How Dangerous is Kim Jong Un?
How Dangerous is Kim Jong Un?
Mason Sullivan
Other urls found in this thread:
Camden Green
He is our guy.
Dylan Hernandez
Say he nukes Seattle, San Francisco, and LA.
Maybe even New York, by sub.
Okay... that puts Democrats as persona non grata in the US for getting us Nuked.
That kills off a couple of million Democrat voters.
We wipe out NK.
Terrible as it is, it might save the US.
Adrian Perry
Only in the minds of idiots is this fat little ching ching dangerous
Jason Bell
Trump would be Vegeta.
Connor Parker
This DPRK thing is just distraction. They have done this shit for centuries.
Jayden Reed
>centuries
well fuck my shit up, decades*
Blake Ramirez
>Destroying Our Ports
>Destorying Our Banking Industry
>Destroying Our Tech Industry
>US GDP Plumets
>Second Depression Follows
How is that winning?
Landon Torres
He's dangerous to his own people but realistically there's no way the leaders of NK believe their own godlike claims about themselves.
Cooper Campbell
Yamcha tier
Michael Gutierrez
depends on if your a food product or not.
Nathaniel Jackson
He should nuke Yellowstone Park.
Although I suppose it might not do anything.
I'm clueless at geology.
Jaxson Hughes
He's dangerous to American hegemony, which is why we have to kill him
William Flores
>I-I-I think he's p-p-p-pretty c-c-c-cool
Dylan Scott
this pic always crack me up how identical he is
Dominic Ross
>destroy our banking industry
that doesn't seem that bad mr. kike
David Baker
HE'LL NAW. I am less than 100 miles from Yellowstone. Nuke some other shit leave me and my buffalo buddy's be. I'd honestly roll the dice with the volcano than deal with radiation/fallout
Tyler Flores
As powerful as a limp dick in a gangbang?
David Jones
Funny, that's why I support him.
Parker Thomas
I Kim was ever based he would have already nuked entire coast of California.
Nuking L.A and S.F would instantly immortalised him as Saint.
Too bad this fat gook can only evade kikes better than frogger.
Adrian Young
If we attack? Very. Lashes out with nuke in last stand.
If we just ignore him? Not dangerous. I'd be very surprised if the DPRK attacked anyone unprovoked.
Owen Richardson
This. I wish he really dressed like that IRL. Might actually give me a reason to support him.
Caleb Butler
I don't know do you want another great recession?
Christopher Sanders
Angel Howard
>>Destroying Our Tech Industry
Nope, multiple failover servers already setup in case this happens. All the code, databases, documentations and other critical information is backed up and easily recoverable.
John Bailey
>went to school in medic bag land
>has hand in pocket
hmmm.
He's just a silly cripple, user.
Wyatt Martinez
he will use the nukes as leverage/blackmail to try and get concessions.
when those are refused. he will act out. depending on how he acts out s. korea/usa might respond.
and if he feels threatened he might use nukes.
thinking he won't act is like thinking a mugger with a gun isn't a problem because you're depending on the death penalty to deter a mugger from shooting you when you don't handover your wallet.
Daniel Fisher
On a danger scale of 1-10 probably a 2.
Grayson Myers
He's an absolute alpha male. Has the entire Jewish controlled West on strings. The more successful he becomes, the larger the chances of him giving nukes to Iran and hence the destruction of Israel.
He is 100% /ourguy/
Bentley Bailey
What's the problem? They'll just bail us out, right?