Assange Seeking Pardon in Exchange for Proof Russia Wasn't Behind DNC Hack

Thoughts on this, lads?

archive.is/uGH2V

Assange is a hero

I'm ok with this.

This literally happened 3 weeks ago.

Fucking retarded MSM is just reporting on it now because shit is about to happen. As in TODAY.

He's never gonna get it.

Russia did it.
He's fucked.

Trump's encircled by kikes, they don't want his proof. They want to tank the last chance at nationalism and keep open the possibility of nuclear war with Russia incase the goyim knowing levels reach the point of no return.

actually big if true. this would allow trump to end the sanctions on russia without media and libtard interference. this in turn would create a better relationship with the US and Russia.

>inb4 Assange is dead and its a trap

This user gets it

PARDON HIM TRUMP

PARDON HIM AND BECOME LEGEND

SHED YOUR MORTAL FLESH AND ASCEND TO THE REALM OF GODS AND KINGS

DO IT

bump
take the deal
save the world

too late. they've moved the goal posts, no one even remembers that Russia was suppose to have "hacked" the DNC. Probably shouldn't have been such a faggot and done this last year.

He has to ask Schumer for permission first

Bump

DELET THIS

IT'S BEEN HAPPENING TODAY FOR EVERY DAY SINCE THE INAUGURATION NOW REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

WAKE ME UP, WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS

...

NOT yet!
Jose is coming to NewYork!

Bullshit.
It's already 7:30EST, way too late.

This is such a horrible move. They fund our enemies and shoot down our allies planes out of the sky. If anyone is going to take a step in repairing relations its going to be Russia first, if America does it will be weakness

He's got to have Mueller and other evidence drive a final stake through the heart of the muh Russia conspiracy before Trump can entertain this. And he probably can't use Assange's evidence to exonerate himself or muh Russia. It might happen, but not until other things get exposed first.

Pardon for what, when did a US court convict him of anything?

some ongoing investigation which they refuse to answer any foia requests and has been going since 2011 without pursuing charges

Kill yourself, jew. Also go back 2 leddit and don't ever come back.

Everybody is probably waiting for Mueller's report before releasing this stuff.

Much more dramatic then. Distraction goldmine.

Muller is /ourguy/ right?
No Russia evidence has been found yet.

Who knows, but the reports have painted his quest as increasingly desperate, last one i saw said he's trading notes with Twitter and facebook about some russians buying ads

>our enemies
>Russia
Is that you schlomo?

>Mueller is our guy?
It's a theory.

I don't buy it.

>facebook
>russia buying ads
Of course it's all a convenient distraction from faceboot claiming to reach more members of a demographic than even exist. Kek.
I hpoe someone can take out Zuckerjew before he gets SS protection.

stupid, this guy should fry in jail and we don't need his help collecting evidence

No, Mueller is most certainly not our guy. He's hired every lawyer Trump has ever sparred with. The guy who sued Trump over Trump University? Just hired to dig in on the Russia probe.

They're going to look till they find something on someone in the family. Trump is clean, but they're obviously focused on Jr and Kushner.

The reason there's any focus on Flynn and Manafort is only to pressure them into giving false testimony to bring an indictment on Trump.

It's the literal definition of a witch hunt.

Yup, this is Stasi-tier shit going on right now.

And the fact that most people don't care pretty much sums up how doomed the Republic is.

>t.cuckservative
Go back, leddit.

Are you the same fucking shill ? You literally say the same shit every thread. Mueller is NOT our guy in the slightest. Deep swamp creature

real question: why do you think Trump is clean? he's been involved in Manhattan real estate and then global real estate for decades, relying on hard money from shady sources, mob-controlled contractors, and that's not even bringing Manafort and Stone into it who literally worked for every dictator they could find in the 80's. there is 100% some impropriety, fraud, money laundering or related financial crime somewhere in his record... your faith is almost breathtakingly naive

OY
Y

this, Drumpf is finished

This needs to be happen so tired of hearing about it from sore loser libtards

Not everyone here is a deep researcher but there are enough of us here and have been here and researching the corrupt world of geopolitics for many years and everyone will tell you that donald trump is not a person who is ever named or mentioned in connection with the enemy.

he is a good man and that is what the left hates the most, because he being so bright and pure reveals all their ugly sins and flaws without even having to try

It only matters if be breaks the law while prez. His life before doesn't matter.

Its so blatantly obvious that Podesta emails were an insider leak. And IC flapped around to pin it on Russia because they'd know Assange would never reveal his source.

What is Assange breaks his own rule in return for pardon, and possibly revealing the biggest coverrup of all times?

Deep State must be shitting bricks if Trump decides to go through with this. They WILL try to engineer a civil war and impeachment.

Because he ran against the entire American establishment and openly insulted them along the way. He threatens their livelihood when he talks about draining the swamp. Endless bureaucracy and unchecked power is their business.

They've been investigating him officially for like a year now, but we all know it started when he threw his name in the hat. If he had even jaywalked or had an unpaid parking ticket in 1963, we'd know about it. If there was ANYTHING on Trump, and I do mean anything, it would be stretched thin enough to bring an indictment on him. They don't need to convict, they're not interested in putting him in jail, they just need to indict to get their impeachment rolling.

Well, he apparently swindled some ((((((GIGA-KIKES)))))) in the 80's, but i'm pretty ok with that tbqh fampai.

Why do you think Trump has surrounded himself with powerful Generals. He knows a fight is possible.

