

>because all men have an immaterial and immortal soul.

Bahahahaha OK. Go with Christ, my son.

Clean his windscreen at a stoplight evidently.

Spoken like a true cuck.

You didn't directly state that, no, but that casual mention of your genetic superiority didn't really help push the discussion further, did it? Neither did making fun of my nationality or fluency in a foreign tongue, but that's to be expected of a cornered animal on a sinking ship. Enjoy your country while you still can.

Looks like he bought that suit off Shaq

>That's a cool factoid, but I'm interested in IQ, not height.

You ascribe intelligence to the brain which is a part of the body, so it is deeply pertinent and relevant to the matter at hand.

>The white ones have created the prevailing culture and prosperity. The brown and black ones have not.

Your fallacy lies in the use of this word "white." For thousands of years many "white" peoples languished in barbarism. The Greeks alone were civilized. Britain was conquered by the Romans in 43 A. D. Now who is the first man of genius, whether in art or science, whom you can even then show me as coming from Britain? You will have to wait 300 or 400 years before you can find such a man. Africa was only properly colonized in the 19th century and yet the black race has already produced thousands of men of worth. You must apply your tests and standards even-handedly.

>My nation was at its strongest when it was 90% white. I don't think 100% white is necessary but it's a good starting place in a negotiation for the public mindshare

Hardly. All it makes people do is run to the open-borders Communists as being the only alternative. Well-nigh every person in Britain has a coloured friend or acquaintance at this point. They will support a movement that seeks to oppose mass immigration and reverse the demographic trends, but they will never support racial absolutism.

When your nation was 90% white it was also an infinitely more moral place. Can you imagine even tithe of the filthy degeneracy that goes on now taking place in the '50s? Immigrants did not cause white people to engage in this wicked behaviour. Like the Greeks and the Romans we are losing our virtue and ultimately that is owing to our own selves. Mass immigration is merely another symptom of it. Likewise this deterministic obsession with blood purity and Jews on the one hand and leftwing grievance-mongering and socialism on the other instead of attention to moral character as the root cause of the trouble.

Neat.

Dualism is as old as the Western philosophical tradition. Hence why Socrates describes us conversing and thinking and reasoning in the afterlife, when the soul detaches from the body:

"What would not a man give if he might converse with Orpheus and Musaeus and Hesiod and Homer? Nay, if this be true, let me die again and again. I myself, too, shall have a wonderful interest in there meeting and conversing with Palamedes, and Ajax the son of Telamon, and any other ancient hero who has suffered death through an unjust judgment; and there will be no small pleasure, as I think, in comparing my own sufferings with theirs. Above all, I shall then be able to continue my search into true and false knowledge; as in this world, so also in the next; and I shall find out who is wise, and who pretends to be wise, and is not."

When the ancient Athenians offered citizenship to the Semite Phoenician philosopher Zeno, they did not have any thought of his "tainting" the national stock; they merely wanted to bring a great-souled man of consummate nobility and virtue into their fold.

>Enjoy your country while you still can.

Hiding your flag and lashing out.

TRIGGERED

That's his wife's son

some sort of appeal to age fallacy, dualism is right because it's an old concept?

Gratuitously presumed. These Northern Europeans needed Greek and Roman civilization to civilize them. They were in barbarism for thousands of years before and it is reasonable to suppose they would have remained barbarians for thousands of years afterwards had it not come to them. The British Empire only really brought the sub-Saharan African into contact with civilization about 150 years ago.

we wuz humanz

Literally who?

No, I was opposing his wrongly saying that dualism was some sort of Christian idea. It is a thoroughly Greek one. The Old Testament does not even make mention of life after death.

>I don't think that being coloured is innately a crime or a mark of inferiority
>mark of inferiority
Well, you think wrong. IQ studies and general human history prove this to be true.

>You ascribe intelligence to the brain which is a part of the body, so it is deeply pertinent and relevant to the matter at hand.

>Height is the length of the body, and IQ is the function of a complex interplay of gene expression in the most complex object known to man. But they are both part of the body. Therefore, this is a good analogy.

Learn to biology, you silly philosopher.

And please learn to be more concise.

>all that nonsense

Just look at avg iq charts you nigger loving cuck

Sir John Glubb went to Hell for accommodating three Muhammadan heretics.

I have already shown you here that the white I. Q. has been lower before in certain groups. The point I was making to you is that there are many phenomena in hereditary that cannot be accounted for by a simple reference to "genes." Epigenetics is an entirely new field of study. It was recently discovered that if (for example) your grandfather was a smoker he makes you more likely to become a smoker yourself.

>No, I was opposing his wrongly saying that dualism was some sort of Christian idea. It is a thoroughly Greek one. The Old Testament does not even make mention of life after death.

No, you are a pseudo-intellectual who is trying to argue around clear empirical evidence by resorting to bad analogies based on ancient cultures.

To sum up (and because you seem to love FALLACIES):

-The ancient Greeks were geniuses but tore themselves apart before blacks and jews showed up, therefore the current influx of blacks and browns isn't necessarily bad (fallacy) and jews aren't the problem, either (fallacy.)
-The Swiss used to be short but now they aren't. Therefore the IQ of uncivilized nations could also increase and they could become civilized (fallacy,) nevermind that they haven't, ever, in their entire history stretching back before recorded history. But just wait, it could happen in the future, hence importing them isn't necessarily bad (lol fallacies.) Also because the Athenians didn't used to think the Scythians could ever be civilized, but boy were they wrong, therefore browns and blacks can become civilized (fallacy!)
-OK, well yeah, IQ is real, but the IQ doesn't make the man (however the collective IQ makes the nation) and each man can choose his own destiny (great, so why do all the non-white nations choose to be shit?)

>blacks are more criminal, have a lower average level of intelligence, accede to a low level of culture etc. because they are innately so
This is true. Developing a personal philosophy contrary to this is just a self delusional rejection of science.

A cursory reading of my posts on this thread would show this to be demonstrably false, but think as you please. You omitted the word "innately" by the way and so mutilated the point.

>brought itself to ruin both by its decadence and its internecine strife long before there was a single Jew in Europe (the first mention of them being there is in the 3rd century B. C.).
The Israelite tribe of Dan were the same as the Danaans.

>It was recently discovered that if (for example) your grandfather was a smoker he makes you more likely to become a smoker yourself
This is most likely due to genes making one more prone to certain behavioral patterns. Behavior is a function of the brain, which in turn is a function of your genes and enviroment. Saying something is hereditary and then claiming it can't be due to genetics is contradictory.

she's trashy as fuck. Probably married her because she'll swallow jizz and take it in the pooper.

neck tat
"kobe" tattoo on arm. Probably the black dude who's her first "baby daddy."

Did they meet at rehab or some shit?

>Ha ha! I've got you now as I pedantically point out how your green text may have been better composed!

>my wifes son

>that the white I. Q. has been lower before in certain groups.

What does "certain groups" mean? Where is the study? Who did they test? Which method?

>It was recently discovered that if (for example) your grandfather was a smoker he makes you more likely to become a smoker yourself.

I'm calling bullshit on that being epigenetic lol

I have a strong feeling you're what the brits refer to as "asian" and you're in panic mode about your race.