It's not a question of whether he's ever done shady deals. The issue is whether he colluded with Russia, whatever that means. Ask yourself whether Russia would even be an issue if Hillary had won. Now as for naive, perhaps the Democrats keep Russia in the headlines to keep Susan Rice, Obama, DWS, Clinton, etc out of the headlines and to derail Trump's presidency because it was literally her turn

The Generals are the ones keeping him from even hearing from Rohrabacher (and by extension Assange)
The only military man he could have trusted was Flynn. Mattis, Kelly, Dunford and McMaster are no allies to Donald J Trump. They are 4 of the biggest statists in our government today.

Seth Rich got the Podesta emails? Or Clinton's. Both?

What the fuck would Big Don have to lose? He should take the deal!

Meh I don't think Kelly is shielding Trump from it. His job is to take info and decide what's worth Trump's time.

Kelly confirmed everything to the Wall Street Journal so it's not like he's trying to keep this secretive. If something comes of it, Trump is gonna be filled in on all the details. But Trump himself can't broker any exchange or anything, he can just sign the pardon.

Rohrabacher needs to find someone trustworthy in the FBI to get this rolling.

Id hope that prevous events and relationships in ones life would come into consideration when electing them as a leader of a nation.. like weather or not they respect howard stern's benis?

Agreed

There's literally no reason for Rohrabacher, a subcommittee chairman, to have been denied the opportunity to sit down face to face and describe information that is personally germane to the President. You sound like a fucking statist.

assange is a pussy. he will get nothing but a bullet in his head. same with snowden. and bradleys is coming soon as well.

COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZING PIGS

Hmmm, this is naive. Remember whitewater? The real estate scandal investigation that led to Clinton being impeached for a sexual affair? Those things don't have much to do with each other, but once you dig, the dirt will come. I'm really surprised at the blind faith some of Sup Forums has in someone who's spent his life in such a shady and corrupt business. Pence is the only pure one.

Do you realize how hard it is for some rando representative to get a sit down with the President?

And what is Trump gonna do when told? Trump will get all the info here, nobody is trying to keep it secret.

Rohrabacher needs to work with the FBI. They're the ones who would broker an exchange and coordinate the pardon through the president.

I do think there's a lot of people who will try very hard to prevent such a deal from happening, particularly in the CIA, but I don't buy the Kelly boogeyman shit. His job is to tell almost everyone know, then hear what they have to say to the POTUS.

no*

You make a good point. Which is that the Clintons have just as much shady dealings as anyone does and yet her loyal fans had no problems with it. With trump, the shady real estate deals was already factored in. If you have evidence of wrong doing then present it. It's been almost a fucking year

Let me guess the source of that - CIA. Fake news. They are the communists - literally headed by one in Obama admin.

Don't count on the details of an investigation leaking while it's still in progress. Mueller will only reveal himself when he's absolutely sure he's got a killshot. This will get messy.

There was no problem before chief statist Kelly started acting like Wormtongue and forced out Trump's body man Schiller

The fact that the right doesn't appear to have a realistic risk assessment toward Trump or a plan B is what really concerns me.

>Rohrabacher needs to work with the FBI.

Hi Nigger - FBI was the one who covered up for Seth Rich's murder, lied about Russia hacking Podesta's emails and performed a rigged investigation for Hillary's email fiasco. Corruption from the very top itself.

Brokering a deal with them is giving them evidence which they can counter and say its not true. FBI is the deep state.

Rohrbacher knows, that's why he wants to go directly to Trump and then Trump can pick some good guys in IC to vet it.

Trump being told means Trump can do with it as he wants AS IT IS RELATED TO HIM. He can tweet, alert the people, work his own angles, just getting the facts in his personal possession to get the wheels in motion and push the action.

>Send it to the FBI
You fucking statist faggot sound just like Kelly, knowing full damn well that the FBI is full of fellow shitheel statists who will slow walk this shit right into the fucking bin

Right. Finding someone honest to work with you is key here. He could even work with someone in the judiciary committee if they're trustworthy.

But the POTUS isn't going to organize and broker an evidence for pardon exchange.

And you sound like a retard that doesn't understand how busy a president is.

Of course the deep state will try to kill this, they're complicit. But Rohrabacher is a representative, by this point he should have built relationships in Washington and have people he trusts. He could go to Nunes or someone like that he does have many relationships in every level of law enforcement.

You don't just take this to the president. It does not work that way.

That'll be key, but whoever is the good person here will need to prepare for the fight of their life. If Trump/Assange are able to prove this was an inside leak, FBI and CIA are fucked. JFK will smile from the heavens. Don't think deep state will just take it lying down though, they'll do whatever they can and they have the entire media arsenal and dems at their disposal.

Retard alert

Shootdown our planes, what? You mean like Gary Powers a million years ago who was actively spying on them? The fuck are you on about

From the outside the someone I'd take something like this to would be rep Nunes. He's known for having many sources inside the FBI/CIA, it's how he got all the unmasking info.

There's damned good reasons to turn down a leak:
>cannot be verified as true
>not notable or important
>holding off on releasing info to a later date
>would put innocent people in immediate danger
>would very likely start a war or crash an economy
>directly involves the people leaking it
>is so ridiculous that, even if true, would remove all credibility of leakers
Not trying to defend Wikileaks here, just saying the argument that they are biased for turning down a leak is literally retarded. The Clinton emails and the Kremlin are issues independent of each other, and their decision to leak info on one but not the other could be indicative of bias, but this cannot be shown due to insufficient info on why they turned down the leak.

Bump

When you want bury a story you publish it on a Friday.
This is journalism 101 people. For fucks sake